SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abouheif E, Fairbairn DJ. 1997. A comparative analysis of allometry for sexual size dimorphism: assessing Rensch's rule. American Naturalist 149: 540562.
  • Abrahamson WG. 1975. Reproductive strategies in dewberries. Ecology 56: 721726.
  • Abrahamson WG. 1980. A comment on vegetative and seed reproduction in plants. Evolution 33: 517519.
  • Ackerman JD, Montalvo AM. 1990. Short- and long-term limitation to fruit production in a tropical orchid. Ecology 71: 263272.
  • Ågren J. 1987. Intersexual differences in phenology and damage by herbivores and pathogens in dioecious Rubus chamaemorus L. Oecologia 72: 161169.
  • Ågren J. 1988. Sexual differences in biomass and nutrient allocation in the dioecious Rubus chamaemorus L. Ecology 69: 962973.
  • Ågren J, Willson MF. 1994. Costs of seed production in the perennial herbs Geranium maculatum and G. sylvaticum: an experimental field study. Oikos 70: 3542.
  • Ahman I. 1997. Growth, herbivory and disease in relation to gender in Salix viminalis L. Oecologia 111: 6168.
  • Allen GA, Antos JA. 1988. Relative reproductive effort in males and females of the dioecious shrub Oemleria cerasiformis. Oecologia 76: 111118.
  • Allen GA, Antos JA. 1993. Sex ratio variation in the dioecious shrub Oemleria cerasiformis. American Naturalist 141: 537553.
  • Alliende MC, Harper JL. 1989. Demographic studies of a dioecious tree. I. Colonization, sex and age structure of a population of Salix cinerea. Journal of Ecology 77: 10291047.
  • Andersson M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
  • Antlfinger AE, Wendel LF. 1997. Reproductive effort and floral photosynthesis in Spiranthes cernua (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 769780.
  • Antonovics J. 1980. Concepts of resource allocation and partitioning in plants. In: JERStoddon, ed. Limits to action. The allocation of individual behaviour. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, 125.
  • Antos JA, Allen GA. 1999. Patterns of reproductive effort in male and female shrubs of Oemleria cerasiformis: a 6-year study. Journal of Ecology 87: 7784.
  • Armstrong RA. 1984. On the quantitative theory of reproductive effort in clonal plants: refinements of theory, with evidence from goldenrods and mayapples. Oecologia 63: 679686.
  • Armstrong JE, Irvine AK. 1989. Flowering, sex ratios, pollen-ovule ratios, fruit set, and reproductive effort of a dioecious tree, Myristica insipida (Myristicaceae), in two different rainforest communities. American Journal of Botany 76: 7485.
  • Ashman T-L. 1992. Indirect costs of seed production within and between seasons in a gynodioecious species. Oecologia 92: 266272.
  • Ashman T-L. 1994. A dynamic perspective on the physiological cost of reproduction in plants. American Naturalist 144: 300316.
  • Ashman T-L, Schoen DJ. 1997. The cost of floral longevity in Clarkia tembloriensis: An experimental investigation. Evolutionary Ecology 11: 289300.
  • Ataroff M, Schwarzkopf M. 1992. Leaf production, reproductive patterns, field germination and seedling survival in Chamaedorea bartlingliana, a dioecious understory palm. Oecologia 92: 250256.
  • Atlan A, Gouyon P-H, Fournial T, Pomente D, Couvet D. 1992. Sex allocation in an hermaphroditic plant: the case of gynodioecy in Thymus vulgaris L. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 5: 189203.
  • Baalen JV, WHO Ernst Andel JV, Janssen DW. 1990. Reproductive allocation in plants of Scrophularia nodosa grown at various levels of irradiance and soil fertility. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 39: 183196.
  • Bailey RC. 1992. Why we should stop trying to measure the cost of reproduction correctly. Oikos 65: 349352.
  • Bakker C, Loonen MJJE. 1998. The influence of goose grazing on the growth of Poa arctic: overestimation of overcompensation. Oikos 82: 459466.
  • Bañuelos MJ. 2001. Ecología del crecimiento y de la reproducción en el arbusto dioico. Rhamnus Alpinus L. Ph D. Dissertation. Oviedo University, Spain.
  • Barret SCH. 1981. Floral sex ratios and life history in Aralia nudicaulis (Araliaceae). Evolution 35: 752762.
  • Bazzaz FA. 1997. Allocation of resources in plants: state of the science and critical questions. In: FABazzaz, JGrace, eds. Plant resource allocation. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, 137.
  • Bazzaz FADD, Ackerly. 1992. Reproductive allocation and reproductive effort in plants. In: MFenner, ed. Seeds. The ecology of regeneration in plant communities. Oxford, UK: CAB International, 126.
  • Bazzaz FA, Carlsson RW, Harper JL. 1979. Contribution to reproductive effort by photosynthetic flowers and fruits. Nature 279: 554555.
  • Bazzaz FAEG, Reekie. 1985. The meaning of reproductive effort in plants. In: JLHarper, ed. Studies on plant demography: a festschrift for John L. Harper. London, UK: Academic Press Inc, 373387.
  • Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR. 1986. Ecology. Individuals, populations and communities. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  • Bell G. 1980. The costs of reproduction and their consequences. American Naturalist 116: 4576.
  • Bell GV, Koufopanou. 1986. The cost of reproduction. In: RDawkins, MRidley, eds. Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, Vol. 3. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 83131.
  • Belsky AJ, Carson WP, Jensen CJ, Fox G. 1993. Overcompensation by plants: herbivore optimization or red herring? Evolutionary Ecology 7: 109121.
  • Bender MH, Baskin JM, Baskin CC. 2000. Age of maturity and life span in herbaceous polycarpic perennials. Botanical Review 66: 311349.
  • Bergelson J, Purrington CB. 1996. Surveying patterns in the cost of resistance in plants. American Naturalist 148: 536558.
  • Biere A. 1995. Genotypic and plastic variation in plant size: effects on fecundity and allocation patterns in Lychnis flos-cuculi along a gradient of natural soil fertility. Journal of Ecology 83: 629642.
