SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • secondary metabolites;
  • plant defence;
  • saponins;
  • benzoxazinoids

Summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Genetic potential for production of secondary metabolites – what is a genome capable of?
  5. Learning from crop plants – dissection of chemical defences in cereals
  6. Saponins
  7. Benzoxazinoids
  8. Concluding remarks
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References

Collectively plants synthesise a diverse array of secondary metabolites. Secondary metabolites are well known as agents that mediate pollination and seed dispersal. They may also act as chemical defenses that ward off pests and pathogens or suppress the growth of neighbouring plants. The ability to synthesise particular classes of secondary metabolite is commonly restricted to selected plant groups, and the evolution of different pathways in distinct plant lineages is likely to have been key for survival and for the generation of diversity at the organism level. An understanding of the evolution of secondary metabolism requires the characterisation of enzymes and genes for complete pathways in a broad range of plants in addition to the two model species, Arabidopsis thaliana and rice. Tracing the ancestry of the pathway components can then unravel the chain of events that led to the creation of individual pathways. This review summarises progress that has been made in the dissection of the pathways for constitutive chemical defences in cereals, namely saponins and benzoxazinoids.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Genetic potential for production of secondary metabolites – what is a genome capable of?
  5. Learning from crop plants – dissection of chemical defences in cereals
  6. Saponins
  7. Benzoxazinoids
  8. Concluding remarks
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References

Thalecress (Arabidopsis thaliana) and rice (Oryza sativa) are predicted to have around 25 500 genes (The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000) and 32 000–50 000 genes (Goff et al., 2002; Yu et al., 2002), respectively, while the genetic complement of the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) is substantially lower (13 601 predicted genes) (Adams et al., 2000). One explanation for this seemingly incongruous discrepancy in the relationship between biological and genetic complexity may lie in the differences between the ways that plants and animals protect themselves against predators, pests and diseases. Vertebrates have developed sophisticated nervous and immune systems that enable them to detect and respond to danger, and they are capable of fleeing from perilous situations. By contrast, plants cannot take avoidance measures to escape from their attackers and so must stay and fight. The production of chemicals that deter or kill pests and pathogens represents one means of self-protection. Collectively, plants are capable of synthesising a diverse array of secondary metabolites (Wink, 1999). These may be produced constitutively (preformed antimicrobial compounds, or phytoanticipins) or in response to pathogen or herbivore attack or stress (phytoalexins) (Morrissey & Osbourn, 1999; Wittstock & Gershenzon, 2002). In addition to their direct effects on pests and pathogens some secondary metabolites may also be important in defence-related signal transduction (Bouarab et al., 2002). The ability of plants to carry out in vivo combinatorial chemistry by mixing, matching and evolving the gene products required for secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways is likely to have been key for their survival and for the generation of diversity at the organism level.

Genetic potential for production of secondary metabolites – what is a genome capable of?

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Genetic potential for production of secondary metabolites – what is a genome capable of?
  5. Learning from crop plants – dissection of chemical defences in cereals
  6. Saponins
  7. Benzoxazinoids
  8. Concluding remarks
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References

The total number of plant secondary metabolites for which structures have been elucidated is around 50 000 (De Luca & St Pierre, 2000), and this is likely to be only the tip of the iceberg in terms of the chemical diversity that is represented in nature. Each plant species produces only a small fraction of this spectrum. In A. thaliana it is estimated that around 5000 genes (i.e. 25% of the total) are involved in secondary metabolism (The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000) while around 25% of rice genes are predicted to be involved in primary or secondary metabolism collectively (Goff et al., 2002). The functions of only a very limited subset of these genes are understood. These include genes required for the synthesis of phytoprotectants such as glucosinolates and the indole phytoalexin camalexin in A. thaliana, and flavanone and diterpene phytoalexins in rice. What is the function of all of the other genes that have been implicated in secondary metabolism? Genes sharing sequence similarity with those required for alkaloid biosynthesis in species such as Papaver somniferum, Berberis stolonifera and Catharanthus roseus (e.g. strictosidine β-glucosidase, berberine bridge enzyme and strictosidine synthase) are present in the genomes of both A. thaliana and rice (Goff et al., 2002) although neither of these two model plant species are known to produce alkaloids. However, sequence relatedness is not a reliable indicator of specific biological function, and painstaking biochemical analysis of individual gene products is still required to support predictions based on gene sequences.

