SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • lichenization;
  • relichenization;
  • foliicolous lichens;
  • lichen development;
  • Tricharia;
  • Trebouxia;
  • Phycopeltis;
  • Trentepohlia

Summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References
  • • 
    Suppositions about lichen reproductive strategies were investigated and elusive early stages of lichen ontogeny documented in a foliicolous lichen community.
  • • 
    Plastic coverslips attached to supportive netting were placed among foliicolous lichen communities within a neotropical lowland forest. The germination and development of diverse lichen propagules colonizing the coverslips were studied with light microscopy.
  • • 
    Foliicolous lichens were observed to begin development from lichenized vegetative propagules, aposymbiotic fungal spores, fungal spores dispersed together with attached phycobionts, and diahyphae. Aposymbiotically dispersed spores and diahyphae were capable of associating with compatible phycobionts encountered upon the substratum, following germination.
  • • 
    Many developing thalli produced characteristic structures (discoid isidia, thalline setae, pycnidia, etc.) which permitted their recognition as typical members of the foliicolous lichen community. Thalline setae in Tricharia were produced upon the prothallus, and subsequently incorporated into the thallus proper by advance of the lichenized thallus margin. Tricharia and other members of the Gomphillaceae showed a distinctive organization of symbionts in thallus growth, whereby the unicellular green phycobiont cells were positioned at the tips of advancing fascicles of mycobiont hyphae. In Coenogonium sp., branching filaments of the phycobiont Trentepohlia grew along prothallic paths initiated by the mycobiont.

Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

About one-fifth of the known species of fungi form lichen symbioses with algae (Kirk et al., 2001). The lichen fungi enclose algal cells within an often plant-like body (Sanders, 2001b) in which the alga supplies the fungal tissues with carbon fixed by photosynthesis (Smith, 1980). For these fungi the symbiosis is, as far as is known, obligatory for the completion of their life cycles. The lichen fungus does not form stable symbioses with a broad range of algae; rather, each fungal species appears to show a fairly high degree of selectivity in its choice of partners (Ahmadjian & Jacobs, 1981; Beck et al., 1998; Paulsrud et al., 1998, 2000; Kroken & Taylor, 2000). Many lichens appear to maintain the partnership in reproduction by means of vegetative propagules, such as soredia, isidia or other types of thallus fragments, which disperse both symbionts together (Bailey, 1976; Schuster et al., 1985; Scheidegger, 1995). On the other hand, a great number of lichens lack recognizable vegetative propagules. They produce fungal ascospores (or basidiospores), presumably resulting from sexual processes, and/or asexual spores such as conidia. In some lichens, phycobiont cells may be present within or upon the fungal spore-producing tissues, where they can be dispersed together with the liberated spores (Bertsch & Butin, 1967). However, in most cases, the fungal spores seem to be dispersed aposymbiotically; upon germination, the fungus would need to re-encounter and lichenize a suitable algal symbiont from the environment. Encounter of a suitable alga is often thought to be problematic because of the reportedly infrequent occurrence of some important phycobionts, such as Trebouxia species, in the free-living state. However, the question of phycobiont availability in nature requires further study. Although a few notable works have shown some apparent stages of lichen resynthesis (Ward, 1884; Werner, 1931; Jahns et al., 1979; Garty & Delarea, 1988), very little is known about the occurrence, procedure and relative success of lichen reproductive strategies. Some lichenologists have even doubted whether relichenization does occur in nature (Lamb, 1959). Others have chosen alternative approaches, ‘… since the process of lichenization itself cannot be observed in nature …’ (Beck et al., 1998). While increasing attention is being focused upon acquisition and loss of the lichen mode of nutrition in fungal evolution (Gargas et al., 1995; Lutzoni et al., 2001), we remain largely ignorant of how and to what extent such events might occur regularly in the life cycles of these organisms. The subsequent processes involved in lichen thallus organization and development are also poorly understood. What is needed is an adequate system for study of the early, microscopic stages of lichen ontogeny in situ. The crustose lichen communities that occur on the surfaces of leaves in humid tropical forests (Santesson, 1952; Lücking, 2001) are ideal subjects for such studies. These foliicolous (i.e. leaf-dwelling) lichens will develop in situ on artificial substrata, such as plastic (Sipman, 1994; Lücking, 1998), and may colonize transparent materials that permit their direct observation with light microscopy (Sanders, 2001a). Furthermore, because they are adapted to a short-lived natural substratum, foliicolous lichens develop rapidly.

In a preliminary study of foliicolous lichen colonization in situ, some evidence of lichenization as well as symbiont codispersal was observed on glass slides taped to a plastic support within a lowland tropical forest (Sanders, 2001a). However, the low diversity of lichens observed on the glass slides and their frequent failure to develop beyond early stages suggested that the substratum and/or microenvironment were suboptimal for development of foliicolous lichens. This situation also raised some questions about whether the observed associations indeed represented development of typical foliicolous lichen thalli. In the present study, these problems were solved by using a clear plastic substratum attached without tape or glue directly over the surfaces of leaves. A variety of typical foliicolous lichens developed readily on the experimental substratum. Their varied reproductive strategies and some of the patterns of subsequent thallus development are documented here.

