SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Anna Chuine, Sandrine Sauzet, François Debias, Emmanuel Desouhant, Consequences of genetic incompatibility on fitness and mate choice: the male point of view, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2014, 113, 4
  2. 2
    Jinlei Li, Xiang Zhang, Youming Hou, Baozhen Tang, Effects of multiple mating on the fecundity of an invasive pest (Octodonta nipae): the existence of an intermediate optimal female mating rate, Physiological Entomology, 2014, 39, 4
  3. 3
    S. Hernández, C. Duffy, M. P. Francis, P. A. Ritchie, Evidence for multiple paternity in the school shark Galeorhinus galeus found in New Zealand waters, Journal of Fish Biology, 2014, 85, 5
  4. 4
    Chad C. Smith, Polyandry and paternity in a wild population of the swordtail Xiphophorus nigrensis, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2014, 68, 3, 415

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    S. A. Ramm, P. Stockley, Sequential male mate choice under sperm competition risk, Behavioral Ecology, 2014, 25, 3, 660

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    S. A. Ramm, L. Scharer, J. Ehmcke, J. Wistuba, Sperm competition and the evolution of spermatogenesis, Molecular Human Reproduction, 2014, 20, 12, 1169

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    B. J. A. Pollux, R. W. Meredith, M. S. Springer, T. Garland, D. N. Reznick, The evolution of the placenta drives a shift in sexual selection in livebearing fish, Nature, 2014, 513, 7517, 233

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Ryne A. Palombit, 2014,

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Carie B. Weddle, Sandra Steiger, Christopher G. Hamaker, Geoffrey D. Ower, Christopher Mitchell, Scott K. Sakaluk, John Hunt, Cuticular hydrocarbons as a basis for chemosensory self-referencing in crickets: a potentially universal mechanism facilitating polyandry in insects, Ecology Letters, 2013, 16, 3
  10. 10
    T. O. Ariyomo, P. J. Watt, Disassortative mating for boldness decreases reproductive success in the guppy, Behavioral Ecology, 2013, 24, 6, 1320

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Katherine Parker, Peter Roessingh, Steph B. J. Menken, Do Female Life Span and Fecundity of Small Ermine Moth Increase with Multiple Mating and Adult Nutrition?, Journal of Insect Behavior, 2013, 26, 3, 416

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    J. C. Senar, F. Mateos-Gonzalez, F. Uribe, L. Arroyo, Familiarity adds to attractiveness in matters of siskin mate choice, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2013, 280, 1773, 20132361

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    S. L. Johnson, H. J. Brockmann, Parental effects on early development: testing for indirect benefits of polyandry, Behavioral Ecology, 2013, 24, 5, 1218

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Rebecca A. Boulton, David M. Shuker, Polyandry, Current Biology, 2013, 23, 24, R1080

    CrossRef

  15. You have free access to this content15
    H. Ajuria Ibarra, T. Reader, Reasons to be different: do conspicuous polymorphisms in invertebrates persist because rare forms are fitter?, Journal of Zoology, 2013, 290, 2
  16. 16
    Johanna Werminghausen, Rolanda Lange, Nils Anthes, Seeking a Sex-Specific Coolidge Effect in a Simultaneous Hermaphrodite, Ethology, 2013, 119, 7
  17. 17
    Clare C. Rittschof, Swetapadma Pattanaik, Laura Johnson, Luis F. Matos, Jérémie Brusini, Marta L. Wayne, Sigma virus and male reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2013, 67, 4, 529

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Guy Boivin, Sperm as a limiting factor in mating success in Hymenoptera parasitoids, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2013, 146, 1
  19. 19
    N. Wedell, The dynamic relationship between polyandry and selfish genetic elements, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2013, 368, 1613, 20120049

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    John L. Hoogland, Why do female prairie dogs copulate with more than one male?—Insights from long-term research, Journal of Mammalogy, 2013, 94, 4, 731

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    John Alcock, 2013,

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    T. Thunken, D. Meuthen, T. C. M. Bakker, S. A. Baldauf, A sex-specific trade-off between mating preferences for genetic compatibility and body size in a cichlid fish with mutual mate choice, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2012, 279, 1740, 2959

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    S. L. Johnson, H. J. Brockmann, Alternative reproductive tactics in female horseshoe crabs, Behavioral Ecology, 2012, 23, 5, 999

