The hidden lifestyles of Bacillus cereus and relatives

Authors


E-mail gbj@ami.dk; Tel. (+45) 3916 5244; Fax (+45) 3916 5201.

Summary

Bacillus cereus sensu lato, the species group comprising Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus thuringiensis and B. cereus (sensu stricto), has previously been scrutinized regarding interspecies genetic correlation and pathogenic characteristics. So far, little attention has been paid to analysing the biological and ecological properties of the three species in their natural environments. In this review, we describe the B. cereus sensu lato living in a world on its own; all B. cereus sensu lato can grow saprophytically under nutrient-rich conditions, which are only occasionally found in the environment, except where nutrients are actively collected. As such, members of the B. cereus group have recently been discovered as common inhabitants of the invertebrate gut. We speculate that all members disclose symbiotic relationships with appropriate invertebrate hosts and only occasionally enter a pathogenic life cycle in which the individual species infects suitable hosts and multiplies almost unrestrained.

Introduction

The Bacillus cereus group, a very homogeneous cluster within the Bacillus genus, comprises six recognized species: B. cereus, B. thuringiensis, B. anthracis, B. mycoides, B. pseudomycoides and B. weihenstephanensis. These species are closely related, but their precise phylogenetic and taxonomic relationships are still debated. Recent data based on multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MEE) (Helgason et al., 2000) and DNA sequence variations of the 16S−23S internal transcribed spacers (Daffonchio et al., 2000) suggested that B. anthracis, B. thuringiensis and B. cereus sensu stricto are members of a single species, B. cereus sensu lato. Whereas intensive work has been performed to decipher their genetic relationship (Harrell et al., 1995; Helgason et al., 2000; Hansen et al., 2001; Chen and Tsen, 2002), less attention has been paid to comparing the biological and ecological properties of the three species in their natural environments. The main purpose of this review is to elucidate the ecological and biological properties of B. cereus, i.e. the three species B. anthracis, B. thuringiensis and B. cereus, with special focus on interactions with other organisms. Furthermore, to the extent of the limited information available, the species B. mycoides, B. pseudomycoides and B. weihenstephanensis are also included in this analysis.

Properties of Bacillus anthracis

Bacillus anthracis is the causative agent of anthrax, which is primarily a disease in mammals, including man (for recent reviews, see Mock and Fouet, 2001). Apart from being one of the oldest known diseases, described as one of the Egyptian plagues in the time of Moses, many of the ecological and epidemiological questions about anthrax are still unanswered. Anthrax has been linked with endemic soil environments long before B. anthracis was identified as the causative agent (Rayer, 1850; Davaine, 1863).

The virulence of B. anthracis is based on the presence of two virulence plasmids, pXO1 (181.7 kbp) and pXO2 (94.8 kbp). The plasmid pXO1 encodes three toxic factors: the protective antigen (PA), the lethal factor (LF) and the oedema factor (EF) (Bhatnagar and Batra, 2001). These components associate into two bipartite exotoxins, PA-LF and PA-EF. The plasmid pXO2 encodes a poly D glutamic acid capsule enabling the bacterium to withstand phagocytosis. The loss of pXO2 renders the cells incapable of establishing an infection, i.e. the bacterium becomes attenuated, a trait that is the basis of the Sterne vaccine strain. Both plasmids have been sequenced recently (Okinaka et al., 1999a,b).