  • Bierzychudek P, Eckhart V. 1988. Spatial segregation of the sexes of dioecious plants. American Naturalist 132: 3443.
  • Bloom A, Chapin FI, Mooney H. 1985. Resource limitation in plants – an economic analogy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 363392.
  • Bram MR, Quinn JA. 1995. Sex ratios, sex expression, and ecology of Amaranthus cannabinus (L.) Sauer. American Journal of Botany 82: S46.
  • Briggs MA, Schultz JC. 1990. Chemical defense production in Lotus corniculatus L. II. Trade-offs among growth, reproduction and defense. Oecologia 83: 3237.
  • Bullock SH. 1982. Population structure and reproduction in the Neotropical dioecious tree Compsoneura sprucei. Oecologia 55: 238242.
  • Bullock SH, Bawa KS. 1981. Sexual dimorphism and the annual flowering pattern in Jacaratia dolichaula (D. Smith) Woodson (Caricacceae) in a Costa Rican rain forest. Ecology 62: 14941504.
  • Bullock SH, Beach JH, Bawa KS. 1983. Episodic flowering and sexual dimorphism in Guarea rhopalocarpa in a Costa Rican rain forest. Ecology 64: 851861.
  • Caesar JC, Macdonald AD. 1984. Shoot development in Betula papyrifera. V. Effect of male inflorescence formation and flowering on long-shoot development. Canadian Journal of Botany 62: 17081713.
  • Calow P. 1981. Resource utilization and reproduction. In: CRTownsend, PCalow, eds. Physiological ecology: an evolutionary approach to resource use. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 245270.
  • Calvo RN. 1990. Four-year growth and reproduction of the Cyclopogon cranichoides (Orchidaceae) in South Florida. American Journal of Botany 77: 736741.
  • Calvo RN. 1993. Evolutionary demography of orchids: intensity and frequency of pollination and the cost of fruiting. Ecology 74: 10331042.
  • Cannell MGR, Dewar RC. 1994. Carbon allocation in trees: a review of concepts for modelling. Advances in Ecological Research 25: 59104.
  • Cavigelli M, Poulos M, Lacey EP, Mellon G. 1986. Sexual dimorphism in a temperate dioecious tree, Ilex montana (Aquifoliaceae). American Midland Naturalist 115: 397406.
  • Chalfoun AD, Thompson FR, Ratnaswamy MJ, III. 2002. Nest predators and fragmentation: a review and meta-analysis. Conservation Biology 16: 306318.
  • Chailakhyan NKH, Khrianin VN 1987. Sexuality in plants and its hormonal regulation. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag.
  • Chapin FSI. 1989. The cost of tundra plant structures: evaluation of concepts and currencies. American Naturalist 133: 119.
  • Chapin FSI, Bloom AJ, Field CB, Waring RH. 1987. Plant responses to multiple environmental factors. Bioscience 37: 4957.
  • Charlesworth D. 1984. Androecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23: 333343.
  • Cipollini ML, Stiles EW. 1991. Costs of reproduction in Nyssa sylvatica: sexual dimorphism in reproductive frequency and nutrient flux. Oecologia 86: 585593.
  • Cipollini ML, Wallace-Senft DA, Whigham DF. 1994. A model of patch dynamics, seed dispersal, and sex ratio in the dioecious shrub Lindera benzoin (Lauraceae). Journal of Ecology 82: 621633.
  • Cipollini ML, Whigham DF. 1994. Sexual dimorphism and cost of reproduction in the dioecious shrub Lindera benzoin (Lauraceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 6575.
  • Clark DA, Clark DB. 1987. Temporal and environmental patterns of reproduction in Zamia skinneri, a tropical rain forest cycad. Journal of Ecology 75: 135149.
  • Clark RB, Orton ER. 1967. Sex ratio in Ilex opaca Ait. Hortscience 2: 115.
  • Coleman RM, Gross MR. 1991. Parental investment theory: the role of past investment. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6: 404406.
  • Colwell RK. 2000. Rensch's rule crosses the line: convergent allometry of sexual size dimorphism in Hummingbirds and flower mites. American Naturalist 156: 495510.
  • Conn JS, Blum U. 1981. Differentiation between the sexes of Rumex hastatulus in net energy allocation, flowering and height. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 108: 446455.
  • Connor HE. 1984. Breeding systems in New Zealand grasses IX: sex ratios in dioecious Spinifex sericeus. New Zealand Journal of Botany 22: 569574.
  • Costich DE. 1995. Gender specialization across a climatic gradient: experimental comparison of monoecious and dioecious Ecballium. Ecology 76: 10361050.
  • Crawford RMM, Balfour J. 1983. Female predominant sex ratios and physiological differentiation in arctic willows. Journal of Ecology 71: 149160.
  • Davidson CG, Remphrey WR. 1990. An analysis of architectural parameters of male and female Fraxinus pennsylvanica in relation to crown shape and crown location. Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 20352043.
  • Dawson TE, Bliss LC. 1989. Patterns of water use and tissue water relation in the dioecious shrub, Salix arctica: the physiological basis for habitat partitioning between the sexes. Oecologia 79: 332343.
  • Dawson TE, Ehleringer JR. 1993. Gender-specific physiology, carbon isotope discrimination, and habitat distribution in boxelder, Acer negundo. Ecology 74: 798815.
  • Dawson TE, Ehleringer JD, Marshall JD. 1990. Sex-ratio and reproductive variation in the mistletoe Phoradendron juniperinum (Viscaceae). American Journal of Botany 77: 584589.
  • Delesalle VA, Mooreside PD. 1995. Estimating the costs of allocation to male and female functions in a monoecious cucurbit, Lagenaria siceraria. Oecologia 102: 916.
  • Delph LF. 1990. Sex-differential resource allocation patterns in the subdioecious shrub Hebe subalpina. Ecology 71: 13421351.
  • Delph LF. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in life history. In: MAGeber, TEDawson, LFDelph, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 149173.
  • Delph LF, Lu Y, Jayne LD. 1993. Patterns of resource allocation in a dioecious Carex (Cyperaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 607615.
