SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abrams, P.A. (1999). Is predator mediated coexistence possible in unstable systems? Ecology, 80, 608621.
  • Abrams, P.A. (2001). A world without competition. Nature, 412, 858859.
  • Abrams, P.A. & Holt, R.D. (2002). The impact of consumer-resource cycles on the coexistence of competitors. Theor. Pop. Biol., 62, 281295.
  • Amarasekare, P. (2000). Coexistence of competing parasitoids on a patchily distributed host: local vs. spatial mechanisms. Ecology, 81, 12861296.
  • Amarasekare, P. (2003). Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis. Ecol. Lett., 6, online publication.
  • Amarasekare, P. & Nisbet, R.M. (2001). Spatial heterogeneity, source-sink dynamics, and the local coexistence of competing species. Am. Nat., 158, 572584.
  • Armstrong, R.A. (1976). Fugitive species: experiments with fungi and some theoretical considerations. Ecology, 57, 953963.
  • Armstrong, R.A. (1979). Prey species replacement along a gradient of nutrient enrichment: a graphical approach. Ecology, 60, 7684.
  • Armstrong, R.A. & McGehee, R. (1980). Competitive exclusion. Am Nat., 115, 151170.
  • Balciunas, D. & Lawler, S.P. (1995). Effects of basal resources, predation, and alternative prey in microcosm food chains. Ecology, 76, 13271336.
  • Baldwin, I.T. & Hamilton, W. (2000). Jasmonate-induced responses of Nicotiana sylvestris results in fitness costs due to impaired competitive ability for nitrogen. J. Chem. Ecol., 26, 915952.
  • van Ballen, M. & Sabelis, M.W. (1995). The milker-killer dilemma in spatially structured predator-prey interactions. Oikos, 74, 391400.
  • Bell, G. (2001). Neutral macroecology. Science, 293, 24132418.
  • Bengtsson, J. (1991). Interspecific competition in metapopulations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 42, 219237.
  • Bestelmeyer, B.T. (2000). The trade-off between thermal tolerance and behavioural dominance in a subtropical South American ant community. J. Anim. Ecol., 69, 9981009.
  • Bohannan, B.J.M. & Lenski, R.E. (1999). Effect of prey heterogeneity on the response of a model food chain to resource enrichment. Am. Nat., 153, 7382.
  • Bohannan, B.J.M. & Lenski, R.E. (2000a). The relative importance of competition and predation varies with productivity in a model community. Am. Nat., 156, 329340.
  • Bohannan, B.J.M. & Lenski, R.E. (2000b). Linking genetic change to community evolution: insights from studies of bacteria and bacteriophage. Ecol. Lett., 3, 362377.
  • Bohannan, B.J.M., Kerr, B., Jessup, C.M., Hughes, J.B. & Sandvik, G. (2002). Trade-offs and coexistence in microbial microcosms. Anot. van Leeuw., 81, 107115.
  • Bolker, B.M. & Pacala, S.W. (1999). Spatial moment equations for plant competition: understanding spatial strategies and the advantages of short dispersal. Am. Nat., 153, 575602.
  • Boyce, M.S. (1984). Restitution of r- and K-selection as a model of density-dependent natural selection. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 15, 427447.
  • Brewer, J.S., Rand, T., Levine, J.M. & Bertness, M.D. (1998). Biomass allocation, clonal dispersal, and competitive success in three salt marsh plants. Oikos, 82, 347353.
  • Brooks, J.L. & Dodson, S.I. (1965). Predation, body size and composition of plankton. Science, 150, 2835.
  • Brown, J.H. & Davidson, D.W. (1977). Competition between seed-eating rodents and ants in desert ecosystems. Science, 196, 880882.
  • Buckling, A., Kassen, R., Bell, G. & Rainey, P.B. (2000). Disturbance and diversity in experimental microcosms. Nature, 408, 961964.
  • Caceres, C.E. (1997). Temporal variation, dormancy, and coexistence: A field test of the storage effect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 91719175.
