SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alatalo, R.V., Gustafsson, L. & Lundberg, A. 1984. High frequency of cuckoldry in pied and collared flycatchers. Oikos 42: 4147.
  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Ausubel, F.M., Brent, R., Kingston, R.E., Moore, D.D., Seidman, J.G., Smith, J.A. & Struhl, K., eds. 1989. Current, Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Badyaev, A.V. 2002. Growing apart: an ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 17: 369378.
  • Badyaev, A.V. & Martin, T.E. 2000. Sexual dimorphism in relation to current selection in the House finch. Evolution 54: 987997.
  • Badyaev, A.V., Hill, G.E., Stoehr, A.M., Nolan, P.M. & McGraw, K.J. 2000. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in the House finch. II. Population divergence in relation to local selection. Evolution 54: 21342144.
  • Badyaev, A.V., Whittingham, L. & Hill, G.E. 2001. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in the House finch. III. Developmental bias. Evolution 55: 176189.
  • Becker, W.A. 1984. Manual of Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Academic Entreprises, Pullman.
  • Boag, P.T. & van Noordwijk, A.J. 1987. Quantitative Genetics. In: Avian Genetics, a Population and Ecological Approach (F.Cooke & P. A.Buckley, eds), pp. 4578. Academic Press, Chicago.
  • Cheverud, J.M., Dow, M.M. & Leutenegger, W. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution 39: 13351351.
  • Clutton-Brock, T.H., Albon, S.D. & Guinnes, F.E. 1984. Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex-ratios in red deer. Nature 308: 358360.
  • Clutton-Brock, T.H., Albon, S.D. & Guinnes, F.E. 1985. Parental investment and sex differences in juvenile mortality in birds and mammals. Nature. 313: 131133.
  • Coltman, D.W., Pilkington, J., Kruuk, L.E.B., Wilson, K. & Pemberton, J.M. 2001. Positive genetic correlation between parasite resistance and body size in a free-living ungulate population. Evolution 55: 21162125.
  • Cramp, S. & Perrins, C.M. (eds) 1994. The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Double, M.C., Dawson, D., Burke, T. & Cockburn, A. 1997. Finding the fathers in the least faithful bird: a microsatellite-based genotyping system for the superb fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus. Mol. Ecol. 6: 691693.
  • Falconer, D.S. & Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Longman Group Ltd, Harlow.
  • Grant, P.R. & Grant, B.R. 1995. Predicting microevolutionary responses to directional selection on heritable variation. Evolution 49: 241251.
  • Griffith, S.C., Stewart, I.R.K., Dawson, D.A., Owens, I.P.F. & Burke, T. 1999. Contrasting levels of extra-pair paternity in mainland and island populations of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): is there an ’island effect’? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 68: 303316.
  • Guntrip, J., Sibly, R.M. & Holloway, G.J. 1997. The effect of novel environment and sex on the additive genetic variation and covariation in and between emergence body weight and development period in the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Heredity 78: 158165.
  • Hansen, T.F., Armbruster, W.S., Carlson, M. L. & Pélabon, C. 2003. Evolvability and genetic constraint in Dalechampia blossoms: Genetic correlations and conditional evolvability. J. Exp. Zool. 296B: 2339.
  • Hardy, I.C.W. 2002. Sex Ratios: Concepts and Research Methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Hoekstra, H.E., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S.N., Hoang, A., Hill, C.E., Beerli, P. & Kingsolver, J.G. 2001. Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98: 91579160.
  • Jensen, H. 2002. Causes and Consequences of Individual Variation in Fitness-Related Traits in House Sparrows. PhD Thesis, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Johnson, S.G. & Johnston, R.F. 1990. Environmental variation and quantitative genetic-parameters in the feral pigeon, Columba livia. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 40: 321332.
  • Johnston, R.F. & Fleischer, R.C. 1981. Overwinter mortality and sexual size dimorphism in the House sparrow. Auk 98: 503511.
  • Keller, L.F., Grant, P.R., Grant, B.R. & Petren, K. 2001. Heritability of morphological traits in Darwin's Finches: misidentified paternity and maternal effects. Heredity 87: 325336.
  • Kingsolver, J.G., Hoekstra, H.E., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S.N., Hill, C.E., Hoang, A., Gibert, P. & Beerli, P. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157: 245261.
  • Knott, S.A., Sibly, R.M., Smith, R.H. & Moller, H. 1995. Maximum-likelihood-estimation of genetic-parameters in life-history studies using the animal-model. Funct. Ecol. 9: 122126.
  • Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292305.
  • Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 12101226.
  • Larsson, K. & Forslund, P. 1992. Genetic and social inheritance of body and egg size in the barnacle goose (Branta leucopsis). Evolution 46: 235244.
  • Lessells, C.M. & Boag, P.T. 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities – a common mistake. Auk 104: 116121.
  • Leutenegger, W. & Cheverud, J.M. 1985. Sexual dimorphism in primates: the effects of size. In: Size and Scaling in Primate Biology (W. L.Jungers ed.), pp. 3050. Plenum Press, New York.
  • Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland.
  • Marshall, T.C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L.E.B. & Pemberton, J.M. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7: 639655.
  • Merilä, J. 1996. Genetic variation in offspring condition: an experiment. Funct. Ecol. 10: 465474.
  • Merilä, J. & Sheldon, B.C. 2000. Lifetime reproductive success and heritability in nature. Am. Nat. 155: 301310.
