SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Davenport M. ABC of general surgery in children: problems with the penis and prepuce. Br Med J 1996; 312: 239244
  • 2
    Shankar KR & Rickwood AMK. The incidence of phimosis in boys. BJU Int 1999; 84: 1012DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00147.x
  • 3
    Kayaba H, Tamura H, Kitajima S, Fujiwara Y, Kato T & Kato T. Analysis of shape and retractability of the prepuce in 603 Japanese boys. J Urol 1996; 156: 18135
  • 4
    Golubovic Z, Milanovic D, Vukadinovic V, Rakic I & Perovic S. The conservative treatment of phimosis in boys. Br J Urol 1996; 78: 7868
  • 5
    Lindhagen T. Topical clobetasol propionate compared with placebo in the treatment of unretractable foreskin. Eur J Surg 1996; 162: 96972
  • 6
    Kikiros CS, Beasley SV & Woodward M. The response of phimosis to local steroid application. Pediatr Surg Int 1993; 8: 32932
  • 7
    Jorgensen ET & Svensson A. The treatment of phimosis in boys, with a potent topical steroid (clobetasol propionate 0. 05%) cream. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1993; 73: 556
  • 8
    Wright JE. The treatment of childhood phimosis with topical steroid. Aust N Z J Surg 1994; 64: 3278
  • 9
    Marzaro M, Carmignola F & Zoppellaro F et al. Fimosi: quando e patologia di interesse chirurgico? [Phimosis: when does it require surgical intervention]? Minerva Pediatr 1997; 49: 2458
  • 10
    Voborilova V & Havranek P. Konzervativni lecba fimozy v detskem veku. [Conservative treatment of phimosis in childhood]. Rozhl Chir 1997; 76: 3646
  • 11
    Ruud E & Holt J. Fimose kan behandles med locale steroider. [Phimosis can be treated with local steroids]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1997; 117: 5134
  • 12
    Monsour MA, Rabinovitch HH & Dean GE. Medical management of phimosis in children: our experience with topical steroids. J Urol 1999; 162: 11624
  • 13
    Chu CC, Chen KC & Diau GY. Topical steroid treatment of phimosis in boys. J Urol 1999; 162: 8613
  • 14
    Pless TK, Spjeldnaes N & Jorgensen TM. Lokal steroidapplikation i behandlingen af phomosis hos born. [Topical steroids in the treatment of phimosis in children]. Ugeskr Laeger 1999; 161: 64935
  • 15
    Orsola A, Caffaratti J & Garat JM. Conservative treatment of phimosis in children using a topical steroid. Urology 2000; 56: 30710
  • 16
    Brown MR, Cartwright PC & Snow BW. Common office problems in pediatric urology and gynecology. Pediatr Clin North Am 1997; 44: 1091115
  • 17
    Griffiths DM, Atwell JD & Freeman NV. A prospective survey of the indications and morbidity of circumcision in children. Eur Urol 1985; 11: 1847
  • 18
    Cuckow PM, Rix G & Mouriquand PD. Preputial plasty: a good alternative to circumcision. J Pediatr Surg 1994; 29: 5613
  • 19
    Cooper GG, Thomson GJ & Raine PA. Therapeutic retraction of the foreskin in childhood. Br Med J 1983; 286: 1867
  • 20
    Preston EN. Whither the foreskin? A consideration of routine neonatal circumcision. JAMA 1970; 13: 8538
  • 21
    Kirkpatrick BV & Eitzman DV. Neonatal septicaemia after circumcision. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1974; 13: 7678
  • 22
    Tan HL. Foreskin fallacies and phimosis. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1985; 14: 32630
  • 23
    Kaplan GW. Circumcision – an overview. Curr Probl Pediatr 1977; 7: 133
  • 24
    Persad R, Sharma S, McTavish J, Imber C & Mouriquand PD. Clinical presentation and pathophysiology of meatal stenosis following circumcision. Br J Urol 1995; 75: 913
  • 25
    Stenram A, Malmfors G & Okmian L. Circumcision for phimosis: indications and results. Acta Paediatr Scand 1986; 75: 3213
  • 26
    Williams N & Kapila L. Complications of circumcision. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 12316
  • 27
    Kaplan GW. Complications of circumcision. Urol Clin N Am 1983; 10: 5439
  • 28
    Heinius J, Hansson JA & Järhult J. Phimosis – ett övervärderat problem ? Läkartidningen 1993; 90: 41078
  • 29
    Rickwood AMK & Walker J. Is phimosis overdiagnosed and are too many circumcisions performed in consequence? Ann Coll Surg Eng 1989; 71: 2757
  • 30
    Palmer JM & Link D. Impotence following anesthesia for elective circumcision. JAMA 1979; 241: 26356
  • 31
    Goldman R. The psychological impact of circumcision. BJU Int 1999; 83 (Suppl 1): 93102
  • 32
    Taylor JR, Lockwood AP & Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996; 77: 2915
  • 33
    Cold CJ & Taylor JR. The prepuce. BJU Int 1999; 83 (Suppl 1): 3444DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00864.x
  • 34
    Halata Z & Munger BL. The neuroanatomic basis for the protopathic sensibility of the human glans. Brain Res 1986; 371: 20530
  • 35
    Oster J. Further fate of the foreskin. Arch Dis Child 1968; 43: 2003
  • 36
    Kragballe K. Topical corticosteroids: mechanism of action. Acta Dermato-Venereol 1989; 69: 710
  • 37
    Atilla MK, Dündaröz R, Odabas O, Oztürk H, Akin R & Gökçay E. A nonsurgical approach to the treatment of phimosis: local nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory ointment application. J Urol 1997; 158: 1967
  • 38
    Zheng P, Lavker RM, Lehman P & Kligman AM. Morphologic investigations on the rebound phenomenon after corticosteroid-induced atrophy in human skin. J Invest Derm 1984; 82: 34552
  • 39
    Gairdner D. The fate of the foreskin. A study of circumcision. Br Med J 1949; 2: 14337