Current models of B. anthracis ecology rely on its pathogenicity, i.e. the spores are ingested by herbivores, the animals becomes infected, and the bacteria proliferate in the lymphoid glands concomitantly expressing the exotoxins, which ultimately leads to the death of the animal (see Fig. 1). Once the animal is dead, the vegetative cells of B. anthracis, having reached a serum concentration of> 107 cells ml−1, will be outcompeted by anaerobic bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract through antagonistic interactions (Dragon and Rennie, 1995). The environmental fate of the spore is not known in detail. The spores will survive ‘indefinitely’ in dry and protected environments. However, exposure to sunlight for 4 h has a significant negative effect on the survival of the spores (Lindeque and Turnbull, 1994). Furthermore, photoinduced repair of UV damage is absent in B. anthracis spores of the Sterne vaccine strain (Knudson, 1986). A few reports stated that spores could actually germinate in nature when conditions are favourable. Van Ness (1971) reported that soil pH above 6.0 and temperatures above 15.5°C favour outbreaks of anthrax. The term ‘incubator areas’ has been introduced to describe puddles in which decaying grass and other organic matter constitute the nutrients necessary for the germination of B. anthracis spores. However, the study by Van Ness (1971) did not show actual growth of B. anthracis in these incubator areas, and other studies indicated that B. anthracis has very specific growth requirements, making it very unlikely for the spores to germinate outside a host (Minett and Dhanda, 1941). It is also noteworthy that growth of B. anthracis outside a host often leads to loss of virulence caused by loss of the plasmid carrying the capsule gene (pXO2) – an argument that further reduces the incubator area theory. As a consequence, Dragon and Rennie (1995) renamed the areas ‘storage areas’.

Figure 1.

An illustration of the known pathogenic life cycles of B. anthracis and B. thuringiensis. Although a human pathogen, B. cereus has not been shown to enter a pathogenic life cycle similar to those of B. anthracis and B. thuringiensis.

Tabaniid flies (horse and deer flies from, for instance, the genera Tabanus and Chrysops) have been reported to disseminate anthrax and to excrete B. anthracis in their faeces up to 13 days (the average lifetime of adult tabaniid flies) after initial feeding on animals infected with anthrax (Khrisna Rao and Mohiyudeen, 1958). These flies have also shown ability to transmit anthrax even after subsequent feeding on uninfected hosts (Krinsky, 1976). In an experiment with radioactive-labelled blood from an impala carcass, Braack and De Vos (1990) were able to show that the faeces of carrion-feeding blowflies (Diptera, Family Calliphoridae) were deposited in the vicinity of the carcass on leaves and twigs. The kudu antelopes in South Africa normally eat leaves and twigs and could therefore be more at risk of acquiring anthrax disseminated this way. Moreover, these browsers are normally severely affected in anthrax epizootic episodes. In laboratory experiments, stable flies and mosquitoes have been shown to transmit B. anthracis after feeding on infected animals (Turell and Knudson, 1987). Also, faeces samples collected from scavengers in the Etosha National Park in Namibia revealed B. anthracis spores in more than half the samples (Lindeque and Turnbull, 1994), indicating a possible route of dissemination. Furthermore, the same study showed a rapid decline in shed, vegetative bacilli, and failed to demonstrate multiplication of B. anthracis in the environment.

Properties of Bacillus thuringiensis

Bacillus thuringiensis is generally regarded as an insect pathogen, because of its ability to produce large crystal protein inclusions (δ-endotoxins) during sporulation, the only feature that can distinguish B. thuringiensis from B. cereus (Baumann et al., 1984). These inclusions, which constitute up to 25% of the dry weight of the sporulated cells (Agaisse and Lereclus, 1995), are responsible for the biopesticide activity of the bacterium and its target specificity (van Rie et al., 1990) (see Fig. 1). The genes encoding the insecticidal proteins are generally located on large transferable plasmids (Kronstad et al., 1983; González and Carlton, 1984). The B. thuringiensis denomination actually comprises a considerable number of isolates covering a broad range of toxins active against larvae from different insect orders, especially Lepidoptera, Diptera and Coleoptera. At present, more than 235 delta-endotoxin gene sequences have been described ( Crickmore et al., 2002), and 82 different serotypes have been reported (Lecadet et al., 1999). The numbers of delta-endotoxin genes are thought to grow steadily as most B. thuringiensis strains carry more than one delta-endotoxin gene. Furthermore, several B. thuringiensis strains are known to produce vegetative insecticidal proteins (VIPs). Unlike the δ-endotoxins, the expression of which is restricted to sporulation, VIPs are expressed in the vegetative stage of growth starting at mid-log phase as well as during sporulation.