  • Delph LF, Meagher TR. 1995. Sexual dimorphism masks life history trade-off in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. Ecology 76: 775785.
  • Despland E, Houle G. 1997. Climate influences on growth and reproduction of Pinus banksiana (Pinaceae) at the limit of the species distribution in Eastern North America. American Journal of Botany 84: 928937.
  • Dick JM, Smith R, Jarvis PG. 1990. Respiration rate of male and female cones of Pinus contorta. Trees 4: 142149.
  • Diggle PK. 1995. Architectural effects and the interpretation patterns of fruit and seed development. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 531552.
  • Domínguez CA, Dirzo R. 1994. Effects of defoliation on Erythroxylum havanense: a tropical proleptic species. Ecology 75: 18961902.
  • Dudash MR, Fenster C. 1997. Multiyear study of pollen limitation and cost of reproduction in the iteroparous Silene virginica. Ecology 78: 484493.
  • Duffy NM, Bonser SP, Aarssen LW. 1999. Patterns of variation in meristem allocation across genotypes and species in monocarpic Brassicaceae. Oikos 84: 284292.
  • Eckart VM. 1992. Resource compensation and evolution of gynodioecy in Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Evolution 46: 13131328.
  • Eckstein RL, Karlsson PS. 2001. The effects of reproduction on nitrogen use-efficiency of three species of the carnivorous genus Pinguicula. Journal of Ecology 89: 798806.
  • Ehrlén J, Groenendael JV. 2001. Storage and the delayed costs of reproduction in the understorey perennial Lathyrus vernus. Journal of Ecology 89: 237246.
  • El-Kassaby YA, Barclay HJ. 1992. Cost of reproduction in Douglas-fir. Canadian Journal of Botany 70: 14291432.
  • El-Keblawy A, Lovett-Doust J. 1996a. Resource re-allocation following fruit removal in cucurbits: patterns in cantaloupe melons. New Phytologist 134: 413422.
  • El-Keblawy A, Lovett-Doust J. 1996b. Resource re-allocation following fruit removal in cucurbits: patterns in two varieties of squash. New Phytologist 133: 583593.
  • Elmqvist T, Gardfjell H. 1988. Differences in response to defoliation between males and females of Silene dioica. Oecologia 77: 225230.
  • Emms SK, Stratton DA, Snow AA. 1997. The effects of inflorescence size on male fitness: experimental tests in the andromonoecious lily, Zygadenus paniculatus. Evolution 51: 14811489.
  • Fairbairn DJ. 1997. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: patterns and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 659687.
  • Fisher M, Gardner AS. 1995. The status and ecology of Juniperus excelsa subsp. Polycarpos woodland in the northern mountains of Oman. Vegetatio 119: 3351.
  • Fisher RA. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Fleming TH, Maurice S, Buchmann SL, Tuttle MD. 1994. Reproductive biology and relative male and female fitness in a trioecious cactus, Pachycereus pringley (Cactaceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 858867.
  • Fox JF. 1995. Shoot demographic responses to manipulation of reproductive effort by bud removal in a willow. Oikos 72: 283287.
  • Fox JF, Stevens GC. 1991. Costs of reproduction in a willow: experimental responses vs natural variation. Ecology 72: 10131023.
  • Freeman DC, Klikoff LG, Harper KT. 1976. Differential resource utilization by the sexes of dioecious plants. Science 193: 597599.
  • Freeman DC, Lovett-Doust J, El-Keblawy A. 1997. Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy. Botanical Review 63: 6592.
  • Galen C. 1996. Cost of reproduction in Polemonium viscosum: phenotypic and genetic approaches. Evolution 47: 10731079.
  • Galen C, Dawson TE, Stanton ML. 1993. Carpels as leaves: meeting the carbon cost of reproduction in an alpine buttercup. Oecologia 95: 187193.
  • García MB, Antor RJ. 1995. Age and size structure in populations of a long-lived dioecious geophyte: Borderea pyrenaica (Dioscoreaceae). International Journal of Plant Science 156: 236243.
  • Geber MA. 1990. The cost of meristem limitation in Polygonum arenastrum: negative genetic correlations between fecundity and growth. Evolution 44: 799819.
  • Gehring JL, Linhart YB. 1993. Sexual dimorphisms and response to low resources in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). International Journal of Plant Science 154: 152162.
  • Gibson DJ, Menges ES. 1994. Population structure and spatial pattern in the dioecious shrub Ceratiola ericoides. Journal of Vegetation Science 5: 337346.
  • Gifford RM, Evans LT. 1981. Photosynthesis, carbon partitioning, and yield. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 32: 485509.
  • Gillooly JF, Brown JH, West GB, Savage VM, Charnov EL. 2001. Effects of size and temperature on metabolic rate. Science 293: 22482251.
  • Goldman DA, Willson MF. 1986. Sex allocation in functionally hermaphroditic plants: a review and a critique. Botanical Review 52: 157194.
  • Gould SJ. 1989. A developmental constraint in Cerion, with comments on the definition and interpretation of constraint in evolution. Evolution 43: 516539.
  • Grant MC, Mitton JB. 1979. Elevational gradients in adult sex ratios and sexual differentiation in vegetative growth rates in Populus tremuloides Michx. Evolution 33: 914918.
  • Gurevitch JLV, Hedges. 1993. Meta-analysis: combining the results of independent experiments. In: SMScheiner, JGurevitch, eds. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall, 378398.
  • Hancock JF, Bringhurst RS. 1980. Sexual dimorphism in the strawberry Fragaria chiloensis. Evolution 34: 762768.
  • Harder LD, Barret SCH. 1992. The energy cost of bee pollination for Pontederia cordata (Pontederiaceae). Functional Ecology 6: 226233.
  • Harper JL. 1977. Population biology of plants. London, UK: Academic Press.
  • Harper JL, White J. 1974. The demography of plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5: 419463.
  • Hasegawa S, Takeda H. 2001. Functional specialization of current shoots as a reproductive strategy in Japanese alder (Alnus shirsuta var. sibirica). Canadian Journal of Botany 79: 3848.