  • Caley, M.J. & Munday, P.L. (2003). Growth rates trade off with habitat specialization. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 270, 175177.
  • Carson, W.P. & Root, R.B. (2000). Herbivory and plant species coexistence: community regulation by an outbreaking phytophagous insect. Ecol. Monogr., 70, 7399.
  • Caswell, H. (1978). Predator-mediated coexistence: a nonequilibrium model. Am. Nat., 112, 127154.
  • Chase, J.M. (2003). Strong and weak trophic cascades along a productivity gradient. Oikos, 101, 187195.
  • Chase, J.M. & Leibold, M.A. (2003). Ecological niches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Chase, J.M., Leibold, M.A. & Simms, E. (2000a). Plant tolerance and resistence in food webs: community-level predictions and evolutionary implications. Evol. Ecol., 14, 289314.
  • Chase, J.M., Leibold, M.A., Downing, A.L. & Shurin, J.B. (2000b). The effects of productivity, herbivory, and plant species turnover in grassland food webs. Ecology, 81, 24852497.
  • Chase, J.M., Wilson, W.G. & Richards, S.A. (2001). Foraging trade-offs and resource patchiness: theory and experiments with a freshwater snail community. Ecol. Lett., 4, 304312.
  • Chase, J.M., Abrams, P.A., Grover, J.P., Diehl, S., Chesson, P., Holt, R.D. et al. (2002). The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis. Ecol. Lett., 5, 302315.
  • Chave, J., Muller-Landau, H.C. & Levin, S.A. (2002). Comparing classical community models: theoretical consequences for patterns of diversity. Am. Nat., 159, 123.
  • Chesson, P. (2000). Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 31, 343366.
  • Chesson, P. & Huntly, N. (1997). The roles of harsh and fluctuating conditions in the dynamics of ecological communities. Am. Nat., 150, 519553.
  • Chesson, P. & Warner, R.R. (1981). Environmental variability promotes coexistence in lottery competitive systems. Am. Nat., 117, 923943.
  • Condit, R., Pitman, N., Leigh, E.G., Jr, Chave, J., Terborgh, J., Foster, R.B. et al. (2002). Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science, 295, 666669.
  • Connell, J.H. (1961). The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of bte barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology, 42, 710723.
  • Cornell, H.V. & Lawton, J.H. (1992). Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities: a theoretical perspective. J. Anim. Ecol., 61, 112.
  • Dunson, W.A. & Travis, J. (1990). The role of abiotic factors in community organization. Am. Nat., 138, 10671091.
  • Enquist, B.J., Haskell, J.P. & Tiffney, B.H. (2002). General patterns of taxanomic and biomass partitioning in extant and fossil plant communities. Nature, 419, 610613.
  • Frank, S.A. & Amarasekare, P. (1998). Increasing resource specialization among competitors shifts control of diversity from local to spatial processes. Ecol. Lett., 1, 35.
  • Fredrickson, A.G. & Stephanopoulos, G. (1981). Microbial competition. Science, 213, 972979.
  • Fritz, R.S. & Simms, E.L. (1992). Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens: Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Futuyma, D.J. & Moreno, G. (1988). The evolution of ecological specialization. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 19, 207233.
  • Gause, G.F. (1934). The Struggle for Existence. Williams and Wilkens, Baltimore.
  • Gleeson, S.K. & Tilman, D. (1990). Allocation and the transient dynamics of succession on poor soils. Ecology, 71, 11441155.
  • Grime, J.P. (1977). Evidence for the existence of three primary strategiew in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat., 111, 11691194.
  • Grover, J.P. (1997). Resource Competition. Chapman and Hall, London.
  • Hanski, I. (1983). Coexistence of competitiors in patchy environment. Ecology, 64, 493500.
  • Hanski, I. & Ranta, E. (1983). Coexistence in a patchy environment: three species of Daphnia in rock pools. J. Anim. Ecol., 52, 263279.
