You have free access to this content

Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?

  1. Richard G. Pearson,
  2. Terence P. Dawson

Article first published online: 21 AUG 2003

DOI: 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00042.x

Issue

Global Ecology and Biogeography

Global Ecology and Biogeography

Volume 12, Issue 5, pages 361–371, September 2003

Additional Information

How to Cite

Pearson, R. G. and Dawson, T. P. (2003), Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12: 361–371. doi: 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00042.x

Author Information

  1. Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, 1 A Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, U.K.

*richard.pearson@eci.ox.ac.uk

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 21 AUG 2003
  2. Article first published online: 21 AUG 2003

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (298K)

REFERENCES

  • Austin, M.P., Nicholls, A.O. & Margules, C.R. (1990) Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species. Ecological Monographs, 60, 161–177.
  • Bakkenes, M., Alkemade, J.R.M., Ihle, F., Leemans, R. & Latour, J.B. (2002) Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050. Global Change Biology, 8, 390–407.
    Direct Link:
  • Beerling, D.J., Huntley, B. & Bailey, J.P. (1995) Climate and the distribution of Fallopia japonica: use of an introduced species to test the predictive capacity of response surfaces. Journal of Vegetation Science, 6, 269–282.
    Direct Link:
  • Berry, P.M., Dawson, T.P., Harrison, P.A. & Pearson, R.G. (2002) Modelling potential impacts of climate change on the bioclimatic envelope of species in Britain and Ireland. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11, 453–462.
    Direct Link:
  • Berry, P.M., Vanhinsberg, D., Viles, H.A., Harrison, P.A., Pearson, R.G., Fuller, R., Butt, N. & Miller, F. (2001) Impacts on terrestrial environments. Climate change and nature conservation in Britain and Ireland: modelling natural resourse responses to climate change (the MONARCH Project) (ed. by P.A.Harrison, P.M.Berry and T.P.Dawson), pp. 43–149. UKCIP technical report, Oxford. http://www.ukcip.org.uk/model_nat_res/model_nat_res.html
  • Box, E.O. (1981) Macroclimate and plant forms: an introduction to predictive modelling in phytogeography. Junk, The Hague.
  • Brown, J.H. & Lomolino, M.V. (1998) Biogeography, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Brown, J.H., Stevens, G.C. & Kaufman, D.M. (1996) The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Annual Review Ecological Systematics, 27, 597–623.
  • Cain, M.L., Milligan, B.G. & Strand, A.E. (2000) Long-distance dispersal in plant populations. American Journal of Botany, 87, 1217–1227.
  • Carey, P.D. (1996) DISPERSE: a cellular automaton for predicting the distribution of species in a changed climate. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letter, 5, 217–226.
  • Clark, J.S., Fastie, C., Hurtt, G., Jackson, S.T., Johnson, C., King, G.A., Lewis, M., Lynch, J., Pacala, S., Prentice, I.C., Schupp, E.W., Webb, T. III & Wyckoff, P. (1998) Reid's paradox of rapid plant migration: dispersal theory and interpretation of paleoecological records. Bioscience, 48, 13–24.
  • Collingham, Y.C., Hill, M.O. & Huntley, B. (1996) The migration of sessile organisms: a simulation model with measurable parameters. Journal of Vegetation Science, 7, 831–846.
    Direct Link:
  • Collingham, Y.C. & Huntley, B. (2000) Impacts of habitat fragmentation and patch size upon migration rates. Ecological Applications, 10, 131–144.
  • Collingham, Y.C., Wadsworth, R.A., Huntley, B. & Hulme, P.E. (2000) Predicting the spatial distribution of non-indigenous riparian weeds: issues of spatial scale and extent. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37, 13–27.
    Direct Link:
  • Connell, J.H. (1961) The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology, 42, 710–723.
  • Cramer, W., Bondeau, A., Woodward, F.I., Prentice, I.C., Betts, R.A., Brovkin, V., Cox, P.M., Fisher, V., Foley, J.A., Friend, A.D., Kucharik, C., Lomas, M.R., Ramankutty, N., Sitch, S., Smith, B., White, A. & Young-Molling, C. (2001) Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models. Global Change Biology, 7, 357–373.
    Direct Link:
  • Crawley, M.J. (1997) The structure of plant communities. Plant ecology (ed. by M.J.Crawley), pp. 475–531. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
  • Davis, A.J., Jenkinson, L.S., Lawton, J.L., Shorrocks, B. & Wood, S. (1998a) Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature, 391, 783–786.
  • Davis, A.J., Lawton, J.L., Shorrocks, B. & Jenkinson, L.S. (1998b) Individualistic species responses invalidate simple physiological models of community dynamics under global environmental change. Journal of Animal Ecology, 67, 600–612.
    Direct Link:
  • Davis, M.B. & Shaw, R.G. (2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science, 292, 673–679.
  • Etterson, J.R. & Shaw, R.G. (2001) Constraint to adaptive evolution in response to global warming. Science, 294, 151–154.
  • Franklin, J. (1995) Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients. Progress in Physical Geography, 19, 474–499.
  • Graham, R.W. & Grimm, E.C. (1990) Effects of global climate change on the patterns of terrestrial biological communities. Trends in Ecology Evolution, 5, 289–292.
  • Guisan, A. & Zimmermann, N.E. (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 135, 147–186.
  • Hannah, L., Midgley, G.F. & Millar, D. (2002) Climate change-integrated conservation strategies. Global Ecology and Biogeograpgy, 11, 485–495.
    Direct Link:
  • Haxeltine, A. & Prentice, I.C. (1996) BIOME3: An equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysical constraints, resourse availability, and competition among plant functional types. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 10, 693–709.
  • Hengeveld, R. (1990) Dynamic biogeography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Higgins, K. & Richardson, D.M. (1999) Predicting plant migration rates in a changing world: the role of long-distance dispersal. American Naturalist, 153, 464–475.
  • Hughes, L. (2000) Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 56–61.
  • Hulme, M. & Jenkins, G.J. (1998) Climate change scenarios for the United Kingdom: scientific report. UK Climate Impacts Programme Technical Report no. 1, Climatic Research Unit, Norwich.
  • Huntley, B. (1999) Species distribution and environmental change: considerations from the site to the landscape scale. Ecosystem management: questions for science and society (ed. by E.Maltby, M.Holdgate, M.Acreman and A.Weir), pp. 115–130. Royal Holloway Institute for Environmental Research, Virginia Water, UK.
  • Huntley, B., Bartlein, P.J. & Prentice, I.C. (1989) Climatic control of the distribution and abundance of beech (Fagus L.) in Europe and North America. Journal of Biogeography, 16, 551–560.
  • Huntley, B., Berry, P.M., Cramer, W. & Mcdonald, A.P. (1995) Modelling present and potential future ranges of some European higher plants using climate response surfaces. Journal of Biogeography, 22, 967–1001.
  • Huntley, B. & Birks, H.J.B. (1983) An atlas of past and present pollen maps for Europe: 0–13 000 B.P. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Hutchinson, G.E. (1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 22, 415–457.
  • IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. by J.T.Houghton, Y.Ding, D.J.Griggs, M.Noguer, P.J.Van Der Linden, X.Dai, K.Maskell and C.A.Johnson). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Jalas, J. & Suominen, J. (1972) Atlas Flora Europaeae: distribution of vascular plants in Europe, 1. The Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe & Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo, Helsinki.
  • Jalas, J. & Suominen, J. (1973) Atlas Flora Europaeae: distribution of vascular plants in Europe, 2. The Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe & Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo, Helsinki.
  • Johnson, W.C. & Webb, T. III (1989) The role of blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata) in the postglacial dispersal of fagaceous trees in eastern North America. Journal of Biogeography, 16, 561–571.
  • Kotliar, N.B. & Wiens, J.A. (1990) Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos, 59, 253–260.
  • Lawton, J.L. (2000) Concluding remarks: a review of some open questions. Ecological consequences of heterogeneity (ed. by M.J.Hutchings, E.John and A.J.A.Stewart), pp. 401–424. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Leibold, M.A. (1995) The niche concept revisited: mechanistic models and community context. Ecology, 76, 1371–1382.