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    E. Huchard, C. I. Canale, C. Le Gros, M. Perret, P.-Y. Henry, P. M. Kappeler, Convenience polyandry or convenience polygyny? Costly sex under female control in a promiscuous primate, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2012, 279, 1732, 1371

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    M. Genevieve W. Jones, N. M. S. Mareile Techow, Peter G. Ryan, Dalliances and doubtful dads: what determines extra-pair paternity in socially monogamous wandering albatrosses?, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2012, 66, 9, 1213

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Rachel A. Slatyer, Brian S. Mautz, Patricia R.Y. Backwell, Michael D. Jennions, Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis, Biological Reviews, 2012, 87, 1
  27. 27
    Miguel Barbosa, Sean R Connolly, Mizue Hisano, Maria Dornelas, Anne E Magurran, Fitness consequences of female multiple mating: A direct test of indirect benefits, BMC Evolutionary Biology, 2012, 12, 1, 185

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    Rosemary J. Byrne, John C. Avise, Genetic mating system of the brown smoothhound shark (Mustelus henlei), including a literature review of multiple paternity in other elasmobranch species, Marine Biology, 2012, 159, 4, 749

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Darcy G. Gordon, Susan N. Gershman, Scott K. Sakaluk, Glycine in nuptial food gifts of decorated crickets decreases female sexual receptivity when ingested, but not when injected, Animal Behaviour, 2012, 83, 2, 369

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Lutz Fromhage, MATING UNPLUGGED: A MODEL FOR THE EVOLUTION OF MATING PLUG (DIS-)PLACEMENT, Evolution, 2012, 66, 1
  31. 31
    C. C. Rittschof, S. A. Hilber, M. S. Tudor, C. M. St Mary, Modeling male reproductive strategies and optimal mate number in an orb-web spider, Behavioral Ecology, 2012, 23, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    KRITIKA M. GARG, BALAJI CHATTOPADHYAY, PARAMANATHA SWAMI DOSS D., VINOTH KUMAR A.K., SRIPATHI KANDULA, UMA RAMAKRISHNAN, Promiscuous mating in the harem-roosting fruit bat, Cynopterus sphinx, Molecular Ecology, 2012, 21, 16
  33. 33
    A.M. OVERDUIN-DE VRIES, J.J.M. MASSEN, B.M. SPRUIJT, E.H.M. STERCK, Sneaky Monkeys: An Audience Effect of Male Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta) on Sexual Behavior, American Journal of Primatology, 2012, 74, 3
  34. 34
    Melvin M. Bonilla, David W. Zeh, Angela M. White, Jeanne A. Zeh, Discriminating Males and Unpredictable Females: Males Bias Sperm Allocation in Favor of Virgin Females, Ethology, 2011, 117, 8
  35. 35
    Xiaoguo Jiao, Lei Guo, Zhanqi Chen, Jun Wu, Jian Chen, Fengxiang Liu, Daiqin Li, Experimental evidence for female-driven monandry in the wolf spider, Pardosa astrigera, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2011, 65, 11, 2117

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Paula Stockley, Jakob Bro-Jørgensen, Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals, Biological Reviews, 2011, 86, 2
  37. 37
    THOMAS J. GIARDINA, ANNA BEAVIS, ANDREW G. CLARK, ANTHONY C. FIUMERA, Female influence on pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection and its genetic basis in Drosophila melanogaster, Molecular Ecology, 2011, 20, 19
  38. 38
    M. P. Haesler, C. M. Lindeyer, O. Otti, D. Bonfils, D. Heg, M. Taborsky, Female mouthbrooders in control of pre- and postmating sexual selection, Behavioral Ecology, 2011, 22, 5, 1033

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Jakob Bro-Jørgensen, Intra- and Intersexual Conflicts and Cooperation in the Evolution of Mating Strategies: Lessons Learnt From Ungulates, Evolutionary Biology, 2011, 38, 1, 28

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    L. Scharer, D. T. J. Littlewood, A. Waeschenbach, W. Yoshida, D. B. Vizoso, Mating behavior and the evolution of sperm design, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011, 108, 4, 1490

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Hannah L. Dugdale, Amy Griffiths, David W. Macdonald, Polygynandrous and repeated mounting behaviour in European badgers, Meles meles, Animal Behaviour, 2011, 82, 6, 1287

