SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackerly, D.D. 2000. Taxon sampling, correlated evolution and independent contrasts. Evolution 54: 14801492.
  • Agapow, P.-M. & Isaac, N.J.B. 2002. MACROCAIC: revealing correlates of species richness by comparative analysis. Diver. Distrib. 8: 4143.
  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Arnold, E.N. 1992. The Rajasthan toad-headed lizard, Phrynocephalus laungwalaensis (Reptilia: Agamidae) represents a new genus. J. Herpetol. 26: 467472.
  • Avise, J.C. & Johns, G.C. 1999. Proposal for a standardized temporal scheme of biological classification for extant species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 96: 73587363.
  • Barraclough, T.G. & Vogler, A.P. 2000. Detecting the geographical pattern of speciation from species-level phylogenies. Am. Natur. 155: 419434.
  • Barraclough, T.G., Harvey, P.H. & Nee, S. 1995. Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 259: 211215.
  • Barraclough, T.G., Vogler, A.P. & Harvey, P.H. 1998. Revealing the factors that promote speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353: 241249.
  • Barts, M. & Wilms, T. 1997. Catalogue of Valid Species and Synonyms, Vol. 4 (Agamidae) – A Bibliography. Herprint International, Bredell.
  • Bennett, P.M. & Owens, I.P.F. 2002. Evolutionary Ecology in Birds: Life Histories, Mating Systems and Extinction. Oxford University Press, London.
  • Blackburn, T.M. & Gaston, K.J. 1998. Some methodological issues in macroecology. Am. Natur. 151: 6883.
  • Carson, H.L. 1997. Sexual selection: a driver of genetic change in Hawaiian Drosophila. J. Hered. 88: 343352.
  • Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Murray, London.
  • Das, I. 1996. Biogeography of the Reptiles of South Asia. Kreiger Publishers, Malabar.
  • Dial, K.P. & Marzluff, J.M. 1988. Are the smallest organisms the most diverse? Ecology 69: 16201624.
  • Dial, K.P. & Marzluff, J.M. 1989. Nonrandom diversification within taxonomic assemblages. Syst. Zool. 38: 2637.
  • Van Doorn, G.S., Noest, A.J. & Hogeweg, P. 1998. Sympatric speciation and extinction driven by environment dependent sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. October, 265: 19151919.
  • Fusco, G. & Cronk, Q.C.B. 1995. A new method for evaluating the shape of large phylogenies. J. Theor. Biol. 175: 235243.
  • Gage, M.J.G., Parker, G.A., Nylin, S. & Wiklund, C. 2002. Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 23092316.
  • Gardezi, T. & Da Silva, J. 1999. Diversity in relation to body size in mammals: a comparative study. Am. Natur. 53: 110123.
  • Gaston, K.J. & Blackburn, T.M. 1997. Age, area and avian diversification. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 62: 239253.
  • Gittleman, J.L. & Purvis, A. 1998. Body size and species richness in primates and carnivores. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 113119.
  • Guyer, C. & Slowinski, J.B. 1991. Comparisons of observed phylogenetic topologies with null expectations among three monophyletic lineages. Evolution 45: 340350.
  • Guyer, C. & Slowinski, J.B. 1993. Adaptive radiation and the topology of large phylogenies. Evolution 47: 253263.
  • Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M.D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Higashi, M., Takimoto, G. & Yamamura, N. 1999. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Nature 402: 523526.
  • Honda, M., Ota, H., Kobayashi, M., Nabhitanhata, J., Yong, H.-S., Sengoku, S. & Hikida, T. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of the family Agamidae (Reptilia: Iguania) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Zool. Sci. 17: 527537.
  • Houde, A.E. 1997. Sex, Color and Mate-Choice in Guppies. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Hutchinson, G.E. & MacArthur, R.H. 1959. A theoretical ecological model of size distributions among species of animals. Am. Natur. 93: 117125.
  • Joger, U. 1991. A molecular phylogeny of agamid lizards. Copeia 1991: 616622.
