SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackerly DD, Bazzaz FA. 1995. Plant growth and reproduction along CO2 gradients: non-linear responses and implications for community change. Global Change Biology 1: 199207.
  • Andalo C, Godelle B, Lefranc M, Mousseau M, Till-Bottraud I. 1996. Elevated CO2 decreases seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Global Change Biology 2: 129135.
  • Atkin OK, Schortemeyer M, McFarlane N, Evans JR. 1999. The response of fast- and slow-growing Acacia species to elevated atmospheric CO2: an analysis of the underlying components of relative growth rate. Oecologia 120: 544554.
  • Bazzaz FA, Ackerly DD, Woodward FI, Rochefort L. 1992. CO2 enrichment and dependence of reproduction on density in an annual plant and a simulation of its population dynamics. Journal of Ecology 80: 643651.
  • Bazzaz FA, Catovsky S. 2002. Impact of global environmental change on plants: From cells to ecosystems. In: MooneyHA, CanadellJG, eds. Encyclopedia of global environmental change, Vol. 2. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 94111.
  • Berner RA. 1997. The rise of plants and their effect on weathering and atmospheric CO2. Science 276: 544546.
  • Berntson GM, Rajakaruna N, Bazzaz FA. 1998. Growth and nitrogen uptake in an experimental community of annuals exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2. Global Change Biology 4: 607626.
  • Bezemer TM, Thompson LJ, Jones TH. 1998. Poa annua shows inter-generational differences in response to elevated CO2. Global Change Biology 4: 687691.
  • Billings WD, Peterson KM, Luken JO, Mortensen DA. 1984. Interaction of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide and soil nitrogen on the carbon balance of tundra microcosms. Oecologia 65: 2629.
  • Bruhn D, Mikkelsen TN, Atkin OK. 2002. Does the direct effect of atmospheric CO2 concentration on leaf respiration vary with temperature? Responses in two species of Plantago that differ in relative growth rate. Physiologia Plantarum 114: 5764.
  • Bunce JA. 1997. Variation on growth stimulation by elevated carbon dioxide in seedlings of some C3 crop and weed species. Global Change Biology 3: 6166.
  • Campbell BD, Laing WA, Newton PCD. 1991. Variation in the response of pasture plants to carbon dioxide. Proceedings of the XVII International Grassland Congress, 11251126.
  • Catovsky S, Bazzaz FA. 2002. Plant competition in an elevated CO2 world. In: MooneyHA, CanadellJG, eds. Encyclopedia of global environmental change, Vol. 2. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 471481.
  • Cave G, Tolley LC, Strain BR. 1981. Effect of carbon dioxide enrichment on chlorophyll content, starch content and starch grain structure in Trifolium subterraneum leaves. Physiologia Plantarum 51: 171174.
  • Centritto M, Lee HS, Jarvis PG. 1999. Increased growth in elevated [CO2]: an early short-term response? Global Change Biology 5: 623633.
  • Ceulemans R, Mousseau M. 1994. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on woody plants. New Phytologist 127: 425446.
  • Clark H, Newton PCD, Bell CC, Glasgow EM. 1997. Dry matter yield, leaf growth and population dynamics in Lolium perenne/Trifolium repens dominated pasture turves exposed to two levels of elevated CO2. Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 304316.
  • Clough JM, Peet MM, Kramer PJ. 1981. Effects of high atmospheric CO2 and sink size on rates of photosynthesis of a soybean cultivar. Plant Physiology 67: 10071010.
  • Coleman JS, Mooney HA, Winner WE. 1990. Anthropogenic stress and natural selection: variability in radish biomass accumulation increases with increasing SO2 dose. Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 102106.
  • Cornelissen JHC, Carnell AL, Callaghan TV. 1999. Generalities in the growth, allocation and leaf quality responses to elevated CO2 in eight woody species. New Phytologist 141: 401409.
