SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alibert, P., Renaud, S., Dod, B., Bonhomme, F. & Auffray, J.-C. 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry in the Mus musculus hybrid zone: a heterotic effect in disrupted co-adapted genomes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 0: 5359.
  • Anderson, P.K. 1978. The serendipitous mouse. Natural history 87: 3843.
  • Andersson, M. & Iwasa, Y. 1996. Sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 5358.
  • Arnold, M.L. 1992. Natural hybridization as an evolutionary process. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 237261.
  • Auffray, J.-C. 1993. Chromosomal divergence in house mice in the light of palaeontology: a colonization related event? Quatern. Int. 19: 2125.
  • Auffray, J.C., Vanlerberghe, F., & Britton-Davidian, J. 1990. The house mouse progression in Eurasia: a paleontological and archeozoological approach. Biol. J. Lin. Soc. 41: 1325.
  • Bella, J.L., Butlin, R.K., Ferris, C. & Hewitt, G.M. 1992. Asymmetrical homogamy and unequal sex ratio from reciprocal mating-order crosses between Chorthippus parallelus subspecies. Heredity. 68: 345352.
  • Berry, R.J. 1981. Town mouse, country mouse: adaptation and adaptability in Mus domesticus (M. musculus domesticus). Mammal Rev. 11: 91136.
  • Boursot, P., Bonhomme, F., Britton-Davidian, J., Catalan, J., Yonekawa, H., Orsini, P., Gerasimov, S. & Thaler, L. 1984. Introgression différentielle des génomes nucléaires et mitochondriaux chez les deux semi-espèces européennes de souris. C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris 299: 365370.
  • Boursot, P., Din, W., Anand, R., Darviche, D., Dod, B., Von Deimling, F., Talwar, G.P. & Bonhomme, F. 1996. Origin and radiation of the house mouse: mitochondrial DNA phylogeny. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 391415.
  • Britton-Davidian, J., Catalan, J. & Belkhir, K. 2002. Chromosomal and allozyme analysis of a hybrid zone between parapatric Robertsonian races of the house mouse: a case of monobrachial homology. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 96: 7584.
  • Butlin, R. 1994.Genetic variation in mating signals and responses. In: Speciation and the Recognition Concept (D. M.Lambert & H.G.Spencer, eds), pp. 327366. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, London.
  • Butlin, R.K. 1998.What do hybrid zones in general, and the Chorthippus parallelus zone in particular, tell us about speciation? In: Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (D. J. H. a. S. H.Berlocher, ed.), Oxford university press, NY, Oxford.
  • Butlin, R.K. & Ritchie, M.G. 1991. Variation in female mate preference across a grasshopper hybrid zone. J. Evol. Biol. 4: 227240.
  • Carlsen, M. 1993. Migrations of Mus musculus musculus in Danish farmland. Z. Säugetierkunde 58: 172180.
  • Cassaing, J. & Croset, H. 1985. Organisation spatiale, compétition et dynamique des populations sauvages de souris (Mus spretus Lataste et Mus musculus domesticus Rutty) du Midi de la France. Z. Säugetierkunde 50: 271284.
  • Christophe, N. & Baudoin, C. 1998. Olfactory preferences in two sub-species of mice Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus and their hybrids. Anim. Behav. 56: 365369.
  • Coopersmith, C.B. & Lenington, S. 1992. Female preferences based on male quality in house mice: interaction between male dominance rank and t-complex genotype. Ethology 90: 116.
  • Cruzan, M.B. & Arnold, M.L. 1994. Assortative mating and natural selection in an Iris hybrid zone. Evolution 48: 19461958.
  • D'udine, B. & Partridge, L. 1981. Olfactory preferences of inbred mice (Mus musculus) for their own strain and for siblings: effects of strain, sex and cross fostering. Behaviour 78: 314324.
  • Dallas, J.F., Dod, B., Boursot, P., Prager, E.M. & Bonhomme, F. 1995. Population subdivision and gene flow in Danish house mice. Mol. Ecol. 4: 311320.
  • Dobzhansky, T. 1940. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat. 74: 312321.
