SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arnold, R.A. 1993. The Lotis Blue, Lycaeides Idas Lotis (Lintner). In: Conservation Biology of the Lycaenidae (Butterflies) (T.R.New, ed.). Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commision no. 8. Information Press, Oxford.
  • Bates, H.W. 1862. Contributions to the insect fauna of the Amazon Valley. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 23: 495566.
  • Bernard, G.D. & Remington, C.L. 1991. Color vision in Lycaena butterflies: spectral tuning of receptor arrays in relation to behavioral ecology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 27832787.
  • Brakefield, P.M. & French, V. 1999. Butterfly wings: the evolution of development of colour patterns. Bioessays 21: 391401.
  • Brakefield, P.M., Gates, J., Keys, D., Kesbecke, F., Wijngaarden, P.J., Monteiro, A., French, V. & Carroll, S.B. 1996. Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Nature 384: 236242.
  • Brower, J.V.Z. 1958. Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies. Part II. Battus philenor and Papilio troilus, P. polyxenes and P. glaucus. Evolution 12: 123136.
  • Brunton, C.F.A. & Majerus, M.E.N. 1995. Ultraviolet colours in butterflies: intra- or inter-specific communication? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260: 199204.
  • Carroll, S.B., Gates, J., Keys, D.N., Paddock, S.W., Panganiban, G.E.F., Selegue, J.E. & Williams, J.A. 1994. Pattern formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings. Science 265: 109114.
  • Conover, W.J. 1999. Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Crane, J. 1955. Imaginal behavior of a Trinidad butterfly, Heliconius erato, with special reference to the social use of color. Zool. Sci. Contrib. N.Y. Zool. Soc. 40: 167196.
  • Darwin, C. 1880. The sexual colours of certain butterflies. Nature 21: 237.
  • Howard, D.J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In: Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process (R. G.Harrison, ed.). Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Jiggins, C.D., Naisbit, R.E., Coe, R.L. & Mallet, J. 2001. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411: 302305.DOI: 10.1038/35077075
  • Kapan, D.D. 2001. Three-butterfly system provides a field test of mullerian mimicry. Nature 409: 338340.
  • Kingsolver, J.G. 1985. Thermoregulatory significance of wing melanization in Pieris butterflies (Lepidoptera: Pieridae): physics, posture and pattern. Oecologia 66: 546553.
  • Knüttel, H. & Fiedler, K. 2001. Host-plant-derived variation in ultraviolet wing patterns influences mate selection by male butterflies. J. Exp. Biol. 204: 24472459.
  • Koch, P.B., Keys, D.N., Rocheleau, T., Aronstein, K., Blackburn, M., Carroll, S.B. & Ffrench-Constant, R.H. 1998. Regulation of dopa decarboxylase expression during colour pattern formation in wild-type and melanic tiger swallowtail butterflies. Development 125: 23032313.
  • Lederer, G. 1960. Verhaltensweisen der images und der entwicklungsstadien von Limenitis camilla camilla (Lep. Nymphalidae). Z. Tierpsychol 17: 34546.
  • Lundgren, L. & Bergstrom, G. 1975. Wing scents and scent-released phases in the courtship behavior of Lycaeides argyrognomon (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 1: 399412.
  • Michaud, R., Lehman, W.F. & Rumbaugh, M.D. 1988. World distribution and historical developments. In: Alfalfa and Alfalfa Improvement, Agronomy Monograph No. 29 (A. A.Hanson, D. K.Barnes & R. R.HillJr, eds). ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI.
  • Müller, F. 1878. Notes on Brazilian entomology. Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond. 1878: 211223.
  • Nabokov, V. 1943. The neartic forms of Lycaeides Hüb. (Lycaenidae, Lepidoptera). Psyche 50: 104138.
  • Nabokov, V. 1949. The neartic members of Lycaeides Hübner (Lycaenidae, Lepidoptera). Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoo. 101: 479540.