  • Cornelissen JHC, Castro-Díez P, Carnelli AL. 1998. Variation in relative growth rate among woody species. In: LambersH, PoorterH, Van VuurenMMI, eds. Inherent variation in plant growth physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers, 363392.
  • Cure JD, Acock B. 1986. Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: a literature survey. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 38: 127145.
  • Curtis PS, Klus DJ, Kalisz S, Tonsor SJ. 1996. Intraspecific variation in CO2 responses in Raphanis raphanistrum and Plantago lanceolata: assessing the potential for evolutionary change with rising atmospheric CO2. In: KörnerC, BazzazFA, eds. Carbon dioxide, populations, communities. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 1322.
  • Curtis PS, Wang X. 1998. A meta-analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology. Oecologia 113: 299313.
  • Dai Z, Ku MSB, Edwards GE. 1995. C4 photosynthesis. The effects of leaf development on the CO2-concentrating mechanisms and photorespiration in maize. Plant Physiology 107: 815825.
  • Den Hertog J, Stulen I, Lambers H. 1993. Assimilation, respiration and allocation of carbon in Plantago major as affected by atmospheric CO2 levels. Vegetatio 104/105: 369378.
  • Díaz S, Grime JP, Harris J, McPherson E. 1993. Evidence of a feedback mechanism limiting plant response to elevated carbon dioxide. 364: 616617.
  • Drennan PM, Nobel PS. 2000. Responses of CAM species to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Plant, Cell & Environment 23: 767781.
  • Du Cloux HC, André M, Daguenet A, Massimino J. 1987. Wheat response to CO2 enrichment: growth and CO2 exchange at two plant densities. Journal of Experimental Botany 38: 14211431.
  • Evans GC. 1972. The quantitative analysis of plant growth. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  • Evans JR, Schortemeyer M, Mcfarlane N, Atkin OK. 2000. Photosynthetic characteristics of 10 Acacia species grown under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27: 1325.
  • Farnsworth EJ, Bazzaz FA. 1995. Inter- and intra-generic differences in growth, reproduction, and fitness of nine herbaceous annual species grown in elevated CO2 environments. Oecologia 104: 454466.
  • Field CB, Jackson RB, Mooney HA. 1995. Stomatal responses to increased CO2: implications from the plant to the global scale. Plant, Cell & Environment 18: 12141226.
  • Firbank LG, Watkinson AR. 1990. On the effects of competition: from monocultures to mixtures. In: GraceJB, TilmanD, eds. Perspectives on plant competition. London, UK: Academic Press, 165192.
  • Fonseca F, Bowsher CG, Stulen I. 1997. Impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 on nitrate reductase transcription and activity in leaves and roots of Plantago major. Physiologia Plantarum 100: 940948.
  • Fonseca F, Den Hertog J, Stulen I. 1996. The response of Plantago major ssp. pleiosperma to elevated CO2 is modulated by the formation of secondary shoots. New Phytologist 133: 627635.
  • Garnier E, Freijsen AHJ. 1994. On ecological inference from laboratory experiments conducted under optimum conditions. In: RoyJ, GarnierE, eds. A whole plant perspective on carbon–nitrogen interactions. The Hague, The Netherlands: SPB Academic Publishing, 267292.
  • Ghannoum O, Von Caemmerer S, Ziska LH, Conroy JP. 2000. The growth response of C4 plants to rising atmospheric CO2 partial pressure: a reassessment. Plant, Cell & Environment 23: 931942.
  • Gibeaut DM, Cramer GR, Seemann JR. 2001. Growth, cell walls, and UDP-Glc dehydrogenase activity of Arabidopsis thaliana grown in elevated carbon dioxide. Journal of Plant Physiology 158: 569576.
  • Goldberg DE. 1990. Components of resource competition in plant communities. In: GraceJB, TilmanD, eds. Perspectives on plant competition. London, UK: Academic Press, 2749.
  • Greer DH, Laing WA, Campbell BD, Halligan EA. 2000. The effect of perturbations in temperature and photon flux density on the growth and photosynthetic response of five pasture species to elevated CO2. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27: 301310.
