SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Assmann SM. 1999. The cellular basis of guard cell sensing of rising CO2. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 629637.
  • Beerling DJ. 1997. Carbon isotope discrimination and stomatal responses of mature Pinus sylvestris L. trees exposed in situ for three years to elevated CO2 and temperature. Acta Oecologica 18: 697712.
  • Bettarini I, Vacari FP, Miglietta F. 1998. Elevated CO2 concentration and stomatal density: observations from 17 plant species growing in a CO2 spring in central Italy. Global Change Biology 4: 1722.
  • Ceulemans R & Mousseau M. 1994. Tansley Review no. 71: Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on woody plants. New Phytologist 127: 425446.
  • Ceulemans R, Jiang XN, Shao BY. 1995. Growth and physiology of one-year-old poplar (Populus) under elevated atmospheric CO2 levels. Annals of Botany 75: 609617.
  • Ceulemans R. 1997. Direct impacts of CO2 and temperature on physiological responses in trees. In: MohrenGMJ, KramerK, SabateS, eds. Impacts of global change on tree physiology and forest ecosystems. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 314.
  • Ceulemans R, Janssens IA, Jach ME. 1999. Effects of CO2 enrichment on trees and forests; lessons to be learned in view of future ecosystem studies. Annals of Botany 84: 577590.
  • Conroy JP, Barlow EWR, Bevege DI. 1986. Response of Pinus radiata seedlings to carbon dioxide enrichment at different levels of water and phosphorus: growth, morphology and anatomy. Annals of Botany 57: 105117.
  • Evans JR. 1999. Leaf anatomy enables more equal access to light and CO2 between chloroplasts. New Phytologist 143: 93104.
  • Ewers FW. 1982. Secondary growth in needle leaves of Pinus longaeva (bristlecone pine) and other conifers: quantitative data. American Journal of Botany 69: 15521559.
  • Garcia RI, Idso SB, Kimball BA. 1994. Net photosynthesis as a function of carbon dioxide concentration in pine trees grown at ambient and elevated CO2. Environmental and Experimental Botany 34: 337341.
  • Gardner SDL, Bosac C, Taylor G. 1995. Leaf growth of hybrid poplar following exposure to elevated CO2. New Phytologist 131: 8190.
  • Gray JE, Holroyd GH, Van Der Lee FM, Bahrami AR, Sijmons PC, Woodward FI, Schuch W, Hetherington AM. 2000. The HIC signalling pathway links CO2 perception to stomatal development. Nature 408: 713716.
  • Guehl JM, Picon C, Aussenac G, Gross P. 1994. Interactive effects of elevated CO2 and soil drought on growth and transpiration efficiency and its determinants in two European tree species. Tree Physiology 14: 707724.
  • Gunderson CA & Wullschleger SD. 1994. Photosynthetic acclimation in trees to rising atmospheric CO2: a broader perspective. Photosynthesis Research 39: 369388.
  • Idso KE & Idso SB. 1994. Plant responses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment in the face of environmental constraints: a review of the past 10 years’ research. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 69: 153203.
  • Jach ME & Ceulemans R. 1997. Impact of elevated CO2 on physiology and leaf morphology of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings. In: MohrenGMJ, KramerK, SabateS, eds. Impacts of global change on tree physiology and forest ecosystems. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 6774.
  • Jach ME & Ceulemans R. 1999. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on phenology, growth and crown structure of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings after two years of exposure in the field. Tree Physiology 19: 289300.
  • Jach ME & Ceulemans R. 2000. Effects of season, needle age and elevated atmospheric CO2 on photosynthesis in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Tree Physiology 20: 145157.
  • Jarvis AJ, Mansfield TA, Davis WJ. 1999. Stomatal behaviour, photosynthesis and transpiration under rising CO2. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 639648.
  • Jokela A, Sarjala T, Kaunisto S, Huttunen S. 1997. Effects of foliar potassium concentration on morphology, ultrastructure and polyamine concentration of Scots pine needles. Tree Physiology 17: 677685.
  • Kinnunen H, Manninen S, Peura R, Laakso K, Huttunen S. 1999. SEM-EDS image analysis as a tool for scoring the epicuticular wax tube distribution on Pinus sylvestris needles – evaluation using a UV-B field experiment. Environmental and Experimental Botany 42: 173180.
  • Körner CK, Pelaez-Riedl S, Van Bel AJE. 1995. CO2 responsiveness of plants: a possible link to phloem loading. Plant, Cell & Environment 18: 595600.
  • Long SP. 1998. Understanding the impacts of rising CO2: contribution of environmental physiology. In: PressMC, ScholesMC, BarkerMG, eds. Physiological plant ecology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science, 263282.
  • Medlyn BE, Barton CVM, Broadmeadow MSJ, Ceulemans R, De Angelis P, Forstreuter M, Freeman M, Jackson SB, Kellomaki S, Laitat E, Rey A, Roberntz P, Sigurdsson BD, Strassemeyer J, Wang K, Curtis PS, Jarvis PG. 2001. Stomatal conductance of forest species after long-term exposure to elevated CO2 concentration: a synthesis. New Phytologist 149: 247264.