Materials and Methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

The present study was carried out from March 2000 to March 2001 at the Parque Estadual de Dois Irmãos, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. The park conserves a remnant of the native Atlantic forest vegetation. A floristic treatment of the foliicolous lichens of coastal Pernambuco (Cáceres, 1998; Cáceres et al., 2000) cites numerous collections from this field site. Plastic screening with a mesh of about 2 mm square was cut into strips 3–4 cm wide and 20–35 cm long. Plastic microscope cover slips (20 × 20 mm) were fastened to the strips of screening by inserting their corners into small diagonal slits cut into the mesh. A total of 31 strips with five to nine cover slips per strip were prepared. The strips were tied, with the cover slips facing upward, to the upper surfaces of leaves of Bactris sp., a common understory palm which typically bears well-developed foliicolous lichen communities (Fig. 1a). Bactris plants were selected from several different localities throughout the reserve. Plants with leaves already colonized by lichens were chosen, as this was an indication of microenvironmental conditions favorable to development of these organisms. At intervals of 3–6 wk, some of the cover slips were removed for microscopic examination. Debris and microorganisms were wiped off the lower surface of the cover slips, which were then inverted and mounted with distilled water onto clean glass microscope slides. In a few instances, a clearer image was obtained by placing the colonized cover slip face up on the microscope slide, with a glass cover slip wet-mounted over it. Attempts to make sequential observations on the same individuals by returning cover slips to the field were not successful; exposure to the intense light of the microscope lamp was believed to be deleterious to the algal symbionts. After about 6 or 7 months from the time of placement in the field, most of the cover slips became heavily covered with foliicolous lichens and other organisms, as well as organic debris, impeding clear microscopic observation of the behavior of individual organisms present. Most of the observations presented here are therefore from cover slips withdrawn for observation during the first 6 months after their placement in the field.

image

Figure 1. Colonization of plastic cover slips placed over leaves in neotropical forest (Recife, Brazil). (a) Experimental set-up: plastic cover slips with corners inserted into slits cut into plastic mesh strips. Each strip was tied to the upper surface of the leaf rachis of Bactris plants already showing colonization by foliicolous lichens. (b,c) Aposymbiotic cells of alga Trebouxia , with broadly lobate central chloroplast (b) , and undergoing cell division (c). Bars, 5 µm. (d) Germination and development of vegetative, lichenized propagule. The propagule is composed of a dense bundle of septate fungal cells, with cytoplasm rich in oil droplets, surrounding unicellular green algal symbionts. Germination of fungal cells produces hyphae which extend over the substratum and may associate with and incorporate additional compatible algal cells (arrow). These frequently observed propagules are produced by Gyalectidium filicinum or related species in the Gomphillaceae. They are formed within the thallus, where they incorporate phycobiont cells ( Sérusiaux & de Sloover, 1986 ). Rather similar-looking propagules with narrow, elongate terminal cells, attributable to the related taxon Actinoplaca strigulacea , were also observed. Bar, 20 µm. (e) Fragment of lichen thallus (Gomphillaceae), germinating from remnant of alga-containing thallus at base of hyaline seta (arrow). Algal cells are multiplying and fungal hyphae are spreading over the substratum. Bar, 50 µm. (f) Large, muriform spore (S) producing numerous germination hyphae on substratum surface (just below plane of focus). The hyphae have contacted and incorporated dividing algal cells into a squamule-like structure (arrow) slightly raised above the substratum. The fungus is most likely a member of the Gomphillaceae or Ectolechiaceae. Bar, 20 µm. (g) Fusiform, transversely septate fungal spore with large oil droplets, germinating from both terminal cells. Hyphae arising from one end have contacted and surrounded the branching filaments of a Phycopeltis alga nearby (horizontal arrow). The growth trajectory of the germ hypha originating from the opposite end of the spore (vertical arrow) may also be deviating toward the alga. The spore is an ascospore of Porina epiphylla , Trichothelium epiphyllum , or a related taxon in the Trichotheliaceae. Bar, 10 µm. (h) Germination of 3-septate ascospores (at upper right; probably P. rubentior or a related taxon in the Trichotheliaceae), one with germination hyphae (arrows) growing toward and contacting the alga Phycopeltis within a young thallus of Phyllophiale (lower left). Phycopeltis is also the phycobiont found in mature thalli of P. rubentior and allies. The remnant of a central attachment stalk (dark area at center of thallus, not in plane of focus) indicates that the lichenized Phycopeltis shown originated from a discoid isidium characteristic of Phyllophiale . The isidium is probably of Phyllophiale alba or Phyllophiale viridis , which are thought to represent the vegetative counterparts of P. mirabilis and Porina pseudoapplanata , respectively ( Lücking & Cáceres, 1999 ). Both of the latter taxa produce 7-septate ascospores. Bar, 50 µm. (i) Development of fungal spores apparently dispersed together with phycobionts. Filiform septate conidia with encircled green algal symbionts. Germination hyphae are emerging radially (arrows). The fungus is Tapellariopsis octomera (Ectolechiaceae), which produces conidia in emergent hood-shaped campylidia; phycobiont cells penetrate into the sporogenous chamber of the campylidia, where they are encircled by the conidia before dispersal. Bar, 10 µm. (j) Germinating muriform ascospore with numerous algal cells appressed to its surface. Some algal cells are beginning to be enveloped by the germination hyphae (arrows). The ascospore is most likely of G. filicinum or Gyalideopsis vulgaris , members of the Gomphillaceae which are common at the field site. These taxa produce muriform ascospores in apothecia with epihymenial phycobiont cells apparently capable of attaching to the spores as they disperse. The great number and small size of the algal cells attached directly to the ascospore surface suggest an epihymenial origin. Symbiont codispersal is thus the most probable explanation in this case, although in other cases, evidence has suggested that algal zoospores may settle upon the surfaces of dispersed fungal spores ( Sanders, 2001a ). Bar, 20 µm. (k) Germination of fungal diahyphae. These fungal propagules, characteristic of the family Gomphillaceae, are borne upon elevated hyphophores. Diahyphal chains of teardrop-shaped fungal cells are producing germination hyphae (vertical arrows). An algal cell has been surrounded by germination hyphae (horizontal arrow). This type of diahypha is produced by hyphophores of certain species of Echinoplaca and Gyalideopsis ( Kalb & Vězda, 1988 ). Bar, 20 µm.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Results