  • Hemborg AM. 1998a. Reproductive allocation and costs of reproduction in subarctic herbs. A resource based perspective. PhD Dissertation, Uppsala University.
  • Hemborg AM. 1998b. Cost of reproduction in subarctic Ranunculus acris: a five-year field experiment. Oikos 83: 273282.
  • Hemborg AM, Karlsson PS. 1998a. Somatic cost of reproduction in eight subarctic plant species. Oikos 82: 149157.
  • Hemborg AM, Karlsson PS. 1998b. Altitudinal variation in size effects on plant reproductive effort and somatic costs of reproduction. Ecoscience 5: 517525.
  • Henriksson J, Ruohomäki K. 2000. Assessing costs of reproduction in mountain birch: the importance of considering the modular level. Annals of Botany 86: 503510.
  • Hermanutz LA, Innes DJ. 1994. Gender variation in Silene acaulis (Caryophyllaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 191: 6981.
  • Herms DA, Mattson WJ. 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 283335.
  • Herrera CM. 1988. Plant size, spacing patterns, and host-plant selection in Osyris quadripartita, a hemiparasitic dioecious shrub. Journal of Ecology 76: 9951006.
  • Hoffmann AJ, Alliende MC. 1984. Interactions in the patterns of vegetative growth and reproduction in woody dioecious plants. Oecologia 61: 109114.
  • Holtsford TP. 1985. Nonfruiting hermaphroditic flowers of Calochortus leichtlinii (Liliaceae): Potential reproductive functions. American Journal of Botany 72: 16871694.
  • Honkanen T, Haukioja E. 1998. Intra-plant regulation of growth and plant–herbivore interactions. Ecoscience 5: 470479.
  • Horvitz CC, Schemske DW. 1988. Demographic cost of reproduction in a neotropical herb: an experimental field study. Ecology 69: 17411745.
  • Horvitz CC, Schemske DW. 2002. Effects of plant size, leaf herbivory, local competition and fruit production on survival, growth and future reproduction of a neotropical herb. Journal of Ecology 90: 279290.
  • Hossaert-McKey M, Jarry. 1992. Spatial and temporal patterns of investment in growth and sexual reproduction in two stoloniferous species, Lathyrus latifolius and L. sylvestris. Journal of Ecology 80: 555565.
  • Houssard C, Escarré J. 1995. Variation and covariation among life-history traits in Rumex acetosella from a successional old-field gradient. Oecologia 102: 7080.
  • Houle G. 2001. Reproductive costs are associated with both male and female functions in Alnus viridis ssp. crispa. Ecoscience 8: 220229.
  • Jackson LL, Dewald CL. 1994. Predicting the evolutionary consequences of greater reproductive effort in Tripsacum dactyloides, a perennial grass. Ecology 75: 627641.
  • Janzen DH. 1976. Effects of defoliation on fruit-bearing branches of the kentucky coffee-tree Gymnocladus dioicus (Leguminosae). American Midland Naturalist 95: 474478.
  • Jennersten O. 1991. Cost of reproduction in Viscaria vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae): a field experiment. Oikos 61: 197204.
  • Jing SW, Coley PD. 1990. Dioecy and herbivory: the effect of growth rate on plant defense in Acer negundo. Oikos 58: 369377.
  • De Jong G. 1993. Covariances between traits deriving from successive allocations of a resource. Functional Ecology 7: 7583.
  • De Jong G, Van Noordwijk AJ. 1992. Acquisition and allocation of resources genetic (co)variances, selection, and life histories. American Naturalist 139: 749770.
  • Jönsson KI. 2000. Life history consequences of fixed costs of reproduction. Ecoscience 7: 423427.
  • Jönsson KI, Tuomi J. 1994. Costs of reproduction in a historical perspective. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 304306.
  • Jönsson KI, Tuomi J, Järemo J. 1995a. Reproductive effort tactics: balancing pre- and postbreeding costs of reproduction. Oikos 74: 3544.
  • Jönsson KI, Tuomi J, Järemo J. 1995b. On the consequences of pre- and postbreeding costs in the evolution of reproductive effort tactics. Ecoscience 2: 311320.
  • Jurik TW. 1985. Differential costs of sexual and vegetative reproduction in wild strawberry populations. Oecologia 66: 394403.
  • Karlsson PS. 1994. Photosynthetic capacity and photosynthetic nutrient-use efficiency of Rhododendron lapponicum leaves as related to nutrient status, leaf age and branch reproductive status. Functional Ecology 8: 694700.
  • Karlsson PS, Olsson L, Hellström K. 1996. Trade-offs among investments in different long-shoot functions – variation among mountain birch individuals. Journal of Ecology 84: 915921.
  • Karlsson PS, Svensson BM, Carlsson BÅ, Nordell KO. 1990. Resource investment in reproduction and its consequences in three Pinguicula species. Oikos 59: 393398.
  • Kesseli R, Jain SK. 1984. An ecological genetic study of gynodioecy in Limnanthes douglasii (Limnanthaceae). American Journal of Botany 71: 775786.
  • Kirby KJ. 1980. Experiments on vegetative reproduction in bramble (Rubus vestitus). Journal of Ecology 68: 513520.
  • Klekowski EJ Jr. 1997. Somatic mutation theory of clonality. In: HD. Kroon, JVGroenendael, eds. The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers, 227241.
  • Klinkhamer PGL, Meelis E, De Jong TJ, Weiner J. 1992. On the analysis of size-dependent reproductive output in plants. Functional Ecology 6: 308316.
  • Kohn JR. 1989. Sex ratio, seed production, biomass allocation and the cost of male function in Cucurbita foetidissima HBK (Cucucurbitaceae). Evolution 43: 14241434.
  • Kohorn LU. 1994. Shoot morphology and reproduction in jojoba: advantages of sexual dimorphism. Ecology 75: 23842394.
  • Koppel L, Troeng E, Linder S. 1987. Respiration and photosynthesis in cones of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Trees 1: 123128.
  • Koricheva J. 2002. Meta-analysis of sources of variation in fitness costs of plant antiherbivore defenses. Ecology 83: 176190.
