SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson, D.J. 1990. Evolution of obligate siblicide in boobies. 1. A test of the insurance-egg hypothesis. Am. Nat. 135: 334350.
  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Monographs in Behavior and Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Arnqvist, G., Edvardsson, M., Friberg, U. & Nilsson, T. 2000. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 1046010464.
  • Bensch, S. 1996. Female mating status and reproductive successin the great reed warbler: is there a potential cost of polygyny that requires compensation? J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 283296.
  • Bensch, S., Hasselquist, D. & Von-Schantz, T. 1994. Genetic similarity between parents predicts hatching failure: nonincestuous inbreeding in the great reed warbler? Evolution 48: 317326.
  • Birkhead, T.R., Møller, A.P. & Sutherland, W.J. 1993. Why do females make it so difficult for males to fertilize their eggs? J.Theor. Biol. 161: 5160.
  • Birkhead, T.R., Sheldon, B.C. & Fletcher, F. 1994. A comparative study of sperm–egg interactions in birds. J. Reprod. Fert. 101: 353361.
  • Birkhead, T.R., Veiga, J.P. & Fletcher, F. 1995. Sperm competition and unhatched eggs in the House Sparrow. J. Avian Biol. 26: 343345.
  • Briskie, J.V. & Montgomerie, R. 1992. Sperm size and sperm competition in birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 247: 8995.
  • Brown, C.R. & Brown, M.B. 2001. Egg hatchability increases with colony size in cliff swallows. J. Field Ornithol. 72: 113123.
  • Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 237268.
  • Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
  • Cordero, P.J., Wetton, J.H. & Parkin, D.T. 1999. Within-clutch patterns of egg viability and paternity in the House Sparrow. J.Avian Biol. 30: 103107
  • De La Seña, C.A., Fechheimer, N.S. & Nestor, K.E. 1992. Evidence for genetic etiology of heteroploidy in embryos of the Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 60: 140145.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control.: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Felsenstein, J.(ed.) 1993. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package). Distributed by the author, Seattle, WA.
  • Gage, M.J.G. 1994. Associations between body size, mating pattern, testis size and sperm lengths across butterflies. Proc. R.Soc. Lond. B 258: 247254.
  • Garland, T., Harvey, P.H. & Ives, A.R. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41: 1832.
  • Gemmell, N.J. & Allendorf, F.W. 2001. Mitochondrial mutations may decrease population viability. TREE 16: 115117.
  • Ginsberg, J.R. & Rubenstein, D.I. 1990. Sperm competition and variation in zebra mating behaviour. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 427434.
  • Ginzburg, A.S. 1972. Fertilisation in Fishes and the Problem ofPolyspermy. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.
  • Griffith, S.C. 2000. High fidelity on islands: a comparative study of extrapair paternity in passerine birds. Behav. Ecol. 11: 265273.
  • Harcourt, A.H., Harvey, P.H., Larson, S.G. & Short, R.V. 1981. Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature 293: 5557.
  • Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M.D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Hedrick, P.W. 1994. Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating. Heredity 73: 363372.
  • Holland, B. & Rice, W.R. 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 50835088.
  • Hosken, D.J. 1997. Sperm competition in bats. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 385392.
  • Jaffe, L.A. & Gould, M. 1985. Polyspermy-preventing mechanisms. In: Biology of Fertilization (C. B.Metz & A. Monroy, eds), pp. 223250. Academic Press, New York.
  • Jennions, M.D. & Passmore, N.I. 1993. Sperm competition in frogs: testis size and a sterile male experiment on Chiromantis xerapelina (Rhacophoridae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 50: 211220.
  • Jennions, M.D. & Petrie, M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75: 2164.
  • Keller, L.F. & Waller, D.M. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild poulations. TREE 17: 230241.
  • Kempenaers, B., Adriaesen, F., Van Noordwijk, A.J. & Dhondt, A.A. 1996. Genetic similarity, inbreeding and hatching failure in blue tits: are unhatched eggs infertile? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 179185.
  • Kempenaers, B., Congdon, B., Boag, P. & Robertson, R.J. 1999. Extrapair paternity and egg hatchability in tree swallows: evidence for the genetic compatability hypothesis? Behav. Ecol. 10: 304311.
  • Kenagy, G.J. & Trombulak, S.C. 1986. Size and function of mammalian testes in relation to body size. J. Mamm. 67: 122.
  • Koenig, W.D. 1982. Ecological and social factors affecting hatchability of eggs. Auk 99: 526536.
  • Krajewski, C. 1991. Review of phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular evolution. Auk 108: 987990.
  • Lande, R. 1995. Mutation and conservation. Conservation Biol. 9: 782791.