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

Within 3–5 wk after placement, many cover slips were colonized by germinating fungal spores, as well as several types of chlorococcalean green algal cells. Among the latter were cells of Trebouxia, identified by their characteristic chloroplast (Fig. 1b). They were most often scattered singly upon the substratum, occasionally in groups of two or three, free of association with fungi. These aposymbiotic Trebouxia cells were occasionally observed in division (Fig. 1c). The discoid filamentous green alga Phycopeltis, an important symbiont in foliicolous lichens, occurred abundantly in the free-living state. The first fully recognizable lichens were minute thalli of Phyllophiale, which developed from characteristic disc-shaped isidia (Sanders, 2001a). Other vegetative lichen propagules, containing both fungal and algal symbionts, were commonly observed germinating on the substratum. The peripheral fungal cells produced hyphae that grew outward, often associating with free algal cells encountered on the substratum (Fig. 1d). Thus, the possession of a phycobiont in proximal portions of the young lichen did not appear to preclude incorporation of additional algae from the external environment by the advancing hyphae. Some dispersed fragments of lichen thalli of the family Gomphillaceae, consisting mainly of single hyaline setae, were seen propagating from remnants of the alga-containing thallus at the base of the seta (Fig. 1e). Soredia and similar lichenized propagules were also observed germinating; these probably represent lichen taxa which normally colonize branches and trunks.

Large, muriform (both longitudinally and transversely septate) fungal spores, most probably representing species of Gomphillaceae or Ectolechiaceae, produced a great number of germination hyphae from their unit cells, giving rise to a dense, radiating mat of mycelium. In several instances the hyphae could be seen surrounding trebouxioid algal cells encountered on the substratum, incorporating them into distinctive structures (Fig. 1f). Many of the enclosed algal cells were dividing. Fusiform, transversely septate fungal spores (Trichotheliaceae) were frequently observed with germination hyphae emerging from the terminal cells at opposite ends of the spore. The hyphae grew towards algal cells, especially thalli of Phycopeltis. The hyphae grew between and around the filamentous branches of Phycopeltis, surrounding the alga and producing hyphal branches, which radiated out over the substratum (Fig. 1g). The alga appeared to remain healthy.

Germinating lichen spores, possibly belonging to Porina rubentior or a related taxon (Trichotheliaceae), were also seen growing toward and apparently contacting already lichenized Phycopeltis within young Phyllophiale thalli (Fig. 1h). However, it was not possible to confirm whether any of the lichenizing hyphae associated with the alga originated from these germinated spores.

Some colonizing lichens began their development from fungal spores dispersed together with their algal symbiont. Filiform, septate spores wrapped around green algal cells were repeatedly observed in germination (Fig. 1i). These were campylidial conidia of Tapellariopsis, which typically has phycobiont cells present in the chambers where conidia are produced. The dispersed spores and algal cells were frequently observed in large clusters which merged in growth to produce a single continuous thallus. Large muriform ascospores (possibly Gyalectidium filicinum or Gyalideopsis vulgaris) with algal cells attached to their surfaces were also seen germinating on the coverslips (Fig. 1j). Their germ hyphae enveloped the attached algal cells and radiated out over the substratum.

The specialized propagular diahyphae characteristic of the Gomphillaceae and apparently unique to this group of fungi were also frequently seen. The diahyphae consisted of wefts of hyphae or chains of short fungal cells, which were generally dispersed as a unit. Numerous individual cells of the diahyphal chains produced germination hyphae (Figs 1k and 2a). Mycelia developing from germinating diahyphae contacted and incorporated trebouxioid algae encountered on the substratum (Fig. 2b).