  • Gurevitch J, Curtis PS, Jones MH. 2001. Meta-analysis in ecology. Advances in Ecological Research 32: 199247.
  • Hamilton JG, DeLucia EH, George K, Naidu SL, Finzi AC, Schlesinger WH. 2002. Forest carbon balance under elevated CO2. Oecologia 131: 250260.
  • Harper JL. 1977. Population biology of plants. London, UK: Academic Press.
  • Hättenschwiler S, Miglietta F, Raschi A, Körner C. 1997. Thirty years of situ tree growth under elevated CO2: a model for future forest response? Global Change Biology 3: 463471.
  • Hoffmann WA, Bazzaz FA, Chatterton NJ, Harrison PA, Jackson RB. 2000. Elevated CO2 changes resprouting of a tropical savanna. Oecologia 123: 312317.
  • Hungate BA, Dijkstra P, Johnson DW, Hinkle CR, Drake BG. 1999. Elevated CO2 increases nitrogen fixation and decreases soil nitrogen mineralization in Florida scrub oak. Global Change Biology 5: 781789.
  • Hunt R, Hand D, Hannah MA, Neal AM. 1991. Response to CO2 enrichment in 27 herbaceous species. Functional Ecology 5: 410421.
  • Hunt R, Hand D, Hannah MA, Neal AM. 1993. Further responses to CO2 enrichment in British herbaceous species. Functional Ecology 7: 661668.
  • Hussain M, Kubiske ME, Connor KF. 2001. Germination of CO2-enriched Pinus taeda L. seeds and subsequent seedling growth responses to CO2 enrichment. Functional Ecology 15: 344350.
  • Huxman TE, Hamerlynck EP, Jordan DN, Salsman KJ, Smith SD. 1998. The effects of parental CO2 environment on seed quality and subsequent seedling performance in Bromus rubens. Oecologia 114: 202208.
  • Huxman TE, Smith SD. 2001. Photosynthesis in an invasive grass and native forb at elevated CO2 during an El Nino year in the Mojave Desert. Oecologia 128: 193201.
  • Idso SB. 1999. The long-term response of trees to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Global Change Biology 5: 493495.
  • Idso KE, Idso SB. 1994. Plant responses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment in the face of environmental constraints: a review of the past 10 years’ research. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 69: 153203.
  • Jablonski LM, Wang X, Curtis PS. 2002. Plant reproduction under elevated CO2 conditions: a meta-analysis of reports on 79 crop and wild species. New Phytologist 156: in press.
  • Jasienski M, Bazzaz FA. 1999. The fallacy of ratios and the testability of models in biology. Oikos 84: 321326.
  • Keddy P, Fraser LH, Wisheu IC. 1998. A comparative approach to examine competitive response of 48 wetland plant species. Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 777786.
  • Kerstiens G. 2001. Meta–analysis of the interaction between shade-tolerance, light environment and growth response of woody species to elevated CO2. Acta Oecologia 22: 6169.
  • Kimball BA. 1986. Influence of Elevated CO2 on Crop Yield. In: EnochHZ, KimballBA, eds. Carbon dioxide enrichment of greenhouse crops, Vol. II. Physiology, yield and economics.Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 105115.
  • Klus DJ, Kalisz S, Curtis PS, Teeri JA, Tonsor SJ. 2001. Variation in responses to atmospheric CO2 concentration: gas exchange and the allocation of C, N, and biomass in Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae). American Journal of Botany 88: 10801087.
  • Körner C. 2001. Biosphere responses to CO2 enrichment. Ecological Applications 10: 15901619.
  • Körner C, Pelaez-Riedl S, Van Bel AJE. 1995. CO2 responsiveness of plants: a possible link to phloem loading. Plant, Cell & Environment 18: 595600.
  • Lambers H, Chapin FS, Pons TL. 1998. Plant physiological ecology. New York, USA: Springer.
