SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Björkman, O. 1981. Reponses to different quantum flux densities. In: Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, Vol. 12A. (L.Lange, P. S.Nobel, C. B.Osmond & H.Ziegler, eds), pp. 57107. Springer, Berlin.
  • Brodie, E.D., Moore, A.J. & Janzen, F.J. 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. TREE 10: 313318.
  • Callahan, H.S. & Pigliucci, M. 2002. Shade-induced plasticity and its ecological significance in wild populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecology 83: 19651980.
  • Corré, W.J. 1983. Growth and morphogenesis of sun and shade plants. II. The influence of light quality. Acta Bot. Neerl. 32: 185202.
  • DeWitt, T.J. 1998. Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity: tests with predator-induced morphology and life history in a freshwater snail. J. Evol. Biol. 11: 465480.
  • DeWitt, T.J., Sih, A. & Wilson, D.S. 1998. Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. TREE 13: 7781.
  • Donohue, K., Hammond Pyle, E., Messiqua, D., Heschel, M.S. & Schmitt, J. 2001. Adaptive divergence in plasticity in natural populations of Impatiens capensis and its consequences for performance in novel habitats. Evolution 55: 692702.
  • Donohue, K., Messiqua, D., Hammond Pyle, E., Heschel, M.S. & Schmitt, J. 2000. Evidence of adaptive divergence in plasticity: density- and site-dependent selection on shade-avoidance responses in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 54: 19561968.
  • Dorn, L.A., Pyle, E.H. & Schmitt, J. 2000. Plasticity to light cues and resources in Arabidopsis thaliana: testing for adaptive value and costs. Evolution 54: 19821994.
  • Dudley, S.A. 1996. Differing selection on plant physiological traits in response to environmental water availability: a test of adaptive hypotheses. Evolution 50: 96102.
  • Dudley, S.A. & Schmitt, J. 1996. Testing the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: density-dependent selection on manipulated stem length in Impatiens capensis. Am. Nat. 147: 445465.
  • Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R.J. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • Evans, G.C. 1972. The quantitative analysis of plant growth. Studies in Ecology, Vol. 1. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
  • Fitter, A.H. & Hay, R.K.M. 1981. Environmental Physiology of Plants. Academic Press, London.
  • Ford, M.A. & Kay, Q.O.N. 1985. The genetics of incompatibility in Sinapis arvensis. Heredity 54: 99102.
  • Goodnight, C.J. & Schwartz, J.M. 1997. A bootstrap comparison of genetic covariance matrices. Biometrics 53: 10261039.
  • Van Kleunen, M., Fischer, M. & Schmid, B. 2000. Costs of plasticity in foraging characteristics of the clonal plant Ranunculus reptans. Evolution 54: 19471955.
  • Lambers, H., Chapin, F.S. & Pons, T.L. 1998. Plant Physiological Ecol. Springer, New York.
  • Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 12101226.
  • Lee, D.W., Krishnapilay, B., Mansor, M., Mohamad, H. & Yap, S.K. 1996. Effects of light intensity and spectral quality on the growth and development of seedlings of six Asian rainforest trees. Ecology 77: 568580.
  • León, J.A. 1993. Plasticity in fluctuating environments. In: Adaptation In Stochastic Environments. (J.Yoshimura & C. W.Clark, eds), pp. 105121. Springer, Berlin.
  • Maliakal, S.K., McDonnell, K., Dudley, S.A. & Schmitt, J. 1999. Effects of red to far-red ratio and plant density on biomass allocation and gas exchange in Impatiens capensis. Int. J. Plant Sci. 160: 723733.
  • Mitchell-Olds, T. & Shaw, R.G. 1987. Regression analysis of natural selection – statistical inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41: 11491161.
  • Moran, N.A. 1992. The evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes. Am. Nat. 139: 971989.
  • Padilla, D.K. & Adolph, S.C. 1996. Plastic inducible morphologies are not always adaptive: the importance of time delays in a stochastic environment. Evol. Ecol. 10: 105117.
  • Pigliucci, M. & Schmitt, J. 1999. Genes affecting phenotypic plasticity in Arabidopsis: pleiotropic effects and reproductive fitness of photomorphogenic mutants. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 551562.
  • Pigliucci, M., Whitton, J. & Schlichting, C.D. 1995. Reaction-norms of Arabidopsis. I. Plasticity of characters and correlations across water, nutrient and light gradients. J. Evol. Biol. 8: 421438.
  • Poorter, L. 1999. Growth responses of 15 rain-forest tree species to a light gradient: the relative importance of morphological and physiological traits. Funct. Ecol. 13: 396410.
  • Poorter, H. & Nagel, O. 2000. The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Austr. J. Plant Physiol. 27: 595607.