  • Dod, B., Jermiin, L.S., Boursot, P., Chapman, V.H., Nielsen, J.T. & Bonhomme, F. 1993. Counter-selection on sex chromosomes in the Mus musculus European hybrid zone. J. Evol. Biol. 6: 529546.
  • Egid, K. & Brown, J.L. 1989. The major histocompatibility complex and female mating preferences in mice. Anim. Behav. 38: 548550.
  • Fel-Clair, F., Lenormand, T., Catalan, J., Grobert, J., Orth, A., Boursot, P., Viroux, M.-C. & Britton-Davidian, J. 1996. Genomic incompatibilities in the hybrid zone between house mice in Denmark: evidence from steep and non-coincident chromosomal clines for Robertsonian fusions. Genet. Res. Camb. 67: 123134.
  • Forejt, J. 1996. Hybrid sterility in the mouse. Trends. Genet. 12: 412417.
  • Howard, D.J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In: Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process (R. G.Harrison, ed.), pp. 4669. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Hatfield, T. & Schulter, D. 1996. A test for sexual selection on hybrids of two sympatric sticklebacks. Evolution 50: 24292434.
  • Hewitt, G.M., Butlin, R.K. & East, T.M. 1987. Testicular dysfunction in hybrids between parapatric subspecies of the grasshopper, Chorthippus parallelus. Bio. J. Linn. Soc. 58: 247276.
  • Howard, D.J. & Waring, G.L. 1991. Topographic diversity, zone width, and the strength of reproductive isolation in a zone of overlap and hybridization. Evolution 45: 11201135.
  • Howard, D.J., Waring, G.L., Tibbets, C.A. & Gregory, P.G. 1993. Survival of hybrids in a mosaic hybrid zone. Evolution 47: 789800.
  • Howard, D.J., Gregory, P.G., Chu, J. & Cain, M.L. 1998. Conspecific sperm precedence is an effective barrier to hybridization between closely related species. Evolution 52: 511516.
  • Hunt, W.G. & Selander, R.K. 1973. Biochemical genetics of hybridisation in European house mice. Heredity. 31: 1133.
  • Hurst, J.L. 1990a. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. I. Communication between males. Anim. Behav. 40: 209222.
  • Hurst, J.L. 1990b. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. II. Communication between females. Anim. Behav. 40: 223232.
  • Hurst, J.L. 1990c. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. III. Communication between the sexes. Anim. Behav. 40: 233243.
  • Isles, A.R., Baum, M.J., Ma, D., Keverne, E.B. & Allen, N.D. 2001. Urinary odour preferences in mice. Nature. 409: 783784.
  • Jiggins, C.D. & Mallet, J. 2000. Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 250255.
  • Jiggins, C.D., McMillan, W.O., Neukirchen, W. & Mallet, J. 1996. What can hybrid zones tell us about speciation? The case of Heliconius erato and H. himera (Lepidoptera Nymphalidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59: 221242.
  • Laukaitis, C.M., Crister, E.S. & Karn, R.C. 1997. Salivary androgen-binding protein (ABP) mediates sexual isolation in Mus musculus. Evolution 51: 20002005.
  • Lee, M.R. & Elder, F.F.B. 1980. Yeast stimulation of bone marrow mitosis for cytogenetic preparations. Cytogenet. Cell genet. 26: 3640.
  • Liou, L.W. & Price, T.D. 1994. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution 48: 14511459.
  • Moulia, C., Aussel, J.P., Bonhomme, F., Boursot, P., Nielsen, J.T. & Renaud, F. 1991. Wormy mice in a hybrid zone: a genetic control of susceptibility to parasite infection. J. Evol. Biol. 4: 679687.
  • Moulia, C., Le Brun, N., Dallas, J., Orth, A. & Renaud, F. 1993. Experimental evidence of genetic determinism in high susceptibility to intestinal pinworms infection in mice: a hybrid zone model. Parasitology. 106: 387393.
  • Munclinger, P. & Frynta, D. 2000. Social interactions within and between two distant populations of house mouse. Folia Zool. 49: 16.
  • Myers, J.H. 1974. Genetic and social structure of feral house mouse populations on Grizzly Island, California. Ecology 55: 747759.
  • Nagel, L. & Schluter, D. 1998. Body size, natural selection, and speciation in sticklebacks. Evolution 52: 209218.