image

Figure 2. Development of lichen thalli upon plastic cover slips placed over leaves in neotropical forest (Recife, Brazil). (a) Germinated diahyphal propagule. The two hyphae traversing the central lower edge of the micrograph are continuous with hyphae shown in (b). (b) Mycelium originating (via upper right corner of image) from germinated diahyphal propagule shown in (a). Coccoid green algal cells encountered upon the substratum have been enveloped by hyphae and are dividing (arrow). Bar, 20 µm. (c) Prothallic hyphae from young lichen thallus containing a chlorococcoid phycobiont (at lower edge of figure) surrounding a young thallus of the alga Phycopeltis . The Phycopeltis cells show clear signs of degeneration. Bar, 20 µm. (d) Young thallus of Tricharia sp., showing characteristic black setae (arrows) in various stages of development and incorporation into the lichenized thallus. Bar, 200 µm. (e) Prothallus of Tricharia , showing initiation of base of seta (arrows). Bar, 20 µm. (f) Tricharia : pigmentation of base of seta (arrow) initiated upon prothallus. Bar, 40 µm. (g) Tricharia : formation of elongate seta upon prothallus. Bar, 50 µm. (h) Tricharia : thallus proper, containing algal cells growing around the base of a seta. Bar, 50 µm. (i) Lobe of young thallus of a member of the Gomphillaceae, possibly Echinoplaca , bearing hyaline setae (not shown). Chlorococcoid phycobiont cells are arranged at the tips of closely appressed, advancing hyphae.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Germination hyphae and prothallic hyphae of young thalli also frequently contacted types of free-living algae clearly different from their phycobiont. In some cases, the contacting hyphae simply grew over or around the foreign algae, while in other cases the alga was encircled, its cells invaded and apparently destroyed by the hyphae (Fig. 2c).

While the fate of individual interactions observed could not be followed directly over time, a continuum of later stages of lichen thallus formation occurred on the experimental substratum. Formation of ascocarps was not observed within the study period, although some thalli did produce pycnidia (see Fig. 3g). Many of the larger thalli developed characteristic structures, such as setae (Fig. 2d) or discoid isidia, which confirmed that these lichens were typical members of the foliicolous community. Dark-pigmented, tapered setae, characteristic of the lichen genus Tricharia, were initiated upon the prothallus of hyphae extending beyond the alga-containing margin of the thallus. The earliest stage of seta initiation was evident as a distinct, circumscribed pad of closely appressed fungal cells which were initially hyaline (Fig. 2e). These prothallic cells produced a dark pigment (Fig. 2f) prior to vertical growth of the seta (Fig. 2g). The base of the seta was eventually surrounded by thalline tissue as the lichenized, alga-containing margin advanced beyond the base of the seta (Fig. 2h). Setae in various stages of development are visible on the Tricharia thallus shown in Fig. 2d.

A distinctive type of symbiont organization was evident at the margin of young Tricharia thalli, as well as in related taxa in the Gomphillaceae that produced hyaline setae. The phycobiont cells were positioned at the tips of a radially advancing fascicle of mycobiont hyphae (Fig. 2i). In many lobes these algal cells could be observed in active division (Fig. 3a). Proximally from the margin, hyphae diverging upward directed phycobiont cells into an algal layer forming above the hyphal fascicles. The positioning of the algal cells at hyphal tips appeared to be organized at an early stage of development (Fig. 3b).

image

Figure 3. Development of lichen thalli upon plastic cover slips placed over leaves in neotropical forest (Recife, Brazil). (a) Edge of young thallus of a member of the Gomphillaceae. Many of the phycobiont cells at the tips of the advancing hyphae are undergoing cell division (arrows). At the left, algal cell derivatives displaced into an overlying layer by diverging hyphae. Bar, 20 µm. (b) Young lichenized areole developing upon prothallus of a member of the Gomphillaceae. Phycobiont cells are displaced peripherally by elongation of fungal hyphae. Bar, 20 µm. (c) Initiation of thallus of Coenogonium sp., apparently from some sort of vegetative fragment (possibly isidioid propagules of Coenogonium isidiiferum ). These were the earliest stages of development attributable to this lichen, which occurred commonly on the experimental substratum. Bar, 50 µm. (d) Coenogonium sp. The filamentous phycobiont Trentepohlia is extending along the prothallic rays (arrows) laid down by the mycobiont. Bar, 50 µm. (e) Coenogonium sp. Detail showing relatively loose longitudinal contacts of fungal hyphae (arrows) with algal filaments. Bar, 20 µm. (f) Merging of lichenized protothalli in thallus development. The lichen might be Tapellariopsis octomera , a stage subsequent to that shown in Fig. 1i, as suggested by what appear to be remnants of looping filiform conidia (arrow). In such a case, the masses of conidia are likely to have originated from the same pycnidium, and the resulting mycelium would be expected to be genetically uniform. Bar, 50 µm. (g) Zone of interaction between two adjacent lichen thalli, both possessing a chlorococcoid phycobiont. One thallus shows a developing pycnidium (P). Bar, 50 µm. (h) Detail of zone of interaction shown in (g), showing contact and fusion of highly branched hyphae, and formation of swollen, septate, partly vacuolate cells. Bar, 20 µm. (i) Two closely adjacent thalli of clearly different taxa, one possessing a chlorococcoid phycobiont (at right), the other, Trentepohlia (at left). Growth of the Trentepohlia -containing lichen appears inhibited within an arc surrounding the young lichen at right (arrows). Bar, 50 µm.

Download figure to PowerPoint

A different type of organization was observed in a crustose Coenogonium (= Dimerella; Lücking & Kalb, 2000). This lichen produced an asterisk-shaped thallus containing the filamentous Trentepohlia as phycobiont. The earliest stages observed were dense clusters of the symbionts which appeared to result from some sort of vegetative propagule or fragment (Fig. 3c). The fungal prothallus of this lichen did not grow uniformly over the substratum; rather, the radial prothallic hyphae were grouped together, extending in several spokes or rays. Filaments of Trentepohlia advanced along these prothallic rays (Fig. 3d), giving rise to a thallus with deeply incised lobes. The fungal hyphae made somewhat intermittent lateral contacts with the algal filaments, often passing between separate algal filament branches (Fig. 3e). Some larger thalli produced pycnidia, which bore characteristic one-septate bacillar conidia.