  • Harrison, S., Thomas, C.D. & Lewinsohn, T.M. (1995). Testing a metapopulation model of coexistence in the insect community on ragwort (Senecio jacobaea). Am. Nat., 145, 546562.
  • Hastings, A. (1980). Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theor. Popul. Biol., 18, 363373.
  • Higgins, S.I. & Cain, M.L. (2002). Spatially realistic plant metapopulation models and the colonization-competition trade-off. J. Ecol., 90, 616626.
  • Holmes, E.E. & Wilson, H.B. (1998). Running from trouble: long-distance dispersal and the competitive coexistence of inferior species. Am. Nat., 151, 578586.
  • Holt, R.D., Grover, J. & Tilman, D. (1994). Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. Am. Nat., 144, 741777.
  • Horn, H.S. & MacArthur, R.H. (1972). Competition among fugitive species in a harlequin environment. Ecology, 53, 749752.
  • Hubbell, S.P. (1979). Tree dispersion, abundance and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science, 203, 12991303.
  • Hubbell, S.P. (2001). The Unified Neutral Theory of Species Abundance and Diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Hubbell, S.P., Foster, R.B., O'Brien, S.T., Harms, K.E., Condit, R. Wechsler, B. et al. (1999). Disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest. Science, 283, 554557.
  • Huisman, J. & Weissing, F.J. (1999). Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations. Nature, 402, 407410.
  • Hutchinson, G.E. (1951). Copepodology for the ornithologist. Ecology, 32, 571577.
  • Juliano, S.A., O'Meara, G.F., Morrill, J.R. & Cutwa, M.M. (2002). Desiccation and thermal tolerance of eggs and the coexistence of competing mosquitoes. Oecologia, 130, 458469.
  • Kareiva, P. (1990). Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 330, 175190.
  • Kassen, R., Buckling, A., Bell, G. & Rainey, P.B. (2000). Diversity peaks at intermediate productivity in experimental microcosms. Nature, 406, 508512.
  • Kinzig, A.P., Levin, S.A., Dushoff, J. & Pacala, S. (1999). Limiting similarity, species packing, and system stability for hierarchical competition–colonization models. Am. Nat., 153, 371383.
  • Kneitel, J.M. & Miller, T.E. (2003). Dispersal rates affect species composition in metacommunities of Sarracenia purpurea inquilines. Am. Nat., 162, 165171.
  • Kotler, B.P. & Brown, J.S. (1988). Environmental heterogeneity and the coexistence of desert rodents. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 19, 281307.
  • Kraaijeveld, A.R. & Godfray, H.C.J. (1998). Trade-off between parasitoid resistence and larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature, 389, 278280.
  • Lande, R. (1996). Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos, 76, 513.
  • Lei, G. & Hanski, I. (1998). Spatial dynamics of two competing specialist parasitoids in a host metapopulation. J. Anim. Ecol., 67, 422433.
  • Leibold, M.A. (1989). Resource edibility and the effects of predators and productivity on the outcome of trophic interactions. Am. Nat., 134, 922949.
  • Leibold, M.A. (1996). A graphical model of keystone predators in food webs: trophic regulation of abundance, incidence, and diversity patterns in communities. Am. Nat., 147, 784812.
  • Leibold, M.A. (1999). Biodiversity and nutrient enrichment in pond plankton communities. Evol. Ecol. Res., 1, 7395.
  • Levin, S.A. (1970). Community equilibria and stability, and an extension of the competitive exclusion principle. Am. Nat., 104, 413423.
  • Levine, J.M. & Rees, M. (2002). Coexistence and relative abundance in annual plant assemblages: the roles of competition and colonization. Am. Nat., 160, 452467.
  • Levins, R. & Culver, D. (1971). Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 68, 12461248.
  • Lewis, S.M. (1986). The role of herbivorous fishes in the organization of a Caribbean reef community. Ecol. Monogr., 56, 183200.
  • Loreau, M. (2000). Are communities saturated? On the relationship between α,β, and γ diversity. Ecol. Lett., 3, 7376.