  • Katzourakis, A., Purvis, A., Azmeh, S., Rotheray, G. & Gilbert, F. 2001. Macroevolution of hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae): the effect of using higher level taxa in studies of biodiversity, and correlates of species richness. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 219227.
  • Kirkpatrick, M. & Ravigne, V. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Natur. 159: S22S35.
  • Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 78: 37213725.
  • Losos, J.B. 1985. An experimental demonstration of the species-recognition role of Anolis dewlap colour. Copeia 1985: 905910.
  • MacArthur, R.H., Recher, H.F. & Cody, M.L. 1966. On the relation between habitat selection and species diversity. Am. Natur. 100: 319332.
  • Macedonia, J.M. & Stamps, J.A. 1994. Species recognition in Anolis grahami (Sauria, Iguanidae): evidence from responses to video playbacks of conspecific and heterospecific displays. Ethology 98: 246264.
  • Macedonia, J.M., Evans, C.S. & Losos, J.B. 1994. Male Anolis lizards discriminate video-recorded conspecific and heterospecific displays. Anim. Behav. 47: 12201223.
  • Macey, J.R., Schulte II, J.A., Larson, A., Ananjeva, N.B., Wang, Y., Pethiyagoda, R., Rastegar-Pouyani, N. & Papenfuss, T.J. 2000. Evaluating trans-Tethys migration: an example using Acrodont lizard phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49: 233256.
  • Magurran, A.E. 1998. Population differentiation without speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353: 275286.
  • Martins, E.P. 2000. Adaptation and the comparative method. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 296299.
  • Marzluff, J.M. & Dial, K.P. 1991. Life history correlates of taxonomic diversity. Ecology 72: 428439.
  • May, R.M. 1986. The search for patterns in the balance of nature: advances and retreats. Ecology 67: 11151126.
  • Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Melville, J., Schulte II, J.A. & Larson, A. 2001. A molecular phylogenetic study of ecological diversification in the Australian lizard genus Ctenophorus. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 291: 339353.
  • Mitra, S., Landel, H. & Pruett Jones, S. 1996. Species richness covaries with mating system in birds. Auk 113: 544551.
  • Mitter, C., Farrell, B. & Wiegmann, B. 1988. The phylogenetic study of adaptive zones: has phytophagy promoted insect diversification? Am. Natur. 132: 107128.
  • Moller, A.P. & Cuervo, J.J. 1998. Speciation and feather ornamentation in birds. Evolution 52: 859869.
  • Moody, S. 1980. Phylogenetic and historical biogeographic relationships of the genera in the Agamidae (Reptilia, Lacertilia). PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Moody, S. 1988. Rediscovery and taxonomic identity of Oreodeira gracilipes Girard, 1857 (Lacertilia: Agamidae). Herpetologica 44: 108-113.
  • Nee, S., Mooers, A.O. & Harvey, P.H. 1992. Tempo and mode of evolution revealed from molecular phylogenies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 89: 83228326.
  • Nee, S., Barraclough, T.G. & Harvey, P.H. 1996. Temporal changes in biodiversity: detecting patterns and identifying causes. In: Biodiversity: A Biology of Numbers and Difference (K. J.Gaston, ed), pp. 230252. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford.
  • Olsson, M. & Madsen, T. 1998. Sexual selection and sperm competition in reptiles. In: Sexual Selection and Sperm Competition (T. R.Birkhead & A. P.Moller, eds), pp. 503577. Academic Press, London.
  • Orme, C.D.L., Isaac, N.J.B. & Purvis, A. 2002. Are most species small? Not within species-level phylogenies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 12791287.
  • Owens, I.P.F. & Hartley, I.R. 1998. Sexual dimorphism in birds: why are there so many different forms of dimorphism? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 397407.
  • Owens, I.P.F., Bennett, P.M. & Harvey, P.H. 1999. Species richness among birds: body size, life-history, sexual selection or ecology? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 17.
  • Paterson, H.E.H. 1993. Evolution of the Recognition Concept of Species. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  • Payne, R.J.H. & Krakauer, D.C. 1997. Sexual selection, space, and speciation. Evolution 51: 19.