  • Kozlowski J. 1991. Optimal energy allocation models – an alternative to the concepts of reproductive effort and cost of reproduction. Acta Oecologica 12: 1133.
  • Kozlowski J. 1992. Optimal allocation of resources to growth and reproduction: implications for age and size at maturity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7: 1519.
  • Krischik VA, Denno RF. 1990. Patterns of growth, reproduction, defense, and herbivory in the dioecious shrub Baccharis halimifolia (Compositae). Oecologia 83: 182190.
  • Laporte MM, Delph LF. 1996. Sex-specific physiology and source-sink relations in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. Oecologia 106: 6372.
  • Law R. 1979. The cost of reproduction in annual meadow grass. American Naturalist 113: 316.
  • Lee TD. 1988. Patterns of fruit and seed production. In: JLovett-Doust, LLovett-Doust, eds. Plant reproductive ecology. patterns and strategies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 179202.
  • Lehtilä K, Syrjänen K. 1995. Positive effects of pollination on subsequent size, reproduction and survival of Primula veris. Ecology 76: 10841098.
  • Lennartsson T, Nilsson P, Tuomi J. 1998. Induction of overcompensation in the field gentian, Gentianella campestris. Ecology. 79: 10611072.
  • Lerdau M. 1992. Future discounts and resource allocation in plants. Functional Ecology 6: 371375.
  • Levins R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
  • Lloyd DG. 1980. Sexual strategies in plants. I. An hypothesis on serial adjustment of maternal investment during one reproductive session. New Phytologist 86: 6979.
  • Lloyd DG. 1984. Gender allocation in outcrossing cosexual plants. In: RDirzo, JSarukhan, eds. Plant population biology. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates, 277303.
  • Lloyd DG, Bawa KS. 1984. Modification of the gender of seed plants in varying conditions. Evolutionary Biology 17: 255338.
  • Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1977. Secondary sex characters in plants. Botanical Review 43: 177216.
  • Loehle C. 1987. Partitioning of reproductive effort in clonal plants: a benefit-cost model. Oikos 49: 199208.
  • Lokker C, Susko D, Lovett-Doust L, Lovett-Doust J. 1994. Population genetic structure of Vallisneria americana, a dioecious clonal macrophyte. American Journal of Botany 81: 10041012.
  • Lovett Doust J, Laporte G. 1991. Population sex ratios, population mixtures and fecundity in a clonal dioecious macrophyte, Vallismeria americana. Journal of Ecology 79: 477489.
  • Lovett-Doust J. 1989. Plant reproductive strategies and resource allocation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4: 230234.
  • Lovett-Doust J, Lovett-Doust L. 1987. Leaf demography and clonal growth in female and male Rumex acetosella. Ecology 68: 20652078.
  • Lovett-Doust J, Lovett-Doust L. 1988. Modules of production and reproduction in a dioecious clonal shrub, Rhus typhina. Ecology 69: 741750.
  • Lubbers A, Lechowicz MJ. 1989. Effect of leaf removal on reproductioin vs belowground storage in Trillium grandiflorum. Ecology 70: 8596.
  • Luken JO. 1987. Interactions between seed production and vegetative growth in staghorn sumac, Rhus typhina. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 114: 247251.
  • Maillete L. 1985. Modular demography and growth patterns of two annual weeds (Chenopodium album L. & Spergula arvensis L.) in relation to flowering. In: JWhite, ed. Studies on plant demography: a festchrift for John L. Harper. London, UK: Academic Press Inc, 239255.
  • Maki M. 1996. Differences in plant size and flower production between hermaphrodites and females of two gynodioecious Chionographis (Liliaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 150153.
  • Marion C, Houle G. 1996. No differential consequences of reproduction according to sex in Juniperus communis var. depressa (Cupresaceae). American Journal of Botany 83: 480488.
  • Marquis RJ. 1992. A bite is a bite is a bite? Constraints on response to folivory in Piper arieianum (Piperaceae). Ecology 73: 143152.
  • Maschinski J, Whitham TG. 1989. The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability, and timing. American Naturalist 134: 119.
  • Matsui K. 1995. Sex expression, sex change and fruiting habit in an Acer rufinerve population. Ecological Research 10: 6574.
  • McDowell SCL, McDowell NG, Marshall JD, Hultine K. 2000. Carbon and nitrogen allocation to male and female reproduction in Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. galuca, Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 539546.
  • Meagher TR. 1984. Sexual dimorphism and ecological differentiation of male and female plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 71: 254264.
  • Meagher TR, Antonovics J. 1982. The population biology of Chamaelirium luteum, a dioecious member of the lily family: life history studies. Ecology 63: 16901700.
  • Melampy MN, Howe HF. 1977. Sex ratio in the tropical tree Triplaris americana (Polygonaceae). Evolution 31: 867872.
  • Méndez M, Karlsson PS. 1999. Costs and benefits of carnivory in plants: insights from the photosynthetic performance of four carnivorous plants in a subarctic environment. Oikos 86: 105112.
  • Méndez M, Obeso JR. 1993. Size-dependent reproductive and vegetative allocation in Arum italicum (Araceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 71: 309314.
  • Meyer GA. 1998. Pattern of defoliation and its effects on photosynthesis and growth of Goldenrod. Functional Ecology 12: 270279.
  • Mitton JB, Corant MC. 1980. Observations on the ecology of Populus tremuloides in the Colorado Front range. American Journal of Botany 67: 202209.
  • Mole S. 1994. Trade-offs and constraints in plant-herbivore defense theory: a life-history perspective. Oikos 71: 312.
  • Muir AM. 1995. The cost of reproduction to the clonal herb Asarum canadense (wild ginger). Canadian Journal of Botany 73: 16831686.
  • Mutikainen P, Ojala A. 1993. Simulated herbivory and air pollution: growth and reproduction of an evergreen dwarf shrub, Empetrum nigrum. Acta Oecologica 14: 771780.
  • Mutikainen P, Walls M, Ojala A. 1994. Sexual differences in responses to simulated herbivory in Urtica dioica. Oikos 69: 397404.
  • Newell EA. 1991. Direct and delayed costs of reproduction in Aesculus californica. Journal of Ecology 79: 365378.