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    Rebecca M. Stumpf, Rodolfo Martinez-Mota, Krista M. Milich, Nicoletta Righini, Milena R. Shattuck, Sexual conflict in primates, Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 2011, 20, 2
  43. 43
    EVA URSPRUNG, MAX RINGLER, ROBERT JEHLE, WALTER HÖDL, Strong male/male competition allows for nonchoosy females: high levels of polygynandry in a territorial frog with paternal care, Molecular Ecology, 2011, 20, 8
  44. 44
    Michael R. Maxwell, Katherine L. Barry, Philip M. Johns, Examinations of Female Pheromone Use in Two Praying Mantids, <I>Stagmomantis limbata</I> and <I>Tenodera aridifolia sinensis</I> (Mantodea: Mantidae), Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 2010, 103, 1, 120

    CrossRef

  45. 45
    Susan N. Gershman, Scott K. Sakaluk, Mate Quality and Novelty Influence Post-Copulatory Female Choice in Decorated Crickets, Gryllodes sigillatus, Ethology, 2010, 116, 11
  46. 46
    J. M. SETCHELL, M. J. E. CHARPENTIER, K. M. ABBOTT, E. J. WICKINGS, L. A. KNAPP, Opposites attract: MHC-associated mate choice in a polygynous primate, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2010, 23, 1
  47. 47
    Omkar OMKAR, Satyendra K. SINGH, Geetanjali MISHRA, Parental age at mating affects reproductive attributes of the aphidophagous ladybird beetle, Coelophora saucia (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), European Journal of Entomology, 2010, 107, 3, 341

    CrossRef

  48. 48
    Dennis Sprenger, Rolanda Lange, Nico K. Michiels, Nils Anthes, Sources of phenotypic variance in egg and larval traits in a marine invertebrate, Evolutionary Ecology, 2010, 24, 1, 185

    CrossRef

  49. 49
    J. M. Schneider, K. Lesmono, Courtship raises male fertilization success through post-mating sexual selection in a spider, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2009, 276, 1670, 3105

    CrossRef

  50. 50
    L. S. Johnson, C. F. Thompson, S. K. Sakaluk, M. Neuhauser, B. G.P. Johnson, S. S. Soukup, S. J. Forsythe, B. S. Masters, Extra-pair young in house wren broods are more likely to be male than female, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2009, 276, 1665, 2285

    CrossRef

  51. 51
    S. Le Cam, J. A. Pechenik, M. Cagnon, F. Viard, Fast versus Slow Larval Growth in an Invasive Marine Mollusc: Does Paternity Matter?, Journal of Heredity, 2009, 100, 4, 455

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Rhonda R. Snook, Tracey Chapman, Patricia J. Moore, Nina Wedell, Helen S. Crudgington, Interactions between the sexes: new perspectives on sexual selection and reproductive isolation, Evolutionary Ecology, 2009, 23, 1, 71

    CrossRef

  53. 53
    Matjaž Kuntner, Jonathan A. Coddington, Jutta M. Schneider, INTERSEXUAL ARMS RACE? GENITAL COEVOLUTION IN NEPHILID SPIDERS (ARANEAE, NEPHILIDAE), Evolution, 2009, 63, 6
  54. 54
    A. C. Nunes, M. d. L. Mathias, G. Ganem, Odor preference in house mice: influences of habitat heterogeneity and chromosomal incompatibility, Behavioral Ecology, 2009, 20, 6, 1252

    CrossRef

  55. 55
    Simone Immler, Michael Taborsky, Sequential polyandry affords post-mating sexual selection in the mouths of cichlid females, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2009, 63, 8, 1219

    CrossRef

  56. You have free access to this content56
    Fleur E. Champion de Crespigny, Laurence D. Hurst, Nina Wedell, DO WOLBACHIA-ASSOCIATED INCOMPATIBILITIES PROMOTE POLYANDRY?, Evolution, 2008, 62, 1
  57. 57
    Anders Ödeen, Clea M. Moray, Drosophila melanogaster virgins are more likely to mate with strangers than familiar flies, Naturwissenschaften, 2008, 95, 3, 253

    CrossRef

  58. 58
    Trevor E. Pitcher, F. Helen Rodd, Locke Rowe, Female choice and the relatedness of mates in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), Genetica, 2008, 134, 1, 137

    CrossRef

  59. 59
    Herman L. Mays, Tomas Albrecht, Mark Liu, Geoffrey E. Hill, Female choice for genetic complementarity in birds: a review, Genetica, 2008, 134, 1, 147

