SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • APG. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Botanic. Garden 85: 531553.
  • Asmussen, C.B. & Chase, M.W. 2001. Coding and noncoding plastid DNA in palm systematics. Am. J. Bot. 88: 11031117.
  • Bakker, F.T., Culham, A., Gomez-Martinez, R., Carvalho, J., Compton, J., Dawtrey, R. & Gibby, M. 2000. Patterns of nucleotide substitution in angiosperm cpDNA trnL (UAA)-trnF (GAA) regions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 11461155.
  • Barkman, T.J., Chenery, G., Mcneal, J.R., Lyons-Weiler, J., Ellisens, W., Moore, G., Wolfe, A.D. & Depamphilis, C.W. 2000. Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 1316613171.
  • Bayer, R.J. & Starr, J.R. 1998. Tribal phylogeny of the Asteraceae based on two non-coding chloroplast sequences, the trnL intron and the trnL/trnF intergenic spacer. Ann. Missouri Botanic. Garden 85: 242256.
  • Benson, G. 1997. Sequence alignment with tandem duplication. J. Comput. Biol. 4: 351367.
  • Besendahl, A., Qiu, Y.-L., Lee, J., Palmer, J.D. & Bhattacharya, D. 2000. The cyanobacterial origin and vertical transmission of the plastid tRNA Leu group I intron. Current Genetics 37: 1223.
  • Borsch, T. 2000. Phylogeny and Evolution of the Genus Nymphaea (Nymphaeaceae). PhD Thesis, University of Bonn, Bonn.
  • Bowe, L.M., Coat, G. & DePamphilis, C.W. 2000. Phylogeny of seed plants on all three genomic compartments: extant gymnosperms are monophyletic and gnetales’ closest relatives are conifers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 40924097.
  • Bremer, K. 2000. Early Cretaceous lineages of monocot flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 47074711.
  • Cech, T.R. 1988. Conserved sequences and structures of group I introns: building an active site for RNA catalysis – review. Gene 73: 259271.
  • Cech, T.R., Damberger, S.H. & Gutell, R. 1994. Representation of the secondary and tertiary structure of group I introns. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1: 273280.
  • Chase, M.W., Soltis, D.E., Olmstead, R.G., Morgan, D., Les, D.H., Mishler, B.D., Duvall, M.R., Price, R.A., Hills, H.G., Qiu, Y.-L., et al. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Botanic. Garden 80: 528580.
  • Chase, M.W., Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S, Rudall, P.J., Fay, M.F., Hahn, W.H., Sullivan, S., Joseph, J., Molvray, M., Kores, P.J., et al. 2000. High level systematics of the monocotyledons: an assessment of current knowledge and a new classification. In: Monocots: Systematics and Evolution (K. L.Wilson & D. A.Morrison, eds), pp. 316. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.
  • Chaw, S.M., Parkinson, C.L., Cheng, Y., Vincent T.M. & Palmer, J.D. 2000. Seed plant phylogeny inferred from all three plant genomes: monophyly of extant gymnosperms and origin of gnetales from conifers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 40864091.
  • Clegg, M.T., Gaut, B.S., Learn, G.H. & Morton, B.R. 1994. Rates and patterns of chloroplast DNA evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 67956801.
  • Crane, P.R. 1985. Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of angiosperms. Ann. Missouri Botanic. Garden 72: 716793.
  • Crane, P.R., Friis, E.M. & Pedersen, K.R. 1995. The origin and early diversification of angiosperms. Nature 374: 2733.
  • Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. New York Botanical Garden, New York.
  • Davis, J.I., Simmons, M.P., Stevenson, D.W. & Wendel, J.W. 1998. Data decisiveness, data quality, and incongruence in phylogenetic analysis: an example from the monocotyledons using mitochondrial atpA sequences. Syst. Biol. 47: 282310.
  • De Pinna, M.C.C. 1991. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7: 367394.