  • Nice, C.C. & Shapiro, A.M. 1999. Molecular and morphological divergence in the butterfly genus Lycaeides (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in North America: evidence of recent speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 936950.
  • Nijhout, H.F. 1991. The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  • Obara, Y. 1970. Studies on the mating behavior of the white cabbage butterfly (Pieris rapae crucivora Boisduval). Z. vergl. Physiologie 69: 99116.
  • Ohsaki, N. 1995. Preferential predation of female butterflies and the evolution of batesian mimicry. Nature 378: 173175.
  • Pellmyr, O. 1982. Plebeian courtship revisited: studies on the female-produced male behavior-eliciting signals in Lycaeides idas courtship (Lycaenidae). J. Res. Lep. 21: 147157.
  • Platt, A.P. & Brower, L.P. 1968. Mimetic versus disruptive coloration in intergrading populations of Limenitis arthemis and Astyanax butterflies. Evolution 22: 699718.
  • Robbins, R.K. 1982. How many butterfly species? News Lepid. Soc. 1982: 4041.
  • Rutowski, R.L. 1977. The use of visual cues in sexual and species discrimination by males of the small sulphur butterfly Eurema lisa (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). J. Comp. Physiol. 115: 6174.
  • Rutowski, R.L. 1981. Sexual discrimination using visual cues in the checkered white butterfly (Pieris protodice). Z. Tierpsychol. 55: 325334.
  • Scoble, M.J. 1992. The Lepidoptera. Oxford University Press, NewYork.
  • Scott, J.A. 1974. Mate-locating behavior of butterflies. Am. Midl. Nat. 91: 103117.
  • Scott, J.A. 1986. The Butterflies of North America. Standford University Press, Stanford, CA.
  • Shapiro, A.M. 1976. Seasonal polyphenism. Evol. Biol. 9: 259333.
  • Silberglied, R.E. 1984. Visual communication and sexual selection among butterflies. In: The Biology of Butterflies (R.I.Vane-Wright & P.R.Ackery, eds). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman, New York.
  • Stride, G.O. 1957. Investigations into the courtship behavior of the male of Hypolimnas misippus (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae), with special references to the role of visual stimuli. Br. J. Anim. Behav. 5: 153167.
  • Uesugi, K. 1996. The adaptive significance of Batesian mimicry in the swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polytes (Insecta: Papilionidae): associative learning in a predator. Ethology. 102: 762775.
  • US Fish and Wildlife Service 1992. Department of the Interior. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Determination of endangered status for the Karner blue butterfly. Final rule. Federal Register December 14. 57: 5923659244.
  • Van Dyck, H. & Matthysen, E. 1998. Thermoregulatory differences between phenotypes in the speckled wood butterfly: Hot perchers and cold patrollers? Oecologia 114: 326334.DOI: 10.1007/s004420050454
  • Vane-Wright, R.I. & Boppre, M. 1993. Visual and chemical signalling in butterflies: Functional and phylogenetic perspectives. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 340: 197205.
  • Wallace, A.R. 1865. On the phenomena of variation and geographical distribution as illustrated by the Papilionidae of the Malayan region. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 25: 171.
  • Warzecha, A.K. & Egelhaaf, M. 1995. Visual pattern discrimination in a butterfly: a behavioral study on the Australian lurcher, Yoma sabina. Naturwissenchaften 82: 567570.
  • Watt, W.B. 1968. Adaptive significance of pigment polymorphisms in Colias butterflies. I. Variation of melanin pigment in relation to thermoregulation. Evolution 22: 437458.
  • Wiernasz, D.C. 1989. Female choice and sexual selection of male wing melanin pattern in Pieris occidentalis (Lepidoptera). Evolution 43: 16721682.
  • Wiernasz, D.C. 1995. Male choice on the basis of female melanin pattern in Pieris butterflies. Anim. Behav. 49: 4551.
  • Wiernasz, D.C. & Kingsolver, J.G. 1992. Wing melanin pattern mediates species recognition in Pieris occidentalis. Anim. Behav. 43: 8994.