This study was funded by the Research Committee of Caring Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Does Birth Center Care During a Woman's First Pregnancy Have Any Impact on Her Future Reproduction?
Article first published online: 5 AUG 2002
Volume 29, Issue 3, pages 177–181, September 2002
How to Cite
Gottvall, K. and Waldenström, U. (2002), Does Birth Center Care During a Woman's First Pregnancy Have Any Impact on Her Future Reproduction?. Birth, 29: 177–181. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2002.00185.x
- Issue published online: 5 AUG 2002
- Article first published online: 5 AUG 2002
ABSTRACT: Background: Women's experiences of childbirth may affect their future reproduction, and the model of care affects their experiences, suggesting that a causal link may exist between model of care and future reproduction. The study objective was to examine whether the birth center model of care during a woman's first pregnancy affects whether or not she has a second baby, and on the spacing to the next birth.
Methods: Between October 1989 and July 1993, a total of 1860 women at low medical risk in early pregnancy, who participated in a randomized controlled trial of in-hospital birth center care versus standard care, gave birth. The 1063 primiparas in the trial, 543 in the birth center group and 520 in the standard care group, were included in a secondary analysis in which women's personal identification codes were linked to the Swedish National Birth Register, which included information about their subsequent birth during the following 7 to10 years. Time to an event curves were constructed by means of the Kaplan Meier method.
Results: The observation period after the first birth was on average 8.8 years in the birth center group and 8.7 years in the standard care group. No statistical difference was found between the groups in time to second birth, which was 2.85 and 2.82 years, respectively (median; log-rank 1.26; p=0.26).
Conclusion: A woman's model of care, such as birth center care, during her first pregnancy does not seem to be a sufficiently important factor to affect subsequent reproduction in Sweden. (BIRTH 29:3 September 2002)