    CrossRef

  60. 60
    William E. Wagner, Alexandra L. Basolo, Incidental Sanctions and the Evolution of Direct Benefits, Ethology, 2008, 114, 6
  61. 61
    Jeanne A. Zeh, David W. Zeh, Maternal inheritance, epigenetics and the evolution of polyandry, Genetica, 2008, 134, 1, 45

    CrossRef

  62. 62
    Nicholas K. Priest, Laura F. Galloway, Deborah A. Roach, Mating Frequency and Inclusive Fitness inDrosophila melanogaster, The American Naturalist, 2008, 171, 1, 10

    CrossRef

  63. 63
    Jennifer L. Kovacs, Eric A. Hoffman, Michael A. D. Goodisman, Mating Success in the Polyandrous Social Wasp Vespula maculifrons, Ethology, 2008, 114, 4
  64. 64
    Jacek Radwan, Aleksandra Tkacz, Agnieszka Kloch, MHC and Preferences for Male Odour in the Bank Vole, Ethology, 2008, 114, 9
  65. 65
    Jennifer C. Perry, Locke Rowe, Neither Mating Rate Nor Spermatophore Feeding Influences Longevity in a Ladybird Beetle, Ethology, 2008, 114, 5
  66. 66
    Scott K. Sakaluk, Josef K. Müller, Risk of Sperm Competition Mediates Copulation Duration, but not Paternity, of Male Burying Beetles, Journal of Insect Behavior, 2008, 21, 3, 153

    CrossRef

  67. 67
    Kevin L. Murray, Theodore H. Fleming, Social structure and mating system of the buffy flower bat, Erophylla sezekorni (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae), Journal of Mammalogy, 2008, 89, 6, 1391

    CrossRef

  68. 68
    Michael GREEFF, Paul SCHMID-HEMPEL, Sperm viability in the male accessory testes and female spermathecae of the bumblebee bombus terrestris (hymenoptera: apidae), European Journal of Entomology, 2008, 105, 5, 849

    CrossRef

  69. 69
    Karim Vahed, All that Glisters is not Gold: Sensory Bias, Sexual Conflict and Nuptial Feeding in Insects and Spiders, Ethology, 2007, 113, 2
  70. 70
    M. D. JENNIONS, J. M. DRAYTON, R. BROOKS, J. HUNT, Do female black field crickets Teleogryllus commodus benefit from polyandry?, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2007, 20, 4
  71. 71
    Paolo Galeotti, Fabio Pupin, Diego Rubolini, Roberto Sacchi, Pietro A. Nardi, Mauro Fasola, Effects of female mating status on copulation behaviour and sperm expenditure in the freshwater crayfish Austropotamobius italicus, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2007, 61, 5, 711

    CrossRef

  72. 72
    H. Kokko, M. D Jennions, A. Houde, Evolution of frequency-dependent mate choice: keeping up with fashion trends, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2007, 274, 1615, 1317

    CrossRef

  73. 73
    Toby S Daly-Engel, R Dean Grubbs, Brian W Bowen, Robert J Toonen, Frequency of multiple paternity in an unexploited tropical population of sandbar sharks (Carcharhinus plumbeus), Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2007, 64, 2, 198

    CrossRef

  74. 74
    DAVID S. PORTNOY, ANDREW N. PIERCY, JOHN A. MUSICK, GEORGE H. BURGESS, JOHN E. GRAVES, Genetic polyandry and sexual conflict in the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, in the western North Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico, Molecular Ecology, 2007, 16, 1
  75. 75
    Christine Edly-Wright, P.L. Schwagmeyer, Patricia G. Parker, Douglas W. Mock, Genetic similarity of mates, offspring health and extrapair fertilization in house sparrows, Animal Behaviour, 2007, 73, 2, 367

    CrossRef

  76. 76
    T. M. IVY, Good genes, genetic compatibility and the evolution of polyandry: use of the diallel cross to address competing hypotheses, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2007, 20, 2
  77. 77
    Michio Hori, Haruki Ochi, Masanori Kohda, Inheritance Pattern of Lateral Dimorphism in Two Cichlids (a Scale Eater, Perissodus microlepis, and an Herbivore, Neolamprologus moorii) in Lake Tanganyika, Zoological Science, 2007, 24, 5, 486

    CrossRef

  78. 78
    Tomohiro Harano, Takahisa Miyatake, Interpopulation variation in female remating is attributable to female and male effects in Callosobruchus chinensis, Journal of Ethology, 2007, 25, 1, 49