  • Newell SJ, Tramer EJ. 1978. Reproductive strategies in herbaceous plant communities during succession. Ecology 59: 228234.
  • Nicotra AB. 1999. Reproductive allocation and the long-term costs of reproduction in Sipanura grandiflora, a dioecious neotropical shrub. Journal of Ecology 87: 138149.
  • Niklas KJ. 1994. Plant allometry. The scaling of form and process. Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago University Press.
  • Noordwijk AJV, De Jong G. 1986. Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. American Naturalist 128: 137142.
  • Obeso JR. 1993a. Does defoliation affect reproductive output in herbaceous perennials and woody plants in different ways? Functional Ecology 7: 150155.
  • Obeso JR. 1993b. Cost of reproduction in the perennial herb Asphodelus albus (Liliaceae). Ecography 16: 365371.
  • Obeso JR. 1997. Costs of reproduction in Ilex aquifolium: effects at tree, branch and leaf levels. Journal of Ecology 85: 159166.
  • Obeso JR. 1998. Effects of defoliation and girdling on fruit production in Ilex aquifolium. Functional Ecology 12: 486491.
  • Obeso JR, Álvarez-Santullano M, Retuerto R. 1998. Sex-ratios, size distributions, and sexual dimorphism in the dioecious tree Ilex aquifolium (Aquifoliaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 16021608.
  • Obeso JR, Grubb PJ. 1993. Fruit maturation in the shrub Ligustrum vulgare (Oleaceae): lack of defoliation effects. Oikos 68: 309316.
  • Obeso JR, Grubb PJ. 1994. Interactive effects of extent and timing of defoliation and nutrient supply on reproduction in a chemically protected annual Senecio vulgaris. Oikos 71: 506514.
  • Obeso JR, Retuerto R. 2002. Sexual dimorphism in holly Ilex aquifolium: costs of reproduction, sexual selection or physiological differentiation? Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 75: 6777.
  • Ogawa K, Furukawa A, Hagihara A, Abdullah AM, Awang M. 1995. In situ CO2 gas-exchange in fruits of a tropical tree, Durio zibethinus Murray. Trees 9: 241246.
  • Ogawa K, Takano Y. 1997. Seasonal courses of CO2 exchange and carbon balance in fruits of Cinnamomum camphora. Tree Physiology 17: 415420.
  • Onyekwelu SS, Harper JL. 1979. Sex ratio and niche differentiation in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Nature 282: 609611.
  • Opler PA, Bawa KS. 1978. Sex ratios in tropical trees. Evolution 32: 812821.
  • Ornduff R. 1990. Geographic variation in reproductive behavior and size structure of the Australian cycad Macrozamia communis (Zamiaceae). American Journal of Botany 77: 9299.
  • Ornduff R. 1996. Gender performance in a cultivated cohort of the cycad Zamia integrifolia (Zamiaceae). American Journal of Botany 83: 10051015.
  • Osunkoya OO. 1999. Population structure and breeding biology in relation to conservation in the dioecious Gardenia actinocarpa (Rubiaceae) – a rare shrub of North Queensland rainforest. Biological Conservation 88: 347359.
  • Oyama K. 1990. Variation in growth and reproduction in the neotropical dioecious palm Chamaedorea tepejilote. Journal of Ecology 78: 648663.
  • Paige KN. 1992. Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: from mutualistic to antagonistic interactions. Ecology 73: 20762085.
  • Paige KN. 1999. Regrowth following ungulate herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata: geographic evidence for overcompensation. Oecologia 118: 316323.
  • Partridge L. 1989. An experimentalist's approach to the role of costs of reproduction in the evolution of life-histories. In: PJGrubb, JBWhittaker, eds. Toward a more exact ecology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 231246.
  • Partridge L. 1992. Measuring reproductive costs. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7: 99.
  • Partridge L, Harvey PH. 1988. Costs of reproduction. Nature 316: 2021.
  • Piñero D, Sarukhán J, Alberdi P. 1982. The costs of reproduction in a tropical palm, Astrocaryum mexicanum. Journal of Ecology 70: 473481.
  • Pitelka LF, Hansen SB, Ashmun JW. 1985. Population biology of Clintonia borealis. I. Ramet and patch dynamics. Journal of Ecology 73: 69183.
  • Popp JW, Reinartz IA. 1988. Sexual dimorphism in biomass allocation and clonal growth of Xanthoxylum americanum. American Journal of Botany 75: 17321741.
  • Preston K. 1999. Can plasticity compensate for architectural constraints on reproduction? Patterns of seed production and carbohydrate translocation in Perilla frutescens. Journal of Ecology 87: 697712.
  • Primack RB, Hall P. 1990. Costs of reproduction in the pink lady's slipper orchid: a four-year experimental study. American Naturalist 136: 638656.
  • Primack RB, Miao SL, Becker KR. 1994. Cost of reproduction in the pink lady's slipper orchid (Cypripedium acaule): defoliation, increased seed production and fire. American Journal of Botany 81: 10831093.
  • Putwain PD, Harper JL. 1972. Studies in the dynamics of plant populations. V. Mechanisms governing the sex ratio in Rumex acetosa and R. acetosella. Journal of Ecology 60: 113129.
  • Pyke G. 1991. What does it cost a plant to produce floral nectar? Nature 350: 5859.
  • Quinn JA. 1991. Evolution of dioecy in Buchloe dactyloides (Gramineae): test for sex-specific vegetative characters, ecological differences, and sexual niche-partitioning. American Journal of Botany 78: 481488.
  • Ramadan AA, El-Keblawy A, Shaltout KH, Lovett-Doust J. 1994. Sexual dymorphism, growth and reproductive effort in Egyptian Thymelea hirsuta (Thymelaeaceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 847857.
  • Rameau C, Gouyon P-H. 1991. Resource allocation to growth, reproduction and survival in Gladiolus: the cost of male function. Journal of Evolutionary Ecology 4: 291307.
  • Ramp PF, Stephenson SN. 1988. Gender dimorphism in growth and mass partitioning by box elder (Acer negundo L.). American Midland Naturalist 119: 420430.