  • Naisbit, R.E., Jiggins, C.D. & Mallet, J. 2001. Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 18491854.
  • Nancé, V., Vanlerberghe, F., Nielsen, J.T., Bonhomme, F. & Britton-Davidian, J. 1990. Chromosomal introgression in house mice from the hybrid zone between M. m. domesticus and M. m. musculus in Denmark. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 41: 215227.
  • Pasteur, N., Pasteur, G., Bonhomme, F., Catalan, J. & Britton-Davidian, J. 1987. Manuel technique de génétique par électrophorèse des protéines. Lavoisier TEC & DOC, Paris.
  • Paterson, H.E.H. 1978. More evidence against speciation by reinforcement. South Afr. J. Sci. 74: 369371.
  • Patton, J.L. & Smith, M.F. 1993. Molecular evidence for mating asymmetry and female choice in a pocket gopher (Thomomys) hybrid zone. Mol. Ecol. 2: 38.
  • Rhymer, J.M. & Simberloff, D. 1996. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 83109.
  • Rice, W.R. 1989. Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223225.
  • Rieseberg, L.H., Desrochers, A.M. & Youn, S.J. 1995. Interspecific pollen competition as a reproductive barrier between sympatric species of Helianthus (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 82: 515519.
  • Rieseberg, L.H., Whitton, J. & Gardner, K. 1999. Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflower species. Genetics 152: 713727.
  • Ritchie, M.G., Butlin, R.K. & Hewitt, G.M. 1989. Assortative mating across a hybrid zone in Chorthippus parallelus (Orthoptera: Acrididae). J. Evol. Biol. 2: 339352.
  • Sall, J., Lehman, A. & Institute, S. 1996. JMPStart Statistics. Duxbury Press, Belmont.
  • Sanderson, N. 1989. Can gene flow prevent reinforcement? Evolution 43: 12231235.
  • Sanderson, N., Szymura, J.M. & Barton, N.H. 1992. Variation in mating call across the hybrid zone between the fire-bellied toads Bombina bombina and B. varietaga. Evolution 46: 595607.
  • Searle, J.B. 1993. Chromosomal hybrid zones in eutherian mammals. In: Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process (R. G.Harrison, ed.), pp. 309353. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Shapiro, L.H. 2001. Asymmetric assortative mating between two hybridizing Orchelimum katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Am. Midl. Nat. 145: 423427.
  • Smadja, C. & Ganem, G. 2002. Subspecies recognition in the house mouse: a study of two populations from the border of a hybrid zone. Behav. Ecol. 13: 312320.
  • Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1981. Biometry. The Principles and Practices of Statistics in Biological Research. Freeman, W. H. and Company, New York.
  • Szymura, J.M. & Barton, N.H. 1991. The genetic structure of the hybrid zone between the fire-bellied toads Bombina bombina and B. Variegata: comparisons between transects and between loci. Evolution 45: 237261.
  • Thuesen, P. 1977. A comparison of the agonistic behaviour of the Mus musculus L. and Mus musculus domesticus Rutty (Mammalia and Rodentia). Vidensk. Dan. Naturhist. Foren. 140: 117128.
  • Vamosi, S.M. & Schluter, D. 1999. Sexual selection against hybrids between sympatric stickleback species: evidence from a field experiment. Evolution 53: 874879.
  • Van Zegeren, K. & Van Oortmerssen, G.A. 1981. Frontier disputes between the West and East-European house mouse in Schleswig-Holstein, West Germany. Z. Säugetierkunde 46: 363369.
  • Vanlerberghe, F., Dod, B., Boursot, P., Bellis, M. & Bonhomme, F. 1986. Absence of Y-chromosome introgression across the hybrid zone between Mus musculus domesticus and Mus musculus musculus. Genet. Res. Camb. 48: 191197.
  • Walkowa, W., Adamczyk, K. & Chelkowska, H. 1989. Characteristics of migrants in a free-living population of the house mouse. Acta Theriol. 34: 305313.
  • Yanai, J. & McClearn, G.E. 1973. Assortative mating in mice. II. Strain differences in female mating preference, male preference, and the question of possible sexual selection. Behav. Genet. 3: 6574.