Although B. thuringiensis is an insect pathogen, the ecology of the bacteria is still somewhat of an enigma. According to Martin and Travers (1989), B. thuringiensis is a ubiquitous soil microorganism, but it is also found in environmental niches, including phylloplane and insects. Descriptions of natural epizootic episodes are very rare but were reported in the first observation of B. thuringiensis by Ishiwata (Milner, 1994), in water mills (Vankova and Purrini, 1979), in a corn crop (Porcar and Caballero, 2000) and in mosquito breeding habitats (Damgaard, 2000). In addition to being organized into a structured parasporal crystal, the δ-endotoxins can also be embedded in the spore wall. Du and Nickerson (1996) found that germination of spores of B. thuringiensis ssp. kurstaki HD-73 with Cry1Ac embedded in the spore coat could be activated by alkaline conditions, whereas selected Cry-negative B. thuringiensis ssp. kurstaki HD-73 could not. Furthermore, cry+ spores could bind to toxin receptors in brush border membrane preparations, a binding that also stimulated spore germination (Du and Nickerson, 1996). This phenomenon may, in part, explain the evolutionary advantage of possessing δ-endotoxins, namely the ability for B. thuringiensis to germinate faster than B. cereus and thus have a greater chance to proliferate and dominate in an insect gut, even in the absence of the crystalline δ-endotoxins. It is important to note, however, that δ-endotoxins have, per se, no apparent antimicrobial effect for enhancing colonization efficacy (Koskella and Stotzky, 2002).

Several facts and/or premises on the ecological niche occupied by B. thuringiensis have been reported: (i) B. thuringiensis does not grow in soil, but is deposited there by insects (Glare and O’Callaghan, 2000); (ii) B. thuringiensis may grow in soil when nutrient conditions are favourable (Saleh et al., 1970); and (iii) it occupies the same niche as B. cereus; (iv) vegetative B. thuringiensis proliferates in the gut of earthworms, leather jacket larvae and in plant rhizospheres (Hendriksen and Hansen, 2002); (v) multiplication of B. thuringiensis occurs in insects weakened by the presence of other pathogens (Eilenberg et al., 2000), and (vi) germinating B. thuringiensis ssp. israelensis were found in excreted food vacuoles of protozoa (Manasherob et al., 1998).

These different possibilities are not mutually exclusive. It is conceivable that B. thuringiensis is a natural inhabitant of the intestinal systems of certain insects, with or without provoking disease and eventually death. Thus, the bacterium is able to be released in soil and can subsequently proliferate when conditions are propitious. Hansen and Salamitou (2000) hypothesized that B. thuringiensis is a natural inhabitant of the digestion system of many invertebrates. As such, if the animal is diseased, the B. thuringiensis present in the digestion system can start to grow in the dying/dead carcass. As nutrients become limited, sporulation occurs, along with the production of δ-endotoxins. These spores and toxins can then contribute to a local epizootic in dense populations of target organisms. The presence of B. thuringiensis in the intestine of mammals is transient, indicating that the food of these animals has varying contents of B. thuringiensis (Swiecicka et al., 2002). Along the same lines, long-term sheep feeding with B. thuringiensis-based biopesticide preparations (≈ 1012 spores daily for 5 months) did not harm the animals (Hadley et al., 1987). Furthermore, recent studies of faecal samples from greenhouse workers did not show adverse effects after exposure to B. thuringiensis (Jensen et al., 2002)

Rhizoid-growing and psychrotolerant bacteria

Rhizoid growth is characterized by the production of colonies with filaments or root-like structures that may extend several centimetres from the site of inoculation. Relatively few data are available on the rhizoid-growing bacteria B. mycoides and B. pseudomycoides, and more specifically on their ecology. As for the other members of the B. cereus group, they have been isolated from various environmental niches, including manured soils (Klimanek and Greilich, 1976), activated sludge, arthropod guts (C. Vannieuwenburgh and J. Mahillon, unpublished results) or plant rhizosphere, where they are thought to have antagonistic activity against fungal species (Pandey et al., 2001). Similarly, inhibition of the pathogen Listeria monocytogenes by putative B. mycoides has also been reported in silage (Irvin, 1969). Although the rhizoid growth is characteristic of B. mycoides, non-rhizoid variants have been described; in a study of environmental isolates of B. mycoides by von Wintzingerode et al. (1997), it was found that fatty acid analysis identified the majority of the isolates as B. mycoides even though they lacked the characteristic rhizoid growth. Even less information has been gathered on B. weihenstephanensis, which regroups part of the psychrotolerant B. cereus isolates (Lechner et al., 1998; Stenfors and Granum, 2001), except for their wide distribution in natural habitats (von Stetten et al., 1999).