Young lichen areoles growing in proximity often appeared to merge during development to form a continuous thallus (Fig. 3f). In other instances, however, a conspicuous zone of interaction developed where the prothalli of adjacent young thalli came into contact and sometimes fused (Fig. 3g). Within this zone, the hyphae sometimes showed extensive rebranching, septation, swelling, and some apparent vacuolation (Fig. 3h). In some cases, a brownish discoloration of the hyphae within the contact zone was apparent. Between neighboring thalli of obviously different lichen species, inhibition was often apparent in the locally restricted growth of the phycobionts of the adjacent thalli (Fig. 3i).

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

The results indicate that dispersal of (1) lichenized vegetative propagules and fragments, (2) aposymbiotic fungal spores, (3) fungal spores together with attached phycobionts and (4) diahyphae, all represent fully functional strategies of early colonization in foliicolous lichens. Early colonization was characterized by relatively large fungal spores or propagules, usually well-provided with food reserves in the form of large oil droplets. The fungus generally germinated from numerous peripheral points and spread in all directions, resulting in rapid establishment. Diahyphae germinated as a unit rather than dissociating into component cells. The dispersion of larger, well-provisioned propagules capable of mobilizing greater resources may permit a more rapid colonization of the ephemeral leaf substratum. The thin-walled ascospores which predominate among foliicolous lichens have also been seen as an adaptation for rapid development (Santesson, 1952). Large ascospores, however, appear to be a general feature of tropical rainforest lichens regardless of substratum; the significance of this feature remains to be fully clarified (Sipman & Harris, 1989).

Both aposymbiotic spores and diahyphae were capable of reassociating with algal symbionts encountered upon the substratum following germination. The associations depicted in Figs 1f,g and 2a,b appear to represent the earliest stages in reestablishment of the lichen symbiosis. The fungi in Fig. 1g,h are members of the Trichotheliaceae, the most abundant and diverse group among foliicolous lichens; these fungi appear to rely chiefly on aposymbiotically dispersed spores for reproduction (Santesson, 1952; Aptroot & Sipman, 1993; Lücking, 1996). The Gomphillaceae (Figs 1e,f,k and 2a,b, and possibly Fig. 1f,j) are the most diverse group of foliicolous lichens and the second most abundant next to the Trichotheliaceae. They appear to be highly adapted for both symbiotic and aposymbiotic modes of dispersal (Vězda, 1979; Vězda & Poelt, 1987; Lücking, 1997; Ferraro et al., 2001).

The specific identities of the algae have not been determined. Accurate identification of lichen phycobionts requires isolation and culture in the laboratory or molecular tools, and very few phycobionts of foliicolous lichens have been investigated (Tschermak-Woess, 1988). Preliminary molecular analyses indicate that Trebouxia and/or close relatives are the principal phycobionts in foliicolous members of the Gomphillaceae and Ectolechiaceae (R. Lücking, unpublished); the Trichotheliaceae have trentepohliaceous phycobionts, in particular the alga Phycopeltis. Representatives of these algal genera were observed on the cover slips both in the free-living state and in various stages of lichenization with germinating fungal propagules. The incorporation of additional external algae by hyphae of already lichenized propagules and thalli suggests that algal populations within lichen thalli might not be genetically uniform, or that their genetic composition might change in the course of development. The latter situation has been reported in the lichen Diploschistes muscorum (Friedl, 1987). Other reports have suggested that the converse process, substitution of the mycobiont, may also occur; lichen fungi might associate with already lichenized algae, replacing the original lichenizing fungus of vegetative propagules (Ott, 1987) or mature thalli (Poelt, 1974; Zehetleitner, 1978; Hawksworth et al., 1980). Such ‘theft’ of phycobionts might occur where microenvironmental conditions are suboptimal for development of a given lichen but more favorable to an invading lichen fungus. Because of the difficulty in determining from which fungus the lichenizing hyphae originate, the present study could not provide clear evidence for phycobiont theft. However, the observation that germinating spores will grow toward and apparently contact lichenized Phycopeltis thalli (Fig. 1h) at least suggests that the initial events postulated for such a process do indeed occur in this lichen community.

The results indicate that for many lichen fungi the symbiosis is interrupted and reacquired in the course of their life cycle. The existence of an aposymbiotic phase provides the opportunity for new nutritional experiments upon which natural selection may act. Selection may favor the germinating lichen fungal propagule which can take advantage of an alternative substrate when compatible algae are not available, leading to the eventual loss of the lichen mode of nutrition in some lineages. Conversely, in the case of nonlichen fungi, selection pressures may favor those germinating spores capable of making use of aposymbiotic lichen algae encountered in the absence of the fungus's usual substrate. New acquisition of the lichen habit by a fungus might also occur by association with algae not previously involved in lichen symbioses. However, it is interesting to note that separate lineages of fungi that acquired lichen symbiosis independently in the Basidiomycota (Omphalina, Dictyonema and Multiclavula) have phycobionts (Coccomyxa and Scytonema) of the same genera as those associated with Ascomycota (Tschermak-Woess, 1988). This suggests that new acquisition of lichen symbiosis by fungi might be more likely to occur with algae already adapted (or predisposed) to lichen symbiosis.

