SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adams, J., Greenwood, P., Pollit, R. & Yonow, T. 1985. Loading constraints and sexual size dimorphism in Asellus aquaticus. Behaviour 92: 277287.
  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Andersson, M. & Iwasa, Y. 1996. Sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 5358.
  • Arnqvist, G. 1992a. The effects of operational sex ratio on the relative mating success of extreme male phenotypes in the water strider Gerris odontogaster (Zett.) (Heteroptera; Gerridae). Anim. Behav. 43: 681683.
  • Arnqvist, G. 1992b. Spatial variation in selective regimes: sexual selection in the water strider, Gerris odontogaster. Evolution 46: 914929.
  • Balesdent, M.L. 1964. Recherches sur la sexualité et le déterminisme des caractères sexuels d’Asellus aquaticus Linné (Crustacé Isopode). Unpublished DPhil Thesis, Université de Nancy.
  • Belsley, D.A., Kuh, E. & Welsch, R.E. 1980. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. John Wiley & Sons, NY, USA.
  • Bertin, A. 2002. Variabilité morphologique et sélection intra-sexuelle chez Asellus aquaticus (Crustacea: Isopoda). Unpublished DPhil Thesis, Université de Dijon.
  • Brodie, E.D. III & Janzen, F.J. 1996. On the assignment of fitness values in statistical analyses of selection. Evolution 50: 437442.
  • Brodie, E.D. III, Moore, A. & Janzen, F.J. 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 313318.
  • Carroll, S.P. & Salamon, M.H. 1995. Variation in sexual selection on male body size within and between populations of the soapberry bug. Anim. Behav. 50: 14631474.
  • Choe, J.C. 1994. Sexual selection and mating system in Zorotypus gurneyi Choe (Insecta: Zoraptera) 1. Dominance hierarchy and mating success. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34: 8793.
  • Conlan, K.E. 1991. Precopulatory mating behavior and sexual dimorphism in the amphipod Crustacea. Hydrobiologia 223: 255282.
  • Conner, J.C. 1989. Density-dependent sexual selection in the fungus beetle, Bolitotherus cornutus. Evolution 43: 13781386.
  • Cox, C.R. & Leboeuf, B.J. 1977. Female incitation of male competition: a mechanism in sexual selection. Am. Nat. 111: 317355.
  • Dick, J.T.A. & Elwood, R.W. 1996. Effects of natural variation in sex ratio and habitat structure in mate-guarding decisions in amphipods (crustacea). Behaviour 133: 985996.
  • Dunn, A.M. 1998. The role of calceoli in mate assessment and precopula guarding in Gammarus. Anim. Behav. 56: 14711475.
  • Dunn, D.W., Crean, C.S., Wilson, C.L. & Gilburn, A.S. 1999. Male choice, willingness to mate and body size in seaweed flies (Diptera: Coelopidae). Anim. Behav. 57: 847853.
  • Endler, J.A. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Fairbairn, D.J. & Preziosi, R.F. 1994. Sexual selection and the evolution of allometry for sexual size dimorphism in the water strider, Aquarius remigis. Am. Nat. 144: 101118.
  • Forslund, P. 2000. Male–male competition and large size mating advantage in European earwigs, Forficula auricularia. Anim. Behav. 59: 753762.
  • French, B.W. & Cade, W.H. 1989. Sexual selection at varying population densities in male field crickets, Gryllus veletis and G. pennsylvanicus. J. Insect. Behav. 2: 105121.
  • Gilburn, A.S., Foster, S.P., Day, T.H. 1992. Female mating preferences for large size in Coelopa frigida. Heredity 69: 209216.
  • Goldsmith, S.K., Stewart, Z., Adams, S. & Trimble, A. 1996. Body size, male aggression, and male mating success in cottonwood borer, Plectrodera scalator (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J. Insect. Behav. 9: 719727.
  • Grafen, A. & Ridley, M. 1983. A model of mate guarding. J. Theor. Biol. 102: 549567.
  • Hanks, L.M., Millar, J.G. & Paine, T.D. 1996. Body size influences mating success of the eucalyptus longhorned borer (Coleoptera: Cerambidae). J. Insect. Behav. 9: 369382.
  • Hegde, S.N. & Krishna, M.S. 1997. Size-assortative mating in Drosophila malerkotliana. Anim. Behav. 54: 419426.
  • Hews, D.K. 1990. Examining hypotheses generated by field measures of sexual selection on male lizards, Uta palmeri. Evolution 44: 19561966.
  • Hoekstra, H.E., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S.N., Hoang, A., Hill, C.E., Beerli, P. & Kingsolver, J.G. 2001. Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild. PNAS 98: 91579160.
  • Hynes, H.B.N. 1954. The ecology of Gammarus duebeni lilljeborg and its occurrence in fresh water in western Britain. J. Anim. Ecol. 23: 3884.