  • Lavorel S. 2002. Plant Functional types. In: MooneyHA, CanadellJG, eds. Encyclopedia of global environmental change, Vol. 2. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Leadley PW, Körner C. 1996. Effects of elevated CO2 on plant species dominance in a highly diverse calcareous grassland. In: KörnerC, BazzazFA, eds. Carbon dioxide, populations, communities. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 159175.
  • LeCain DR, Morgan JA. 1998. Growth, gas exchange, leaf nitrogen and carbohydrate concentration in NAD-ME and NADP-ME C4 grasses grown in elevated CO2. Physiologia Plantarum 102: 297306.
  • Li CR, Gan LJ, Xia K, Zhou X, Hew CS. 2002. Responses of carboxylating enzymes, sucrose metabolising enzymes and plant hormones in a tropical epiphytic CAM orchid to CO2 enrichment. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 369377.
  • Lin J, Jack ME, Ceulemans R. 2001. Stomatal density and needle anatomy of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) are affected by elevated CO2. New Phytologist 150: 665674.
  • Lloyd J, Farquhar GD. 2000. Do slow-growing species and nutrient-stressed plants consistently respond less to elevated CO2? A clarification of some issues raised by Poorter (1998). Global Change Biology 6: 871876.
  • Lovelock CE, Winter K, Mersits R, Popp M. 1998. Responses of communities of tropical tree species to elevated CO2 in a forest clearing. Oecologia 116: 207218.
  • Lüscher A, Hendrey GR, Nössberger J. 1998. Long-term responsiveness to free air CO2 enrichment of functional types, species and genotypes of plants from fertile permanent grassland. Oecologia 113: 3745.
  • Maroco JP, Breia E, Faria T, Pereira JS, Chaves MM. 2002. Effects of long-term exposure to elevated CO2 and N fertilization on the development of photosynthetic capacity and biomass accumulation in Quercus suber L. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 105113.
  • Mooney HA, Canadell J, Chapin FS, Ehleringer JR, Körner C, McMurtrie RE, Parton WJ, Pitelka LF, Schulze ED. 1999. Ecosystem physiology responses to global change. In: WalkerBH, SteffenWL, CanadellJ, IngramJSI, eds. The terrestrial biosphere and global change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 141189.
  • Morison JIL, Gifford RM. 1984. Plant growth and water use with limited water supply in high CO2 concentrations. II. Plant dry weight, partitioning and water use efficiency. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 11: 361374.
  • Morse SR, Bazzaz FA. 1994. Elevated CO2 and temperature alter recruitment and size hierarchies in C3 and C4 annuals. Ecology 75: 966975.
  • Mortensen LM. 1994. The influence of carbon dioxide or ozone concentration on growth and assimilate partitioning in seedlings of nine conifers. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B, Soil et Plant Sciencea 44: 157163.
  • Mousseau M. 1993. Effects of elevated CO2 on growth, photosynthesis and respiration of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.). Vegetatio 104/105: 413419.
  • Mousseau M, Enoch HZ. 1989. Carbon dioxide enrichment reduces shoot growth in sweet chestnut seedlings (Castanea sativa Mill.). Plant, Cell & Environment 12: 927934.
  • Navas ML. 1998. Individual species performance and response of multi-specific comunities to elevated CO2: a review. Functional Ecology 12: 721727.
  • Navas ML, Garnier E, Austin MP, Gifford RM. 1999. Effect of competition on the responses of grasses and legumes to elevated atmospheric CO2 along a nitrogen gradient: differences between isolated plants and multi-species mixtures. New Phytologist 143: 323331.
  • Navas ML, Sonie L, Richarte J, Roy J. 1997. The influence of elevated CO2 on species phenology, growth and reproduction in a Mediterranean old-field community. Global Change Biology 3: 523530.
  • Neales TF, Nicholls AO. 1978. Growth response of young wheat plants to a range of ambient CO2 levels. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 5: 4559.
