SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 1995. Sexual conflict arms races between the sexes – a morphological adaptation for control of mating in a female insect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 261: 123127.
  • Aspbury, A.S. & Basolo, A.L. 2002. Repeatable female preferences, mating order and mating success in the poeciliid fish, Heterandria formosa. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51: 238244.
  • Baer, C.F. 1998. Population structure in a south-eastern US freshwater fish, Heterandria formosa. II. Gene flow and biogeography within the St. Johns River drainage. Heredity 81: 404411.
  • Ball, M.A. & Parker, G.A. 1996. Sperm competition games: external fertilization and ‘adaptive’ infertility. J. Theor. Biol. 180: 141150.
  • Berteaux, D., Bety, J., Rengifo, E. & Bergeron, J.M. 1999. Multiple paternity in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus): investigating the role of the female. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45: 283291.
  • Birkhead, T. 2000. Promiscuity: an Evolutionary History of Sperm Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Bisazza, A. & Pilastro, A. 1997. Small male mating advantage and reversed size dimorphism in poeciliid fishes. J. Fish Biol. 50: 397406.
  • Bisazza, A., Vaccari, G. & Pilastro, A. 2001. Female mate choice in a mating system dominated by male sexual coercion. Behav. Ecol. 12: 5964.
  • Borowsky, R. & Kallman, K.D. 1976. Patterns of mating in natural populations of Xiphophorus from Belize and Mexico. Evolution 30: 693706.
  • Borowsky, R. & Khouri, J. 1976. Patterns of mating in natural populations of Xiphophorus II. X. variatus from Tamaulipas, Mexico. Copeia 1976: 727734.
  • Brockmann, H.J., Colson, T. & Potts, W. 1994. Sperm competition in horseshoe crabs (Limulus polyphemus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35: 153160.
  • Chesser, R.K., Smith, M.W. & Smith, M.H. 1984. Biochemical genetics of mosquitofish. III. Incidence and significance of multiple insemination. Genetica 64: 7781.
  • Chick, J.H., Jordan, F., Smith, J.P. & McIvor, C.C. 1992. A comparison of four enclosure traps and methods used to sample fishes in aquatic macrophytes. J. Freshw. Ecol. 7: 353361.
  • Conner, J. 1989. Density dependent sexual selection in the fungus beetle Bolitotherus cornutus. Evolution 43: 13781386.
  • Constantz, G.D. 1984. Sperm competition in poeciliid fishes. In: Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (R. L.Smith, ed.), pp. 465485. Academic Press, New York.
  • Constantz, G.D. 1989. Reproductive biology of poeciliid fishes. In: Ecology and Evolution of Livebearing Fishes (Poeciliidae) (G. K.Meffe & F. F.SnelsonJr, eds), pp. 3350. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Crim, J.L., Spotila, L.D., Spotila, J.R., O'Connor, M., Reina, R., Williams, C.J. & Paladino, F.V. 2002. The leatherback turtle, Dermochelys coriacea, exhibits both polyandry and polygyny. Mol. Ecol. 11: 20972106.
  • Daley, M. 1978. The cost of mating. Am. Nat. 112: 171174.
  • Evans, J.P. & Magurran, A.E. 2000. Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 1007410076.
  • Evans, J.P. & Magurran, A.E. 2001. Patterns of sperm precedence and predictors of paternity in the Trinidadian guppy. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 268: 719724.
  • Farr, J.A. 1989. Sexual selection and secondary sexual differentiation in poeciliids: determinants of male mating success and the evolution of female choice. In: Ecology and Evolution of Livebearing Fishes (Poeciliidae) (G. K.Meffe & F. F.Snelson Jr, eds), pp. 91123. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Garner, T.W.J., Gregory, P.T., McCracken, G.F., Burghardt, G.M., Koop, B.F., McLain, S.E. & Nelson, R.J. 2002. Geographic variation of multiply paternity in the common garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis). Copeia 2002: 1523.
