INTENTIONALITY AND PHENOMENOLOGY
Article first published online: 4 NOV 2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-0114.2003.00183.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Wilson, R. A. (2003), INTENTIONALITY AND PHENOMENOLOGY. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 84: 413–431. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-0114.2003.00183.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 4 NOV 2003
- Article first published online: 4 NOV 2003
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Abstract: This paper examines two recent attempts to articulate a particular relationship between intentionality and phenomenology. Terry Horgan and John Tienson (2002) have argued for what they call the inseparability thesis: that the intentional and the phenomenal are, in a certain sense, inseparable. Brian Loar (2002, 2003), following on from earlier work, has argued for a kind of intentionality, phenomenal intentionality, that is pervasive and more fundamental than ordinary wide content. Problems with both views can be seen once we consider a number of dimensions to intentionality, and reflect more generally on the notion of phenomenal intentionality itself.

1468-0114/asset/PAPQ_centre.gif?v=1&s=e84ad797c41b896ac6e6cd4fc5a4a6abb1f43e79)