  • Loreau, M. & Mouquet, N. (1999). Immigration and the maintenance of local species diversity. Am. Nat., 154, 427440.
  • Losos, J.B. (1996). Phylogenetic perspectives on community ecology. Ecology, 77, 13441354.
  • Losos, J.B., Leal, M., Glor, R.E., de Queiroz, K., Hertz, P.E., Rodriguez Schettino, L. et al. (2003). Niche lability in the evolution of Caribbean lizard community. Nature, 424, 542545.
  • MacArthur, R.H. (1972). Geographical Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • MacArthur, R.H. & Levins, R. (1964). Competition, habitat selection, and character displacement. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 51, 12071210.
  • MacArthur, R.H. & Wilson, E.O. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • McGill, B.J. (2003). A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature, 422, 881885.
  • McPeek, M.A. (1996). Trade-offs, food web structure, and the coexistence of habitat specialists and generalists. Am. Nat., 148, S124S138.
  • McPeek, M.A. (1998). The consequences of changing the top predator in a food web: a comparative experimental approach. Ecol. Monogr., 68, 123.
  • McPeek, M.A. & Brown, J.M. (2000). Building a regional species pool: diversification of the Enallagma damselflies in eastern North America. Ecology, 81, 904920.
  • Marino, P.C. (1991a). Competition between mosses (Splachnaceae) in patchy habitats. J. Ecol., 79, 10311046.
  • Marino, P.C. (1991b). Dispersal and coexistence of mosses (Splachnaceae) in patchy habitats. J. Ecol., 79, 10471060.
  • Marshall, S.D., Walker, S.E. & Rypstra, A.L. (2000). A test for a differential colonization and competitive ability in two generalist predators. Ecology, 81, 33413349.
  • Miller, T.E. & Kneitel, J.M. (in press). Inquiline communitie in pitcher-plants as a prototypical metacommunity. In: Metacommunities (eds Holyoak, M., Holt, R. & Leibold, M.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Morin, P.J. (1983). Predation, competition, and composition of larval anuran guilds. Ecol. Monogr., 53, 119138.
  • Mouquet, N. & Loreau, M. (2002). Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. Am. Nat., 159, 420426.
  • Mouquet, N. & Loreau, M. (2003). Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. Am. Nat., 162, 544557.
  • Mouquet, N., Hoopes, M.F. & Amarasekare, P. (in press). The world is patchy and heterogeneous! Trade-off dynamics in competitive metacommunities. In: Metacommunities (eds Holyoak, M., Holt, R. & Leibold, M.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Nakajima, T. & Kurihara, Y. (1994). Evolutionary changes of ecological traits of bacterial populations through predator-mediated competition. 1. Experimental analysis. Oikos, 71, 2434.
  • Nee, S. & May, R.M. (1992). Dynamics of metapopulations: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. J. Anim. Ecol., 61, 3740.
  • Norris, S. (2003). Neutral theory: a new, unified model for ecology. Bioscience, 53, 124129.
  • Pacala, S.W. & Rees, M. (1998). Models suggesting field experiments to test two hypotheses explaining successional diversity. Am. Nat., 152, 729737.
  • Paine, R.T. (1966). Food web complexity and species diversity. Am. Nat., 100, 6575.
  • Pake, C.E. & Venable, D.L. (1995). Is coexistence in Sonoran desert annuals mediated by temporal variability in reproductive success? Ecology, 76, 246261.
  • Pake, C.E. & Venable, D.L. (1996). Seed banks in desert annuals: Implications for persistence and coexistence in a variable environment? Ecology, 77, 14271435.
  • Peacor, S.D. & Werner, E.E. (2001). The contribution of trait-mediated indirect effects to the net effects of a predator. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 39043908.
  • Petraitis, P.S., Latham, R.E. & Niesenbaum, R.A. (1989). The maintenance of species diversity by disturbance. Quart. Rev. Biol., 64, 393418.
  • Pianka, E.R. (1970). On r- and K-selection. Am. Nat., 104, 592597.