  • Norby RJ, Wullschleger SD, Gunderson CA, Nietch CT. 1995. Increased growth efficiency of Quercus alba trees in a CO2-enriched atmosphere. New Phytologist 131: 9197.
  • Oechel WC, Strain BR. 1985. Native responses to increased carbon dioxide concentration. In: StrainBR, CureJD, eds. Direct effects of carbon dioxide on vegetation. Washington DC, USA: United States Department of Energy, 117154.
  • Patterson DT, Flint EP. 1980. Potential effects of global atmospheric CO2-enrichment on the growth and competitiveness of C3 and C4 weed and crop plants. Weed Science 28: 7175.
  • Pattison R, Goldstein G, Ares A. 1998. Growth, biomass allocation and photosynthesis of invasive and native Hawaiian rainforest species. Oecologia 117: 449459.
  • Paul MJ, Foyer CH. 2001. Sink regulation of photosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 13831400.
  • Penning de Vries FWT, Brunsting AHM, Van Laar HH. 1974. Products, requirements and efficiency of biosynthetic processes: a quantitative approach. Journal of Theoretical Biology 45: 339377.
  • Poorter H. 1993. Interspecific variation in the growth response of plants to an elevated ambient CO2 concentration. Vegetatio 104/105: 7797.
  • Poorter H. 1998. Do slow-growing species and nutrient-stressed plants respond relatively strongly to elevated CO2? Global Change Biology 4: 693697.
  • Poorter H. 2002. Plant Growth and Carbon Economy. In: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences.[WWW document] URL http://www.els.net. London, UK: Nature Publishing Group.
  • Poorter H, Garnier E. 1996. Plant growth analysis: evaluation of experimental design and computational methods. Journal of Experimental Botany 47: 13431351.
  • Poorter H, Gifford RM, Kriedemann PE, Wong SC. 1992. A quantitative analysis of dark respiration and carbon content as factors in the growth response of plants to elevated CO2. Australian Journal of Botany 40: 501513.
  • Poorter H, Nagel O. 2000. The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27: 595607.
  • Poorter H, Pérez-Soba M. 2001. The growth response of plants to elevated CO2 under non-optimal environmental conditions. Oecologia 129: 120.
  • Poorter H, Pot CS, Lambers H. 1988. The effect of an elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on growth, photosynthesis and respiration of Plantago major. Physiologia Plantarum 73: 553559.
  • Poorter H, Roumet C, Campbell BD. 1996. Interspecific variation in the growth response of plants to elevated CO2: A search for functional types. In: KörnerC, BazzazFA, eds. Carbon dioxide, populations, communities. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 375412.
  • Poorter H, Van Berkel Y, Baxter B, Bel M, Den Hertog J, Dijkstra P, Gifford RM, Griffin KL, Roumet C, Wong SC. 1997. The effect of elevated CO2 on the chemical composition and construction costs of leaves of 27 C3 species. Plant, Cell & Environment 20: 472482.
  • Poorter H, Van der Werf A. 1998. Is inherent variation in RGR determined by LAR at low irradiance and by NAR at high irradiance? A review of herbaceous species. In: LambersH, PoorterH, Van VuurenMMI, eds. Inherent variation in plant growth physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers, 309336.
  • Poorter L. 1999. Growth response of 15 rain-forest tree species to a light gradient: the relative importance of morphological and physiological traits. Functional Ecology 13: 396410.
  • Raunkiaer C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
  • Reekie EG, MacDougall G, Wong I, Hicklenton PR. 1998. Effect of sink size on the growth response to elevated atmospheric CO2 within the genus Brassica. Canadian Journal of Botany 76: 829835.
  • Reich PB, Knops J, Tilman D, Craine J, Ellsworth D, Tjoelker M, Lee T, Wedin D, Naeem S, Bahauddin D, Hendrey G, Jose S, Wrage K, Goth J, Bengston W. 2001. Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition. Nature 410: 809812.
