Chemosensitivity of nociceptive, mechanosensitive afferent nerve fibres in the guinea-pig ureter


  • Holger Sann

    1. Physiologisches Institut, Tierärztliche Hochschule, Bischofsholer Damm 15/102, D-30173 Hannover, and Max-Planck-Institut für Physiologische und Klinische Forschung, W.G. Kerckhoff-Institut, Parkstrasse 1, D-61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author

Correspondence: H. Sann, Physiologisches Institut, Tierärztliche Hochschule, Bischofsholer Damm 15/102, D-30173 Hannover, Germany.


The mechanosensitivity and chemosensitivity of afferent fibres were investigated in an in vitro preparation of the guinea-pig ureter. Electrophysiological recordings were obtained from 5 U-1 (low mechanical threshold, contraction-sensitive) and 74 U-2 units (high threshold). U-2 units had significant higher levels of spontaneous activity, lower conduction velocities, higher mechanical thresholds (U-1: 7 mmHg; U-2: 39 mmHg), less pronounced phasic responses and longer latencies in the response to distensions than the U-1 units. For chemical stimulation, guinea-pig urine (> 800 mosmol/L), bradykinin and capsaicin were applied intraluminally. The responses of U-1 units mainly corresponded to the contractions induced by the chemical stimulation. The vast majority of the U-2 units were excited by urine, bradykinin (threshold: 0.1–1 μm) and capsaicin (threshold: 0.03–0.3 μm). The responses to urine could be mimicked by high concentrations of potassium ions (> 200 mm), but not by an equiosmolar solution of NaCl, urea and mannitol. Chemical stimulation could also result in a transient sensitization of the U-2 units to mechanical stimuli. In the anaesthetized guinea-pig, pseudo-affective responses could be evoked by ureteric distension (threshold: 30–60 mmHg) and serosal application of capsaicin. Intraluminal application of urine in vivo did not evoke any reactions, suggesting that the responses of the U-2 units to urine might be due to an impaired barrier function of the urothelium in vitro. The data are in agreement with the hypothesis that U-2 units are visceral polymodal nociceptors. Since the U-1 units were also able to encode at least noxious mechanical stimuli, their involvement in visceral nociception cannot be excluded.