Conservation Biology
Explore this journal >

The Olympic Mountain Goat Controversy: A Different Perspective

Authors

No abstract is available for this article.

Continue reading full article

Ancillary

Article Information

DOI

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030898.x

Format Available

Full text: PDF

Request Permissions

Publication History

  • Issue online:
  • Version of record online:
  • Paper submitted February 14, 1994; revised manuscript accepted March 9, 1994.

Related content

Articles related to the one you are viewing

Citing Literature

  • Number of times cited: 6
  1. 1Jack M. Broughton, R. Kelly Beck, Joan B. Coltrain, Dennis H. O’ Rourke, Alan R. Rogers, A Late Holocene Population Bottleneck in California Tule Elk (Cervus elaphus nannodes): Provisional Support from Ancient DNA, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2013, 20, 3, 495CrossRef
  2. 2Thomas A. Wake, ARCHAEOLOGICAL SEWELLEL (APLODONTIA RUFA) REMAINS FROM DUNCAN'S POINT CAVE, SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, Journal of Mammalogy, 2006, 87, 1, 139CrossRef
  3. 3R. Lee Lyman, Applied zooarchaeology: The relevance of faunai analysis to wildlife management, World Archaeology, 1996, 28, 1, 110CrossRef
  4. 4R. Lee Lyman, Determining when rare (zoo-)archaeological phenomena are truly absent, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1995, 2, 4, 369CrossRef
  5. 5MICHAEL HUTCHINS, Olympic Mountain Goat Controversy Continues, Conservation Biology, 1995, 9, 5, 1324CrossRef
  6. 6MICHAEL HUTCHINS, Olympic Mountain Goat Controversy Continues, Conservation Biology, 1995, 9, 5, 1324Wiley Online Library