  • Donoghue, M.J. & Doyle, J.A. 2000. Seed plant phylogeny: demise of the anthophyte hypothesis? Current Biol. 10: R106R109.
  • Doyle, J.J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Systematic Bot. 17: 144163.
  • Doyle, J.J. & Davis, J.I. 1998. Homology in molecular phylogenetics: a parsimony perspective. In: Molecular Systematics of Plants II (D. L.Soltis, P. S.Soltis & J. J.Doyle, eds), pp. 101131. Kluwer, Boston.
  • Doyle, J.A. & Donoghue, M.J. 1986. Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: an experimental cladistic approach. Botanic. Rev. 52: 321431.
  • Doyle, J.A. & Endress, P.K. 2000. Morphological phylogenetic analyses of basal angiosperms:comparison and combination with molecular data. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161(Suppl.): 121153.
  • Endress, P.K. & Igersheim, A. 2000. Gynoecium structure and evolution in basal angiosperms. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161(Suppl.): 211213.
  • Erikson, T. & Wikstrom, N. 1996. AutoDecay 3.0. University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Friis, E.M., Pedersen, K.R. & Crane, P.R. 1999. Early angiosperm diversification: the diversity of pollen associated with angiosperm reproductive structures in early cretaceous floras from Portugal. Ann. Missouri Botanic. Garden 86: 259296.
  • Gandolfo, M.A., Nixon, K.C. & Crepet, W.L. 2000. Monocotyledons: a review of their early cretaceous record. In: Monocots: Systematics and Evolution (K. L.Wilson & D. A.Morrison, eds), pp. 4451. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.
  • Gatesy J., De Salle, R. & Wheeler, W. 1993. Alignment-ambiguous nucleotide sites and the exclusion of systematic data. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2: 152157.
  • Gielly, L., Yuan, Y.M., Küpfer, P. & Taberlet, P. 1996. Phylogenetic use of noncoding regions in the genus Gentiana L.: chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron versus nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer sequences. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 5: 460466.
  • Golenberg, E.M., Clegg, M.T., Durbin, M.L., Doebley, J. & Ma, D.P. 1993. Evolution of a non-coding region of the chloroplast genome. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2: 5264.
  • González, F. & Rudall, P. 2001. The questionable affinities of Lactoris: evidence from branching pattern, inflorescence morphology, and stipule development. Am. J. Bot. 88: 21432150.
  • Goremykin, V., Bobrova, V., Pahnke, J., Tritsky, A., Antonov, A. & Martin, W. 1996. Noncoding sequences from the slowly evolving chloroplast inverted repeat in addition to rbcL data do not support Gnetalean affinities of angiosperms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 383396.
  • Gottlieb, O.R., Kaplan, M.A.C., Kubitzki, K. & Toledo, Barros, J.R. 1989. Chemical dichotomies in the magnolialean complex. Nordic J. Bot. 8: 437444.
  • Graham, S.W. & Olmstead, R.G. 2000. Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 87: 17121730.
  • Graham, S.W., Reeves, P.A., Burns, A.C.E. & Olmstead, R.G. 2000. Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: Interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161(Suppl.): 8396.
  • Gu, X. & Li, W.H. 1995. The size distribution of insertions and deletions in human and rodent pseudogenes suggests the logarithmic gap penalty for sequence alignment. J. Mol. Evol. 40: 464473.
  • Hamby, R.K. & Zimmer, E.A. 1992. Ribosomal RNA as a phylogenetic tool in plant systematics. In: Molecular Systematics of Plants (P. S.Soltis, D. S.Solis & J. J.Doyle, eds), pp. 5091. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • Herendeen, P.S. & Crane, P.R. 1995. The fossil history of monocotyledons. In: Monocotelydons: Systematics and Evolution (P. J.Rudall, P. J.Cribb, D. F.Cutler & C. J.Humphries, eds), pp. 121. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, England.
  • Hillis, D.M. 1998. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. Syst. Biol. 47: 38.