Developing lichen thalli revealed strikingly different patterns of organization by which mycobiont and phycobiont growth were coordinated. In several members of the Gomphillaceae (Tricharia and related taxa), the chlorococcoid phycobiont cells were organized at the periphery of the young lobes, their spherical cells positioned at the tips of parallel, longitudinally appressed hyphae growing outward from the thallus. This type of organization appears to provide a very simple mechanism by which growth of the mycobiont directly distributes the dividing phycobiont cells to the youngest parts of the radially expanding thallus. Inasmuch as the algal cells and their division products remain positioned at the tips of the advancing hyphae and their branches, apical growth of the hyphae would be sufficient to move the algal cells. Thus, it is not necessary to postulate nonapical or diffuse growth of fungal cells to explain algal distribution in such a system, although such nonapical growth might indeed occur. Various investigators have considered the question of how unicellular phycobionts become distributed throughout the lichen thallus in the course of mycobiont growth. Nienburg (1917) described localized, ephemeral bundles of Schiebehyphen (‘pushing hyphae’) in the lichen Pertusaria which appeared to direct isolated algal cells from within already differentiated, stratified portions of the thallus towards the prothallus at the periphery. In an examination of symbiont distribution mechanisms in Parmelia saxatilis, Greenhalgh & Anglesea (1979) did not observe any structures resembling Nienburg's Schiebehyphen. They attributed algal distribution to the repeated penetration of Trebouxia spore packets and subsequent separation of the daughter cells. A comparable process of separation and short-distance shifting of algal division products was proposed by Honegger (1987) to account for phycobiont distribution in complex lecanoralean lichen thalli. These mechanisms may represent more sophisticated, less obvious variants of the organizational system observed here in the simple crustose thalli of gomphillaceous lichens. By contrast, in Coenogonium, where both the fungus and its algal symbiont are filamentous, no comparable means of mechanical distribution of the phycobiont was evident. The algal filaments were seemingly autonomous in their growth and branching, yet their direction of development rather strictly followed the rays of prothallic hyphae laid down by the mycobiont. Coordination of symbiont growth in this lichen might depend more closely on substances released by the mycobiont.

Observation of seta development in Tricharia indicates that, while these structures often occur centrally on the lichenized, alga-containing thallus, they are actually formed peripherally upon the fungal prothallus. Structural organization of the thallus in this lichen thus appears to be overwhelmingly driven by the mycobiont. At the mycelial periphery the fungus initiates highly differentiated setae which tower above the thallus; fascicles of radially advancing hyphae move the phycobiont cells centrifugally to cover the prothallus with an organized layer of algal cells, surrounding the bases of the setae. Considering their size relative to the diminutive thallus, the setae would appear to represent a substantial investment of the lichen's resources, yet their function is unclear. Homologous structures often borne alongside them, the hyphophores, serve in production of the diahyphal propagules. Usually, however, the setae greatly outnumber the hyphophores, and are frequently numerous on thalli lacking hyphophores altogether. Some evidence of setae functioning as detachable propagules was observed in this study (Fig. 1e). However, those were shorter, hyaline setae of another taxon in the Gomphillaceae, perhaps Echinoplaca. The long black setae of Tricharia were not observed to disperse upon the experimental substratum and their germination capacity is unknown.

Interaction between mycobionts of neighboring thalli were also observed. Although such interactions have previously eluded microscopic study, there is reason to expect that neighboring lichen fungi interact in ways similar to nonlichen fungi. Researchers studying nonlichen fungi have characterized antagonistic/inhibitory interactions between nearby hyphae of competing species. These competitive interactions may include inhibition by depletion of resources, antagonism by antibiosis, or a cytological interference response produced by intimate contact between hyphae of competing species (Ikediugwu, 1976a,b; Rayner & Webber, 1984). Between the two neighboring thalli shown in Fig. 3i, whose different phycobionts clearly indicate that the lichens are of different species, a concave zone of mycelial avoidance is present in the otherwise circular perimeter of the Trentepohlia-containing lichen, where it approaches a neighboring lichen containing a chlorococcoid phycobiont. This inhibition is most likely produced by antibiosis, to which both the fungal prothallus and the Trentepohlia phycobiont appear to respond. In contrast to mycelial antagonism between competing species, mycelia of the same or closely related species may express somatic incompatibility, by which genotypically different individuals reject nonself cytoplasm following hyphal fusion (Aylmore & Todd, 1984; Rayner et al., 1984). The dark lines and inhibition zones frequently visible between adjacent crustose lichen thalli (including foliicolous taxa) have been attributed to somatic rejection responses (Rayner et al., 1984; Rayner, 1991; Clayden, 1997), although duplicating these interactions with axenically cultured mycobionts has been problematic (Dyer et al., 2001). The unusual morphology of the prothallic hyphae within the contact zone between certain thalli (Fig. 3g,h) may represent such a response. Hyphae from the adjacent lichens appear to be fused in the contact zone; they differ strikingly from prothallic hyphae elsewhere in their high degree of septation, swelling, and vacuolization, as well as in the extensive rebranching from hyphae peripheral to the contact zone.

