End-result of routine ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies: The Belgian Multicentric Study 1984–92

Authors

  • Professor S. Levi,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hopital Universitaire Brugmann Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Diagnostic Ultrasound lab, Hopital Universitaire Brugmann, place van Gehuchten 4, B 1020 Brussels, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author
  • J. P. Schaap,

    1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Régional de la Citadelle, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author
  • P. De Hava,

    1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hopital civil de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author
  • R. Coulon,

    1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hopital de la Madeleine, Ath, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author
  • P. Defoort

    1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akademisch Ziekenhuis, Rijksuniversiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Five ultrasound laboratories from Obstetrics and Gynecology departments of Belgian university hospitals or affiliated institutions conducted a prospective study from 1984 to 1992 in which the results of prenatal ultrasound examinations were compared to examination reports of the neonates. The results of the period 1984–89 (PI) have been published previously, and those of the period 1990–92 (PII) are presented here. Some very minor congenital anomalies, as listed. and defined in the EUROCAT Register, were excluded. Of 26 147 pregnant women at normal risk for congenital anomalies, 25 046 had at least one ultrasound scan (96%). A total of 616 fetuses were structurally abnormal (prevalence 2.42%), and 685 abnormalities were recorded. The sensitivity of the ultrasound test was 40.4% in PI and 51.1% in PII for abnormal fetuses (p < 0.05) and 45% (PI) and 64% (PII) for abnormalities (p < 0.01). The specificity was 99.9%) and the positive and negative predictive values were 94.2% and 98.6%, respectively; these values did not differ significantly between the two periods. The sensitivity for the detection of anomalies before 23 weeks increased from 21% in PI to 41% in PII, indicating an improvement in the early detection of fetal abnormalities. Copyright © 1995 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Ancillary