Continuity of Caregivers for Care During Pregnancy and Childbirth
Article first published online: 24 DEC 2001
Volume 27, Issue 3, page 218, September 2000
How to Cite
Hodnett, E.D. (2000), Continuity of Caregivers for Care During Pregnancy and Childbirth. Birth, 27: 218. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00217-2.x
- Issue published online: 24 DEC 2001
- Article first published online: 24 DEC 2001
- Cited By
A substantive amendment to this systematic review was last made on 04 March 1998. Cochrane reviews are regularly checked and updated if necessary.
Background: Care is often provided by multiple caregivers, many of whom work only in the antenatal clinic, labour ward, or postnatal unit. However, continuity of care is provided by the same caregiver or a small group from pregnancy through the postnatal period.
Objectives: The objective of this review was to assess continuity of care during pregnancy and childbirth and the puerperium with usual care by multiple caregivers.
Search strategy: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register was searched.
Selection criteria: Controlled trials comparing continuity of care with usual care during pregnancy, childbirth and the postnatal period.
Data collection and analysis: Trial quality was assessed. Study authors were contacted for additional information.
Main results: Two studies involving 1815 women were included. Both trials compared continuity of care by midwives with non-continuity of care by a combination of physicians and midwives. The trials were of good quality. Compared to usual care, women who had continuity of care from a team of midwives were less likely to be admitted to hospital antenatally (odds ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.64–0.97) and more likely to attend antenatal education programs (odds ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.41–0.81). They were also less likely to have drugs for pain relief during labour (odds ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.44–0.64), and their newborns were less likely to require resuscitation (odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.52–0.83). No differences were detected in Apgar scores, low birthweight, and stillbirths or neonatal deaths. While they were less likely to have an episiotomy (odds ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.60–0.94), women receiving continuity of care were more likely to have either a vaginal or perineal tear (odds ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 1.05, 1.56). They were more likely to be pleased with their antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care.
Reviewers' conclusions: Studies of continuity of care show beneficial effects. It is not clear whether these are due to greater continuity of care, or to midwifery care.
Citation: Hodnett ED. Continuity of caregivers for care during pregnancy and childbirth (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.
The preceding reports are abstracts of regularly updated, systematic reviews prepared and maintained by the Cochrane Collaboration. The full texts of the reviews are available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464-780X).
Update Software Ltd, Summertown Pavilion, Middle Way, Oxford OX2 7LG, United Kingdom (Tel.: +44 1865 513902; Fax: +44 1865 516918).