  • Retuerto R, Rochefort L, Woodward FI. 1996. The influence of plant density on the responses of Sinapis alba to CO2 and windspeed. Oecologia 108: 241251.
  • Reynolds HL. 1996. Effects of elevated CO2 on plants grown in competition. In: KörnerC, BazzazFA, eds. Carbon dioxide, populations, communities. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 273286.
  • Roumet C, Bel MP, Sonie L, Jardon F, Roy J. 1996. Growth response of grasses to elevated CO2: a physiological plurispecific analysis. New Phytologist 133: 595603.
  • Roumet C, Garnier E, Suzor H, Salager JL, Roy J. 2000. Short and long-term responses of whole-plant gas exchange to elevated CO2 in four herbaceous species. Environmental and Experimental Botany 43: 155169.
  • Roumet C, Laurent G, Roy J. 1999. Leaf structure and chemical composition as reflected by elevated CO2: genotypic responses of two perennial grasses. New Phytologist 143: 7381.
  • Sage RF. 2001. Environmental and evolutionary preconditions for the origin and diversification of the C4 photosynthetic syndrome. Plant Biology 3: 202213.
  • Samarakoon AB, Gifford RM. 1996. Water use and growth of cotton in response to elevated CO2 in wet and drying soil. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 23: 6374.
  • Saxe H, Ellsworth DS, Heath J. 1998. Tree and forest functioning in an enriched CO2 atmosphere. New Phytologist 139: 395436.
  • Schäppi B. 1996. Growth dynamics and population development in an alpine grassland under elevated CO2. Oecologia 106: 9399.
  • Schmid B, Birrer A, Lavigne C. 1996. Genetic variation in the response of plant populations to elevated CO2 in a nutrient-poor, calcareous grassland. In: KörnerC, BazzazFA, eds. Carbon dioxide, populations and communities. Physiological Ecology Series. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 3150.
  • Schortemeyer M, Atkin OK, McFarlane N, Evans JR. 1999. The impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 and nitrate supply on growth, biomass allocation, nitrogen partitioning and N2 fixation of Acacia melanoxylon. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 26: 737747.
  • Sigurdsson BD, Thorgeirsson H, Linder S. 2001. Growth and dry-matter partitioning of young Populus trichocarpa in response to carbon dioxide concentration and mineral nutrient availability. Tree Physiology 21: 941950.
  • Sims DA, Seemann JR, Luo Y. 1998. Elevated CO2 concenttration has independent effects on expansion rates and thickness of soybean leaves across light and nitrogen gradients. Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 583591.
  • Smith TM, Shugart HH, Woodward FI. 1997. Plant functional types. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry. New York, USA: Freeman.
  • Stöcklin J, Körner C. 1999. Interactive effects of elevated CO2, P availability and legume presence on calcareous grassland: result of a glasshouse experiment. Functional Ecology 13: 200209.
  • Stulen I, Den Hertog J. 1993. Root growth and functioning under CO2 enrichment. Vegetatio 104/105: 99115.
  • Thomas JF, Harvey CN. 1983. Leaf anatomy of four species grown under continuous CO2 enrichment. Botanical Gazette 144: 303309.
  • Thomas SC, Jasienski M, Bazzaz FA. 1999. Early vs. asymptotic growth responses of herbaceous plants to elevated CO2. Ecology 80: 15521567.
  • Tousignant D, Potvin C. 1996. Selective responses to global change: Experimental results on Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. In: KörnerC, BazzazFA, eds. Carbon dioxide, populations and communities. Physiological Ecology Series. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 2330.
  • Van Bel AJE. 1999. Evolution, polymorphology and multifunctionality of the phloem system. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2: 163184.
  • Van der Werf A, Van Nuenen M, Visser AJ, Lambers H. 1993. Contribution of physiological and morphological plant traits to a species’ competitive ability at high and low nitrogen supply. A hypothesis for inherently fast- and slow-growing monocotyledonous species. Oecologia 94: 434440.