A burning question in plant biology is just how much combinatorial chemistry can a single species or accession carry out, with or without the help of man-made genetic modifications? The synthesis of secondary metabolites is often tightly regulated, and is commonly either restricted to specific plant tissues or developmental stages, or induced in response to pathogen attack or treatment with inducing agents (methyl jasmonate and other elicitors). Plant genomes are relatively rich in genes for transcription factors when compared with those of animals (Riechmann et al., 2000), and one explanation for this bias may lie in the need to regulate the myriad of complex processes associated with secondary metabolism (Szathmáry et al., 2001). Interference with transcriptional regulators for genes encoding biosynthetic enzymes can ‘wake up’ dormant biochemical pathways. For example, activation tagging of a gene for a transcriptional regulator of alkaloid biosynthesis in C. roseus circumvented the normal jasmonate requirement for pathway induction and led to constitutive synthesis of these secondary metabolites (van der Fits & Memelink, 2000). Similarly, in A. thaliana activation tagging of a MYB transcription factor gene resulted in overproduction of phenylpropanoids (Borevitz et al., 2000) (Fig. 1). Thus the absence of secondary metabolites may simply be a regulatory issue; the necessary genes may be present and have the potential to encode fully functional products but they are not expressed under the commonly studied growth conditions. Differences in the ability of different species and genera to synthesise secondary metabolites are more likely to be explained by the presence or absence of genes for biosynthetic enzymes. The absence of genes required for one or more key steps in the biosynthetic pathway need not be an insurmountable barrier to metabolite engineering for plant defence. For example, A. thaliana lacks the genes for cyanogenic glycoside biosynthesis but if provided with three genes from sorghum that are necessary and sufficient for the entire biosynthetic pathway it will synthesise and store large amounts of these compounds (Tattersall et al., 2001). Cyanogenic glycosides have been implicated in defence against pathogens and herbivores (Morrissey & Osbourn, 1999). Consistent with this, transgenic A. thaliana plants that produce cyanogenic glycosides display enhanced resistance to flea beetle, a herbivore pest of brassicas (Tattersall et al., 2001).

image

Figure 1. Overexpression of the MYB transcription factor gene Pap1 leads to enhanced phenylpropanoid production in Arabidopsis thaliana. (Left, control transformant; right, transformant overexpressing Pap1).

Download figure to PowerPoint

Learning from crop plants – dissection of chemical defences in cereals

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Genetic potential for production of secondary metabolites – what is a genome capable of?
  5. Learning from crop plants – dissection of chemical defences in cereals
  6. Saponins
  7. Benzoxazinoids
  8. Concluding remarks
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References

It is clear that the manipulation of secondary metabolite biosynthesis in plants holds great potential for the development of enhanced pest and disease resistance in economically important crops. The application of genome- and metabolome-based approaches to A. thaliana and rice will allow major advances to be made in our understanding of plant secondary metabolism, and is expected to unveil novel pathways and complex metabolic networks (Fiehn et al., 2000; Fiehn, 2002; Hadacek, 2002; Weckwerth & Fiehn, 2002). However, a comprehensive picture of the in vivo combinatorial chemistry behind the myriad of compounds found in nature will depend on a detailed knowledge of enzymes, genes and pathways required for the synthesis of secondary metabolites in other species in addition to the two ‘model’ plants. Information of this kind will also be important in assessing the potential of different genetic backgrounds to synthesise novel or altered compounds. Multi-faceted approaches that combine biochemistry, molecular genetics and genomics with classical genetics have proved to be highly effective in the dissection of secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways. Here the application of such approaches to two classes of constitutive secondary metabolites that confer resistance to pests and diseases in cereals will be considered, namely saponins and benzoxazinoids.