    CrossRef

  79. 79
    Laurent Lehmann, Lukas F. Keller, Hanna Kokko, Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2007, 244, 2, 282

    CrossRef

  80. 80
    T Harano, T Miyatake, No genetic correlation between the sexes in mating frequency in the bean beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis, Heredity, 2007, 99, 3, 295

    CrossRef

  81. 81
    LEIF ENGQVIST, Nuptial food gifts influence female egg production in the scorpionfly Panorpa cognata, Ecological Entomology, 2007, 32, 3
  82. 82
    Leif Engqvist, Nuptial gift consumption influences female remating in a scorpionfly: male or female control of mating rate?, Evolutionary Ecology, 2007, 21, 1, 49

    CrossRef

  83. 83
    A.V. Peretti, A. Córdoba-Aguilar, On the value of fine-scaled behavioural observations for studies of sexual coercion, Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 2007, 19, 1, 77

    CrossRef

  84. 84
    Francisco García-González, Leigh W. Simmons, Paternal Indirect Genetic Effects on Offspring Viability and the Benefits of Polyandry, Current Biology, 2007, 17, 1, 32

    CrossRef

  85. 85
    Penelope R. HADDRILL, David M. SHUKER, Sean MAYES, Michael E.N. MAJERUS, Temporal effects of multiple mating on components of fitness in the two-spot ladybird, Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), European Journal of Entomology, 2007, 104, 3, 393

    CrossRef

  86. 86
    S. C. ROBERTS, M. L. HALE, M. PETRIE, Correlations between heterozygosity and measures of genetic similarity: implications for understanding mate choice, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2006, 19, 2
  87. 87
    Scott K. Sakaluk, Rachel L. Avery, Carie B. Weddle, Cryptic Sexual Conflict in Gift-Giving Insects: Chasing the Chase-Away, The American Naturalist, 2006, 167, 1, 94

    CrossRef

  88. 88
    Chad C. Smith, R. Craig Sargent, Female fitness declines with increasing female density but not male harassment in the western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis, Animal Behaviour, 2006, 71, 2, 401

    CrossRef

  89. 89
    M. Barbosa, A. E. Magurran, Female mating decisions: maximizing fitness?, Journal of Fish Biology, 2006, 68, 6
  90. 90
    K. Vahed, Larger ejaculate volumes are associated with a lower degree of polyandry across bushcricket taxa, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2006, 273, 1599, 2387

    CrossRef

  91. 91
    Leif Engqvist, Nuptial gift consumption influences female remating in a scorpionfly: male or female control of mating rate?, Evolutionary Ecology, 2006,

    CrossRef

  92. 92
    G. A. Parker, Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2006, 361, 1466, 235

    CrossRef

  93. 93
    S. K. Schwartz, M. A. Peterson, Strong material benefits and no longevity costs of multiple mating in an extremely polyandrous leaf beetle, Chrysochus cobaltinus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Behavioral Ecology, 2006, 17, 6, 1004

    CrossRef

  94. You have free access to this content94
    Göran Arnqvist, José A. Andrés, The Effects of Experimentally Induced Polyandry on Female Reproduction in a Monandrous Mating System, Ethology, 2006, 112, 8
  95. 95
    Gerald Borgia, 2006,

    CrossRef

  96. 96
    T. M Ivy, C. B Weddle, S. K Sakaluk, Females use self-referent cues to avoid mating with previous mates, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2005, 272, 1580, 2475

    CrossRef

  97. 97
    BRYAN D. NEFF, TREVOR E. PITCHER, Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes, Molecular Ecology, 2005, 14, 1
  98. 98
    Jonathan P. Evans, Dustin J. Marshall, MALE-BY-FEMALE INTERACTIONS INFLUENCE FERTILIZATION SUCCESS AND MEDIATE THE BENEFITS OF POLYANDRY IN THE SEA URCHIN HELIOCIDARIS ERYTHROGRAMMA, Evolution, 2005, 59, 1, 106

    CrossRef

  99. 99
    Jonathan P. Evans, Dustin J. Marshall, MALE-BY-FEMALE INTERACTIONS INFLUENCE FERTILIZATION SUCCESS AND MEDIATE THE BENEFITS OF POLYANDRY IN THE SEA URCHIN HELIOCIDARIS ERYTHROGRAMMA, Evolution, 2005, 59, 1
  100. 100
    Lutz Fromhage, Jutta M. Schneider, No discrimination against previous mates in a sexually cannibalistic spider, Naturwissenschaften, 2005, 92, 9, 423