  • Rabinowitz, D.A. & Rapp, J.K. (1981). Dispersal abilities of seven sparse and common grasses from a Missouri prairie. Am. J. Bot., 68, 616624.
  • Rainey, P.B. & Travisano, M. (1998). Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature, 394, 6972.
  • Ricklefs, R.E. (1987). Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science, 235, 161171.
  • Ricklefs, R.E. & Schluter, D. (1993). Species Diversity in Ecological Communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Ritchie, M.E., Tilman, D. & Knops, J.M.H. (1998). Herbivore effects on plant and nitrogen dynamics in oak savanna. Ecology, 79, 165177.
  • Rothhaupt, K.O. (1988). Mechanistic resource competition theory applied to laboratory experiments with zooplankton. Nature, 333, 660662.
  • Schmitz, O.J. (1998). Direct and indirect effects of predation and predation risk in old- field interaction webs. Am. Nat., 151, 327342.
  • Sevenster, J.G. & van Alphen, J.J.M. (1993). A life history trade-off in Drosophila species and community structure in variable environments. J. Anim. Ecol., 62, 720736.
  • Shikano, S., Luckinbill, L.S. & Kurchara, G. (1990). Changes of traits in a bacterial population associated with protozoa predation. Microb. Ecol., 20, 7584.
  • Shurin, J.B. (2001). Interactive effects of predation and dispersal on zooplankton communities. Ecology, 82, 34043416.
  • Shurin, J.B. & Allen, E.G. (2001). Effects of competition, predation, and dispersal on species richness at local and regional scales. Am. Nat., 158, 624637.
  • Silvertown, J., Dodd, M.E., Gowing, D. & Mountford, O. (1999). Hydrologically-defined niches reveal a basis for species-richness in plant communities. Nature, 400, 6163.
  • Silvertown, J., Dodd, M. & Gowing, D. (2001). Phylogeny and the niche structure of meadow plant communities. J. Ecology, 89, 428435.
  • Simberloff, D. (1983). Competition theory, hypothesis-testing, and other community ecological buzzwords. Am. Nat., 122, 626635.
  • Skellam, J.G. (1951). Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika, 38, 196218.
  • Slatkin, M. (1974). Competition and regional coexistence. Ecology, 55, 128134.
  • Sokolowski, M.B. (1980). Foraging strategies of Drosophila melanogastor: a chromosomal analysis. Behav. Genet., 10, 291302.
  • Sommer, U. (1985). Comparison between steady state and non-steady state competition: experiments with natural phytoplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr., 30, 335346.
  • Sommer, U. (1993). Phytoplankton competition in Pluβ see: a field test of the resource- ratio hypothesis. Limnol. Oceanogr., 38, 838845.
  • Sommer, U. (1994). The impact of light intensity and daylength on silicate and nitrate competition among marine phytoplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr., 39, 16801688.
  • Stearns, S.C. (1989). Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Funct. Ecol., 3, 259268.
  • Steiner, C.F. (2003). Keystone predator effects and grazer control of planktonic primary production. Oikos, 101, 569577.
  • Strauss, S.Y. & Agrawal, A.A. (1999). The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol., 14, 179185.
  • Strong, D.R., Simberloff, D., Abele, L.G. & Thistle, A.B. (1984). Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Tessier, A.J. & Woodruff, P. (2002). Trading off the ability to exploit rich versus poor food quality. Ecol. Lett., 5, 685692.
  • Thompson, J.N., Reichman, O.J., Morin, P.J., Polis, G.A., Power, M.E., Sterner, R.W. et al. (2001). Frontiers of Ecology. BioScience, 51, 1524.
  • Tiffin, P. (2000). Are tolerance, avoidance, and antibiosis evolutionarily and ecologically equivalent responses of plants to herbivores? Am. Nat., 155, 128138.
  • Tilman, D. (1982). Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Tilman, D. (1988). Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Tilman, D. (1990). Constraints and tradeoffs: toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos, 58, 315.