Saponins

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Genetic potential for production of secondary metabolites – what is a genome capable of?
  5. Learning from crop plants – dissection of chemical defences in cereals
  6. Saponins
  7. Benzoxazinoids
  8. Concluding remarks
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References

Saponins are an important group of plant secondary metabolites consisting of glycosylated triterpenes and steroids. These compounds are widespread in dicotyledonous plant species. Cereals and grasses, however, appear to be generally saponin-deficient with the exception of oats (Avena spp.) (Hostettmann & Marston, 1995). Oats synthesise two different families of saponins, the steroidal avenacosides (Tschesche et al., 1969; Tschesche & Lauven, 1971) and the triterpenoid avenacins (Crombie & Crombie, 1986; Crombie et al., 1986), which are produced in the leaves and roots, respectively (Fig. 2). Many saponins have potent antimicrobial activity, suggestive of a role in plant defence (Morrissey & Osbourn, 1999). Detection methods for saponins generally rely on relatively nonspecific chromogenic stains or on HPLC-based methods (Hostettmann & Marston, 1995), making screening for saponin-deficient mutants difficult. However the major oat root saponin avenacin A-1 is esterified with N-methyl anthranilic acid and so fluoresces under ultra-violet light (Crombie & Crombie, 1986; Crombie et al., 1986). This property, which is extremely unusual amongst saponins, has facilitated the isolation of a collection of sodium azide-generated mutants of diploid oat that are deficient in their ability to synthesise avenacins (Papadopoulou et al., 1999) (Fig. 3). These saponin-deficient (sad) mutants are compromised in resistance to a range of pathogens, confirming a role for saponins in plant defence.

image

Figure 2. Representatives of the two different families of saponins synthesised by oat. Top, the triterpenoid saponin avenacin A-1, which is the major saponin present in the roots; bottom, the steroidal saponin avenacoside B, which is found in the leaves.

Download figure to PowerPoint

image

Figure 3. Identification of saponin-deficient mutants of diploid oat by screening for reduced root fluorescence. Left, wild type; right, a saponin-deficient mutant.

Download figure to PowerPoint

The process of saponin biosynthesis is not well understood for any plant species, despite the considerable interest in this important group of natural products (Haralampidis et al., 2001a). This is due in part to the complexity of the molecules and also to the lack of pathway intermediates for biochemical studies. In plants, synthesis of sterols is initiated by cyclisation of 2,3-oxidosqualene to cycloartenol, mediated by the oxidosqualene cyclase enzyme cycloartenol synthase. The first committed step in avenacin biosynthesis involves the cyclisation of 2,3-oxidosqualene to an alternative product, the triterpene β-amyrin (Fig. 4). This reaction is catalysed by another oxidosqualene cyclase, β-amyrin synthase (Haralampidis et al., 2001a,b). β-Amyrin does not have substantial antimicrobial activity but is converted to the biologically active saponin avenacin A-1 by a series of modifications that are predicted to involve cytochrome P-450s, acyltransferases and glycosyltransferases (Fig. 4). Avenacin A-1 is concentrated in the tips of young oat roots, and radiolabelled precursor feeding experiments and β-amyrin synthase assays indicate that this is the site of synthesis (Trojanowska et al., 2000; Trojanowska et al., 2001).

