• 1
    McNeal JE, Redwine EA, Freiha FS, Stamey TA. Zonal distribution of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Correlation with histologic pattern and direction of spread. Am J Surg Pathol 1988; 12: 897906
  • 2
    Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989; 142: 714
  • 3
    Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997; 157: 199202
  • 4
    Terris MK, Pham TQ, Issa MM, Kabalin JN. Routine transition zone and seminal vesicle biopsies in all patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies are not indicated. J Urol 1997; 157: 2046
  • 5
    Babaian RJ, Toi A, Kamoi K et al. A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy. J Urol 2000; 163: 1527
  • 6
    Lindgren PG. Percutaneous needle biopsy. A new technique. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1982; 23: 6536
  • 7
    Braeckman J, Corujeira-Figueira F, Goossens A, Keuppens F. Ultrasonically guided prostatic biopsy: technical improvements. Eur Urol 1990; 17: 2035
  • 8
    Helbich TH, Rudas M, Bohm G et al. Randomized in vitro and in vivo evaluation of different biopsy needles and devices for breast biopsy. Clin Radiol 1999; 54: 5662
  • 9
    Hopper KD, Baird DE, Reddy VV et al. Efficacy of automated biopsy guns versus conventional biopsy needles in the pygmy pig. Radiology 1990; 176: 6716
  • 10
    Ragde H, Aldape HC, Bagley CM. Ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Biopty gun superior to aspiration. Urology 1988; 32: 5036
  • 11
    Wagner HJ, Barth P, Schade-Brittinger C, Plein S, Klose KJ. Postmortem evaluation of four randomly selected automated biopsy devices for transthoracic lung biopsy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1995; 18: 3006
  • 12
    Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, Matthews YL, Stevens LA, Shirk SJ. Automated biopsy devices: a blinded evaluation. Radiology 1993; 187: 65360
  • 13
    Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L, Sparen P, Norlen BJ, Busch C. The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 1997; 50: 5626DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00306-3
  • 14
    Rogatsch H, Moser P, Volgger H et al. Diagnostic effect of an improved preembedding method of prostate needle biopsy specimens. Hum Pathol 2000; 31: 11027
  • 15
    Rogatsch H, Mairinger T, Horninger W, Gschwendtner A, Bartsch G, Mikuz G. Optimized preembedding method improves the histologic yield of prostatic core needle biopsies. Prostate 2000; 42: 1249DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0045(20000201)42:2<124::aid-pros6>;2-5
  • 16
    Lane RB, Lane CG, Mangold KA, Johnson MH, Allsbrook WC. Needle biopsies of the prostate: what constitutes adequate histologic sampling? Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998; 122: 8335
  • 17
    Renshaw AA. Adequate tissue sampling of prostate core needle biopsies. Am J Clin Pathol 1997; 107: 269
  • 18
    Reyes AO, Humphrey PA. Diagnostic effect of complete histologic sampling of prostate needle biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 1998; 109: 41622
  • 19
    Green R, Epstein JI. Use of intervening unstained slides for immunohistochemical stains for high molecular weight cytokeratin on prostate needle biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol 1999; 23: 56770