  • Hilu, K.W. & Liang, H. 1997. The matK gene: sequence variation and application in plant systematics. Am. J. Bot. 84: 830839.
  • Hilu, K.W., Borsch, T., Müller, K., Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Savolainer, V., Chase, M.W., Powell, M.P., Alice, L.A., Evans, R., Sauquet, H., Neinhuis, C., Slota, T.A.B., Rohwer, J.G., Campbell, C.S. & Chatrou, L. In press. Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information. Am. J. Bot.
  • Hoot, S.B. & Douglas, A.W. 1998. Phylogeny of the Proteaceae based on atpB and atpB-rbcL intergenic spacer region sequences. Aust. J. Syst. Bot. 11: 301320.
  • Huelsenbeck, J.P. 1995. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44: 1748.
  • Jaeger, J.A., Turner, D.H. & Zucker, M. 1989. Improved predictions of secondary structures for RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 77067710.
  • Jaeger, J.A., Turner, D.H. & Zucker, M. 1990. Predicting optimal and suboptimal structure for RNA. Meth. Enzymol. 183: 281306.
  • Jukes, T.H. & King, J.L. 1971. Deleterious mutations and neutral substitutions. Nature 231: 114115.
  • Kallersjö, M., Farris, J.S., Chase, M.W., Bremer, B., Fay, M.F., Humphries, C.J., Petersen, G., Seberg, O. & Bremer, K. 1998. Simultaneous parsimony jackknife analysis of 2538 rbcL DNA sequences reveals support for major clades of green plants, land plants, seed plants, and flowering plants. Plant. Syst. Evol. 213: 259287.
  • Kallersjö, M., Albert, V.A. & Farris, J.S. 1999. Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure. Cladistics 15: 9193.
  • Kanno, A. & Hirai, A. 1993. A transcription map of the chloroplast genome from rice (Oryza sativa). Current Genetics 23: 166174.
  • Kelchner, S.A. 2000. The evolution of noncoding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Ann. Missouri Botanic. Garden 87: 482498.
  • Kelchner, S.A. & Clark, L.G. 1997. Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the chloroplast rpl16 intron in Chusquea and the Bambusoideae (Poaceae). Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 8: 385397.
  • Kellogg, E.A. & Juliano, N.D. 1997. The structure and function of RuBisCo and their implications for systematic studies. Am. J. Bot. 84: 413428.
  • Kimura, M. 1983. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Krassilov, V.A. 1997. Angiosperm Origins: Morphological and Ecological Aspects. Pensoft, Sofia, Bulgaria.
  • Kuhsel, M.G., Strickland, R. & Palmer, J.D. 1990. An ancient group-I intron shared by bacteria and chloroplasts. Science 250: 15711573.
  • Les, D.H. & Schneider, E.L. 1995. The Nymphaeales, Alismatidae and the theory of an aquatic monocotyledon origin. In: Monocotelydons: Systematics and Evolution (P. J.Rudall, P. J.Cribb, D. F.Cutler & C. J.Humphries, eds), pp. 2342. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, England.
  • Levinson, G. & Gutman, G. 1987. Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 203221.
  • Lewis, L.A., Mishler, B.D. & Vilgalys, R. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of the liverworts (Hepaticae), a basal embryophyte lineage, inferred from nucleotide sequence data of the chloroplast gene rbcL. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 7: 377393.
  • Liang, H. & Hilu, K.W. 1996. Application of the matK gene sequences to grass systematics. Can. J. Bot. 74: 125134.
  • Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. 1997. MacClade 3.07. Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution (computer program). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
  • Mathews, D.H., Zucker, M. & Turner, D.H. 2001. RNAstructure 3.6 (computer program)http://www.bioinfo.math.edu.
  • Mathews, S. & Donoghue, M.J. 1999. The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science 286: 947950.
  • Mathews, S. & Donoghue, M.J. 2000. Basal angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochromes A and C. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161(Suppl.): 4155.
  • McClure, M.A., Vasi, T.K. & Fitch, W.M. 1994. Comparative analysis of multiple protein sequence alignment methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11: 571592.
