SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Alatalo, R. V., Lundberg, A. & Glynn, C. 1986: Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature 323 , 152153.
  • 2
    Andersson, M. 1994: Sexual Selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
  • 3
    Andersson, S., Ornborg, J. & Andersson, M. 1998: Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265 , 445450.DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0315
  • 4
    Bereczkei, T., Voros, S., Gal, A. & Bernath, L. 1997: Resources, attractiveness, family commitment; reproductive decisions in human mate choice. Ethology 103 , 681699.
  • 5
    Buss, D. M. 1989: Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav. Brain Sci. 12 , 149.
  • 6
    Buss, D. M. 1994: The Evolution of Desire. BasicBooks, New York.
  • 7
    Clutton-Brock, T. H., Rose, K. E. & Guinness, F. E. 1997: Density-related changes in sexual selection in red deer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 264 , 15091516.
  • 8
    Crowley, P. H., Travers, S. E., Linton, M. C., Cohn, S. L., Sih, A. & Sargent, R. C. 1991: Mate density, predation risk, and the seasonal sequence of mate choices: a dynamic game. Am. Nat. 137 , 567596.
  • 9
    Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P. & Druen, P. B. 1995: `Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours': consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female attractiveness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68 , 261279.
  • 10
    Darwin, C. 1871: The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. Murray, London.
  • 11
    Deaux, K. & Hanna, R. 1984: Courtship in the personals column: the influence of gender and sexual orientation. Sex Roles 11 , 363375.
  • 12
    Deutsch, J. C. 1997: Colour diversification in Malawi cichlids: evidence for adaptation, reinforcement or sexual selection? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 62 , 114.
  • 13
    Endler, J. A. 1993: Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 340 , 215225.
  • 14
    Endler, J. A. & Houde, A. E. 1995: Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49 , 456468.
  • 15
    Eschel, I. 1979: Sexual selection, population density, and availability of mates. Theor. Pop. Biol. 16 , 301314.
  • 16
    Furnham, A., Tan, T. & McManus, C. 1997: Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: a replication and extension. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 22 , 539549.
  • 17
    Gangestad, S. W. & Buss, D. M. 1993: Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethol. Sociobiol. 14 , 8996.
  • 18
    Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R. & Yeo, R. A. 1994: Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethol. Sociobiol. 15 , 7385.
  • 19
    Gaquin, D. A. & Littman, M. S. 1999: County and City Extra: Annual Metro, City, and County Databook, 8th edn. Bernan Press, Washington, DC.
  • 20
    Grammer, K. & Thornhill, R. 1994: Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection — the role of symmetry and averageness. J. Comp. Psychol. 108 , 233242.
  • 21
    Greenlees, I. A. & McGrew, W. C. 1994: Sex and age differences in preferences and tactics of mate attraction: analysis of published advertisements. Ethol. Sociobiol. 15 , 5972.
  • 22
    Griffith, S. C., Owens, I. P. F. & Burke, T. 1999: Female choice and annual reproductive success favour less-ornamented male house sparrows. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266 , 765770.DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0703
  • 23
    Hill, G. E., Nolan, P. M. & Stoehr, A. M. 1999: Pairing success relative to male plumage redness and pigment symmetry in the house finch: temporal and geographic constancy. Behav. Ecol. 10 , 4853.
  • 24
    Houde, A. E. & Endler, J. A. 1990: Correlated evolution of female mating preferences and male colour patterns in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science 248 , 14051408.
  • 25
    Hubbell, S. P. & Johnson, L. K. 1987: Environmental variation in lifetime mating success, mate choice and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 130 , 91112.
  • 26
    Jennions, M. D. & Petrie, M. 1997: Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Camb. Phil. Soc. Biol. Rev. 72 , 283327.
  • 27
    Jirotkul, M. 1999: Population density influences male–male competition in guppies. Anim. Behav. 58 , 11691175.DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1248
  • 28
    Kenrick, D. T. & Keefe, R. C. 1992: Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in reproductive strategies. Behav. Brain. Sci. 15 , 75133.
  • 29
    Lessells, C. M. & Boag, P. T. 1987: Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104 , 116121.
  • 30
    Lundberg, A. & Alatalo, R. V. 1992: The Pied Flycatcher. T. & A. D. Poyser, London.