image

Figure 4. Synthesis of sterols and triterpenoid saponins in oat. The oxidosqualene cyclase enzymes cycloartenol synthase and β-amyrin synthase are key branchpoint enzymes for the sterol and triterpene pathways, respectively. sad1 mutants are blocked in the synthesis of β-amyrin. The conversion of β-amyrin to the antimicrobial triterpenoid saponin avenacin A-1 is predicted to involve as yet uncharacterised cytochrome P-450s, acyltransferases and glycosyltransferases.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Expressed sequence tag (EST) collections derived from plant tissues that are actively synthesising secondary metabolites represent valuable resources for gene discovery (Lange et al., 1999; Ohlrogge & Benning, 2000; White et al., 2000; Gang et al., 2001; Brandle et al., 2002). The exploitation of ESTs derived from oat root tips in combination with the sad mutants has proved to be a powerful strategy for the isolation of saponin biosynthetic genes. A cDNA for a predicted oxidosqualene cyclase was identified in an oat root EST collection and was subsequently shown to encode oat β-amyrin synthase (AsbAS1) by expression in yeast (Haralampidis et al., 2001b). AsbAS1, which is the first triterpene synthase to be cloned from monocots, defines a new subgroup within the oxidosqualene cyclase superfamily (Haralampidis et al., 2001b) (Fig. 5). A direct link between AsbAS1, triterpenoid saponin biosynthesis and disease resistance has emerged from studies of the sad mutants. Mutants at Sad1, one of the loci defined in the screen for sad mutants, accumulate radiolabelled 2,3-oxidosqualene when fed with the 14C-labelled precursor mevalonic acid, suggesting that the triterpenoid pathway is blocked between 2,3-oxidosqualene and β-amyrin (Trojanowska et al., 2001) (Fig. 4). sad1 mutants also lack β-amyrin synthase activity (Trojanowska et al., 2000) and have substantially reduced levels of the AsbAS1 transcript (Haralampidis et al., 2001b), indicative of mutations either in the AsbAS1 gene itself or in a regulator of this gene. These two possibilities have been resolved by DNA sequence analysis of the complete AsbAS1 genes of two independent sad1 mutants, which identified single point mutations within the AsbAS1 coding sequence in each of the mutants (Haralampidis et al., 2001b). These point mutations, which are both predicted to result in premature termination of translation, presumably affect transcript stability. The connection between AsbAS1 and Sad1 was subsequently confirmed by single nucleotide polymorphism analysis of populations segregating for the sad1 phenotype (Haralampidis et al., 2001b; Qi et al., 2001).

image

Figure 5. Amino acid sequence relatedness of members of the oxidosqualene cyclase superfamily. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the upgma method as implemented in the ‘Neighbor’ program of the phylip package (Version 3.5c). Amino acid distances were calculated using the Dayhoff PAM matrix method of the ‘Protdist’ program of phylip. The numbers indicate the numbers of bootstrap replications (out of 500) in which the given branching was observed. The sequences represented are as follows: ASβAS, A. strigosa AsbAS1 (AJ311789); Lanosterol synthases (LaS): HS-LA, Homo sapiens (U22526); RN-LA, Rattus norvegicus (U31352); SC-LA, Saccharomyces cerevisiae (U04841); AA-SC, Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius squalene-hopene cyclase (AB007002); Lupeol synthases (LuS): OE-LU, Olea europaea (AB025343); TO-LU, Taraxacum officinale (AB025345); β-amyrin synthases (βAS): PG-βAS, Panax ginseng (AB009030); GG-βAS, Glycyrrhiza glabra (AB037203); PS-βAS, Pisum sativum (AB034802); cycloartenol synthases (CS): AS-CS, A, strigosa AsCS1 (AJ311790); OS-CS, Oryza sativa (AF169966); LC-CS, Luffa cylindrica (AB033334); GG-CS, Glycyrrhiza glabra (AB025968); PS-CS, Pisum sativum (D89619); PG-CS, Panax ginseng (AB009029); OE-CS, Olea europaea (AB025344).

Download figure to PowerPoint

Southern hybridisation and database mining suggests that DNA sequences that are closely related to AsbAS1 are present only in Avena spp. (Haralampidis et al., 2001b), although other members of the Gramineae are capable of producing β-amyrin (Ohmoto & Ikuse, 1970; Heupel & Nes, 1985; Taton et al., 1986). The sad mutant collection defines at least six additional loci that are required for avenacin biosynthesis (Papadopoulou et al., 1999). These loci may encode biosynthetic enzymes required for the conversion of β-amyrin into avenacins (cytochrome P450s, acyltransferases and glycosyltransferases) or regulatory components (Papadopoulou et al., 1999; Haralampidis et al., 2001a,b). The characterisation of more enzymes and genes for saponin biosynthesis from oat and comparative analysis with other members of the Gramineae should reveal why saponin biosynthesis is restricted to Avena spp. One explanation may be that other cereals have lost components of the pathway during the selective processes leading to the development of modern cultivars. Alternatively the pathways for avenacin and avenacoside biosynthesis may have evolved after the divergence of oats from other cereals.