  • Tilman, D. (1994). Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology, 75, 216.
  • Tilman, D. (2000). Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity. Nature, 405, 208211.
  • Tilman, D. & Kareiva, P. (1997). Spatial Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Tilman, D. & Pacala, S. (1993). The maintenance or species richness in plant communities. In: Species Diversity in Ecological Communities (eds Ricklefs, R.E. & Schluter, D.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 1325.
  • Tuomisto, H., Ruokolainen, K. & Ylia-Halla, M. (2003). Dispersal, environment, and floristic variation of western Amazonian forests. Science, 299, 24142244.
  • Turnbull, L.A., Rees, M. & Crawley, M.J. (1999). Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade-off: a sowing experiment. J. Ecol., 87, 899912.
  • Uriate, M., Canham, C.D. & Root, R.B. (2002). A model of simultaneous evolution of competitive ability and herbivore resistance in a perennial plant. Ecology, 83, 26492663.
  • Vance, R.R. (1978). Predation and resource partitioning in one predator-two prey model communities. Am. Nat., 112, 797813.
  • Vincent, T.L.S., Scheel, D., Brown, J.S. & Vincent, T.L. (1996). Trade-offs and coexistence in consumer-resource models: it all depends on what and where you eat. Am. Nat., 148, 10381058.
  • Volkov, I., Banavar, J.R., Hubbell, S.P. & Maritan, A. (2003). Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature, 424, 10351037.
  • Wang, Z.-L., Wang, F.-Z., Chen, S. & Zhu, M.-Y. (2002). Competition and cexistence in regional habitats. Am. Nat., 159, 498508.
  • Warner, R.R. & Chesson, P.L. (1985). Coexistence mediated by recruitment fluctuations: a field guide to the storage effect. Am. Nat., 125, 769787.
  • Webb, C.O., Ackerly, D.A., McPeek, M.A. & Donoghue, M.J. (2002). Phylogenies and community ecology. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 33, 475505.
  • Wedin, D.A. & Tilman, D. (1993). Competition among grasses along a nitrogen gradient: initial conditions and mechanisms of competition. Ecol. Monogr., 63, 199229.
  • Wellborn, G.A., Skelly, D.K. & Werner, E.E. (1996). Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 27, 337363.
  • Werner, P.A. & Platt, W.J. (1976). Ecological relationships of co-occurring goldenrods (Soldiago: Compositae). Am Nat., 110, 959971.
  • Whitfield, J. (2002). Ecology: neutrality versus the niche. Nature, 417, 480481.
  • Whittaker, R.H. (1972). Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21, 213251.
  • Whittaker, R.H. & Levin, S.A. (1977). The role of mosaic phenomenon in natural communities. Theor. Popul. Biol., 12, 117139.
  • Wilson, D.S. (1992). Complex interactions in metacommunities, with implications for biodiversity and higher levels of selection. Ecology, 73, 19842000.
  • Wilson, W.G., Osenberg, C.W., Schmitt, R.J. & Nisbet, R. (1999). Complementary foraging behavior allows coexistence of two grazers. Ecology, 80, 23582372.
  • Wilson, W.G., Lundberg, P., Vázquez, D.P., Shurin, J.B., Smith, M.D., Langford, W. et al. (2003). Biodiversity and species interactions: extending Lotka-Volterra community theory. Ecol. Lett., 6, 944952.
  • Yoshida, T., Jones, L.E., Ellner, S.P., Fussmann, G.F., Hairston, N.G. (2003). Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator-prey system. Nature, 424, 303306.
  • Yu, D. & Wilson, H.B. (2001). The competition–colonization trade-off is dead; long live the competition–colonization trade-off. Am. Nat., 158, 4963.
  • Yu, D.W., Wilson, H.B. & Pierce, N.E. (2001). An empirical model of species coexistence in a spatially structured environment. Ecology, 82, 17611771.
  • Zera, A.J. & Harshman, L.G. (2001). The physiology of life history trade-offs in animals. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 32, 95126.