  • Lee, K.-H., Fechheimer, N.S. & Abplanalp, H. 1990. Euploid chicken embryos from eggs containing one, two or several yolks. J. Reprod. Fert. 89: 8590.
  • Lifjeld, J.T. 1994. Do female House Sparrows copulate with extra-pair males to enhance their fertility? J. Avian Biol. 25: 7576.
  • Martins, E.P. & Garland, T. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuos characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45: 534557.
  • Møller, A.P. 1988. Testes size, ejaculate quality and sperm competition in birds. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 33: 273283.
  • Møller, A.P. 1991. Sperm competition, sperm depletion, paternal care, and relative testis size in birds. Am. Nat. 137: 882906.
  • Møller, A.P. 2000. Male parental care, female reproductive success, and extrapair paternity. Behav. Ecol. 11: 161168.
  • Møller, A.P. & Birkhead, T.R. 1993. Certainty of paternity covaries with paternal care in birds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33: 261268.
  • Møller, A.P. & Briskie, J.V. 1995. Extra-pair paternity, sperm competition and the evolution of testis size in birds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36: 357365.
  • Møller, A.P. & Cuervo, J.J. 2000. The evolution of paternity and parental care in birds. Behav. Ecol. 11: 472485.
  • Møller, A.P. & Ninni, P. 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection: a meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 43: 345358.
  • Murton, R.K. & Westwood, N.J. 1977. Avian Breeding Cycles. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • O'Hara, R.J. 1991. Review of phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular evolution. Auk 108: 990994.
  • Parker, G.A. 1984. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating strategies. In: Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (R. L.Smith, ed.), pp. 160. Academic Press, London.
  • Partridge, L. & Mangel, M. 1999. Messages from mortality: the evolution of death rates in the old. TREE 14: 438442.
  • Petrie, M. & Kempenaers, B. 1998. Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. TREE 13: 5258.
  • Petrie, M., Doums, C. & Møller, A.P. 1998. The degree of extra-pair paternity increases with genetic variability. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 93909395.
  • Raikow, R.J. 1991. Review of phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular evolution. Auk 108: 985987.
  • Rice, W.R. & Holland, B. 1997. The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 110.
  • Rose, M.R. 1991. Evolutionary Biology of Aging. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Sibley, C.G. 1994. On the phylogeny and classification of living birds. J. Avian Biol. 25: 8792.
  • Sibley, C.G. & Ahlquist, J.E. 1990. Phylogeny and Classification of Birds. A Study in Molecular Evolution. Yale University Press, London.
  • Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. W.H. Freeman, New York.
  • Stockley, P., Gage, M.J.G., Parker, G.A. & Møller, A.P. 1997. Sperm competition in fishes: the evolution of testes size and ejaculate characteristics. Am. Nat. 149: 933954.
  • Stricker, S.A. 1999. Comparative biology of calcium signalling during fertilization and egg activation in animals. Dev. Biol. 211: 157176.DOI: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9340
  • Stutchbury, B.J. & Morton, E.S. 1995. The effect of breeding synchrony on extra-pair mating systems in songbirds. Behaviour 132: 675690.
  • Swanson, W.J. & Vacquier, V.D. 2002. The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3: 137144.DOI: 10.1038/nrg733
  • Thornhill, N.W. 1993. The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
  • Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. 2000. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Mol. Ecol. 9: 10131027.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2000.00964.x
  • Van Noordwijk, A.J. & Scharloo, W. 1981. Inbreeding in an island population of the great tit. Evolution 35: 674688.
  • Veiga, J.P. 1992. Hatching asynchrony in the house sparrow: a test of the egg-viability hypothesis. Am. Nat. 139: 669675.
  • Warner, R.R. & Robertson, D.R. 1978. Sexual patterns in the labroid fishes of the Western Caribbean, I: the Wrasses (Labridae). Smiths. Contrib. Zool. 254: 127.
  • Webb, D.R. 1987. Thermal tolerance of avian embryos – a review. Condor 89: 874898.
  • Westneat, D.F. & Sherman, P.W. 1997. Density and extra-pair fertilizations in birds: a comparative analysis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 205215.DOI: 10.1007/s002650050381
  • Wetton, J.H. & Parkin, D.T. 1991. An association between fertility and cuckoldry in the house sparrow, Passer domesticus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 245: 227233.
  • Wingfield, J.C. 1984. Environmental and endocrine control of reproduction in the song sparrow, Melospiza melodia. Gen. Comparative Endocrinol. 56: 406416.
  • Zeh, J.A. & Zeh, D.W. 1996. The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 17111717.
  • Zeh, J.A. & Zeh, D.W. 1997. The evolution of polyandry II: post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. Proc. R.Soc. Lond. B 264: 6975.