  • Poorter, H. & Van Der Werf, A. 1998. Is inherent variation in RGR determined by LAR at low irradiance and by NAR at high irradiance? A review of herbaceous species. In: Inherent Variation in Plant Growth. (H.Lambers & H.Poorter & M. M. I.Van Vuuren, eds), pp. 309336. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.
  • Rausher, M.D. 1992. The measurement of selection on quantitative traits – biases due to environmental covariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46: 616626.
  • Roy, B.A. & Stanton, M.L. 1999. Asymmetry in wild mustard, Sinapis arvensis (Brassicaceae), in response to severe physiological stresses. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 440449.
  • Roy, B.A., Stanton, M.L. & Eppley, S.M. 1999. Effects of environmental stress on leaf hair density and consequences for selection. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 10891103.
  • SAS Institute. 1989. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 6, 4th edn., Vol. 2. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.
  • Scheiner, S.M. & Berrigan, D. 1998. The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. VIII. The cost of plasticity in Daphnia pulex. Evolution 52: 368378.
  • Scheiner, S.M. & Lyman, R.F. 1989. The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. 1. Heritability. J. Evol. Biol. 2: 95107.
  • Schlichting, C.D. 1986. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 667693.
  • Schmid, B. 1992. Phenotypic variation in plants. Evol. Trends Plants 61: 4560.
  • Schmitt, J., McCormac, A.C. & Smith, H. 1995. A test of the adaptive plasticity hypothesis using transgenic and mutant plants disabled in phytochrome-mediated elongation responses to neighbors. Am. Nat. 146: 937953.
  • Schmitt, J., Dudley, S.A. & Pigliucci, M. 1999. Manipulative approaches to testing adaptive plasticity: phytochrome-mediated shade-avoidance responses in plants. Am. Nat. 154: S43S54.
  • Shipley, B. 2000. Plasticity in relative growth rate and its components following a change in irradiance. Plant Cell Environ. 23: 12071216.
  • Sinervo, B. & Basolo, A.L. 1996. Testing adaptation using phenotypic manipulations. In: Adaptation. (M. R.Rose & G.Lauder, eds), pp. 148185. Academic Press, New York.
  • Smekens, M. 1998. On phenotypic plasticity in relation to salt tolerance in Plantago coronopus. PhD dissertation. University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Smith, H. 1981. Adaptation to shade. In: Physiological Processes Limiting Plant Productivity. (C. B.Johnson, ed.), pp. 159173. Butterworths, London.
  • Stanton, M.L., Roy, B.A. & Thiede, D.A. 2000. Evolution in stressful environments. I. Phenotypic variability, phenotypic selection, and response to selection in five distinct environmental stresses. Evolution 54: 93111.
  • Stuefer, J.F. & Huber, H. 1998. Differential effects of light quantity and spectral light quality on growth, morphology and development of two stoloniferous Potentilla species. Oecologia 117: 18.
  • Sultan, S.E. 1987. Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Evol. Ecol. 21: 127178.
  • Sultan, S.E. 1995. Phenotypic plasticity and plant adaptation. Acta Bot. Neerl. 44: 363383.
  • Sultan, S.E. & Bazzaz, F.A. 1993. Phenotypic plasticity in Polygonum persicaria. 1. Diversity and uniformity in genotypic norms of reaction to light. Evolution 47: 10091031.
  • Van Tienderen, P.H. 1991. Evolution of generalists and specialists in spatially heterogeneous environments. Evolution 45: 13171331.
  • Van Tienderen, P.H. 1997. Generalists, specialists, and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in sympatric populations of distinct species. Evolution 51: 13721380.
  • Tucic, B. & Stojkovic, B. 2001. Shade avoidance syndrome in Picea omorika seedlings: a growth-room experiment. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 444455.
  • Tucic, B., Tomic, V., Avramov, S. & Pemac, D. 1998. Testing the adaptive plasticity of Iris pumila leaf traits to natural light conditions using phenotypic selection analysis. Acta Oecol. 19: 473481.
  • Veneklaas, E.J. & Poorter, H. 1998. Carbon partitioning strategies of tropical tree seedlings in contrasting light environments. In: Inherent Variation in Plant Growth. (H.Lambers, H.Poorter & M. M. I.Van Vuuren, eds), pp. 337361. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.
  • Wade, M.J. & Kalisz, S. 1990. The causes of natural selection. Evolution 44: 19471955.
  • Weinig, C. 2000. Differing selection in alternative competitive environments: shade-avoidance responses and germination timing. Evolution 54: 124136.
  • Weinig, C. & Delph, L.F. 2001. Phenotypic plasticity early in life constrains developmental responses later. Evolution 55: 930936.
  • Westoby, M., Warton, D. & Reich, P.B. 2000. The time value of leaf area. Am. Nat. 155: 649656.
  • Williams, K., Field, C.B. & Mooney, H.A. 1989. Relationships among leaf construction cost, leaf longevity, and light environment in rain-forest plants of the genus Piper. Am. Nat. 133: 198211.