The hidden life cycle of B. cereus

One major consequence of the lack of knowledge on the ecology of B. cereus is that pleomorphism of B. cereus has not been given much attention. This could result partly from the general notion of modern microbiologists that bacteria only occasionally show slight morphological variation. In the very early days of microbiology, the study of microorganisms was almost exclusively restricted to microscopical observations and, hence, surprisingly detailed observations were made then.

Bacillus cereus is a well-known food poisoning bacterium. B. cereus causes two distinct types of food poisoning, characterized either by diarrhoea and abdominal pain (diarrhoeal syndrome) or by nausea and vomiting (emetic syndrome). The latter has often been associated with fried rice. Apart from food poisoning cases, there are only a few reports on intestinal carriage of B. cereus. Turnbull and Kramer (1985) reported seasonal changes in the isolation of B. cereus ranging from 24.3% in the winter to 43% in the summer from faecal samples from 120 school children. Ghosh (1978) reported the presence of B. cereus in 100 samples from 711 adults (14%). Both papers stated that, because of the omnipresence of B. cereus in many food products, the bacteria are inevitably ingested in small numbers and thus contribute to the transitory intestinal flora.

A place to look for this bacterium in its natural niche is the gut microflora of invertebrates. In certain arthropods, the ‘intestinal stage’ of B. cereus has been shown to be filamentous, the so-called Arthromitus stage. In fact, this filamentous stage of the bacterium was discovered in different soil-dwelling arthropods as early as 1849 (Leidy, 1849). The filamentous forms of B. cereus have been studied in continuous cultures (Wahren et al., 1967) and have lately been proposed as the normal intestinal stage of B. cereus sensu lato in soil-dwelling insects (Margulis et al., 1998). Furthermore, colonization of mosquito larvae and various soil-dwelling pests by B. cereus has been observed (Feinberg et al., 1999; Luxananil et al., 2001; Wenzel et al., 2002) (see Fig. 1).

Other circumstantial evidence supports the data on B. cereus colonization of insect gut systems. In aphids, Dasch et al. (1984) reported that the introduction of penicillin had little effect on growth and, as evident from Table 1, the majority of the members of the B. cereus group are known to produce β-lactamases. In one case, the symbiont of Cletus signatus (a hemipteran insect) is identified as B. cereus var. signatus (Singh, 1974). A high frequency of vegetative B. cereus and B. mycoides has been found in the gut of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris (B. M. Hansen and N. B. Hendriksen, unpublished results).

Table 1. . Selected phenotypic, genotypic and ecological features of B. anthracis, B. thuringiensis and B. cereus.
 B. anthracisB. thuringiensisB. cereus
  • a

    . Note that at least four distinct haemolytic protein complexes can participate in the haemolytic activity.