Benzoxazinoids

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Genetic potential for production of secondary metabolites – what is a genome capable of?
  5. Learning from crop plants – dissection of chemical defences in cereals
  6. Saponins
  7. Benzoxazinoids
  8. Concluding remarks
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References

Benzoxazinoids occur constitutively as glucosides in a number of members of the Gramineae (Niemeyer, 1988; Sicker et al., 2000). In rye the main benzoxazinoid is a glucoside of 2,4-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIBOA), whereas in maize and wheat it is the glucoside of the methoxylated form, 2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIMBOA). The glucosides are hydrolysed in response to infection or physical damage to produce DIBOA and DIMBOA, which are antimicrobial and also have pesticidal and allelopathic activity. The complete molecular pathway for benzoxazinoid biosynthesis has been elucidated in maize using an innovative combination of gene expression analysis, reverse genetics, transposon tagging and genetic mapping (Gierl & Frey, 2001).

The first committed step towards DIBOA and DIMBOA biosynthesis is the conversion of indole-3-glycerol phosphate to indole, which is catalysed by the tryptophan synthase α (TSA) homologue BX1 (Fig. 6). The subsequent conversion of indole into DIBOA is catalysed by four related but highly substrate-specific cytochrome P450s (Bx2-Bx5) belonging to the CYP71C subfamily. The Bx1 gene was cloned from maize using the Mutator transposon tagging system (Frey et al., 1997). Bx2–5 were cloned using an approach based on differential cDNA screening with high and low DIMBOA content maize lines (Frey et al., 1995). Direct evidence for the involvement of one of these enzymes (BX3) in benzoxazinoid biosynthesis was obtained by isolation of a mutant allele, again using the Mutator transposon tagging system (Frey et al., 1997). Two further genes (Bx8 and Bx9) encoding benzoxazinoid glucosyltransferases, the enzymes that catalyse the last step in benzoxazinoid biosynthesis, were also recently isolated using a reverse genetics approach that relied on protein purification (von Rad et al., 2001). The glucosides of DIBOA and DIMBOA have reduced chemical reactivity when compared with the aglycones, suggesting that glucosylation may reduce phytotoxicity and so be important for storage (von Rad et al., 2001).

image

Figure 6. Synthesis of benzoxazinoids. In primary metabolism tryptophan is synthesised from indole-3-glycerol phosphate via indole. This conversion is catalysed by the sequential action of the tryptophan synthase subunits α and β (TSA and TSB, respectively). The first committed step in the benzoxazinoid pathway is catalysed by the TSA homologue BX1. The subsequent conversion of indole to DIBOA is mediated by the cytochrome P-450-dependent monooxygenases BX2-BX5. The enzymes that convert DIBOA to DIMBOA (BX6 and 7) have not yet been characterised. Glucosylation of DIBOA and DIMBOA is carried out by the glucosyltransferases BX8 and BX9 (adapted from Gierl & Frey, 2001).

Download figure to PowerPoint

Gene sequence comparisons and genetic mapping have yielded a glimpse of the evolutionary events that have led to the creation of the benzoxazinoid pathway (Gierl & Frey, 2001). Bx1 presumably arose either directly or indirectly by duplication of the maize gene encoding TSA, which is required for primary metabolism (Frey et al., 1997) (Fig. 6). The evolution of the Bx1 gene has involved not only modification of the enzymatic properties of the product but also a change in the gene expression pattern (Gierl & Frey, 2001). Remarkably, all of the other characterised Bx genes, with the exception of Bx9, are clustered within 6 cm of Bx1 on the short arm of chromosome 4, Bx1 and Bx2 being separated by 2.5 kb (Frey et al., 1997; von Rad et al., 2001). The sequence similarity, similar exon/intron structures and clustering of the cytochrome P450 genes Bx2–Bx5 is indicative of gene duplication from a common precursor (Frey et al., 1997). The glucosyltransferase genes Bx8 and Bx9 share similar gene structures and the gene products have around 90% amino acid similarity, again suggesting a common origin (von Rad et al., 2001).

