SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • - 1. 
    Slim K, Haugh M, Fagniez P-L, Pezet D, Chipponi J. Ten-year audit of randomised trials in digestive surgery from Europe. Br. J. Surg. 2000; 87: 15856.
  • 2
    McCulloch PM, Taylor I, Sasako M, Lovett B, Griffin D. Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions. BMJ 2002; 324: 144851.
  • 3
    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. A proposal for reporting. JAMA 2000; 283: 200812.
  • 4
    Bhandari M, Morrow F, Kulkarni AV, Tornetta P. Meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery. A systematic review of their methodologies. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2001; 83: 1524.
  • 5
    Khan KS, Ter Riet G, Popay J, Nixon J, Kleijnen J. Study quality assessment. In: Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness. CRD's guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews CRD Report 4, 2nd edn. York: York Publishing Services; March 2001.
  • 6
    Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 1998; 52: 37784.
  • 7
    Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1991; 44: 12718.
  • 8
    Feinstein AR. Clinimetrics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987.
  • 9
    Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 11914.
  • 10
    King TS, Chinchilli VM. A generalized concordance correlation coefficient for continuous and categorical data. Stat. Med. 2001; 20: 213147.
  • 11
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ 1997; 314: 572.
  • 12
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Validating scales and indexes. BMJ 2002; 324: 6067.
  • 13
    Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 40812.
  • 14
    Jüni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA 1999; 282: 105460.