SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alatalo, R.V., Kotiaho, J., Mappes, J. & Parri, S. 1998. Mate choice for offspring performance: major benefits or minor costs? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 265: 22972301.
  • Alford, R.A. 1999. Ecology: resource use, competition and predation. In: Tadpoles: the Biology of Anuran Larvae (R. W.McDiarmid & R.Altig, eds), pp. 240278. Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Alonzo, S.H. & Sinervo, B. 2001. Mate choice games, context-dependent good genes, and genetic cycles in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 176186.
  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • APHA 1985. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
  • Barber, I. & Arnott, S.A. 2000. Split-clutch IVF: a technique to examine indirect fitness consequences of mate preference in sticklebacks. Behaviour 137: 11291140.
  • Barber, I., Arnott, S.A., Braithwaite, V.A., Andrew, J. & Huntingford, F.A. 2001. Indirect fitness consequences of mate choice in sticklebacks: offspring of brighter males grow slowly but resist parasitic infections. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 268: 7176.
  • Beath, K.J. 2000. GLMStat 5.1. http://www.ozemail.com/kjbeath/glmstat.html
  • Charlesworth, B. 1987. The heritability of fitness. In: Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives (J.W.Bradbury & M.B.Andersson, eds), pp. 2140. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
  • David, P., Bjorksten, T.A. Fowler, K. & Pomiankowski, A. 2000. Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyes flies. Nature 406: 186188.
  • Doty, G.V. & Welch, A.M. 2001. Advertisement call duration indicates good genes for offspring feeding rate in gray tree frogs (Hyla versicolor). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 150156.
  • Fog, K., Schmedens, A. & Rosenørn-de Lasson, D. 1997. Nordens padder og krybdyr. G.E.C. Gads Forlag, Copenhagen. (in Danish)
  • Harosi, F.I. 1982. Recent results from single-cell microspectrophotometry – cone pigments in frog, fish and monkey. Col. Res. Appl. 7: 135141.
  • Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S. & von Schantz, T. 1996. Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature 381: 229232.
  • Hedengren, I. 1987. Selection of Body Size, Arm Length and Colour in Male and Female Moor Frogs (Rana arvalis). MSc Thesis, Section of Ethology, Department of Zoology, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.
  • Hoikkala, A., Aspi, J. & Suvanto, L. 1998. Male courtship song frequency as an indicator of male genetic quality in an insect species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 265: 503508.
  • Houle, D. 1998. How should we explain variation in genetic variance of traits? Genetica 102/103: 241253.
  • Jennions, M.D. & Petrie, M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75: 2164.
  • Jia, F.-Y. & Greenfield, M.D. 1997. When are good genes good? Variable outcomes of female choice in wax moths. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 264: 10571063.
  • Jia, F.-Y., Greenfield, M.D. & Collins, R.D. 2000. Genetic variance of sexually selected traits in wax moths: maintenance by genotype × environment interaction. Evolution 54: 953967.
  • Johnsen, A., Andersen, V., Sunding, C. & Lifjeld, J.T. 2000. Female bluethroats enhance offspring immunocompetence through extra-pair copulations. Nature 406: 296299.
  • Kicliter, E. & Goytia, E.J. 1995. A comparison of spectral response functions of poisitive and negative phototaxis in two anuran amphibians. Neurosci. Lett. 185: 144146.
  • Kicliter, E., Kay, C.J. & Chino, Y.M. 1981. Spectral opponency of on-type ganglion cells and the blue preference of Rana pipiens. Brain Res. 210: 103113.
  • Kotiaho, J.S., Simmons, L.W. & Tomkins, J.L. 2001. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410: 684686.
  • Kruuk, L.E.B., Clutton-Brock, T.H., Slate, J., Pemberton, J.M., Brotherstone, S. & Guinness, F.E. 2000. Heritability of fitness in a wild mammal population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 698703.
  • Lardner, B. 1998. Plasticity or fixed adaptive traits? Strategies for predation avoidance in Rana arvalis tadpoles. Oecologia 117: 119126.
  • Lesna, I. & Sabelis, M.W. 1999. Diet-dependent female choice for males with ‘good genes’ in a soil predatory mite. Nature 401: 581584.
  • Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Møller, A.P. & Alatalo, R.V. 1999. Good genes effects in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 266: 8591.
  • Merilä, J. & Sheldon, B.C. 1999. Genetic architecture of fitness and non-fitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas. Heredity 83: 103109.
  • Merilä, J. & Sheldon, B.C. 2000. Lifetime reproductive success and heritability in nature. Am. Nat. 155: 301310.
  • Merilä, J., Laurila, A., Pahkala, M., Timenes Laugen, A. & Räsänen, K. 2000. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in the timing of metamorphosis in the common frog, Rana temporaria. Ecoscience 7: 1824.
  • Moore, A.J. 1994. Genetic evidence for the ‘good genes’ process of sexual selection. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35: 235241.
  • Promislow, D.E.L., Smith, E.A. & Pearse, L. 1998. Adult fitness consequences of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 1068710692.
  • Przyrembel, C., Keller, B. & Neumayer, C. 1995. Trichromatic color vision in the samalamander (Salamandra salamandra). J. Comp. Physiol. A 176: 575586.
  • Qvarnström, A. 2001. Context-dependent genetic benefits from mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 57.
  • Qvarnström, A., Pärt, T. & Sheldon, B.C. 2000. Adaptive plasticity in mate preference linked to differences in reproductive effort. Nature 405: 344347.
  • Rowe, L. & Houle, D. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition-dependant traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 14151421.
  • Rugh, R. 1962. Experimental Embryology. Burgess Publishing Company, Mineapolis, MN.
  • Sandvik, M., Rosenqvist, G. & Berglund, A. 2000. Male and female mate choice affects offspring quality in a sex-role reversed pipefish. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 267: 21512155.
  • SAS. 2001. JMP Version 4.0.4. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
  • Sheldon, B.C. 2000. Environmental dependence of genetic indicator mechanisms. In: Animal Signals: Signalling and Signal Design in Animal Communication (Y.Espmark, T.Amundsen & G.Rosenqvist, eds), pp. 195-207. Tapir Publishers, Trondheim.
  • Sheldon, B.C., Merilä, J., Qvarnström, A., Gustafsson, L. & Ellegren, H. 1997. Paternal genetic contribution to offspring condition predicted by size of male sexual ornament. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 264: 297302.
  • Sillman, A.J. 1987. Extraction and characterization of the blue-sensitive visual pigment of the toad Bufo marinus. Can. J. Zool. 65: 884887.
  • Summers, K., Symula, R., Clough, M. & Cronin, T. 1999. Visual mate choice in poison frogs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 266: 21412145.
  • Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. 2000. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage. Mol. Ecol. 9: 10131027.
  • Wedekind, C., Müller, R. & Spicher, H. 2001. Potential genetic benefits of mate selection in whitefish. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 980986.
  • Welch, A.M., Semlitsch, R.D. & Gerhardt, H.C. 1998. Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. Science 280: 19281930.
  • Wilczynski, W. 1992. The nervous system. In: Environmental Physiology of the Amphibians (M. E.Feder & W. W.Burggren, eds), pp. 939.University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Wilkinson, G.S., Presgraves, D.C. & Crymes, L. 1998. Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression. Nature 391: 276279.
  • Zeh, J.A. & Zeh, D.A. 2001. Reproductive mode and the genetic benefits of polyandry. Anim. Behav. 61: 10511063.