  • 31
    Møller, A. P. 1994: Sexual Selection and the Barn Swallow. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
  • 32
    Moynihan, M. H. 1998: The Social Regulation of Competition and Aggression in Animals. Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, DC.
  • 33
    O'Donald, P. 1978: Theoretical aspects of sexual selection: a generalized model of mating behaviour. Theor. Pop. Biol. 13 , 226243.
  • 34
    Parker, G. A., Baker, R. R. & Smith, V. G. F. 1972: The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon. J. Theor. Biol. 36 , 529533.
  • 35
    Parker, P. G. & Burley, N. T. 1998: Avian Reproductive Tactics: Female and Male Perspectives. Am. Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC.
  • 36
    Pärt, T. & Qvarnström, A. 1997: Badge size in collared flycatchers predicts outcome of male competition over territories. Anim. Behav. 54 , 893899.
  • 37
    Perrett, D. I., May, K. A. & Yoshikawa, S. 1994: Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 368 , 239242.
  • 38
    Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L. & Akamatsu, S. 1998: Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394 , 884887.
  • 39
    Perrett, D. I., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., Lee, K. J., Rowland, D. A. & Edwards, R. 1999: Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 20 , 295307.
  • 40
    Piper, W. H. 1997: Social dominance in birds. Early findings and new horizons. Curr. Ornithol. 14 , 125187.
  • 41
    Pomiankowski, A. 1988: The evolution of female mate preferences for male genetic quality. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 5 , 136184.
  • 42
    Qvarnström, A. & Forsgren, E. 1998: Should females prefer dominant males? Trends Ecol. Evol. 13 , 498501.
  • 43
    Regosin, J. V. & Pruett-Jones, S. 2001: Sexual selection and tail-length dimorphism in scissor-tailed flycatchers. Auk 118 , 167175.
  • 44
    Saetre, G. P. & Slagsvold, T. 1996: Female pied flycatchers prefer brightly coloured males. Anim. Behav. 48 , 14071416.
  • 45
    Saetre, G. P., Moum, T., Bures, S., Kral, M., Adamjan, M. & Moreno, J. 1997: A sexually selected character displacement reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387 , 589592.
  • 46
    Seehausen, O. & Van Alphen, J. J. M. 1998: The effect of male coloration on female mate choice in closely related Lake Victoria cichlids (Haplochromis nyererei complex). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42 , 18.DOI: 10.1007/s002650050405
  • 47
    Siegel, S. & Castellan Jr, N. J. 1988: Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • 48
    Simpson, J. A. & Gangestad, S. W. 1992: Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice. J. Pers. 60 , 3151.
  • 49
    Singh, D. 1994a: Body fat distribution and perception of desirable female body shape by young black men and women. Int. J. Eat. Disorder 16 , 465481.
  • 50
    Singh, D. 1994b: Is thin really beautiful and good? Relationship between waist-to-hip ratio (WRH) and female attractiveness. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 16 , 123132.
  • 51
    Singh, D. & Luis, S. 1995: Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of waist-to-hip ratio on judgement of women's attractiveness. Hum. Nat. 6 , 5165.
  • 52
    Thiessen, D., Young, R. K. & Burroughs, R. 1993: Lonely hearts advertisements reflect sexually dimorphic mating strategies. Ethol. Sociobiol. 14 , 209229.
  • 53
    Waynforth, D. & Dunbar, R. I. M. 1995: Conditional mate choice strategies in humans: evidence from `lonely hearts' advertisements. Behaviour 132 , 755779.
  • 54
    Wetsman, A. & Marlowe, F. 1999: How universal are preferences for female waist-to-hip ratios? Evidence from the Hazda of Tanzania. Evol. Hum. Behav. 20 , 219228.
  • 55
    Wiederman, M. W. 1993: Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: evidence from personal advertisements. Ethol. Sociobiol. 14 , 331352.
  • 56
    Wiederman, M. W. & Allgeier, E. R. 1992: Gender differences in mate selection criteria: sociobiological or socioeconomic explanation? Ethol. Sociobiol. 13 , 115124.
  • 57
    Yu, D. W. & Shepard, G. H. Jr 1998: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature 396 , 321322.
  • 58
    Zar, J. H. 1984: Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.