  • Ramsey M. 1997. No evidence for demographic costs of seed production in the pollen-limited perennial herb Blandfordia grandiflora (Liliaceae). International Journal of Plant Science 158: 785793.
  • Reekie EG. 1991. Cost of seed versus rhizome production in Agropyron repens. Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 26782683.
  • Reekie EG. 1998. An experimental field study of the cost of reproduction in Plantago major L. Ecoscience 5: 200206.
  • Reekie EG, Bazzaz FA. 1987a. Reproductive effort in plants. I. Carbon allocation to reproduction. American Naturalist 129: 876896.
  • Reekie EG, Bazzaz FA. 1987b. Reproductive effort in plants. 2. Does carbon reflect the allocation of other resources? American Naturalist 129: 897906.
  • Reekie EG, Bazzaz FA. 1987c. Reproductive effort in plants. 3. Effect of reproduction on vegetative activity. American Naturalist 129: 907919.
  • Reekie EG, Bazzaz FA. 1992. Costs of reproduction as reduced growth in genotypes of two congeneric species with contrasting life histories. Oecologia 90: 2126.
  • Reekie EG, Reekie JYC. 1991. The effect of reproduction on canopy structure, allocation and growth in Oenothera biennis. Journal of Ecology 79: 10611071.
  • Rensch B. 1960. Evolution above species level. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
  • Retuerto R, Fernández-Lema B, Rodriguez-Roiloa S, Obeso JR. 2000. Gender, light and water effects in carbon isotope discrimination, and growth rates in the dioecious tree Ilex aquifolium. Functional Ecology 14: 529537.
  • Reznick D. 1985. Cost of reproduction: an evaluation of the empirical evidence. Oikos 44: 257267.
  • Reznick D. 1992. Measuring the costs of reproduction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7: 4249.
  • Reznick D, Nunney L, Tessier A. 2000. Big houses, big cars, superfleas and the cost of reproduction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 421425.
  • Rocheleau AF, Houle G. 2001. Different costs of reproduction for the males and females of a rare dioecious shrub –Corema conradii Torrey. American Journal of Botany 88: 659666.
  • Roff DA. 1992. The evolution of life histories. Theory and analysis. London, UK: Chapman & Hall, Inc.
  • Roff DA. 2000. Trade-offs between growth and reproduction: an analysis of the quantitative genetic evidence. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: 434445.
  • Ruohomäki K, Haukioja E, Repka S, Lehtilä K. 1997. Leaf value: Effects of damage to individual leaves on growth and reproduction of mountain birch shoots. Ecology 78: 21052117.
  • Sakai AK, Burris TA. 1985. Growth in male and female aspen clones: a twenty-five-year longitudinal study. Ecology 66: 19211927.
  • Sakai AK, Sharik TL. 1988. Clonal growth of male and female Bigtooth Aspen (Populus grandidentata). Ecology 69: 20312033.
  • Sakai AK, Weller SG. 1991. Ecological aspects of sex expression in subdioecious Schriedea globosa (Caryophillaceae). American Journal of Botany 78: 12801288.
  • Samson DA, Werk KS. 1986. Size-dependent effects in the analysis of reproductive effort in plants. American Naturalist 127: 667680.
  • Schaffer WM. 1974. Optimal reproductive effort in fluctuating environments. American Naturalist 108: 783790.
  • Schmitt J. 1993. Reaction norms of morphological and life history traits to light availability in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 47: 15541568.
  • Schoen DJ, Ashman T-L. 1995. The evolution of floral longevity: resource allocation to maintenance versus construction of repeated parts in modular organisms. Evolution 49: 131139.
  • Shapcott A, Brown MJ, Kirkpatrick JB, Reid JB. 1995. Stand structure, reproductive activity and sex expression in Huon Pine (Lagarostrobos franklinii (Hook L.) Quinn.). Journal of Biogeography 22: 10351045.
  • Shea MM, Dixon PM, Sharitz RR. 1993. Size differences, sex ratio, and spatial distribution of male and female water tupelo, Nyssa aquatica (Nyssaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 2630.
  • Silvertown J. 1987. Possible sexual dimorphism in double coconut: reinterpretation of the data of Savage and Ashton. Biotropica 19: 282283.
  • Silvertown J, Dodd M. 1999. The demographic cost of reproduction and its consequences in Balsam fir (Abies balsamea). American Naturalist 154: 321332.
  • Sinervo B. 1999. Mechanistic analysis of natural selection and a refinement of Lack's and Williams's principles. American Naturalist 154: S26S42.
  • Sinervo B, DeNardo DF. 1999. Costs of reproduction in the wild: path analysis of natural selection and experimental tests of causation. Evolution 50: 12991313.
  • Slade AJ, Hutchings MJ. 1989. Within- and between-population variation in ramet behaviour in the gynodioecious clonal herb, Glecoma hederacea (Labiateae). Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 633639.
  • Smith AP, Young TP. 1982. The cost of reproduction in Senecio keniodendron, a giant rosette species of Mt. Kenya. Oecologia 55: 243247.
  • Snow AG. 1942. Sex and vegetative propagation. Journal of Forestry 40: 807808.
  • Snow AA, Whigham DF. 1989. Costs of flower production in Tipularia discolor (Orchidaceae). Ecology 70: 12861293.
  • Sohn JJ, Policansky D. 1977. The costs of reproduction in the mayapple Podophyllum peltatum (Berberidaceae). Ecology 58: 13661374.
  • Southwick EE. 1984. Photosynthate allocation to floral nectar: a neglected energy investment. Ecology 65: 17751779.
  • Sprugel DG, Hinckley TM, Schaap W. 1991. The theory and practice of branch autonomy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22: 309334.
  • Stearns SC. 1976. Life-history tactics: a review of the ideas. Quarterly Review of Biology 51: 347.
  • Stearns SC. 1989. Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Functional Ecology 3: 259268.
  • Stearns SC. 1992. The evolution of life histories. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
  • Stephenson TD. 1980. Fruit set, herbivory, fruit reduction, and the fruiting strategy of Catalpa speciosa (Bignoniaceae). Ecology 61: 5764.
