Body size and area-incidence relationships: is there a general pattern?
Article first published online: 21 AUG 2003
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Volume 12, Issue 5, pages 381–387, September 2003
How to Cite
Biedermann, R. (2003), Body size and area-incidence relationships: is there a general pattern?. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12: 381–387. doi: 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00048.x
- Issue published online: 21 AUG 2003
- Article first published online: 21 AUG 2003
- Area requirement;
- body size;
- habitat fragmentation;
- incidence function;
- logistic regression;
Aim This paper tests firstly for the existence of a general relationship between body size of terrestrial animals and their incidence across habitat patches of increasing size, and secondly for differences in this relationship between insects and vertebrates.
Location The analysis was based on the occupancy pattern of 50 species from 15 different landscapes in a variety of ecosystems ranging from Central European grassland to Asian tropical forest.
Methods The area-occupancy relationship was described by incidence functions that were calculated using logistic regression. A correlation analysis between body size of the species and the patch area referring to the two given points of the incidence function was performed. In order to test for an effect of taxon (insects vs. vertebrates), an analysis of covariance was conducted.
Results In all species, the incidence was found to increase with increasing patch area. The macroecological analysis showed a significant relationship between the incidence in habitat patches and the body size of terrestrial animals. The area requirement was found to increase linearly with increasing body size on a log-log scale. This relationship did not differ significantly between insects and vertebrates.
Conclusions The approach highlighted in this paper is to associate incidence functions with body size. The results suggest that body size is a general but rather rough predictor for the area requirements of animals. The relationship seems valid for a wide range of body sizes of terrestrial animals. However, further studies including isolation of habitats as well as additional species traits into the macroecological analysis of incidence functions are needed.