SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Khan KS, Chien PFW. Evaluation of a clinical test. I: Assessment of reliability. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;108: 562567.
  • 2
    Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia : Lippincott-Raven, 1998.
  • 3
    Nielsen PV, Stigsby B, Nickelsen C, Nim J. Intra- and inter-observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987;99: 421424.
  • 4
    Keith RD, Beckley S, Garibaldi JM, Westgate JA, Ifeachor EC, Greene KR. A multicentre comparative study of 17 experts and an intelligent computer system for managing labour using the cardiotocogram. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102: 688700.
  • 5
    Donker DK, van Geijn HP, Hasman A. Interobserver variation in the assessment of fetal heart rate recordings. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993;52: 2128.
  • 6
    Murphy KW, Johnson P, Moorcraft J, Pattinson R, Russell V, Turnbull A. Birth asphyxia and the intrapartum cardiotocograph. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97: 470479.
  • 7
    Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Pereira-Leite L. Inconsistencies in classification by experts and subsequent clinical decision. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106: 13071310.
  • 8
    Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J. Early, variable and late decelerations: can consensus be reached in their identification?. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;65: 305306.
  • 9
    Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Ayres-de-Campos D, van Geijn HP, Pereira-Leite L. Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997;57: 3337.
  • 10
    Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Ayres-de-Campos D, van Geijn HP, Pereira-Leite L. A more objective fetal heart rate baseline estimation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103: 714715.
  • 11
    Taylor GM, Mires GJ, Abel EW, et al. The development and validation of an algorithm for real-time computerized fetal heart rate monitoring in labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;107: 11301137.
  • 12
    Ingemarsson I, Ingemarsson E. Elektronisk Fosterovervåking. Electronic Fetal Monitoring. Lund : Studentlitteratur, 1987.
  • 13
    Ingemarsson I, Arulkumaran S, Ingemarsson E, Tambyraja RL, Ratnam SS. Admission test: a screening test for fetal distress in labor. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68: 800806.
  • 14
    Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P. Clinical Epidemiology. A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine. Boston : Little, Brown and Company, 1991.
  • 15
    Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York : Wiley, 1981.
  • 16
    Grant JM. The fetal heart rate trace is normal, isn't it? Observer agreement of categorical assessments. Lancet 1991;337: 215218.
  • 17
    SPSS. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences. SPSS for Windows 95/NT version 6.0 ed. Chicago : SPSS, 1996.
  • 18
    Center for evidence based medicine. The EBM Toolbox. Available at: http://www.cebm.jr2.ox.ac.uk/. Accessed September 30, 2001.
  • 19
    SAS Institute. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 6, Vol 1. Cary, North Carolina, 1990
  • 20
    Mires G, Williams F, Howie P. Randomised controlled trial of cardiotocography versus Doppler auscultation of fetal heart at admission in labour in low risk obstetric population. BMJ 2001;322: 14571460.
  • 21
    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Use of Electronic Fetal Monitoring. The Use and Interpretation of Cardiotocography in Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance. London : RCOG, 2001.
  • 22
    Thacker SB, Stroup D, Chang M. Continuous fetal heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor [Cochrane review]. The Cochrane Library, Issue 1: Oxford : Update Software, 2001
  • 23
    Sarno AP, Phelan JP, Ahn MO. Relationship of early intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns to subsequent patterns and fetal outcome. J Reprod Med 1990;35: 239242.
  • 24
    Ingemarsson I, Arulkumaran S, Paul RH, Ingemarsson E, Tambyraja RL, Ratnam SS. Fetal acoustic stimulation in early labor in patients screened with the admission test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158: 7074.
  • 25
    Somerset DA, Murrills AJ, Wheeler T. Screening for fetal distress in labour using the umbilical artery velocity waveform. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100: 5559.
  • 26
    Tannirandorn Y, Wacharaprechanont T, Phaosavasdi S. Fetal acoustic stimulation for rapid intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being. J Med Assoc Thai 1993;11: 606612.
  • 27
    Chua C, Arulkumaran S, Kurup A, Anandakumar C, Selemat N, Ratham SS. Search for the most predictive test of fetal well-being in early labor. J Perinat Med 1996;24: 199206.
  • 28
    Farrell T, Seaton L, Owen P. Evaluation of fetal movements as an early labour admission test in low-risk pregnancies. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1998;25: 2325.
  • 29
    Blix E, Øian P. Labor admission test: an assessment of the test's value as screening for fetal distress in labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80: 738743.
  • 30
    Beckley S, Stenhouse E, Greene K. The development and evaluation of a computer-assisted teaching programme for intrapartum fetal monitoring. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;107: 11381144.
  • 31
    Wilson T, Mires GJ. A comparison of performance by medical and midwifery students in multiprofessional teaching. Med Educ 2000;34: 744746.
  • 32
    Trepanier MJ, Niday P, Davies B, et al. Evaluation of a fetal monitoring education program. J Obstet Neonatal Nurs 1996;25: 137144.
  • 33
    Murray ML, Higgins P. Computer versus lectures: strategies for teaching fetal monitoring. J Perinatol 1996;16: 1519.