SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alexander M. 1977. Introduction to soil microbiology, 2nd edn. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Anderson JPE, Domsch KH. 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biological Biochemistry 10: 215221.
  • Anderson T-H, Domsch KH. 1993. The metabolic quotient for CO2 (qCO2) as a specific activity parameter to assess the effects of environmental conditions, such as pH, on the microbial biomass of forest soils. Short Communication Soil Biology and Biochemistry 25: 393395.
  • Anderson T-H, Joergensen RG. 1997. Relationship between SIR and FE estimates of microbial biomass C in deciduous forest soils at different pH. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29: 10331042.
  • Arnebrant K. 1994. Nitrogen amendments reduce the growth of extramatrical ectomycorrhizal mycelium. Mycorrhiza 5: 715.
  • Arnebrant K, Bååth E. 1991. Measurements of ATP in forest humus. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 23: 501506.
  • Bååth E. 1992. Thymidine incorporation into macromolecules of bacteria extracted from soil by homogenization-centrifugation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 24: 11571165.
  • Bååth E. 1996a. Adaption of soil bacterial communities to prevailing pH in different soils. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 19: 227237.
  • Bååth E. 1996b. Thymidine incorporation of bacteria sequently extracted from soil using repeated homogenization-centrifugation. Microbial Ecology 31: 153166.
  • Bååth E, Anderson T-H. 2003. Comparison of soil fungal/bacterial ratios in a pH gradient using physiological and PLFA-based techniques. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 35: 955963.
  • Bååth E, Frostegård Å, Pennanen T, Fritze H. 1995. Microbial community structure and pH response in relation to soil organic matter quality in wood ash fertilized, clear-cut or burned coniferous forest soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 27: 229240.
  • Bååth E, Söderström B. 1982. Seasonal and spatial variation in fungal biomass in a forest soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 14: 353358.
  • Bauhus J, Khanna PK. 1999. The significance of microbial biomass in forest soils. In: RastinN, BauhusJ, eds. Going underground-ecological studies in forest soils. Trivandrum, India: Research Signpost, 77110.
  • Bauhus J, Pare′ D, Côte′ L. 1998. Effects of tree species, stand age and soil type on soil microbial biomass and its activity in a southern boreal forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30: 10771089.
  • Berg B, McClaugherty C. 2003. Plant litter. Decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration. Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
  • Bhupinderpal-Singh Nordgren A, Ottosson-Löfvenius M, Högberg MN, Mellander P-E, Högberg P. 2003. Tree root and soil heterotrophic respiration as revealed by girdling of boreal Scots pine forest: extending observations beyond the first year. Plant, Cell & Environment doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01053.x
  • Blagodatskaya EV, Anderson T-H. 1998. Interactive effects of pH and substrate quality on the fungal-to-bacterial ratio and qCO2 of microbial communities in forest soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30: 12691274.
  • Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology 37: 911917.
  • Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS. 1985. Chloroform fumigation and release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biological Biochemistry 17: 837842.
  • Cannell MGR. 1989. Physiological basis of wood production: a review. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 4: 459490.
  • FAO. 1988. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) FAO/UNESCO Soil Map of the World. Revised legend. World Resources Report. Rome, Italy: FAO.
  • Federle TW. 1986. Microbial distributions in soil – new techniques. In: MegusarF, GantarM, eds. Perspectives in microbial ecology Ljubljana, Slovene: Slovene Society for Microbiology, 493498.
  • Fritze H, Bååth E. 1993. Microfungal species composition and fungal biomass in a coniferous forest soil polluted by alkaline deposition. Microbial Ecology 25: 8392.
  • Frostegård Å, Bååth E. 1996. The use of phospholipid fatty acid analysis to estimate bacterial and fungal biomass in soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 22: 5965.
  • Frostegård Å, Bååth E, Tunlid A. 1993. Shifts in the structure of soil microbial communities in limed forests as revealed by phospholipid fatty acid analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 25: 723730.
  • Frostegård Å, Tunlid A, Bååth E. 1991. Microbial biomass measured as total lipid phosphate in soil of different organic content. Journal of Microbiological Methods 14: 151163.
  • Gadgil RL, Gadgil PD. 1975. Suppression of litter decomposition by mycorrhizal roots of Pinus radiata. New Zealand Journal of Forest Science 5: 3341.
  • Garbaye J. 1994. Helper bacteria: a new dimension to the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Tansley Review, 76 New Phytologist 128: 197210.
  • Giesler R, Högberg M, Högberg P. 1998. Soil chemistry and plants in Fennoscandian boreal forest as exemplified by a local gradient. Ecology 79: 119137.
  • Hansen J, Türk R, Vogg G, Heim R, Beck E. 1997. Conifer carbohydrate physiology: updating classical views. In: RennenbergH, EschrichW, ZieglerH, eds. Trees-contributions to modern tree physiology. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers, 97108.
  • Hartel PG. 1999. The soil habitat. In: SylviaDM, FuhrmannJJ, HartelPG, ZubererDA, eds. Principles and applications of soil microbiology. New Jersey, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 2143.
  • Högberg P. 2001. Interactions between hillslope hydrochemistry, nitrogen dynamics, and plants in Fennoscandian boreal forest. In: SchulzeE-D, HeimanM, HarrisonS, HollandE, LloydJ, Colin PrenticeI, SchimelD, eds. Global biogeochemical cycles in the climate system. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 227233.
  • Högberg P, Ekblad A. 1996. Substrate-induced respiration mesured in situ in a C3-plant ecosystem using additions of C4-sucrose. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 28: 11311138.
  • Högberg MN, Högberg P. 2002. Extramatrical ectomycorrhizal mycelium contributes one-third of microbial biomass and produces, together with associated roots, half the dissolved organic carbon in soil. New Phytologist 154: 791795.