  • Michel, F. & Westhof, E. 1990. Modeling of the three-dimensional architecture of group I catalytic introns based on comparative sequence analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 216: 585610.
  • Moritz, C. & Hillis, D.M. 1996. Molecular systematics: context and controversies. In Molecular Systematics (D. MHillis, C.Moritz & B. K.Mable, eds), 2nd edn, pp. 113. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
  • Morton, B.R. & Clegg, M.T. 1993. A chloroplast DNA mutational hotspots and gene conversion in a non-coding region near rbcL in the grass family (Poaceae). Current Genetics 24: 357365.
  • Müller, J.J. 2000. QuickAlign 1.5.5. (computer program). Available from http://www.uni-bonn.de/uzsfjj/
  • Neinhuis, C., Borsch, T. & Hilu, K.W. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships within Aristolochiaceae based on trnT-trnF sequences. Abstracts XVI. Abstract number 351. International Botanical Congress, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Olmstead R.G. & Palmer, J.D. 1994. Chloroplast DNA systematics: a review of methods and data analysis. Am. J. Bot. 81: 12051224.
  • Qiu, Y.-L., Chase, M.W., Les, D.H. & Parks, C.R. 1993. Molecular phylogenetics of the magnoliidae: cladistic analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Botanic. Garden 80: 587606.
  • Qiu, Y.-L., Lee, J., Bernasconi-Quadroni, F., Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Zanis, M., Zimmer, E.A., Chen, Z., Savolainen, V. & Chase, M.W. 1999. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402: 404407.
  • Qiu, Y.-L., Lee, J., Bernasconi-Quadroni, F., Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Zanis, M., Zimmer, E.A., Chen, Z., Savolainen, V. & Chase, M.W. 2000. Phylogeny of basal angiosperms: analyses of five genes from three genomes. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161(Suppl.): 327.
  • Reeves, G., Chase, M.W., Goldblatt, P., Rudall, P., Fay, M.F., Cox, A.V., Lejeune, B. & Souza-Chies, T. 2001. Molecular systematics of Iridaceae: evidence from four plastid DNA regions. Am. J. Bot. 88: 20742087.
  • Renner, S.S. 1999. Circumscription and phylogeny of the Laurales: evidence from molecular and morphological data. Am. J. Bot. 86: 13011315.
  • Richardson, J.E., Fay, M.F., Cronk, Q.C.B., Bowman, D. & Chase, M.W. 2000. A phylogenetic analysis of Rhamnaceae using rbcL and trnL-F plastid DNA sequences. Am. J. Bot. 87: 13091324.
  • Sang, T., Crawford, D.J. & Stuessy, T.F. 1997. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84: 11201136.
  • Sauquet, H., Doyle, J.A., Scharaschkin, T., Borsch, T., Hilu, K.W., Chatrou, L.W. & Le Thomas, A. In press. Phylogenetic analysis of Magnoliales and Myristicaceae based on Multiple data sets: implications for character evolution. Botanic. J. Lim. Soc.
  • Savolainen, V., Chase, M.W., Hoot, S.B., Morton, C.M., Soltis, D.E., Bayer, C., Fay, M.F., De, Bruijn, A.Y., Sullivan, S. & Qiu, Y.-L. 2000. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based upon a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst. Biol. 49: 306362.
  • Shinozaki, K., Ohme, M., Tanaka, M., Wakasugi, T., Hayashida, N., Matsubayashi, T., Zaita, N., Chunwomgse, J., Obokata, J., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., Ohto, C., Torazawa, K., Meng, B.-Y., Sugita, M., Deno, H., Kamogashira, T., Yamada, K., Kusuda, J., Takaiwa, F., Kato, A., Tohdoh, N., Shimada, H. & Sugiura, M. 1986. The complete nucleotide sequence of the tobacco chloroplast genome. Plant Mol. Biol. Reporter 4: 110147.