  • Van Rijn CPE. 2001. A Physiological and Genetic Analysis of Growth Characteristics in Hordeum spontaneum. PhD thesis, Utrecht University.
  • Volin JC, Reich PB. 1996. Interaction of elevated CO2 and O3 on growth, photosynthesis and respiration of three perennial species grown in low and high nitrogen. Physiologia Plantarum 97: 674684.
  • Volin JC, Reich PB, Givnish TJ. 1998. Elevated carbon dioxide ameliorates the effects of ozone on photosynthesis and growth: species respond similarly regardless of photosynthetic pathway or plant functional group. New Phytologist 138: 315325.
  • Wand SJE, Midgley GF, Jones MH, Curtis PS. 1999. Responses of wild C4 and C3 (Poaceae) species to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration: a meta-analytic test of current theories and perceptions. Global Change Biology 5: 723741.
  • Wand SJE, Midgley GF, Stock WD. 2001. Growth responses to elevated CO2 in NADP-ME, NAD-ME and PCK C4 grasses and a C3 grass from South Africa. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 28: 1325.
  • Ward JK, Strain BR. 1999. Elevated CO2 studies: past, present and future. Tree Physiology 19: 211220.
  • Warwick KR, Taylor G, Blum H. 1998. Biomass and compositional changes occur in chalk grassland turves exposed to elevated CO2 for two seasons in FACE. Global Change Biology 4: 375385.
  • Wayne PM, Bazzaz FA. 1995. Seedling density modifies the growth responses of yellow birch maternal families to elevated carbon dioxide. Global Change Biology 1: 315324.
  • Weiner J, Mallory EB, Kennedy C. 1990. Growth and variability in crowded and uncrowded populations of dwarf marigolds (Tagetes patula). Annals of Botany 65: 513524.
  • Wilson SD, Keddy PA. 1986. Measuring diffuse competition along an environmental gradient: results from a shoreline plant community. American Naturalist 127: 862869.
  • Winter K, Lovelock CE. 1999. Growth responses of seedlings of early and late succesional tropical forest trees to elevated atmospheric CO2. Flora 194: 221227.
  • Wong SC. 1979. Elevated atmospheric partial pressure of CO2 and plant growth. I. Interactions of nitrogen nutrition and photosynthetic capacity in C3 and C4 plants. Oecologia 44: 6874.
  • Wong SC. 1990. Elevated atmospheric partial pressure of CO2 and plant growth. II. Non-structural carbohydrate content and its effect on growth parameters. Photosynthesis Research 23: 171180.
  • Wong SC. 1993. Interaction between elevated atmospheric CO2 and humidity on plant growth: comparison between cotton and radish. Vegetatio 104/105: 211221.
  • Woodward FI. 2002. Potential impacts of global elevated CO2 concentrations on plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 5: 207211.
  • Wright IJ, Westoby M. 1999. Differences in seedling growth behaviour among species: trait correlations across species, and trait shifts along nutrient compared to rainfall gradients. Journal of Ecology 87: 8597.
  • Wulff RD, Alexander HM. 1985. Intraspecific variation in the response to CO2 enrichment in seeds and seedlings of Plantago lanceolata L. Oecologia 66: 458460.
  • Wulff RD, Strain BR. 1982. Effects of CO2 enrichment on growth and photosynthesis in Desmodium paniculatum. Canadian Journal of Botany 60: 10841091.
  • Wyszomirski T, Wyszomirska I, Jarzyna I. 1999. Simple mechanisms of size distribution dynamics in crowded and uncrowded virtual monocultures. Ecological Modelling 115: 253273.
  • Ziska LH, Bunce JA. 1997. Influence of increasing carbon dioxide concentration on the photosynthetic and growth stimulation of selected C4 crops and weeds. Photosynthesis Research 54: 199208.
  • Ziska LH, Bunce JA. 2000. Sensitivity of field-grown soybean to future atmospheric CO2: selection for improved productivity in the 21st century. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27: 979984.