  • Perez-Mellado, V. & De la Riva, I. 1993. Sexual size dimorphism and ecology: the case of a tropical lizard, Tropidurus melanopleurus (Sauria: Tropiduridae). Copeia 1993: 969976.
  • Price, T. 1997. Correlated evolution and independent contrasts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 352: 519529.
  • Price, T. 1998. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353: 251260.
  • Price, T. & Schluter, D. 1993. Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 253: 117122.
  • Purvis, A. 1996. Using interspecific phylogenies to test macroevolutionary hypotheses. In: New Uses for New Phylogenies (P. H.Harvey, A. J.Leigh Brown, J.Maynard Smith & S.Nee, eds), pp. 153168. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Purvis, A. & Rambaut, A. 1995. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 11: 247251.
  • Purvis, A., Nee, S. & Harvey, P.H. 1995. Macroevolutionary inferences from primate phylogeny. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260: 329333.
  • Purvis, A., Gittleman, J.L., Cowlishaw, G. & Mace, G.M. 2000. Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 19471952.
  • Purvis, A., Katzourakis, A. & Agapow, P.-M. 2002. Evaluating phylogenetic tree shape: two modifications to Fusco and Cronk's method. J. Theor. Biol. 214: 99103.
  • Ratcliffe, L.M. & Grant, P.R. 1983. Species recognition in Darwin's finches (Geospiza, Gould). II. Geogrpahic variation in mate preference. Anim. Behav. 31: 11541165.
  • Raup, D.M., Gould, S.J., Schopf, D.J. & Simberloff, D. 1973. Stochastic models of phylogeny and the evolution of diversity. J. Geol. 81: 525542.
  • Ricklefs, R.E. & Renner, S.S. 1994. Species richness within families of flowering plants. Evolution 48: 16191636.
  • Rosenzweig, M.L. 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, London.
  • Rosenzweig, M.L. 1997. Tempo and mode of speciation. Science 277: 16221623.
  • Saetre, G.P., Moum, T., Bures, S., Kral, M., Adamjan, M. & Moreno, J. 1997. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387: 589592.
  • Schluter, D. 1996. Ecological causes of adaptive radiation. Am. Natur. 148: S40S64.
  • Seehausen, O. & Van Alphen, J.M. 1999. Can sympatric speciation by disruptive sexual selection explain rapid evolution of cichlid diversity in Lake Victoria? Ecol. Lett. 2: 262271.
  • Shine, R. 1989. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Q. Rev. Biol. 64: 419443.
  • Simpson, G.G. 1953. The Major Features of Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Slowinski, J.B. & Guyer, C. 1989. Testing the stochasticity of patterns of organismal diversity: an improved null model. Am. Natur. 134: 907921.
  • Smith, M.A. 1935. The Fauna of British India, Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and Amphibia, Vol. II. Sauria. Taylor & Francis, London.
  • Stamps, J.A. 1983. Sexual selection, sexual dimorphism and territoriality. In: Lizard Ecology: Studies of a Model Organism (R. B.Huey, E. R.Pianka & T. W.Schoener, eds), pp. 169204. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • Stanley, S.M. 1973. An explanation for Cope's rule. Evolution 27: 126.
  • Stanley, S.M. 1979. Macroevolution: Pattern and Process. Freeman Press, San Francisco.
  • Storr, G. 1981. Three new Agamid lizards from Western Australia. Records West Aust. Mus. 8: 599607.
  • Tokarz, R.R. 1995. Mate choice in lizards: a review. Herpetol. Monogr. 9: 1740.
  • Turner, G.F. & Burrows, M.T. 1995. A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 260: 287292.
  • Van Valen, L. 1973. Body size and numbers of plants and animals. Evolution 27: 2735.
  • West-Eberhard, M.J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58: 155183.
  • Williams, E.E. 1977. Species recognition, dewlap function and faunal size. Am. Zool. 17: 261270.
  • Witten, G.J. 1984. Relationships of Tympanocryptis aurita Storr, 1981. Records West Aust. Museum 11: 399401.