Phenotype
 Penicillin resistant
 (β-lactamase production)
11% of tested B. anthracis strains showed resistance to penicillin G (Cavallo et al., 2002)Yes1% of tested strains showed no resistance to ampicillin (Rusul and Yaacob, 1995)
 Haemolytic activity a
 (on sheep erythrocytes)
Weak haemolysis by some strains of B. anthracis (Drobniewski, 1993; Guttmann and Ellar, 2000)YesFew haemolysis-negative mutants have been isolated
 MotilityIsolated monoflagellar B. anthracis have been described (Liang and Yu, 1999). Occasional motile strains (Brown and Cherry, 1955)Spontaneous flagella-minus mutants of B. thuringiensis can be readily isolated4% of tested strains showed no motility (Logan and Berkeley, 1984). Occasional isolation of non-motile variants (Brown and Cherry, 1955)
 Crystalline parasporal
 inclusions
No6% of tested strains showed no inclusions (Logan and Berkeley, 1984)No
 Mucoid colony
 (capsule synthesis)
YesNoNo
 Gamma phage sensitivitySeveral rare B. anthracis are refractory (Abshire et al., 2001)NoB. cereus ATCC4342 susceptible (Abshire et al., 2001)
 Chitinase activityActivity was not found in B. anthracisGuttmann and Ellar, 2000)YesYes
Genotype
 pXO1YesSequence homology to pBtoxis of Bt ssp israelensis (Berry et al., 2002) B. cereus (ATCC 43881) shows high homology to an unknown ORF of pXO1 (co-ordinates 121815–122327) (Okinaka et al., 1999b; Pannucci et al., 2002)
IS231 from Bt ssp. finitimus found in pXO1 (Okinaka et al., 1999b) 
B. thuringiensis ssp. kurstaki (ATCC 33679) shows high homology to an unknown ORF in pXO1 (base numbers 121815–122327) (Okinaka et al., 1999b; Pannucci et al., 2002) 
 pXO2Growth of B. anthracis outside a host often leads to loss of pXO2The replicons of pAW63 from Bt ssp. kurstaki are almost identical to that of pXO2 (Wilcks et al., 1999) 
 Phospholipase C+
(Mignot et al., 2001; G. B. Jensen, unpublished results)
++
 nheA gene (accession  no. Y19005)+
(Mignot et al., 2001; G. B. Jensen, unpublished results)
++
Ecology
 Host range
 (toxin specific)
VertebratesInvertebrates
Specific toxins are only active against a limited number of related invertebrate hosts
Not known
 DistributionWorldwide, but many areas not yet studiedWorldwide, but lack of success in isolating in Antarctica (Wasano et al., 1999)Worldwide
 Prevalence in hostsEndemic in Africa/AsiaGenerally low natural levels of infection, occasional epidemics among mosquitoes and insects in stored product environment (Milner, 1994)Present in invertebrates (gut system), but not regarded as a disease of invertebrates

Gene transfer in the environment

Interestingly, earthworms are known to contribute to gene transfer activity with gut passage being a prerequisite for DNA transfer (Daane et al., 1996; Thimm et al., 2001). Other insects have been shown to promote gene transfer, and transfer of B. thuringiensis plasmids has been observed in lepidopteran larvae (Jarrett and Stephenson, 1990; Thomas et al., 2000; 2001). It is therefore tempting to envisage the continuous exchange of B. thuringiensis plasmids, as these phenotype/virulence plasmids are easily transferable by transduction, mobilization or conjugation (Reddy et al., 1987; Green et al., 1989; Stepanov et al., 1989; Jensen et al., 1996). The actual exchange of DNA is further corroborated by the data presented in Table 1, e.g. the replicon of the virulence plasmid pXO2 is almost identical to the replicon found on the conjugative plasmid pAW63 from B. thuringiensis ssp. kurstaki HD-73 (Wilcks et al., 1999). Other genotypical features such as the presence of genetic markers for phospholipase C and non-haemolytic enterotoxin genes characteristic of B. cereus further substantiate the close relationship among these species. Furthermore, serotyping of B. thuringiensis has revealed that the number of cross-reacting H-antigens among B. cereus strains is increasing (Lecadet et al., 1999).

However, the case of B. anthracis has its own particularities. It now seems likely that B. anthracis does not simply stem from the superposition of the virulence genes borne by the pXO1 and pXO2 plasmids on the chromosomic background of an opportunistic bacteria, B. cereus. Recent studies have indeed indicated that the ‘emergence’ of B. anthracis as a specialized animal and human pathogen has most probably proceeded through a stepwise, reciprocal adaptation between its chromosomal and extrachromosomal genomes (Mignot, 2002). This has resulted in a finely tuned gene regulation of different operons and regulons, such as those involved in sporulation/germination, haemolytic activity, capsule formation or exotoxin expression. These complex genomic cross-talks are thought to be mediated by an arsenal of gene regulators, among which are the plasmid-encoded PagR and AtxA (Guignot et al., 1997; Mignot et al., 2001; Mignot, 2002). For instance, the pleiotrophic regulator PlcR that regulates several virulence functions in B. cereus (Gohar et al., 2002) is inactive in B. anthracis because of a nonsense mutation. The introduction of a functional PlcR in B. anthracis activates several B. cereus-like virulence functions, which are not normally expressed in B. anthracis (Mignot et al., 2001). This is in agreement with the data of Bonventre (1965), who found that, in contrast to B. cereus, filtrates from liquid cultures of B. anthracis were not toxic to animal tissue culture cells.

