• Adams SR, Pearson S, Hadley P. 2001. Improving quantitative flowering models through a better understanding of the phases of photoperiod sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 655662.
  • Allen KD, Sussex IM. 1996. Falsiflora and anantha control early stages of floral meristem development in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Planta 200: 254264.
  • Bernier G, Kinet JM, Sachs RM. 1981. The physiology of flowering, Vol. II.The initiation of flowers. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
  • Bradley D, Ratcliffe O, Vincent C, Carpenter R, Coen E. 1997. Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science 275: 8083.
  • Corbesier L, Lejeune P, Bernier G. 1998. The role of carbohydrates in the induction of flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana: comparison between the wild type and a starchless mutant. Planta 206: 131137.
  • Crafts AS, Crisp CE. 1971. Phloem transport in plants. San Francisco, CA, USA: WH Freeman.
  • Dielen V, Marc D, Kinet JM. 1998. Flowering in the uniflora mutant of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.): description of the reproductive structure and manipulation of flowering time. Plant Growth Regulation 25: 149157.
  • Dielen V, Lecouvet V, Dupont S, Kinet JM. 2001. In vitro control of floral transition in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), the model for autonomously flowering plants, using the late flowering uniflora mutant. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 715723.
  • Ellis RH, Collinson ST, Hudson D, Patefield WM. 1992. The analysis of reciprocal transfer experiments to estimate the durations of the photoperiod-sensitive and photoperiod-insensitive phases of plant development: an example in soya bean. Annals of Botany 70: 8792.
  • Fehleisen S. 1967. Uniflora and conjunctiflora: two new mutants in tomato. Tomato Genetics Cooperative Reports 17: 2628.
  • Kinet JM. 1977. Effect of light conditions on the development of the inflorescence in tomato. Scientia Horticulturae 6: 1526.
  • Kinet JM, Peet MM. 1997. Tomato. In: WienHC, ed. The physiology of vegetable crops. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 207258.
  • Lejeune P, Bernier G, Requier MC, Kinet JM. 1993. Sucrose increase during floral induction in the phloem sap collected at the apical part of the shoot of the long-day plant Sinapis alba L. Planta 190: 7174.
  • Levy YY, Dean C. 1998. The transition to flowering. Plant Cell 10: 19731989.
  • Mapelli S, Kinet JM. 1992. Plant growth regulator and graft control of axillary bud formation and development in the TO-2 mutant tomato. Plant Growth Regulation 11: 385390.
  • McDaniel CN. 1996. Developmental physiology of floral initiation in Nicotiana tabacum L. Journal of Experimental Botany 47: 465475.
  • Micallef BJ, Haskins KA, Vanderveer PJ, Roh KS, Shewmaker CK, Sharkey TD. 1995. Altered photosynthesis, flowering and fruiting in transgenic tomato plants that have an increased capacity for sucrose synthesis. Planta 196: 327334.
  • Périlleux C, Bernier G. 2002. The control of flowering: do genetical and physiological approaches converge? In: O'NeillSD, RobertsJA, eds. Plant reproduction. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press, 132.
  • Pnueli L, Carmel-Goren L, Hareven D, Gutfinger T, Alvarez J, Ganal M, Zamir D, Lifschitz E. 1998. The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development 125: 19791989.
  • Reeves PH, Coupland G. 2000. Response of plant development to environment: control of flowering by daylength and temperature. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3: 3742.
  • Thomas B, Vince-Prue D. 1984. Juvenility, photoperiodism and vernalization. In: WilkinsMB, ed. Advanced plant physiology. London, UK: Pitman, 408439.
  • Turnbull CGN, Booker JP, Leyser HMO. 2002. Micrografting techniques for testing long-distance signalling in Arabidopsis. Plant Journal 32: 255262.
  • Zhao D, Yu Q, Chen C, Ma H. 2002. Genetic control of reproductive meristems. In: McManusMT, VeitBE, eds. Meristematic tissues in plant growth and development. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press, 89141.