  • Simmons, M.P. & Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369381.
  • Small, R.L., Ryburn, J.A., Cronn, R.C., Seelanan, T. & Wendel, J.F. 1998. The tortoise and the hare: choosing between non-coding plastome and Adh sequences for phylogeny reconstruction in a recently diverged plant group. Am. J. Bot. 85: 13011305.
  • Soltis, D.E. & Soltis, P.S. 1998. Choosing an approach and an appropriate gene for phylogenetic analysis. In: Molecular Systematics of Plants II (D.L.Soltis, P.S.Soltis & J.J.Doyle, eds), pp. 142. Kluwer, Boston.
  • Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E. & Chase, M.W. 1999a. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402: 402404.
  • Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Chase, M.W., Mort, M.E., Albach, D.C., Zanis, M., Savolainen, V., Hahn, W., Hoot, S.B., Fay, M.F., Axtell, M., Swensen, S.M., Prince, L.M., Kress, W.L., Nixon, K.C. & Farris, J.S. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanic. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 381461.
  • Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Nickrent, D.L., Johnson, L.A., Hahn, W.J., Hoot, S.B., Sweere, J.A., Kuzoff, R.K., Kron, K.A., Chase, M.W., et al. 1997. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann. Missouri Botanic. Garden 84: 149.
  • Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E., Wolf, P.G., Nickrent, D.L., Chaw, S.-M. & Chapman, R.L. 1999b. The phylogeny of land plants inferred from 18S rDNA sequences: pushing the limits of rDNA signal? Mol. Biol. Evol. 16: 17741784.
  • Swofford, D.L. 2001. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, version 4.0b6 (computer program) . Sinauer, Sunderland.
  • Swofford, D.L. & Olsen, G.J. 1990. Phylogeny reconstruction. In: Molecular Systematics (D. M.Hillis & C.Moritz, eds), pp. 411501. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
  • Swofford, D.L., Olsen, G.J., Waddell, P.J. & Hillis, D.M. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In: Molecular Systematics (D. M.Hillis, C.Moritz & B. K.Mable, eds), 2nd edn, pp. 407514. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
  • Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G. & Bouvet, J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding chloroplast regions. Plant Mol. Biol. 17: 11051109.
  • Takhtajan, A. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Botanic. Rev. 46: 225359.
  • Thorne, J.L., Kishino, H. & Felsenstein, J. 1992. Inching towards reality: an improved likelihood model of sequence evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 34: 316.
  • Tsudzuki, J., Nakashima; K., Tsudzuki, T., Hiratsuka, J., Shibata, M., Wakasugi, T. & Sugiura, M. 1992. Chloroplast DNA of black pine retains a residual inverted repeat lacking rRNA genes: nucleotide sequences of trnQ, trnK, psbA, trnI and trnH and the absence of rps16. Mol. Gen. Genet. 232: 206214.
  • Van Ham, R.C.H.J., T'hart, H., Mes, T.H.M. & Sandbrink, J.M. 1994. Molecular evolution of non-coding regions of the chloroplast genome in the Crassulaceae and related species. Current Genet. 25: 558566.
  • Winter, K.U., Becker, A., Münster, T., Kim, J.T., Saedler, H. & Theissen, G. 1999. MADS-box genes reveal that gnetophytes are more closely related to conifers than to flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 73427347.
  • Zanis, M., Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Mathews, S. & Donoghue, M.J. 2002. The root of angiosperms revisited. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 68486853.
  • Zucker, M. 1994. Prediction of RNA secondary structure by energy minimization. In: Computer Analysis of Sequence Data (A. M.Griffin & H. G.Griffin, eds) 25(II), pp. 267294. CRC Press, Totowa, NJ.
  • Zucker, M., Mathews, D.H. & Turner, D.H. 1999. Algorithms and thermodynamics for RNA secondary structure prediction: a practical guide. In: RNA Biochemistry and Biotechnology (J.Barciszewski & B. F. C.Clark, eds). NATO ASI Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers.