SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anonymous. 1985. Soil survey of Marin County, California. Petaluma, CA, USA: US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.
  • Arora D. 1986. Mushrooms demystified, 2nd edn. Berkeley CA, USA: Ten Speed Press.
  • Baar J, Horton TR, Kretzer A, Bruns TD. 1999. Mycorrhizal recolonization of Pinus muricata from resistant propagules after a stand-replacing wildfire. New Phytologist 143: 409418.
  • Bonello P, Bruns TD, Gardes M. 1998. Genetic structure of a natural population of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Suillus pungens. New Phytologist 138: 533542.
  • Casgrain P, Legendre P. 1999. The R package for multivariate and spatial analysis. Montreal, Canada: University of Montreal.
  • Dahlberg A. 1997. Population ecology of Suillus variegatus in old Swedish Scots pine forests. Mycological Research 101: 4754.
  • Dahlberg A, Stenlid J. 1990. Population structure and dynamics in Suillus bovinus as indicated by spatial distribution of fungal clones. New Phytologist 115: 487494.
  • Dahlberg A, Stenlid J. 1994. Size, distribution and biomass of genets in populations of Suillus bovinus (L. Fr.) Roussel revealed by somatic incompatibility. New Phytologist 128: 225234.
  • Dickman A, Cook S. 1989. Fire and fungus in a mountain hemlock forest. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 20052016.
  • Evens JG. 1993. The Natural History of the Point Reyes Peninsula. Point Reyes, CA, USA: Point Reyes National Seashore Association, xiii.
  • Ferrier RC, Alexander IC. 1985. Persistence under field conditions of excised fine roots and mycorrhizas of spruce. In: FitterAH, AtkinsonD, ReadDJ, UsherMB, eds. Ecological Interactions in soil: plants, microbes and animals. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 175179.
  • Gardes M, Bruns TD. 1996. Community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Pinus muricata forest: above- and below-ground views. Journal of Botany 74: 15721583.
  • Grogan P, Baar J, Bruns TD. 2000a. Below-ground ectomycorrhizal community structure in a recently burned bishop pine forest. Journal of Ecology 88: 10511062.
  • Grogan P, Bruns TD, Chapin FS. 2000b. Fire effects on ecosystem nitrogen cycling in a Californian bishop pine forest. Oecologia 122: 537544.
  • Hagerman SM, Jones MD, Bradfield GE, Gillespie M, Durall DM. 1999a. Effects of clear-cut logging on the diversity and persistence of ectomycorrhizae at a subalpine forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 124134.
  • Hagerman SM, Jones MD, Bradfield GE, Sakakibara SM. 1999b. Ectomycorrhizal colonization of Picea engelmannii×Picea glauca seedlings planted across cut blocks of different sizes. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 18561870.
  • Harvey AE, Jurgensen MF, Larsen MJ. 1980. Clearcut harvesting and ectomycorrhizae: survival of activity on residual roots and influence on a bordering forest stand in western Montana. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 10: 300303.
  • Heady HF, Foin TC, Hektner MM, Taylor DW, Barbour MG, Barry WJ. 1977. Coastal prairie and Northern coastal scrub. In: BarbourMG, MajorJ eds. Terrestrial vegetation of California. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 733760.
  • Horton TR, Bruns TD. 1998. Multiple-host fungi are the most frequent and abundant ectomycorrhizal types in a mixed stand of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii D. Don) and bishop pine (Pinus muricata. D. Don). New Phytologist 139: 331339.
  • Horton TR, Cázares E, Bruns TD. 1998. Ectomycorrhizal, vesicular– arbuscular and dark septate fungal colonization of bishop pine (Pinus muricata) seedlings in the first 5 months of growth after wildfire. Mycorrhiza 8: 1118.
  • Keeley JE, Zedler PH. 1998. Evolution of life histories in Pinus. In: RichardsonDM, ed. Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 219250.
  • Parsons WFJ, Miller SL, Knight DH. 1994. Root-gap dynamics in a lodgepole pine forest – ectomycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal fine root activity after experimental gap formation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24: 15311538.
  • Redecker D, Szaro TM, Bowman JR, Bruns TD. 2001. Small genets of Lactarius xanthogalactus, Russula cremoricolor and Amanita francheti in late stage ectomycorrhizal successions. Molecular Ecology 10: 10251034.
  • Smith ML, Bruhn JN, Anderson JB. 1992. The fungus Armillaria bulbosa is among the largest and oldest living organisms. Nature 356: 428434.
  • Swofford DL. 2002. paup†: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA. Sinaver.
  • Sugnet P. 1985. Fire history and postfire stand dynamics of Inverness bishop pine populations. MSc Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  • Taylor DL, Bruns TD. 1999. Community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Pinus muricata forest: minimal overlap between the mature forest and resistant propagule communities. Molecular Ecology 8: 18371850.
  • Thiers HD. 1982. The Agaricales (gilled fungi) of California. Eureka, CA, USA: Mad River Press.
  • Torres P, Honrubia M. 1997. Changes and effects of a natural fire on ectomycorrhizal inoculum potential of soil in a Pinus halepensis forest. Forest Ecology and Management 96: 189196.
  • Visser S. 1995. Ectomycorrhizal fungal succession in jack pine stands following wildfire. New Phytologist 129: 389401.
  • Vogl RJ, Armstrong WP, White KL, Cole KL. 1977. The closed-cone pines and cypress. In: BarbourMG, MajorJ, eds. Terrestrial vegetation of California. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 295358.