Although leaf-dwelling lichens are evidently adapted for colonization of a specific type of substrate and microhabitat (Lücking, 2001), there is little reason to believe that they differ fundamentally from lichens of other substrates in their biology and development. The same basic types of propagules occur in other lichens of different habitats and substrates; the development of these propagules presumably follows similar principles. The ease with which foliicolous lichen development can be studied in situ should prove to be of great advantage in future experimental investigations of lichen biology and ecology.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

The first author would like to thank the Federal University of Pernambnco (UFPE) for the opportunity to fence as visiting professor at that Institution, and Dr Isabelle Tavares for her counsel and generosity. The kind cooperation of Luis Carlos Mafra and Alexandre Albuquerque of the Parque Estadual de Dois Irmãos, Recife, is gratefully acknowledged. Figures were composed using facilities at the Scientific Visualization Center, UC Berkeley, with technical advice kindly provided by Dr W. P. Chan. The manuscript benefited from critical review by Drs Isabelle Tavares, Richard L. Moe, and two anonymous referees.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References
  • Ahmadjian V, Jacobs JB. 1981. Relationship between fungus and alga in the lichen Cladonia cristatella Tuck. Nature 289: 169172.
  • Aptroot A, Sipman HJM. 1993. Trichotheliaceae. In: Görts-van RijnARA, ed. Flora of the Guianas. Series E: fungi and lichens. Königstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books, 157.
  • Aylmore RC, Todd NK. 1984. Hyphal fusion in Coriolus versicolor. In: JenningsDH, RaynerADM, eds. The ecology and physiology of the fungal mycelium. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 103125.
  • Bailey RH. 1976. Ecological aspects of dispersal and establishment in lichens. In: BrownDH, HawksworthDL, BaileyRH, eds. Lichenology: progress and problems. London, UK: Academic Press, 215247.
  • Beck A, Friedl T, Rambold G. 1998. Selectivity of photobiont choice in a defined lichen community: inferences from cultural and molecular studies. New Phytologist 139: 709720.
  • Bertsch A, Butin H. 1967. Die Kultur der Erdflechte Endocarpon pusillum im Labor. Planta 72: 2942.
  • Cáceres MES. 1998. Liquens foliícolas da Mata Atlântica de Pernambuco (Brasil): diversidade, ecogeografia, e conservação (Master's Thesis). Pernambuco, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.
  • Cáceres MES, Maia LC, Lücking R. 2000. Foliicolous lichens and their lichenicolous fungi in the Atlantic rainforest of Brazil: diversity, ecogeography and conservation. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 75: 4770.
  • Clayden SR. 1997. Intraspecific interactions and parasitism in an association of Rhizocarpon lecanorinum and R. geographicum. Lichenologist 29: 533545.
  • Dyer PS, Murtagh GJ, Crittenden PD. 2001. Use of RAPD-PCR DNA fingerprinting and vegetative incompatibility tests to investigate genetic variation within lichen-forming fungi. Symbiosis 31: 213229.
  • Ferraro LI, Lücking R, Sérusiaux E. 2001. A world monograph of the lichen genus Gyalectidium (Gomphillaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 137: 311345.
  • Friedl T. 1987. Aspects of thallus development in the parasitic lichen Diploschistes muscorum. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 25: 9597.
  • Gargas A, DePriest PT, Grube M, Tehler A. 1995. Multiple origins of lichen symbiosis in fungi suggested by SSU rDNA phylogeny. Science 268: 14921495.
  • Garty J, Delarea J. 1988. Evidence of liberation of lichen ascospores in clusters and reports on contact between free-living algal cells and germinating lichen ascospores under natural conditions. Canadian Journal of Botany 66: 21712177.
  • Greenhalgh GN, Anglesea D. 1979. The distribution of algal cells in lichen thalli. Lichenologist 11: 283292.
  • Hawksworth DL, Coppins BJ, James PW. 1980. Blarneya, a lichenized hyphomycete from southern Ireland. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 79: 357367.
  • Honegger R. 1987. Questions about pattern formation in the algal layer of lichens with stratified (heteromerous) thalli. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 25: 5971.
  • Ikediugwu FEO. 1976a. Ultrastructure of hyphal interference between Coprinus heptemerus and Ascobolus crenulatus. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 66: 281290.
  • Ikediugwu FEO. 1976b. The interface in hyphal interference by Peniophora gigantea against Heterobasidion annosum. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 66: 291296.
  • Jahns HM, Mollenhauer D, Jenninger M, Schönborn D. 1979. Die Neubesiedlung von Baumrinde durch Flechten I. Natur und Museum 109: 4051.
  • Kalb K, Vězda A. 1988. Neue oder bemerkenswerte Arten der Flechtenfamilie Gomphillaceae in der Neotropis. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 29: 1112.
  • Kirk PM, Cannon PF, David JC, Stalpers JA. 2001. Ainsworth and Bisby's dictionary of the fungi, 9th edn. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
  • Kroken S, Taylor J. 2000. Phylogenetic species, reproductive mode, and specificity of the green alga Trebouxia forming lichens with the fungal genus Letharia. Bryologist 103: 645660.