  • Jivoff, P. & Hines, A.H. 1998. Female behaviour, sexual competition and mate guarding in the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. Anim. Behav. 55: 589603.
  • Jormalainen, V. 1998. Precopulatory mate guarding in crustaceans: male competitive strategy and intersexual conflict. Q. Rev. Biol. 73: 275304.
  • Jormalainen, V. & Merilaita, S. 1995. Female resistance and duration of mate-guarding in three aquatic peracarids (Crustacea). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36: 4348.
  • Jormalainen, V., Merilaita, S. & Tuomi, J. 1994. Male choice and male–male competition in Idotea baltica (Crustacea, Isopoda). Ethology 96: 4657.
  • Kingsolver, J.G., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S.N., Hill, C.E., Hoang, A., Gibert, P. & Beerli, P. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157: 245261. Database available on the following web site: http://www.bio.unc.edu/faculty/kingsolver/lab.
  • Kvarnemo, C. & Ahnesjö, I. 1996. The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 404408.
  • Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 12101226.
  • Lefebvre, F., Limousin, M. & Caubet, Y. 2000. Sexual dimorphism in the antennae of terrestrial isopods: a result of male contests or scramble competition? Can. J. Zool. 78: 19871993.
  • Lessells, C.M. & Boag, P.T. 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104: 116121.
  • McLain, D.K. 1982. Density dependent sexual selection and positive phenotypic assortative mating in natural populations of the soldier beetle, Chauliognathus pennsylvanicus. Evolution 36: 12271235.
  • McLain, D., Burnette, L. & Deeds, D. 1993. Within season variation in the intensity of sexual selection on body size in the bug Margus obscurator (Hemiptera Coreidae). Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 5: 7586.
  • Madsen, T. & Shine, R. 1993. Temporal variability in sexual selection acting on reproductive tactics and body size in male snakes. Am. Nat. 141: 167171.
  • Manning, J.T. 1975. Male discrimination and investment in Asellus aquaticus (L.) and Asellus meridianus Racovitza (Crustacea: Isopoda). Behaviour 55: 114.
  • Manning, J.T. 1980. Sex ratio and optimal males time investment strategies in Asellus aquaticus (L.) and Asellus meridianus Racovitza. Behaviour 74: 264273.
  • Naylor, C. & Adams, J. 1987. Sexual dimorphism, drag constraints and male performance in Gammarus duebeni (Amphipoda). Oikos 48: 2327.
  • Norry, F.M., Vilardi, J.C., Fanara, J.J. & Hasson, E. 1995. Courtship success and multivariate analysis of sexual selection on morphometric traits in Drosophila buzzatii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Insect. Behav. 8: 219229.
  • Preziosi, R.F. & Fairbairn, D.J. 1996. Sexual size dimorphism and selection in the wild in the waterstrider Aquarius remigis: body size, components of body size and male mating success. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 317336.
  • Ridley, M. & Thompson, D.J. 1979. Size and mating in Asellus aquaticus (Crustacea: Isopoda). Z. Tierpsychol. 51: 380397.
  • Ridley, M. & Thompson, D.J. 1985. Sexual selection of population dynamics in aquatic Crustacea. In: Behavioural Ecology (R. M.Sibly & R. H.Smith eds). Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Schluter, D. 1988. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42: 849861.
  • Schluter, D. 2000. Estimating fitness functions using cubic spline; glms4.0; glmswin1.0. Available through the D. Schluter's home page: http://www.zoology.ubc.ca/schluter/splines.html.
  • Shuker, D.M. & Day, T.H. 2001. The repeatability of a sexual conflict over mating. Anim. Behav. 61: 755762.
  • Steel, E.A. 1961. Some observations of the life history of A. aquaticus (L.) and A. meridianus Racovitza. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 137: 7187.
  • Thompson, D.J. 1986. Heritability for body size in the isopod Asellus aquaticus (L.). Crustaceana 51: 241244.
  • Thornhill, R. & Alcock, J. 1983. The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Vandel, A. 1926. La reconnaissance sexuelle chez les aselles. Bull. Soc. Zool. France 51: 163172.
  • Wada, S., Tanaka, K. & Goshima, S. 1999. Precopulatory mate guarding in the hermit crab Pagurus middendorffii (Brandt) (Decapoda: Paguridae): effects of population parameters on male guarding duration. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 239: 289298.
  • Ward, P.I. 1983. Advantages and a disadvantage of large size for male Gammarus pulex (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14: 6976.
  • Ward, P.I. 1988. Sexual selection, natural selection, and body size in Gammarus pulex (Amphipoda). Am. Nat. 131: 348359.
  • Yamamura, N. 1987. A model on correlation between precopulatory guarding and short receptivity to copulation. J. Theor. Biol. 127: 171180.