You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Previous testicular position in boys referred for an undescended testis: further explanation of the late orchidopexy enigma?
Article first published online: 23 JUL 2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04317.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Hack, W.W.M., Meijer, R.W., Van Der Voort-Doedens, L.M., Bos, S.D. and De Kok, M.E. (2003), Previous testicular position in boys referred for an undescended testis: further explanation of the late orchidopexy enigma?. BJU International, 92: 293–296. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04317.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 JUL 2003
- Article first published online: 23 JUL 2003
- Accepted for publication 13 February 2003
REFERENCES
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5, , , , . Apparent doubling of frequency of undescended testis in England and Wales in 1962–81. Lancet 1984; ii: 330 – 2
- 6
- 7
- 8, , , . A new clinical classification for undescended testis. Scan J Urol Nephrol 2003; 37: 43 – 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14, . Is the ascending testis actually ‘stationary’? Normal elongation of the spermatic cord is prevented by a fibrous remnant of the processus vaginalis. Pediatr Surg Int 1997; 12: 155 – 7
- 15, , , , . The prevalence of retained testes in Dunedin. NZ Med J 1985; 98: 758 – 60
- 16, , . The undescended testis - ‘lies, damned lies and statistics’. Prog Reprod Biol Med 1984; 10: 24 – 30
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26, . Orchidopexy. Theory and practice. Br Med J 1985; 291: 706 – 7
- 27. Undescended testes: early versus late maldescent. Pediatr Surg Int 1997; 12: 165 – 7
- 28. The position and retractibility of the normal testis in childhood with reference to the diagnosis and treatment of cryptorchidism. J Pediatr Surg 1968; 3: 53 – 9
- 29

1464-410X/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=3b023a287baccfcd7715cf1935101c4ef9feb906)
1464-410X/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=2aeadcb16d199baae496a2f637919008651befce)