  • Lamb IM. 1959. Lichens. Scientific American 201: 144156.
  • Lücking R. 1996. Taxonomic studies in foliicolous species of the genus Porina. I. The Porina rufula aggregate. Botanica Acta 109: 248260.
  • Lücking R. 1997. Additions and corrections to the knowledge of the foliicolous lichen flora of Costa Rica, Central America. The family Gomphillaceae. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 65: 1109.
  • Lücking R. 1998. ‘Plasticolous’ lichens in a tropical rainforest at La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. Lichenologist 30: 287291.
  • Lücking R. 2001. Lichens on leaves in tropical rainforests: life in a permanently ephemerous environment. In: GottsbergerG, LiedeS, eds. Life forms and dynamics in tropical forests [dissertationes botanicae 346]. Berlin/Stuttgart, Germany: J. Cramer in der Gebrüder Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, 4177.
  • Lücking R, Cáceres MES. 1999. New species or interesting records of foliicolous lichens. IV. Porina pseudoapplanata (lichenized ascomycetes: Trichotheliaceae), a remarkable new species with Phyllophiale-type isidia. Lichenologist 31: 349358.
  • Lücking R, Kalb K. 2000. Foliikole Flechten aus Brasilien (vornehmlich Amazonien), inklusiv einer Checkliste und Bemerkungen zu Coenogonium und Dimerella (Gyalectaceae). Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 122: 161.
  • Lutzoni F, Pagel M, Reeb V. 2001. Major fungal lineages are derived from lichen symbiotic ancestors. Nature 411: 937940.
  • Nienburg W. 1917. Über die Beziehungen zwischen den Algen und Hyphen im Flechtenthallus. Zeitschrift für Botanik 9: 529545.
  • Ott S. 1987. Reproductive strategies in lichens. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 25: 8193.
  • Paulsrud P, Rikkinen J, Lindblad P. 1998. Cyanobiont specificity in some Nostoc-containing lichens and in a Peltigera aphthosa photosymbiodeme. New Phytologist 139: 517524.
  • Paulsrud P, Rikkinen J, Lindblad P. 2000. Spatial patterns of photobiont diversity in some Nostoc-containing lichens. New Phytologist 146: 291299.
  • Poelt J. 1974. Die parasitische Flechte Lecidia insidiosa und ihre Biologie. Plant Systematics and Evolution 123: 2534.
  • Rayner ADM. 1991. The challenge of the individualistic mycelium. Mycologia 83: 4871.
  • Rayner ADM, Webber JF. 1984. Interspecific mycelial interactions – an overview. In: JenningsDH, RaynerADM, eds. The Ecology and physiology of the fungal mycelium. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 383417.
  • Rayner ADM, Coates D, Ainsworth AM, Adams THJ, Williams END, Todd NK. 1984. The biological consequences of the individualistic mycelium. In: JenningsDH, RaynerADM, eds. The Ecology and physiology of the fungal mycelium. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 509540.
  • Sanders WB. 2001a. Preliminary light microscopic observations of fungal and algal colonization and lichen thallus initiation on glass slides placed near foliicolous lichen communities within a lowland tropical forest. Symbiosis 31: 8594.
  • Sanders WB. 2001b. Lichens: the interface between mycology and plant morphology. Bioscience 51: 10251035.
  • Santesson R. 1952. Foliicolous lichens – a revision of the taxonomy of the obligately foliicolous, lichenized fungi. Symbolae Botanicae Upsaliensis 12: 1590.
  • Scheidegger C. 1995. Early development of transplanted isidioid soredia of Lobaria pulmonaria in an endangered population. Lichenologist 27: 361374.
  • Schuster G, Ott S, Jahns HM. 1985. Artificial cultures of lichens in the natural environment. Lichenologist 17: 247253.
  • Sérusiaux E, De Sloover J. 1986. Taxonomical and ecological observations on foliicolous lichens in Northern Argentina, with notes on the hypophores [sic] of Asterothyriaceae. Veröffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes der Eidgenossischen Technischen Hochschule, Stiftung Rübel, Zürich 91: 260292.
  • Sipman HJM. 1994. Foliicolous lichens on plastic tape. Lichenologist 26: 311312.
  • Sipman HJM, Harris RC. 1989. Lichens. In: LiethH, WergerMJA, eds. Tropical rain forest ecosystems. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 303309.
  • Smith DC. 1980. Mechanisms of nutrient movement between the lichen symbionts. In: CookCB, PappasPW, RudolphED, eds. Cellular interactions in symbiosis and parasitism. Columbus, OH, USA: Ohio State University Press, 197227.
  • Tschermak-Woess E. 1988. The algal partner. In: GalunM, ed. CRC handbook of lichenology. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 3992.
  • Vězda A. 1979. Flechtensystematische Studien XI. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Familie Asterothyriaceae (Discolichenes). Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica, Praha 14: 4394.
  • Vězda A, Poelt J. 1987. Flechtensystematische Studien XII. Die Familie Gomphillaceae und ihre Gliederung. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica, Praha 22: 179198.
  • Ward HM. 1884. On the structure, development and life history of a tropical epiphyllous lichen (Strigula complanata Fée). Transactions of the Linnean Society (London), Botany 2: 87119.
  • Werner R-G. 1931. Histoire de la synthèse lichénique. Mémoires de la Société des Sciences Naturelles du Maroc 27: 745.
  • Zehetleitner G. 1978. Über einige parasitischen Arten der Flechtengattung Verrucaria. Nova Hedwigia 29: 683734.