  • MacArthur, R.H. (1972) Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. Harper & Row, New York.
  • Mack, R.N. (1996) Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Biological Conservation, 78, 107–121.
  • McCarty, J.P. (2001) Ecological consequences of recent climate change. Conservation Biology, 15, 320–331.
    Direct Link:
  • Midgley, G.F., Hannah, L., Millar, D., Rutherford, M.C. & Powerie, L.W. (2002) Assessing the vulnerability of species richness to anthropogenic climate change in a biodiversity hotspot. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11, 445–451.
    Direct Link:
  • Pearson, R.G., Dawson, T.P., Berry, P.M. & Harrison, P.A. (2002) SPECIES: a spatial evaluation of climate impact on the envelope of species. Ecological Modelling, 154, 289–300.
  • Peterson, A.T., Ortega-Huerta, M.A., Bartley, J., Sanchez-Cordero, V., Soberon, J. & Buddemeier, R.W. (2002) Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios. Nature, 416, 626–629.
  • Peterson, A.T., Sanchez-Cordero, V., Soberon, J., Bartley, J., Buddemeier, R.W. & Navarro-Singuenza, A.G. (2001) Effects of global climate change on geographic distributions of Mexican Cracidae. Ecological Modelling, 144, 21–30.
  • Peterson, A.T., Soberon, J. & Sanchez-Cordero, V. (1999) Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science, 285, 1265–1267.
  • Pigott, C.D. & Huntley, J.P. (1981) Factors controlling the distribution of Tilia cordata at the northern limits of its geographical range. III. Nature and causes of seed sterility. New Phytologist, 87, 817–839.
    Direct Link:
  • Plaisance, G. (1979) L’if. La foret privée — revue forèire Européenne, 126, 34–47.
  • Prentice, I.C., Cramer, W., Harrison, S.P., Leemans, R., Monserud, R.A. & Solomon, A.M. (1992) A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. Journal of Biogeography, 19, 117–134.
  • Prentice, I.C. & Solomon, A.M. (1991) Vegetation models and global change. Global changes of the past (ed. by R.S.Bradley), pp. 365–383. UCAR/Office for Interdisciplinary Earth Studies, Boulder, CO.
  • Silander, J.A. & Antonovics, J. (1982) Analysis of interspecific interactions in a coastal plant community — a perturbation approach. Nature, 298, 557–560.
  • Sykes, M.T., Prentice, I.C. & Cramer, W. (1996) A bioclimatic model for the potential distributions of north European tree species under present and future climates. Journal of Biogeography, 23, 203–233.
  • Sykes, M.T., Prentice, I.C., Smith, B., Cramer, W. & Venevsky, S. (2001) An introduction to the European Terrestrial Ecosystem Modelling Activity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10, 581–593.
    Direct Link:
  • Thomas, C.D., Bodsworth, E.J., Wilson, R.J., Simmons, A.D., Davies, Z.G., Musche, M. & Conradt, L. (2001) Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature, 411, 577–581.
  • Turner, M.G., Gardner, R.H. & O'Neill, R.V. (2001) Landscape Ecology: in Theory and Practice. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Walther, G.R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menze, 1, A., Parmesan, C., Beebee, T.J.C., Fromentin, J.M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O. & Bairlein, F. (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature, 416, 389–395.
  • Whittaker, R.J., Willis, K.J. & Field, R. (2001) Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 28, 453–470.
    Direct Link:
  • Willis, K.J. & Whittaker, R.J. (2002) Species diversity — scale matters. Science, 295, 1245–1248.
  • Woodward, F.I. (1987) Climate and plant distribution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Woodward, F.I. (1990) The impact of low temperatures in controlling the geographical distribution of plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 326, 585–593.
  • Woodward, F.I. & Beerling, D.J. (1997) The dynamics of vegetation change: health warnings for equilibrium ‘dodo’ models. Global Ecology Biogeography Letters, 6, 413–418.
  • Woodward, F.I. & Rochefort, I. (1991) Sensitivity analysis of vegetation diversity to environmental change. Global Ecology Biogeography Letters, 1, 7–23.
  • Wu, J. & Loucks, O.L. (1995) From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. The Quarterly Review Biology, 70, 439–466.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (298K)