Can an increased copper requirement in copper-tolerant Mimulus guttatus explain the cost of tolerance? II. Reproductive phase

Authors

  • FRANCES A. HARPER,

    1. Department of Biological Sciences, Hatherly Laboratories, University of Exeter, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK
    2. To whom correspondence should be sent at present address.
    3. Present address: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RB, UK. E-mail: Fran.Harper@plants.ox.ac.uk
    Search for more papers by this author
  • SUZANNE E. SMITH,

    1. Department of Biological Sciences, Hatherly Laboratories, University of Exeter, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • MARK R. MACNAIR

    1. Department of Biological Sciences, Hatherly Laboratories, University of Exeter, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Circumstantial evidence suggests that plants that have evolved metal tolerance are at a disadvantage on normal soil, i.e. there is a cost of tolerance. One hypothesis for the cause of this cost is that individuals have a greater requirement for copper, and so suffer micronutrient deficiency on normal soils, as a result of a reduced uptake, distribution and/or utilization of copper. We provided highly and less copper-tolerant plants of Mimulus guttatus Fischer ex DC. (the common monkey flower) with sub-optimal copper, and demonstrated the importance of copper as an essential micronutrient during the reproductive phase, both in the production of viable pollen and in seed set. We also looked at the effect of sub-optimal copper supply on the growth of the microgametophyte, and the efficiency with which seed was set. No evidence was found that highly tolerant plants have an increased copper requirement during the reproductive phase. This is in agreement with earlier work on Mimulus guttatus, which investigated the copper requirement of highly tolerant plants during vegetative growth and found that any differences in copper requirement were small. The ‘metal requirement hypothesis’ is, therefore, not the sole explanation for the cost of copper tolerance in M. guttatus.

Ancillary