  • Merilä, J. & Sheldon, B.C. 2001. Avian quantitative genetics. In: Current Ornithology 16. (V.NolanJr. & C.F.Thompson, eds), pp. 179255. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.
  • Merilä, J., Sheldon, B.C. & Ellegren, H. 1998. Quantitative genetics of sexual size dimorphism in the Collared flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis. Evolution 52: 870876.
  • Merilä, J., Kruuk, L.E.B. & Sheldon, B.C. 2001. Natural selection on the genetical component of variance in body condition in a wild bird population. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 918929.
  • Mignon-Grasteau, S., Beaumont, C., Poivey, J.P. & De Rochambeau, H. 1998. Estimation of the genetic parameters of sexual dimorphism of body weight in ‘label’ chickens and Muscovey ducks. Genet. Sel. Evol. 30: 481491.
  • Mignon-Grasteau, S., Beaumont, C., Le Bihan Duval, E., Poivey, J.P., De Rochambeau, H. & Ricard, F.H. 1999. Genetic parameters of growth curve parameters in male and female chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 40: 4451.
  • Milner, J.M., Albon, S.D., Illius, A.W., Pemberton, J.M. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 1999. Repeated selection of morphometric tratis in the Soay sheep on St Kilda. J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 472488.
  • Mousseau, T.A. & Roff, D.A. 1987. Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59: 181197.
  • Mousseau, T.A., Sinervo, B. & Endler, J. (eds) 2000. Adaptive Genetic Variation in the Wild. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Møller, A.P. 1993. Sexual selection in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica. III. Female tail ornaments. Evolution 47: 417431.
  • Neumaier, A. & Groeneveld, E. 1998. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of covariances in sparse linear models. Genet. Sel. Evol. 30: 326.
  • Neumann, K. & Wetton, J.H. 1996. Highly polymorphic microsatellites in the house sparrow Passer domesticus. Mol. Ecol. 5: 307309.
  • van Noordwijk, A.J., van Balen, J.H. & Scharloo, W. 1988. Heritability of body size in a natural-population of the great tit (Parus major) and its relation to age and environmental-conditions during growth. Genet. Res. 51: 149162.
  • Phillips, P.C. 1998. CPC: Common Principal Components Analysis. University of Texas at Arlington. Software available at: http://www.uta.edu/biology/phillips/software.
  • Phillips, P.C. & Arnold, S.J. 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53: 15061515.
  • Potti, J. & Merino, S. 1996. Parasites and the ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism in a passerine bird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 912.
  • Price, T. 1984. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in Darwin's finches (Geospiza fortis). Am. Nat. 123: 500518.
  • Price, D.K. 1996. Sexual selection, selection load and quantitative genetics of zebra finch bill colour. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 217221.
  • Price, D.K. & Burley, N.T. 1993. Constraints on the evolution of attractive traits – genetic (co)variance of zebra finch bill colour. Heredity 71: 405412.
  • Price, T. & Langen, T. 1992. Evolution of correlated characters. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 307310.
  • Reeve, J.P. & Fairbairn, D.J. 1996. Sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on body size: an empirical test of the quantitative genetic model. Evolution 50: 19271938.
  • Ringsby, T.H., Sæther, B.-E., Tufto, J., Jensen, H. & Solberg, E.J. 2002. Asynchronous spatiotemporal demography of a house sparrow metapopulation in a correlated environment. Ecology 83: 561569.
  • Roff, D.A. 1995. The estimation of genetic correlations from phenotypic correlations: a test of Cheverud's conjecture. Heredity 74: 481490.
  • Roff, D.A. 1996. The evolution of genetic correlations: An analysis of patterns. Evolution 50: 13921403.
  • Roff, D.A. 1997. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • Roff, D.A. & Mousseau, T.A. 1987. Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila. Heredity 58: 103118.
  • Rosenthal, R. 1991. Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research, Rev. edn. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.
  • Schluter, D. & Smith, J.N.M. 1986. Natural selection on beak and body size in the song sparrow. Evolution 40: 221231.
  • Shaw, R.G. 1987. Maximum-likelihood approaches applied to quantitative genetics of natural-populations. Evolution 41: 812826.
  • Sheldon, B.C., Merilä, J., Lindgren, G. & Ellegren, H. 1998. Gender and environmental sensitivity in nestling collared flycatchers. Ecology 79: 19391948.
  • Smith, T.B. 1993. Disruptive selection and the genetic basis of bill size polymorphism in the African finch, Pyrenestes. Nature 363: 618620.
  • Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry, 2nd edn, W. H. Freeman & Co., New York.
  • Sorensen, D.A. & Kennedy, B.W. 1984. Estimation of genetic variances from unselected and selected populations. J. Anim. Sci. 59: 12131223.
  • Sorensen, D.A. & Kennedy, B.W. 1986. Analysis of selection experiments using mixed model methodology. J. Anim. Sci. 63: 245258.
  • SPSS Inc. 1997. SPSS Advanced Statistics 7.5. SPSS Inc., Chicago.
  • Stearns, S.C. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Summers-Smith, J.D. 1988. The Sparrows: a Study of the Genus Passer. T & AD Poyser, Calton.
  • Svensson, L. 1992. Identification Guide to European Passerines. British Trust for Ornithology, Norfolk.
  • Sæther, B.-E., Ringsby, T.H., Bakke, Ø. & Solberg, E.J. 1999. Spatial and temporal variation in demography of a house sparrow metapopulation. J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 628637.
  • Walsh, P.S., Metzger, D.A. & Higuchi, R. 1991. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 10: 506513.