  • Greene, J.M. & Brown, K.L. 1991. Demographic and genetic characteristics of multiply inseminated female mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Copeia 1991: 434444.
  • Hanotte, O.T., Burke, T., Armour, J.A.L. & Jeffreys, A.J. 1991. Hypervariable minisatellite DNA sequences in the Indian pea fowl Pavo cristatus. Genomics 9: 587597.
  • Hendrie, R., Abercrombie-Higgins, J., Chang, T., Maddocks, R., Truong, B.T., Morgan, E. & Wetherall, J. 1998. Genepop on the Web. http://www.wbiomed.curtin.edu.au/genepop/
  • Hicks, C.R. 1973. Fundamental Concepts in the Design of Experiments. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.
  • Holland, R. & Rice, W.R. 1998. Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52: 17.
  • Horth, L.A. 2003. Melanic body colour and aggressive mating behaviour are correlated traits in male mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 270: 10331040.
  • Houde, A.E. & Endler, J.A. 1990. Correlated evolution of female mating preferences and male color patterns in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science 248: 14051408.
  • Hutchings, J.A. & Myers, R.A. 1988. Mating success of alternative maturation phenotypes in male Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Oecologia 75: 169174.
  • Jaeger, R.G., Gillette, J.R. & Cooper, R.C. 2002. Sexual coercion in a territorial salamander: males punish socially polyandrous female partners. Anim. Behav. 63: 871877.
  • Jennions M.D. & Petrie, M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75: 2164.
  • Keller L. & Reeve, H.K. 1994. Partitioning of reproduction in animal societies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 98102.
  • Kelly, C.D., Godin, J.-G.J. & Wright, J.M. 1999. Geographical variation in multiple paternity within natural populations of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 266: 24032408.
  • Laumann, E., Gagnon, J. Michael, R. & Michael, S. 1994. The Social Organization of Sexuality. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Leips, J. & Travis, J. 1999. The comparative expression of life-history traits and its relationship to the numerical dynamics of four populations of the least killifish. J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 595616.
  • Leips, J., Travis, J. & Rodd, F.H. 2000. Genetic influences on experimental population dynamics of the least killifish. Ecol. Monogr. 70: 289309.
  • Leslie, J.F. & Vrijenhoek, R.C. 1977. Genetic analysis of natural populations of Poeciliopsis monacha. J. Hered. 68: 301306.
  • Levitan, D.R. 1998. Sperm limitation, sperm competition and sexual selection in external fertilizers. In: Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (T.Birkhead & A.Moller, eds), pp. 173215. Academic Press, San Diego.
  • McCarthy, M.A. & Lindenmayer, D.B. 1998. Population density and movement data for predicting mating systems of arboreal marsupials. Ecol. Modeling 109: 193202.
  • Marshall, T., Slate, J., Kruuk, L. & Pemberton, J.M. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7: 639655.
  • Martin, R.G. 1975. Sexual and aggressive behaviour, density and social structure in a natural population of mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis holbrooki. Copeia 1975: 445454.
  • Martin, F.D. 1980. Heterandria formosa Agassiz, least killifish. In: Atlas of North American Fishes (D. S.Lee, C. R.Gilbert, C. H.Hocutt, R. E.Jenkins, D. E.McAllister & J. R.StaufferJr, eds), pp. 547. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, NC.
  • Moller, A.P. & Birkhead, T.R. 1994. The evolution of plumage brightness in birds is related to extrapair paternity. Evolution 48: 10891100.
  • Murie, J.O. 1995. Mating behavior of Columbian ground squirrels. 1. Multiple mating by females and multiple paternity. Can. J. Zool. 73: 18191826.
  • Nakamura, K. 2001. Isolation and Characterization of Nuclear Microsatellite Markers in the Sailfin Molly, Poecilia latipinna. Department of Biology, Florida International University, Miami, FL. 58 p.
