SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Baum, D. 1998. Individuality and existence of species through time. Syst. Biol. 47: 641653.
  • Benton, M.J. 2000. Stems, nodes, crown-clades and rank-free lists: Is Linnaeus dead? Biol. Rev. 75: 633648.
  • Bryant, H.N. & Cantino, P.D. 2002. A review of criticisms of phylogenetic nomenclature: is taxonomic freedom the fundamental issue? Biol. Rev. 77: 3955.
  • Cain, A.J. 1954. Animal Species and Their Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Cracraft, J. 1983. Species concepts and speciation analysis. Curr. Ornith. 1: 159187.
  • Darwin, C. 1859. On The Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection, Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle For Life. John Murray, London (Penguin Classics reprint).
  • Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Dowling, T.E. & Secor, C.L. 1997. The role of hybridization and introgression in the diversification of animals. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 593619.
  • Dupre, J. 1993. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Dupre, J. 2000. On the impossibility of a monistic account of species. In: Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays (R. A.Wilson, ed.), pp. 322. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Ehrlich, P. & Raven, P. 1969. Differentiation of populations. Science 165: 12281232.
  • Eldredge, N. 1985. Unfinished Synthesis: Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Ellstr, N.C., Whitkus, R. & Rieseberg, L.H. 1996. Distribution of spontaneous plant hybrids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93: 50905093.
  • Ereshefsky, M. 1991. Species, higher taxa, and the units of evolution. Philos. Sci. 58: 84101.
  • Ereshefsky, M. 1992. The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Ereshefsky, M. 1997. The evolution of the Linnaean hierarchy. Biol. Philos. 12: 493519.
  • Ereshefsky, M. 2000. Species and the Linnaean hierarchy. In: Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays (R. A.Wilson, ed.), pp. 285306. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Ereshefsky, M. 2001. The Poverty of The Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Ferguson, J.W. 2002. On the use of genetic divergence for identifying species. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 75: 509516.
  • Fitzpatrick, B.M. 2002. Molecular correlates of reproductive isolation. Evolution 56: 191198.
  • Gauthier, J., Kluge, A.G. & Rowe, T. 1988. Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils. Cladistics 4: 105209.
  • Ghiselin, M.T. 1974. A radical solution to the species problem. Syst. Zool. 23: 536544.
  • Ghiselin, M.T. 1987. Species concepts, individuality and objectivity. Biol. Philos. 2: 127143.
  • Ghiselin, M.T. 1997. Metaphysics and The Origin of Species. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
  • Grant, V. 1981. Plant Speciation. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Greuter, W., Mcneill, J., Barrie, F.R., Burdet, H.-M., Demoulin, V., Filgueiras, T.S., Nicolson, D.H., Silva, P.C., Skog, J.E., Trehane, P., Turland, N.J. & Hawksworth, D.L. 2000. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code). Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein.
  • Griffiths, G. 1976. The future of Linnaean nomenclature. Syst. Zool. 25: 168173.
  • Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Illinois.
  • Hennig, W. 1969. Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten. Waldemar Kramer, Frankfurt.
  • Hey, J. 2001. Genes, Categories and Species: The Evolutionary and Cognitive Causes of The Species Problem. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Kitcher, P. 1988. Species. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Kluge, A.G. 1990. Species as historical individuals. Biol. Philos. 5: 417431.
  • Lee, M.S.Y. 2001. On recent arguments for phylogenetic taxonomy. Taxon 50: 175180.
  • Lee, M.S.Y. & Wolsan, M. Cohesion, individuality, and the nature of species. Biol. Philos. In press.
  • Mallet, J. 1995. A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 294299.
  • Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Mayr, E. 2000a. The biological species concept. In: Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: a Debate (Q. D.Wheeler & R. Meier, eds), pp. 1729. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Mayr, E. 2000b. A critique from the biological species concept perspective: what is a species, and what is not? Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: a Debate (Q. D.Wheeler & R. Meier, eds), pp. 93100. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Meier, R. & Willman, R. 2000. The Hennigian species concept. In: Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: a Debate (Q. D.Wheeler & R. Meier, eds), pp. 3043. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Mishler, B. 1990. Reproductive biology and species distinctions in the moss genus Tortula, as represented in Mexico. Syst. Bot. 15: 8697.
