Pattern and process in the geographical ranges of freshwater fishes
Version of Record online: 4 JUL 2002
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Volume 11, Issue 4, pages 323–332, July 2002
How to Cite
Rosenfield, J. A. (2002), Pattern and process in the geographical ranges of freshwater fishes. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11: 323–332. doi: 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00287.x
- Issue online: 4 JUL 2002
- Version of Record online: 4 JUL 2002
- body size, conservation biology, endangered species, fish, geographical range size, islands, macroecology, North America, range shape, speciation rates.
North American freshwater fishes were studied to determine whether they displayed the same relationships between log (geographical range size) and log (body size) and the same pattern of range shape as found among North American birds and mammals. The forces that produce these patterns were also investigated. The log (geographical range size) : log (body size) relationship was analysed for 121 North American freshwater fish species. Thirty-two imperilled species were compared with 89 non-imperilled species to determine if the overall relationship could result from differential extinction. Range geometries were analysed, within and among habitat guilds, to determine if general patterns could be detected. The log (geographical range size) : log (body size) pattern among freshwater fish species was triangular and qualitatively similar to that found for North American birds and mammals. The results suggest that below a minimum geographical range, the likelihood of extinction increases dramatically for freshwater fishes and that this minimum range size increases with body size. The pattern of fish species’ range shapes differs from that found for other North American vertebrate taxa because, on average, fish possess much smaller ranges than terrestrial species and most fish species’ geographical ranges extend further on a north–south axis than on an east–west axis. The log (geographical range size) : log (body size) pattern reveals that fish species’ geographical ranges are more constrained than those of terrestrial species. The triangular relationship may be caused by differential extinction of species with large bodies and small geographical ranges as well as higher speciation rates of small-bodied fish. The restricted geographical ranges of freshwater fishes gives them much in common with terrestrial species on oceanic islands. Range shape patterns within habitat guilds reflect guild-specific historical and current ecological forces. The overall pattern of range shapes emerges from the combination of ecologically different subunits.