  • Norby RJ, Wullschleger SD, Gunderson CA. 1996. Tree responses to elevated CO2 and the implications for forests. In: KochGW, MooneyHA, eds. Carbon dioxide and terrestrial ecosystems. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 121.
  • Norby RJ, Wullschleger SD, Gunderson CA, Johnson DW, Ceulemans R. 1999. Tree responses to rising CO2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 683714.
  • Parkhurst J. 1986. Internal leaf structure: a three dimensional perspective. In: GivnishTJ, ed. On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 215250.
  • Peñuelas J & Matamala R. 1990. Changes in N and S leaf content, stomatal density and specific leaf area of 14 plant species during the last three centuries of CO2 increase. Journal of Experimental Botany 41: 11191124.
  • Pearson M, Davies WJ, Mansfield TA. 1995. Asymmetric responses of adaxial and abaxial stomata to elevated CO2: impact on the control of gas exchange by leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 18: 837843.
  • Poole I, Weyers JDB, Lawson T, Raven JA. 1996. Variations in stomatal density and index: implications for palaeoclimatic reconstructions. Plant, Cell & Environment 19: 705712.
  • Prior SA, Pritchard SG, Runion GB, Rogers HH, Mitchell RJ. 1997. Influence of atomospheric CO2 enrichment, soil N and water on needle surface wax formation in Pinus palustris (Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 10701077.
  • Pritchard SG, Peterson CM, Prior SA, Rogers HH. 1997. Elevated atmospheric CO2 differentially affects needle chloroplast ultrastructure and phloem anatomy in Pinus palustris: interactions with soil resource availability. Plant, Cell & Environment 20: 461471.
  • Pritchard SG, Mosjidis C, Peterson CM, Runion GB, Rogers HH. 1998. Anatomical and morphological alterations in longleaf pine needles resulting from growth in elevated CO2: Interactions with soil resource availability. International Journal of Plant Sciences 159: 10021009.
  • Pritchard SG, Rogers HH, Prior SA, Peterson CM. 1999. Elevated CO2 and plant structure: a review. Global Change Biology 5: 807837.
  • Pushnik JC, Demaree RS, Houpis JLJ, Flory WB, Bauer SM, Anderson PD. 1995. The effect of elevated CO2 on a Sierra-Nevadan dominant species: Pinus ponderosa. Journal of Biogeography 22: 249254.
  • Radoglou KM & Jarvis PG. 1990. Effects of CO2 enrichment on four poplar clones. I. Growth and leaf anatomy. Annals of Botany 65: 617626.
  • Roderick ML, Berry SL, Noble IR. 1999. The relationship between leaf composition and morphology at elevated CO2 concentrations. New Phytologist 143: 6372.
  • Rogers HH, Thomas JF, Bingham GE. 1983. Response of agronomic and forest species to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science 220: 428429.
  • Sachs T, Novoplansky N, Kagan ML. 1993. Variable development and cellular patterning in the epidermis of Ruscus hypoglossum. Annals of Botany 71: 237243.
  • Saxe H, Ellsworth DS, Heath J. 1998. Tree and forest functioning in an enriched CO2 atmosphere. New Phytologist 139: 395436.
  • Schnitzler JP, Jungblut TP, Heller W et al. 1996. Tissue localization of UV-B screening pigments and of chalcone synthase mRNA in needles of Scots pine seedlings. New Phytologist 132: 247258.
  • Stewart JD & Hoddinott J. 1993. Photosynthetic acclimation to elevated atmospheric CO2 and UV radiation in Pinus banksiana. Physiologia Plantarum 88: 493500.
  • Sutinen S & Koivisto L. 1995. Microscopic structure of conifer needles as a diagnostic tool in the field. In: MunawarM, HaenninenO, RoyS, MunawarN, eds. Bioindicators of environmental health. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: SPB Academic Publishing bv, 7381.
  • Taylor G, Ranasinghe S, Bosac C, Gardner SDL, Ferris R. 1994. Elevated CO2 and plant growth: cellular mechanisms and responses of whole plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 45: 17611774.
  • Teskey RO. 1997. Combined effects of elevated CO2 and air temperature on carbon assimilation of Pinus taeda trees. Plant, Cell & Environment 20: 373380.
  • Thomas JF & Harvey CH. 1983. Leaf anatomy of four species grown under continuous CO2 enrichment. Botanical Gazette 144: 303309.
  • Wang KY & Kellomaki S. 1997. Stomatal conductance and transpiration in shoots of Scots pine after 4-year exposure to elevated CO2 and temperature. Canadian Journal of Botany 75: 552561.
  • Woodward FI & Bazzaz FA. 1988. The responses of stomatal density to CO2 partial pressure. Journal of Experimental Botany 39: 1771 1781.
  • Woodward FI & Kelly CK. 1995. The influence of CO2 concentration on stomatal density. New Phytologist 131: 13111327.
  • Wullschleger SD, Norby RJ, Gunderson CA. 1997. Forest trees and their responses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment: A compilation of results. In: AllenJrLH, KirkhamMB, OlszykDM, WilliamsCE, eds. Advances in carbon dioxide effects research. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy (ASA) Special Publication no. 61: 79100.
  • Yoshie F & Sakai A. 1985. Types of Florin rings, distributional pattern of epicuticular wax, and their relationships in the genus Pinus. Canadian Journal of Botany 63: 21502158.