SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson, E. 1949. Introgressive Hybridization. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Arnold, M.L. 1997. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
  • Arnold, M.L. & Hodges, S.A. 1995. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? TREE 10: 6771.
  • Barton, N.H. & Hewitt, G.M. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 113148.
  • Boake, C.R.B. 2000. Flying apart: mating behavior and speciation. BioScience 50: 501508.
  • Brodsky, L.M., Ankney, C.D. & Dennis, D.G. 1988. The influence of male dominance on social interactions in black ducks and mallards. Anim. Behav. 36: 13711378.
  • Childs, M.R., Echelle, A.A. & Dowling, T.E. 1996. Development of the hybrid swarm between Pecos pupfish (Cyprinodontidae: Cyprinodon pecosensis) and sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus): a perspective from allozymes and mtDNA. Evolution 50: 20142022.
  • Dobzhansky, T. 1940. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat. 74: 312321.
  • Echelle, A.A. & Connor, P.J. 1989. Rapid geographically extensive genetic introgression after secondary contact between two pupfish species (Cyprinodon, Cyprinodontidae). Evolution 43: 717727.
  • Echelle, A.A. & Echelle, A.F. 1978. The Pecos River Pupfish, Cyprinodon pecosensis n. sp. (Cyprinodontidae), with comments on its evolutionary origin. Copeia 1978: 569582.
  • Echelle, A.A. & Echelle, A.F. 1992. Mode and pattern of speciation in the evolution of inland pupfishes in the Cyprinodonvariegatus complex (Teleostei: Cyprinodontidae): an ancestor-descendant hypothesis. In: Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes (R.Mayden, ed.), pp. 691709. Stanford Univ. Press, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
  • Echelle, A.A., Hoagstrom, C.W., Echelle, A.F. & Brooks, J.E. 1997. Expanded occurrence of genetically introgressed pupfish (Cyprinodontidae: Cyprinodon pecosensis × variegatus) in New Mexico. Southwestern Naturalist 42: 336339.
  • Good, T.P., Ellis, J.C., Annett, C.A. & Pierotti, R. 2000. Bounded hybrid superiority in an avian hybrid zone: effects of mate, diet, and habitat choice. Evolution 54: 17741783.
  • Grant, P.R. & Grant, B.R. 1997. Hybridization, sexual imprinting, and mate choice. Am. Nat. 149: 128.
  • Haney D.C. 1999. Osmoregulation in the sheepshead minnow, Cyprinodon variegatus: influence of a fluctuating salinity regime. Estuaries 22: 10711077.
  • Harrison, R.G. 1986. Pattern and process in a narrow hybrid zone. Heredity 56: 337349.
  • Hatfield, T. & Schluter, D. 1999. Ecological speciation in sticklebacks: environment-dependent hybrid fitness. Evolution 53: 866873.
  • Hewitt, G.M. 1988. Hybrid zones – natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. TREE 3: 158167.
  • Howard, D.J. 1986. A zone of overlap and hybridization between two ground cricket species. Evolution 40: 3443.
  • Hubbs, C.L. 1955. Hybridization between fish species in nature. Systematic Zoology 4: 120.
  • Hubbs, C.L. 1961. Isolating mechanisms in the speciation of fishes. In: Vertebrate Speciation (W. F.Blair, ed.), pp. 523. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, USA.
  • Itzkowitz, M. 1977. Interrelationships of dominance and territorial behavior in the pupfish, Cyprinodon variegatus. Behav. Process. 2: 383391.
  • Itzkowitz, M. 1978. Female mate choice in the pupfish, Cyprinodon variegatus. Behav. Process. 3: 18.
  • Itzkowitz, M. 1981. The relationships of intrusions and attacks to territory size and quality in the pupfish, Cyprinodon variegatus Lacepede. Biology of Behaviour 6: 273280.
  • Kaneshiro, K.Y. 1976. Ethological isolation and phylogeny in the Planitibia subgroup of Hawaiian Drosophila. Evolution 30: 740745.
  • Kodric-Brown, A. 1977. Reproductive success and the evolution of breeding territories in pupfish (Cyprinodon). Evolution 31: 750766.
  • Kodric-Brown, A. 1981. Variable breeding systems in pupfishes (genus Cyprinodon): adaptations to changing environments. In: Fishes in North American Deserts (R. J.Naiman & D. L.Soltz, eds), pp. 205235. John Wiley and Sons, NY, USA.
  • Kodric-Brown, A. 1983. Determinants of male reproductive success in pupfish (Cyprinodon pecosensis). Anim. Behav. 31: 128137.
  • Kodric-Brown, A. 1988a. Effect of population density, size of habitat and oviposition substrate on the breeding system of pupfish (Cyprinodon pecosensis). Ethology 77: 2843.
  • Kodric-Brown, A. 1988b. Effects of sex-ratio manipulation on territoriality and spawning success of male pupfish, Cyprinodon pecosensis. Anim. Behav. 36: 11361144.