Table 1 lists the textbook characteristics of each member of the B. cereus group together with exceptions found in the literature. These data are intended to display both the close relationship among the species and, subsequently, the possible pitfalls of data misinterpretation. Thus, B. anthracis seems to constitute a narrow group of highly similar strains, which have only recently been distinguished genetically (Jackson et al., 1999; Ticknor et al., 2001). Consequently, and as the most significant differences are plasmid encoded, it seems appropriate to (p)reserve the name B. anthracis for B. cereus strains possessing the pXO1 and pXO2 plasmids. Likewise, emetic B. cereus strains constitute a narrow group of bacteria, most of which belong to the B. cereus H-1 serotype. Furthermore, strains that produce the emetic toxin do not show expression of enterotoxins and starch hydrolytic activity (Agata et al., 1996; Pirttijarvi et al., 2000).

Conclusion

The presence of B. anthracis in both vultures and various biting insects reveals multiple routes of recycling of B. anthracis. Whether there is de facto colonization of the intestinal systems of both the vultures and the insects or the observations cited here resulted from transient exposures resulting from feeding habits is still debatable. However, the carnivorous nature of the Tabanus larvae may equip the adult fly with an intestinal flora comprising any member(s) of the B. cereus group and, although much of the data on anthrax transmission by tabaniid flies is experimental, the importance of tabaniid flies in natural outbreaks is conceivable. According to previously presented data, B. cereus can enter a filamentous stage in which it colonizes a variety of insects. In this context, it is suggested, as illustrated in Fig. 2, that members of the B. cereus group experience two types of life cycles: one in which the bacteria live in a symbiotic relation with their invertebrate host(s) and another, more infrequent life cycle, in which the bacteria can multiply rapidly in another and infected host (invertebrate or vertebrate). The relationship between the two types of life cycle has not yet been documented experimentally, but some indications exist. In the case of a pathogenic relationship, the invertebrate host from the symbiotic relationship becomes the vector of the disease.

Figure 2.

A supposed model in which the members of the B. cereus group experience two life cycles: one type in which the bacteria live in a symbiotic relation with their invertebrate host(s) and another, more infrequent life cycle, in which the bacteria can multiply rapidly in another infected insect host or a mammal.

For example, a recent study showed that female mosquitoes are attracted to culture filtrates of B. thuringiensis for ovipositioning (Poonam et al., 2002). It is possible that these and other insects could have a preference for ovipositioning in areas where B. thuringiensis is frequently located, i.e. soil (Martin and Travers, 1989), activated sludge (Mizuki et al., 2001), water (Ichimatsu et al., 2000; Maeda et al., 2000) and the ‘storage areas’ mentioned earlier, subsequently giving the larvae a possibility of being fitted with an intestinal flora consisting of members of the B. cereus group. These bacteria can then provide their host with enhanced capabilities, for instance degrading cellulose (Wenzel et al., 2002).

Further studies on the ecology of B. anthracis, B. cereus and B. thuringiensis will hopefully not only shed light on the working models proposed here. They will also enable us to set up better controlling programmes that could cope with different objectives. One objective is to avoid B. anthracis outbreaks especially in risk areas. Other objectives are to improve the biotechnological use of B. thuringiensis and consequently obtain better control of insect pests.

Although experimental evidence is still missing, it is likely that the rhizoid-growing bacteria share part of the horizontal gene pool of the B. cereus senso lato group, using plasmid conjugation, phage transduction or DNA transformation. Consequently, it remains to be seen whether, and how, these still cryptic bacteria participate, directly or indirectly, in the various life cycles of the other members of the B. cereus group.

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Tâm Mignot for his inspiring PhD thesis. We are thankful to Lars Andrup for fruitful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. J.M. is a research associate at the National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS, Belgium).

Ancillary