  • Mishler, B. 2000. Getting rid of species? Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays (R. A.Wilson, ed.), pp. 307315. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Mishler, B. & Brandon, R.N. 1987. Individuality, pluralism, and the phylogenetic species concept. Biol. Philos. 2: 397414.
  • Mishler, B. & Donoghue, M.J. 1982. Species concepts: a case for pluralism. Syst. Zool. 31: 491503.
  • Mishler, B. & Theriot, E.C. 2000. The phylogenetic species concept (sensu Mishler and Theriot): monophyly, apomorphy and phylogenetic species concepts. In: Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: a Debate (Q. D.Wheeler & R. Meier, eds), pp. 4454. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Nixon, K.C. & Carpenter, J.M. 2000. On the other ‘phylogenetic systematics’. Cladistics 16: 298318.
  • O'Hara, R.J. 1997. Population thinking and tree thinking in systematics. Zool. Scr. 26: 323329.
  • Paterson, H.E.H. 1985. The recognition concept of species. In: Species and Speciation (E. S.Vrba, ed.), pp. 2129. Pretoria Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.
  • Pleijel, F. 1999. Phylogenetic taxonomy, a farewell to species, and a revision of Heteropodarke (Hesionidae, Polychaeta, Annelida). Syst. Biol. 48: 755789.
  • Pleijel, F. & Rouse, G.W. 1999. Least-inclusive taxonomic unit: a new taxonomic concept for biology. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 627630.
  • Pleijel, F. & Rouse, G.W. 2000. A new taxon, capricornia (Hesionidae, Polychaeta), illustrating the LITU (‘least-inclusive taxonomic unit’) concept. Zool. Scr. 29: 157168.
  • De Queiroz, K. 1988. Systematics and the Darwinian revolution. Phil. Sci. 55: 238259.
  • De Queiroz, K. 1997. The Linnaean hierachy and the evolutionization of taxonomy, with emphasis on the problem of nomenclature. Aliso 15: 125144.
  • De Queiroz, K. 2000. The general lineage concept of species and the defining properties of the species category. In: Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays (R. A.Wilson, ed.), pp. 4989. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • De Queiroz, K. & Donoghue, M.J. 1988. Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. Cladistics 4: 317338.
  • De Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 449480.
  • Raff, R.A. 1996. The Shape of Life: Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Ride, D., Kraus, O., Cogger, H., Tubbs, P., Dupuis, C. & Thompson, C. 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4th edn. The Natural History Museum, London.
  • Rowe, T. 1987. Definition and diagnosis in the phylogenetic system. Syst. Zool. 36: 208211.
  • Simpson, G.G. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Sneath, P.H.A., ed. 1992. International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria. International Union of Microbiological Sciences, Washington, DC.
  • Sober, E. 1993. Philosophy of Biology. Westview Press, Boulder CO.
  • Sokal, R. & Crovello, T. 1970. The biological species concept: a critical evaluation. Am. Nat. 104: 127153.
  • Templeton, A.R. 1989. The meaning of species and speciation. In: Speciation and its Consequences (D.Otte & J. A. Endler, eds), pp. 327. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Trewick, S.A. 2000. Mitochondrial DNA sequences support allozyme evidence for cryptic radiation of New Zealand peripatoides (Onychophora). Molec. Ecol. 9: 269281.
  • Van Valen, L. 1976. Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25: 233239.
  • Wheeler, Q.D. & Meier, R. (eds). 2000. Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: A Debate. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Wheeler, Q.D. & Platnick, N.I. 2000. The phylogenetic species concept (sensu Wheeler and Platnick). In: Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: a Debate (Q. D.Wheeler & R. Meier, eds), pp. 5569. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Wiley, E.O. & Mayden, R.L. 2000. The evolutionary species concept. In: Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: a Debate (Q. D.Wheeler & R. Meier, eds), pp. 7089. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Willman, R. & Meier, R. 2000. A critique from the Hennigian species concept perspective. In: Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: a Debate (Q. D.Wheeler & R. Meier, eds), pp. 101118. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Wu, C.-I. 2001. The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 851865.