The distribution of benzoxazinoids across the Gramineae is sporadic. Maize, wheat, rye and certain wild barley species are capable of the synthesis of these compounds, while oats, rice and cultivated barley varieties are not (Niemeyer, 1988; Sicker et al., 2000). All of the cytochrome P-450-mediated enzyme activities required for DIBOA synthesis are present in rye, and functional orthologues of Bx2–5 have been found in wild barley species. By contrast cultivated barley lacks these genes and enzyme activities (Glawischnig et al., 1999; Gierl & Frey, 2001). Similarly, benzoxazinone glycosyltransferase activity has been detected in some wild barley varieties but is absent in other varieties that do not contain benzoxazinoids (Leighton et al., 1994). If the Bx gene cluster does turn out to be conserved in distantly related cereals such as maize and rye (members of the Panicoideae and Pooideae, respectively) then its origins must lie way back in the evolution of the Gramineae and possibly earlier, since some dicotyledonous species also produce benzoxazinones (Sicker et al., 2000; Gierl & Frey, 2001). Analysis of the A. thaliana and rice genomes should shed light on this. The failure of cultivated barley to synthesise these compounds is presumably due to loss of components of the pathway during the plant breeding process.

The genes for benzoxazinoid biosynthesis represent the first example of clustered genes for a secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathway in plants. The reasons for clustering are unclear. In fungi, clusters of genes that encode distinct classes of enzymes required for synthesis of secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways are common. One suggestion is that ‘selfish’ gene clusters persist because clustering favours transmission by horizontal gene transfer, a process that may be significant in the evolution of fungal genomes (Walton, 2000). The Bx gene cluster may be a consequence of horizontal gene transfer from a microbe, although this is an unlikely scenario. Presumably there are benefits to the plant in maintaining the genes as a cluster. Clustering may have advantages for coregulation of gene expression, while disruption of the cluster may lead to failure to produce phytoprotectants and possibly also accumulation of deleterious intermediates (Gierl & Frey, 2001).

Concluding remarks

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Genetic potential for production of secondary metabolites – what is a genome capable of?
  5. Learning from crop plants – dissection of chemical defences in cereals
  6. Saponins
  7. Benzoxazinoids
  8. Concluding remarks
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References