  • Parker, G.A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (M. S.Blum & N. B.Blum, eds), pp. 123166. Academic Press, New York.
  • Ptacek, M.B. & Travis, J. 1996. Interpopulation variation in male mating behaviours in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna. Anim. Behav. 52: 5971.
  • Ptacek, M.B. & Travis, J. 1998. Hierarchical patterns of covariance between morphological and behavioural traits. Anim. Behav. 56: 10441048.
  • Raymond, M. & Rousset, F. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86: 248249.
  • Reed, D.H. & Frankham, R. 2003. Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv. Biol. 17: 230237.
  • Robbins, L.W., Hartman, G.D. & Smith, M.H. 1987. Dispersal, reproductive strategies, and the maintenace of genetic variability in mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Copeia 1987: 156164.
  • Roff, D. 2002. Life History Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Rosen, D.E. & Bailey, R.M. 1963. The poeciliid fishes (Cyprinodontiformes), their structure, zoogeography, and systematics. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 126: 1176.
  • Rowe, L. 1994. The costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Anim. Behav. 48: 10491056.
  • Seckinger, J., Brinkmann, H. & Meyer, A. 2002. Microsatellites in the genus Xiphophorus, developed in Xiphophorus montezumae. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2: 46.
  • Sikstrom, B., Hellberg, D., Nilsson, S., Brihmer, C. & Mardh, P.A. 1996. Sexual risk behavior in women with cervical human papillomavirus infection. Arch. Sex. Behav. 25: 361372.
  • Simpson, R., Wilding, C. & Grahame, J. 1999. Simple protocol for extracting nuclear DNA from single embryos of a marine snail. Biotechniques 26: 10501052.
  • Smith, M.H., Garten, C.T. & Ramsey, P.R. 1975. Genic heterozygosity and population dynamics in small mammals. In: Isozymes IV. Genetics and Evolution (C. L.Markert, ed.), pp. 85102. Academic Press, New York.
  • Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York.
  • Stouthamer, R., Breeuwer, J.A.J. & Hurst, G.D.D. 1999. Wolbachia pipientis: microbial manipulator of arthropod reproduction. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 53: 71102.
  • Travis, J. 1990. The interplay of population dynamics and the evolutionary process. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 330: 253259.
  • Travis, J., Farr, J.A., Henrich, S. & Cheong, R.T. 1987. Testing theories of clutch overlap with the reproductive ecology of Heterandria formosa. Ecology 68: 611623.
  • Travis, J., Trexler, J.C. & Mulvey, M. 1990. Multiple paternity and its correlates in female Poecilia latipinna (Poeciliidae). Copeia 1990: 722729.
  • Trexler, J.C., Travis, J. & Dinep, A. 1997. Variation among populations of the sailfin molly in the rate of concurrent multiple paternity and its implications for mating-system evolution. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40: 297305.
  • Trexler, J.C., McElroy, T.C., Loftus, W.F., Jordan, F., Chick, J.H., Kandl, K.L. & Bass, O.L. Jr 2002. Ecological scale and its implications for freshwater fish in the Everglades. In: The Everglades, Florida Bay, and Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys: an Ecosystem Sourcebook (J. W.Porter & K. G.Porter, eds), pp. 153181. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  • Wallander, J., Blomqvist, D. & Lifjeld, J.T. 2001. Genetic and social monogamy: does it occur without mate guarding in the ringed plover? Ethology 107: 561572.
  • Westneat, D.F., Fredrick, P.C. & Haven, W.R. 1987. The use of genetic markers to estimate the frequency of successful alternative reproductive tactics. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21: 3545.
  • Young, A., Boyle, T. & Brown, T. 1996. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 413418.
  • Zane, L., Nelson, W.S., Jones, A.G. & Avise, J.C. 1999. Microsatellite assessment of multiple paternity in natural populations of a live bearing fish, Gambusia holbrooki. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 6169.