  • Stephenson AG. 1981. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 253279.
  • Suzuki A. 2000. Patterns of vegetative growth and reproduction in relation to branch orders. the plant as a spatially structured population. Trees 14: 329333.
  • Svensson BM, Carlsson BA, Karlsson PS, Nordell O. 1993. Comparative long-term demography of three species of Pinguicula. Journal of Ecology 81: 635645.
  • Syrjänen K, Lehtilä K. 1993. The cost of reproduction in Primula veris: differences between two adjacent populations. Oikos 67: 465472.
  • Thomas SC, LaFrankie JV. 1993. Sex, size, and interyear variation in flowering among dioecious trees of the malayan rain forest. Ecology 74: 15291537.
  • Thompson K, Stewart AJA. 1981. The measurement and meaning of reproductive effort in plants. American Naturalist 117: 205211.
  • Thorén LM, Hemborg AM, Karlsson PS. 1996. Resource investment in reproduction and its consequences for subarctic plants. Ecological Bulletins 45: 127132.
  • Tomlinson PB. 1983. Tree architecture. American Scientist 71: 141149.
  • Trueman SJ, Turnbull CGN. 1994. Fruit set, abscission and dry matter accumulation on girdled branches of Macadamia. Annals of Botany 74: 667674.
  • Tuomi J, Hakala T, Haukioja E. 1983. Alternative concepts of reproductive effort, cost of reproduction, and selection in life-history evolution. American Zoologist 23: 2534.
  • Tuomi J, Niemelä P, Rousi M, Sirén S, Vuorisalo T. 1988. Induced accumulation of foliage phenols in mountain birch: Branch response to defoliation. American Naturalist 132: 602608.
  • Tuomi J, Nilsson P, Aström M. 1994. Plant compensatory responses: bud dormancy as an adaptation to herbivory. Ecology 14291436.
  • Vasiliauskas SA, Aarssen LW. 1992. Sex ratio and neighbor effects in monospecific stands of Juniperus virginiana. Ecology 73: 622632.
  • Venecz JI, Aarssen LW. 1998. Effects of shoot apex removal in Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae): Assessing the costs of reproduction and apical dominance. Annals of Botany Fennici 35: 101111.
  • Verdú V, García-Fayos P. 1998. Female biased sex ratios in Pistacia lentiscus L. (Anacardiaceae). Plant Ecology 135: 95101.
  • Walker AJ, Ho LC. 1977. Carbon translocation in the tomato: carbon import and fruit growth. Annals of Botany 41: 813823.
  • Wardlaw IF. 1990. The control of carbon partitioning in plants. New Phytologist 116: 341381.
  • Waser NM. 1984. Sex ratio variation in populations of a dioecious desert perennial, Simmondsia chinensis. Oikos 42: 343348.
  • Watson MA. 1984. Developmental constraints: effect on population growth and patterns of resource allocation in a clonal plant. American Naturalist 123: 411426.
  • Watson MA, Casper BB. 1984. Morphogenetic constraints on patterns of carbon distribution in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15: 233258.
  • Wegener C, Odasz AM. 1997. Effects of laboratory simulated grazing on biomass of the perennial Arctic grass Dupontia fisheri from Svalbard: evidence of overcompensation. Oikos 79: 496502.
  • Weiner J. 1988. The influence of competition on plant reproduction. In: JLovett-Doust, LLovett-Doust, eds. Reproductive plant ecology. Patterns and strategies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 228245.
  • Van Der Werf HMG, Van Der Berg W. 1995. Nitrogen fertilization and sex expression affect size variability of fibre hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Oecologia 103: 462470.
  • Westley LC. 1993. The effect of inflorescence bud removal on tuber production in Helianthus tuberosus L. (Asteraceae). Ecology 74: 21362144.
  • Whiley AW, Schaffer B, Lara SP. 1992. Carbon dioxide exchange of developing avocado (Persea americana Mill.) fruit. Tree Physiology 11: 8594.
  • Williams GC. 1966a. Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
  • Williams GC. 1966b. Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and the refinement of Lack's principle. American Naturalist 100: 687690.
  • Williams GC. 1975. Sex and evolution. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
  • Williams SL. 1995. Sufgrass (Phyllospadix torreyi) reproduction: reproductive phenology, resource allocation, and male rarity. Ecology 76: 19531970.
  • Williams K, Koch GW, Mooney HA. 1985. The carbon balance of flowers of Diplaucus auranticus (Scrophulariaceae). Oecologia 66: 530535.
  • Willson MF. 1983. Plant reproductive ecology. New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Interscience.
  • Willson MF. 1986. On the cost of reproduction in plants: Acer negundo. American Midland Naturalist 115: 204207.
  • Willson MF. 1994. Sexual selection in plants: perspective and overview. American Naturalist 144: S13S39.
  • Willson MF, Burley N. 1983. Mate choice in plants: tactics, mechanisms, and consequences. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
  • Wilson BF. 1990. The development of tree form. Hortscience 25: 5254.
  • Wolfe LM, Shmida A. 1997. The ecology of sex expression in a gynodioecious israeli desert shrub (Ochradenus baccatus). Ecology 78: 101110.
  • Worley AC, Harder LD. 1996. Size-dependent resource allocation and costs of reproduction in Pinguicula vulgaris (Lentibulariaceae). Journal of Ecology 84: 195206.
  • Zangerl ARFA, Bazzaz. 1992. Theory and pattern in plant defense allocation. In: RFritz, ELSimms, eds. Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens. Ecology, evolution, and genetics. Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago University Press, 363391.
  • Zimmerman JK. 1991. Ecological correlates of labile sex expression in the orchid Catasetum viridiflavum. Ecology 72: 597608.
  • Zimmerman JK, Aide TM. 1989. Patterns of fruit production in a neotropical orchid: pollinaator vs resource limitation. American Journal of Botany 76: 6773.
  • Zobolo AM, Van Staden J. 1999. The effects of deflowering and defruiting on growth and senescence of Bidens pilosa L. South African Journal of Botany 65: 8688.