The secondary metabolites that plants produce – chemical phytoprotectants, scents, colours and flavours – represent a snapshot of the ongoing processes of evolution and diversification in the Plant Kingdom. We are only just beginning to understand how particular secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways have arisen in different plant lineages. Many of the genes for biosynthetic enzymes are likely to have been recruited from primary metabolism. New pathways may be generated in different ways, for example by the formation of new enzymes or by changes in the spatial distribution of existing ones (Pichersky & Gang, 2000). The components of these new pathways may then be recruited for the next round of biosynthetic diversification. An understanding of the evolution of secondary metabolism requires the characterisation of enzymes and genes for complete pathways. This will enable the chain of events that led to the creation of individual pathways to be unravelled by tracing the ancestry of the pathway components. The story of the Bx gene cluster is an elegant example of this. The A. thaliana and rice genomes, and other plant genome sequences that emerge in the future, will serve as key reference templates for studies of this kind.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Genetic potential for production of secondary metabolites – what is a genome capable of?
  5. Learning from crop plants – dissection of chemical defences in cereals
  6. Saponins
  7. Benzoxazinoids
  8. Concluding remarks
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References
  • Adams MD, Celniker SE, Holt RA et al. 2000. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287: 21852195.
  • Borevitz JO, Xia Y, Blount J, Dixon RA, Lamb C. 2000. Activation tagging identifies a conserved MYB regulator of phenypropanoid biosynthesis. Plant Cell 12: 23832393.
  • Bouarab K, Melton R, Peart J, Baulcombe D, Osbourn A. 2002. A saponin-detoxifying enzyme mediates suppression of plant defences. Nature 418: 889892.
  • Brandle JE, Richman A, Swanson AK, Chapman BP. 2002. Leaf ESTs from Stevia rebaudiana: a resource for gene discovery in diterpene synthesis. Plant Molecular Biology 50: 613622.
  • Crombie WML, Crombie L. 1986. Distribution of the avenacins A-1, A-2, B-1 and B-2 in oat roots: their fungicidal activity towards take-all fungus. Phytochemistry 25: 20692073.
  • Crombie L, Crombie WML, Whiting DA. 1986. Structures of the oat root resistance factors to take-all disease, avenacins A-1, A-2, B-1 and B-2 and their companion substances. Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkins Translation I: 19171922.
  • De Luca V, St Pierre B. 2000. The cell and developmental biology of alkaloid biosynthesis. Trends in Plant Sciences 5: 168173.
  • Fiehn O. 2002. Metabolomics – The link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Molecular Biology 48: 155171.
  • Fiehn O, Kopka J, Dörmann P, Altmann T, Trethewey RN, Willmitzer L. 2000. Metabolite profiling for plant functional genomics. Nature Biotechnology 18: 11571161.
  • Van Der Fits L, Memelink J. 2000. ORCA3, a jasmonate-responsive transcriptional regulator of plant primary and secondary metabolism. Science 289: 295297.
  • Frey M, Chomet P, Glawischnig E, Stettner C, Grün S, Winklmair A, Eisenreich W, Bacher A, Meeley RB, Briggs SP, Simcox K, Gierl A. 1997. Analysis of a chemical defense mechanism in grasses. Science 277: 696699.
  • Frey M, Kliem R, Saedler H, Gierl A. 1995. Expression of a cytochrome P450 gene family in maize. Molecular General Genetics 246: 100109.
  • Gang DR, Wang J, Dudareva N, Hee Nam K, Simon JE, Lewinsohn E, Pichersky E. 2001. An investigation of the storage and biosynthesis of phenylpropenes in sweet basil. Plant Physiology 125: 539555.
  • Gierl A, Frey M. 2001. Evolution of benzoxazinone biosynthesis and indole production in maize. Planta 213: 493498.
  • Glawischnig E, Grün S, Frey M, Gierl A. 1999. Cytochrome P450 monooxygeneases of DIBOA biosynthesis: Specificity and conservation among grasses. Phytochemistry 50: 925930.
  • Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan T-H et al. 2002. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science 296: 92100.
  • Hadacek F. 2002. Secondary metabolites as plant traits: Current assessment and future perspectives. Critical Reviews in Plant Science 21: 273322.
  • Haralampidis K, Trojanowska M, Osbourn AE. 2001a. Biosynthesis of triterpenoid saponins in plants. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/ Biotechnology 75: 3149.
  • Haralampidis K, Bryan G, Qi X, Papadopoulou K, Bakht S, Melton R, Osbourn AE. 2001b. A new class of oxidosqualene cyclases directs synthesis of antimicrobial phytoprotectants in monocots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98: 1343113436.