  • Högberg P, Johannisson C, Nicklasson H, Högbom L. 1990. Shoot nitrate reductase activities of field-layer species in different forest types. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 5: 449456.
  • Högberg P, Nordgren A, Buchmann N, Taylor AFS, Ekblad A, Högberg MN, Nyberg G, Ottosson-Löfvenius M, Read DJ. 2001. Large-scale forest girdling shows that current photosynthesis drives soil respiration. Nature 411: 789792.
  • Kårén O, Nylund JE. 1997. Effects of ammonium sulphate on the community structure and biomass of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Norway spruce stand in southwestern Sweden. Canadian Journal of Botany 75: 16281642.
  • Lindahl B, Stenlid J, Finlay R. 2001. Effects of resource availability on mycelial interactions and 32P transfer between a saprotrophic and an ectomycorrhizal fungus in soil microcosms. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 38: 4352.
  • Lindahl BO, Taylor AFS, Finlay RD. 2002. Defining nutritional constrains on carbon cycling in boreal forests-towards a less ‘phytocentric’ perspective. Plant and Soil 242: 123135.
  • Majdi H, Persson H. 1995. Effects of ammonium sulphate application on the chemistry of bulk soil, rhizosphere, fine roots and fine-root distribution in a Piecea abiest (L.) Karst. Stand Plant and Soil 168–169: 151160.
  • Martikainen PJ, Palojärvi A. 1990. Evaluation of the fumigation-extraction method for the determination of microbial C and N in a range of forest soils. Soil Biology Biochemistry 22: 797802.
  • Myrold DD. 1987. Relationship between microbial biomass nitrogen and a nitrogen availability index. Soil Science Society of America Journ 51: 10471049.
  • Myrold DD, Matson PA, Peterson DL. 1989. Relationships between soil microbial properties and aboveground stand caracteristics of conifer forest in Oregon. Biogeochemistry 8: 265281.
  • Nilsson LO, Wallander H. 2003. Production of external mycelium by ectomycorrhizal fungi in a norway spruce forest was reduced in response to nitrogen fertilization. New Phytologist 158: 409416.
  • Nordgren A, Bååth E, Söderström B. 1988. Evaluation of soil respiration characteristics to assess heavy metal effect on soil microorganisms using glutamic acid as a substrate. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 20: 949954.
  • Nordin A, Högberg P, Näsholm T. 2001. Soil nitrogen form and plant nitrogen uptake in a boreal forest along a forest productivity gradient. Oecologia 129: 125132.
  • Nylund J-E. 1988. The regulation of mycorrhiza formation-carbohydrate and hormone theories reviewed. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 3: 465479.
  • Olsson PA. 1999. Signature fatty acids provide tools for determination of the distribution and interactions of mycorrhizal fungi in soil. Minireview FEMS Microbiology Ecology 29: 303310.
  • Olsson PA, Bååth E, Jakobsen I, Söderström B. 1995. The use of phospholipid and neutral lipid fatty acids to estimate biomass of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil. Mycological Research 99: 623629.
  • Read DJ. 1991. Mycorrhizas in ecosystems. Experientia 47: 376391.
  • Smolander A, Mälkönen E. 1994. Microbial biomass C and N in limed soil of Norway spruce stands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 26: 503509.
  • Söderberg KH, Bååth E. 1998. Bacterial activity along a young barley root measured by the thymidine and leucine incorporation techniques. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30: 12591268.
  • Söderström B. 1979. Seasonal fluctuations of active fungal biomass in horizons of a podzolized pine-forest soil in central Sweden. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 11: 149154.
  • Tamm C-O. 1991. Nitrogen in terrestrial systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  • Timonen S, Jörgensen KS, Haahtela K, Sen R. 1998. Bacterial community structure at defined locations of Pinus sylvestris – Suillus bovinus and Pinus sylvstris – Paxillus involutus mycorrhizospheres in dry pine forst humus and nursery peat. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 44: 499513.
  • Tunlid A, White DC. 1992. Biochemical analysis of biomass, community structure, nutritional status, and metabolic activity of microbial communities in soil. In: StotzkyG, BollagJ-M, eds. Soil biochemistry. New York, USA: Dekker, USA. 229261.
  • Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. 1987. An extraction method for measuring microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 19: 703707.
  • Wallander H. 1995. A new hypothesis to explain allocation of dry matter between mycorrhizal fungi and pine seedlings in relation to nutrient supply. Plant and Soil 168–169: 243248.
  • Wallander H, Nilsson L-O, Hagerberg D, Bååth E. 2001. Estimation of the biomass and seasonal growth of external mycelium of ectomycorrhizal fungi in the field. New Phytologist 151: 753760.
  • Wallander H, Nylund J-E. 1992. Effects of excess nitrogen and phosphorus starvation on the extramatrical mycelium of ectomycorrhizas of Pinus sylvestris L. New Phytologist 120: 495503.
  • Wardle DA. 1992. A comparative assessement of factors which influence microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen levels in soil. Biological Reviews 67: 321358.
  • Wu J, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. 1993. Formation and destruction of microbial biomass during the decomposition of glucose and ryegrass in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 25: 14351441.
  • Wyland LJ, Jackson LE, Brooks PD. 1994. Eliminating nitrate interference during Kjeldahl digestion of soil extracts for microbial biomass determination. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58: 357360.
  • Zak DR, Tilman D, Parmente RR, Rice CW, Fischer FM, Vose J, Milchunas D, Martin CW. 1994. Plant production and soil microorganisms in late successional ecosystems: a continental-scale study. Ecology 75: 23332347.