Radiotherapy utilization in New South Wales from 1996 to 1998

Authors

  • Michael Barton

    1. Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Simpson Centre for Health Innnovation, Liverpool Health Service, Liverpool and Department of Medicine, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author

  • M Barton FRANZCR.

Correspondence: Assoc. ProfessorMichaelBarton Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Simpson Centre for Health Innovation, Liverpool Health Service, PO Box 7103, Liverpool BC, NSW 1871, Australia. Email: michael.barton@swsahs.nsw.gov.au

SUMMARY

The purpose of the present study was to examine utilization rates of radiotherapy by newly diagnosed cancer patients in New South Wales (NSW) from 1996 to 1998. The 1989 report of the Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council (AHMAC) recommended that 50% of all newly diagnosed cancer patients should receive radiotherapy. Previous reports showed that the true rate was between 30 and 36%. In 1991 and 1995 the NSW Department of Health developed strategic plans that were intended to implement the AHMAC recommendation. An analysis was carried out of activity reports of radiation oncology departments in NSW and its component Area Health Services (AHS). All NSW patients newly diagnosed with cancer between 1996 and 1998 and treated by radiotherapy were included in the study. A total of 37% of newly diagnosed cancer patients received radiotherapy in NSW in 1998. This has increased from 30% since 1990–91. Rural AHS in 1998 had an identical average rate of 37% (range: 23–54%) when compared to urban AHS (average: 37%; range: 26–49%). Rural AHS have increased utilization from 19% in 1990–91. Area health services with a radiation oncology department had a slightly higher rate of utilization than those AHS without a radiation oncology department (39 and 36%, respectively). The rates of utilization of radiotherapy in NSW in 1998 continued to be well below the benchmark set by AHMAC and varied widely between AHS. Attention to and expansion of services should be focused on both rural and urban areas of need.

Ancillary