• Bürkle L, Hibberd JM, Quick WP, Kuhn C, Hirner B, Frommer WB. 1998. The H+-sucrose cotransporter NtSUT1 is essential for sugar export from tobacco leaves. Plant Physiology 118: 5968.
  • Conrath U, Pieterse CMJ, Mauch-Mani B. 2002. Priming in plant–pathogen interactions. Trends in Plant Science 7: 210216.
  • Corre WJ. 1983a. Growth and Morphogenesis of Sun and Shade Plants. 3. The Combined Effects of Light-Intensity and Nutrient Supply. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 32: 277294.
  • Corre WJ. 1983b. Growth and Morphogenesis of Sun and Shade Plants.1. The influence of light intensity. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 32: 4962.
  • Furukawa A. 1997. Stomatal frequency of Quercus myrsinaefolia grown under different irradiances. Photosynthetica 34: 195199.
  • Gay AP, Hurd RG. 1975. The influence of light on stomatal density in the tomato. New Phytologist 75: 3746.
  • Kurschner WM. 1997. The anatomical diversity of recent and fossil leaves of the durmast oak (Quercus petraea Lieblein Q-pseudocastanea Goeppert) implications for their use as biosensors of palaeoatmospheric CO2 levels. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 96: 130.
  • Lake JA, Quick WP, Beerling DJ, Woodward FI. 2001. Plant development – Signals from mature to new leaves. Nature 411: 154154.
  • Lake JA, Woodward FI, Quick WP. 2002. Long-distance CO2 signalling in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 53: 183193.
  • Lang A, Chailakhyan MK, Frolova IA. 1977. Promotion and inhibition of flower formation in a day-neutral plant in grafts with a short-day and a long-day plant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 74: 24122416.
  • Metcalfe CR, Chalk L. 1979. Anatomy of the dicotyledons, Vol. I.Systematic anatomy of the leaf and stem. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Rawson HM, Craven CL. 1975. Stomatal development during leaf expansion in tobacco and sunflower. Australian Journal of Botany 23: 253251.
  • Salisbury EJ. 1927. On the causes and ecological significance of stomatal frequency, with special reference to the woodland flora. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 216: 165.
  • Schoch PG, Jacques R, Lecharny A, Sibi M. 1984. Dependence of the Stomatal Index on Environmental-Factors During Stomatal Differentiation in Leaves of Vigna-Sinensis L.2. Effect of Different Light Quality. Journal of Experimental Botany 35: 14051409.
  • Schoch PG, Zinsou C, Sibi M. 1980. Dependence of the stomatal index on environmental factors during stomatal differentiation in leaves of Vignia sinensis L. Journal of Experimental Botany 31: 12111216.
  • Sheen J, Zhou L, Jang JC. 1999. Sugars as signaling molecules. Current Opinions in Plant Biology 2: 410418.
  • Visser AJ, Tosserams M, Groen MW, Kalis G, Kwant R, Magendans GWH, Rozema J. 1997. The combined effects of CO2 concentration and enhanced UV-B radiation on faba bean.3. Leaf optical properties, pigments, stomatal index and epidermal cell density. Plant Ecology 128: 208222.
  • Watson RW. 1942. The effect of cuticular hardening on the form of epidermal cells. New Phytologist 41: 223229.
  • Wild A, Wolf G. 1980. The effect of different light intensities on the frequency and size of stomata, the size of cells, the number, size and chlorophyll content of chloroplasts in the mesophyll and the guard cells during the ontogeny of primary leaves of Sinnapis alba. Pflanzenphysiology 97: 325342.
  • Yano S, Terashima I. 2001. Separate localization of light signal perception for sun or shade type chloroplast and palisade tissue differentiation in Chenopodium album. Plant and Cell Physiology 42: 13031310.