  • Heupel RC, Nes DW. 1985. The biosynthesis, metabolism and translocation of β-amyrin in Sorghum bicolour. Phytochemistry 24: 29052909.
  • Hostettmann KA, Marston A. 1995. Saponins Chemistry and Pharmacology of Natural Products. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lange BM, Wildung MR, Stauber EJ, Sanchez C, Pouchnik D, Croteau R. 1999. Probing essential oil biosynthesis and secretion by functional evaluation of expressed sequence tags from mint glandular trichomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 29342939.
  • Leighton V, Niemeyer HM, Jonsson LMV. 1994. Substrate specificity of a glucosyltransferase and a N-hydroxylase involved in the biosynthesis of cyclic hydroxamic acids in Gramineae. Phytochemistry 36: 887892.
  • Morrissey JP, Osbourn AE. 1999. Fungal resistance to plant antibiotics as a mechanism of pathogenesis. Microbiological Molecular Biological Revs 63: 708724.
  • Niemeyer HM. 1988. Hydroxamic acids (4-hydroxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-ones), defense chemicals in the Gramineae 1988. Phytochemistry 27: 33493358.
  • Ohlrogge J, Benning C. 2000. Unraveling plant metabolism by EST analysis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3: 224228.
  • Ohmoto T, Ikuse M. 1970. Triterpenoids of the Gramineae. Phytochemistry 9: 21372148.
  • Papadopoulou K, Melton RE, Leggett M, Daniels MJ, Osbourn AE. 1999. Compromised disease resistance in saponin-deficient plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96: 1292312928.
  • Pichersky E, Gang DR. 2000. Genetics and biochemistry of secondary metabolites: an evolutionary perspective. Trends in Plant Science 5: 439445.
  • Qi X, Bakht S, Devos KM, Gale MD, Osbourn AE. 2001. L-RCA (Ligation-Rolling Circle Amplification): a general method for genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Nucleic Acids Research 29 e16.
  • Von Rad U, Hüttl R, Lottspeich F, Gierl A, Frey M. 2001. Two glucosyltransferases are involved in detoxification of benzoxazinoids in maize. Plant Journal 28: 633642.
  • Riechmann JL, Heard J, Martin G et al. 2000. Arabidopsis transcription factors: Genome-wide comparative analysis amongst eukaryotes. Science 290: 21052110.
  • Sicker D, Frey M, Schulz M, Gierl A. 2000. Role of benzoxazinones in the survival strategy of plants. International Review of Cytology 198: 319347.
  • Szathmáry E, Jordán F, Pál C. 2001. Can genes explain biological complexity? Science 292: 13151316.
  • Taton M, Benveniste P, Rahier A. 1986. N-(1,5,9)-trimethyl-decyl-4α, 10-dimethyl-8-aza-trans-decal-3β-ol, a novel potent inhibitor of 2,3-oxidosqualene cycloartenol and lanosterol cyclases. Biochemistry and Biophysics Research Communications 138: 764770.
  • Tattersall DB, Bak S, Jones PR, Olsen CE, Nielsen JK, Hansen ML, Høj PB, Møller BL. 2001. Resistance to an herbivore through engineered cyanogenic glucoside synthesis. Science 293: 18261828.
  • Trojanowska MR, Osbourn AE, Daniels MJ, Threlfall DR. 2000. Biosynthesis of avenacins and phytosterols in roots of Avena sativa cv. Image. Phytochemistry 54: 153164.
  • Trojanowska MR, Osbourn AE, Daniels MJ, Threlfall DR. 2001. Investigation of avenacin-deficient mutants of Avena strigosa. Phytochemistry 56: 121129.
  • Tschesche R, Lauven P. 1971. Avenacosid B, ein zweites bisdesmosidisches Steroidsaponin aus Avena sativa. Chemische Berichte 104: 35493555.
  • Tschesche R, Tauscher M, Fehlhaber HW, Wulff G. 1969. Avenacosid A, ein bisdesmosidisches Steroidsaponin aus Avena sativa. Chemistry Ber 102: 20722082.
  • Walton JD. 2000. Horizontal gene transfer and the evolution of secondary metabolite gene clusters in fungi: An hypothesis. Fungal Genetics and Biology 30: 167171.
  • Weckwerth W, Fiehn O. 2002. Can we discover novel pathways using metabolomic analysis? Current Opinion in Biotechnology 13: 156160.
  • White JA, Todd J, Newman T, Focks N, Girke T, Martínez de Ilárduya M, Jaworski JG, Ohlrogge JB, Benning C. 2000. A new set of Arabidopsis expressed sequence tags from developing seeds. The metabolic pathway from carbohydrates to seed oil. Plant Physiology 124: 5821594.
  • Wink M. 1999. Functions of plant secondary metabolites and their exploitation in biotechnology. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press.
  • Wittstock U, Gerschenzon J. 2002. Constitutive plant toxins and their role in defense against herbivores and pathogens. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 5: 300307.
  • Yu J, Hu S, Wang J et al. 2002. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Science 296: 7992.