    CrossRef

  101. 101
    Tracie M. Ivy, Scott K. Sakaluk, POLYANDRY PROMOTES ENHANCED OFFSPRING SURVIVAL IN DECORATED CRICKETS, Evolution, 2005, 59, 1, 152

    CrossRef

  102. 102
    Tracie M. Ivy, Scott K. Sakaluk, POLYANDRY PROMOTES ENHANCED OFFSPRING SURVIVAL IN DECORATED CRICKETS, Evolution, 2005, 59, 1
  103. 103
    G. Rudolfsen, L. Figenschou, I. Folstad, J. T. Nordeide, E. Søreng, Potential fitness benefits from mate selection in the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua), Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2005, 18, 1
  104. 104
    Sergey Gavrilets, Takehiko I. Hayashi, Speciation and Sexual Conflict, Evolutionary Ecology, 2005, 19, 2, 167

    CrossRef

  105. 105
    D. W. Dunn, J. P. Sumner, D. Goulson, The benefits of multiple mating to female seaweed flies, Coelopa frigida (Diptera: Coelpidae), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2005, 58, 2, 128

    CrossRef

  106. 106
    D. J. MARSHALL, J. P. EVANS, The benefits of polyandry in the free-spawning polychaete Galeolaria caespitosa, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2005, 18, 3
  107. 107
    R. Härdling, A. Kaitala, The evolution of repeated mating under sexual conflict, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2005, 18, 1
  108. 108
    Michael D. Jennions, John Hunt, Russell Graham, Robert Brooks, NO EVIDENCE FOR INBREEDING AVOIDANCE THROUGH POSTCOPULATORY MECHANISMS IN THE BLACK FIELD CRICKET, TELEOGRYLLUS COMMODUS, Evolution, 2004, 58, 11
  109. 109
    Michael D. Jennions, John Hunt, Russell Graham, Robert Brooks, NO EVIDENCE FOR INBREEDING AVOIDANCE THROUGH POSTCOPULATORY MECHANISMS IN THE BLACK FIELD CRICKET, TELEOGRYLLUS COMMODUS, Evolution, 2004, 58, 11, 2472

    CrossRef

  110. 110
    William D. Brown, Adam Bjork, Karin Schneider, Scott Pitnick, NO EVIDENCE THAT POLYANDRY BENEFITS FEMALES IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER, Evolution, 2004, 58, 6, 1242

    CrossRef

  111. 111
    William D. Brown, Adam Bjork, Karin Schneider, Scott Pitnick, NO EVIDENCE THAT POLYANDRY BENEFITS FEMALES IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER, Evolution, 2004, 58, 6
  112. 112
    Kevin A. Feldheim, Samuel H. Gruber, Mary V. Ashley, RECONSTRUCTION OF PARENTAL MICROSATELLITE GENOTYPES REVEALS FEMALE POLYANDRY AND PHILOPATRY IN THE LEMON SHARK, NEGAPRION BREVIROSTRIS, Evolution, 2004, 58, 10
  113. 113
    Kevin A. Feldheim, Samuel H. Gruber, Mary V. Ashley, RECONSTRUCTION OF PARENTAL MICROSATELLITE GENOTYPES REVEALS FEMALE POLYANDRY AND PHILOPATRY IN THE LEMON SHARK, NEGAPRION BREVIROSTRIS, Evolution, 2004, 58, 10, 2332

    CrossRef

  114. 114
    Manfred Eberle, Peter M. Kappeler, Selected polyandry: female choice and inter-sexual conflict in a small nocturnal solitary primate (Microcebus murinus), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2004, 57, 1, 91

    CrossRef

  115. 115
    John Hunt, Luc F. Bussière, Michael D. Jennions, Robert Brooks, What is genetic quality?, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2004, 19, 6, 329

    CrossRef

  116. 116
    Jakob Bro-Jørgensen, Sexual Selection and Female Competition, eLS,
  117. 117
    Scott K. Sakaluk, Carie Weddle, John Hunt, Signal Reliability, Sex-Specific Genotype-by-Environment Interactions in Cuticular Hydrocarbon Expression, and the Maintenance of Polyandry through Chemosensory Self-Referencing in Decorated Crickets, Gryllodes sigillatus,