Optimizing insulin delivery: assessment of three strategies in intensive diabetes management
Article first published online: 25 DEC 2001
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Volume 2, Issue 5, pages 299–305, October 2000
How to Cite
Kalergis, M., Pacaud, D., Strychar, I., Meltzer, S., Jones, P. J. H. and Yale, J. .-F. (2000), Optimizing insulin delivery: assessment of three strategies in intensive diabetes management. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2: 299–305. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1326.2000.00107.x
- Issue published online: 25 DEC 2001
- Article first published online: 25 DEC 2001
- Received 18 November 1999; revised version accepted 2 April 2000
- intensive management;
- carbohydrate counting;
- carbohydrate ratios
Objective To compare three intensive management strategies with respect to metabolic control (glycated haemoglobin, preprandial blood glucose, lipid profile, body weight, hypoglycaemic episodes) and psycho-social adaptation (quality of life, self-efficacy, stress and perceived complexity).
Research Design and Methods: Fifteen adults with type 1 diabetes completed this 1-year, randomized, prospective, cross-over study. The three treatment strategies were categorized according to flexibility with insulin self-adjustments as follows: Simplified (SIMP) = meal plan based on food exchanges with no self-adjustments of insulin for food, exercise and stress; Qualitative (QUAL) = meal plan based on food exchanges with qualitative adjustment of insulin for food, exercise and stress; Quantitative (QUANT) = meal plan using carbohydrate counting with quantitative adjustment of insulin for food and qualitative adjustment for exercise and stress. All three strategies allowed for adjustments of insulin for preprandial blood glucose and the option of adjusting diet for exercise. All subjects followed each strategy for 3.5 months.
Subjects kept detailed log sheets where they recorded preprandial blood glucose, insulin dosages, food intake, activity and stress level at least four times/day. The psycho-social aspects were determined with validated questionnaires that were completed before and after each strategy.
Results There were no statistically significant differences in metabolic control, quality of life and self-efficacy between the three strategies. The mean (± s.e.) for HbA1 levels (normal < 8.5%) were: Baseline: 10.9 ± 0.06 and End of SIMP = 9.7 ± 0.03; QUAL = 9.5 ± 0.04; QUANT = 10.2 ± 0.04. Body weight and serum lipid levels did not change significantly. The frequency of severe hypoglycaemic episodes for the entire study was 20 episodes/100 patient-years. Perceived complexity of treatment strategy increased (p < 0.0001) from SIMP to QUANT (least to most flexible). Although the majority of subjects (n = 11) were following a strategy similar to SIMP prior to entering the study, 12 subjects chose to continue with QUAL, three with QUANT and none with SIMP at the end of the study.
Conclusions These results indicate that a strategy that allows for flexibility of self-adjustments of insulin and is not very complex (such as QUAL) may be the strategy of choice for intensive management programmes.