  • Kodric-Brown, A. 1993. Female choice of multiple male criteria in guppies – interacting effects of dominance, coloration, and courtship. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32: 415420.
  • Kodric-Brown, A. 1996. Role of male–male competition and female choice in the development of breeding coloration in pupfish (Cyprinodon pecosensis). Behav. Ecol. 7: 431437.
  • Kodric-Brown, A. 1998. Sexual dichromatism and temporary color changes in the reproduction of fishes. Amer. Zool. 38: 7081.
  • Kodric-Brown, A. & Mazzolini, P. 1992. The breeding system of pupfish, Cyprinodon pecosensis, effects of density and interspecific interactions with killifish, Fundulus zebrinus. Environ. Biol. Fish. 35: 169176.
  • Lee, D.S., Gilbert, C.R., Hocutt, C.H., Jenkins, R.E., McAllister, D.E. & Stauffer, J.R. 1980. Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, NC, USA.
  • Loiselle, P. 1982. An Experimental Analysis of Pupfish (Teleostei: Cyprinodontidae: Cyprinodon) Reproductive Behavior, PhD dissertation. University of California, Berkeley, USA.
  • McDonald, D.B., Clay, R.P., Brumfield, R.T. & Braun, M.J. 2001. Sexual selection on plumage and behavior in an avian hybrid zone: experimental tests of male–male interactions. Evolution 55: 14431451.
  • McLennan D.A. & Ryan, M.J. 1999. Interspecific recognition and discrimination based upon olfactory cues in Northern Swordtails. Evolution 53: 880888.
  • Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Moore, W.S. 1977. An evaluation of narrow hybrid zones in vertebrates. Quart. Rev. Biol. 52: 263277.
  • Muller, H.J. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6: 71125.
  • New Mexico Department of Game and Fish. 1999. Distribution, Status, and Conservation of the Pecos Pupfish. C.W. Hoagstrum and J.E. Brooks,Technical Report #2. Santa Fe, NM, USA.
  • Orr, H.A. 1995. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139: 18051813.
  • Paterson, H.E.H. 1985. The recognition species concept. In: Species and speciation (E. S.Vrba, ed.), pp. 2129. Transvaal Museum Monograph 4, Pretoria.
  • Pfennig, K.S. 2000. Female spadefoot toads compromise on mate quality to ensure conspecific matings. Behavioral Ecology 11: 220227.
  • Pierotti, R. & Annett, C.A. 1993. Hybridization and male parental investment in birds. Condor 95: 670679.
  • Rice, W.R. & Hostert, E.E. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47: 16371653.
  • Rohwer, S. & Wood C. 1998. Three hybrid zones between hermit and Townsend's warblers in Washington and Oregon. Auk 115: 284310.
  • Rosenfield, J.A., Todd, T. & Greil, R. 2000. Molecular evidence of unidirectional hybridization and introgression between pink and chinook salmon of the St. Mary's River, MI. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 129: 670679.
  • Ryan, M.J. & Rand, A.S. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47: 647657.
  • Ryan, M.J. & Rand, A.S. 1995. Female responses to ancestral advertisement calls in Túngara frogs. Science 269: 390392.
  • Ryan M.J. & Wagner, W. 1987. Asymmetries in mating preferences between species: female swordtails prefer heterospecific mates. Science 236: 595597.
  • Schluter, D. 1998. Ecological causes of speciation. In: Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (D. J.Howard & S. H.Berlocher, eds.), pp. 114129. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford.
  • Scribner, K. 1993. Hybrid zone dynamics are influenced by genotype-specific variation in life-history traits: experimental evidence from hybridizing gambusia species. Evolution 47: 632646.
  • Smith, G.R., Rosenfield J.A. & Porterfield, J. 1995. Processes of origin and criteria for preservation of fish species. In: Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation (J. L.Nielsen, ed.), pp. 4557. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 17, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Soltz, D. 1974. Variation in Life History and Social Organization of Some Populations of Nevada Pupfish, Cyprinodon nevadensis, PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
  • Strecker, U. & Kodric Brown, A. 1999. Mate recognition systems in a species flock of Mexican pupfish. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12: 927935.
  • Strecker, U. & Kodric Brown, A. 2000. Mating preferences in a species flock of Mexican pupfishes (Cyprinodon, Teleostei). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 71: 677687.
  • Templeton, A.R. 1989. The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective. In: Speciation and its Consequences (D.Otte & J. A.Endler, eds), pp. 327. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA.
  • Tinbergen, N. 1953. Social Behavior in Animals. Methuen, London, UK.
  • Uy, J.A.C. & Borgia, G. 2000. Sexual selection drives rapid divergence in bowerbird display traits. Evolution 54: 273278.
  • Vamosi, S.M. & Schluter, D. 1999. Sexual selection against hybrids between sympatric stickleback species: evidence from a field experiment. Evolution 53: 874879.
  • Van Valen, L. 1988. Species, sets, and the derivative nature of philosophy. Biol. Philos. 3: 4966.
  • West-Eberhard, M.J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Quarterly Review of Biology 58: 155183.