Support for this project was provided by the Exploratory Center for Pain, Fatigue & Sleep Alterations in Cancer Patients at Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing and the Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, funded by National Institute for Nursing Research Grant #1P20NR03278-01, and by the American Cancer Society Professorship in Oncology Nursing (P.M.G., 1993–1999).
Caregiver Responses and Needs
An Ambulatory Bone Marrow Transplant Model
Article first published online: 24 DEC 2001
Volume 8, Issue 3, pages 120–128, May/June 2000
How to Cite
Grimm, P. M., Zawacki, K. L., Mock, V., Krumm, S. and Frink, B. B. (2000), Caregiver Responses and Needs. Cancer Practice, 8: 120–128. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.2000.83005.x
- Issue published online: 24 DEC 2001
- Article first published online: 24 DEC 2001
- Bone marrow transplant;
- Caregiver emotional response;
- Caregiver need;
- Outcomes of care
Purpose: This longitudinal, descriptive outcomes study was conducted to compare the emotional responses and needs of the caregivers of patients who undergo bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for hematologic malignancies, as observed in an inpatient/outpatient (IPOP) setting with those in an inpatient setting.
Description of study: A convenience sample of 43 caregivers for patients undergoing either autologous or allogeneic BMT was selected from both the inpatient unit (n = 26) and the IPOP ambulatory setting (n = 17). Emotional responses were measured by the Profile of Mood States. The importance and satisfaction of informational, patient-care, and psychological needs were assessed with the Caregiver Needs Survey, a modified version of the Home Cancer Caregiver Needs Survey. Data were collected at six points across the BMT trajectory, from before the procedure to 12 months after. Descriptive statistics were used to report sample characteristics, emotional responses, and needs. Nonparametric statistics were used to compare the IPOP and inpatient caregiver groups, and to identify relationships between emotional responses and needs within groups.
Results: IPOP caregivers were found to have significantly less mood disturbance at points before discharge. Both groups showed a decrease in mood disturbance 6 and 12 months after BMT. IPOP caregivers had higher levels of satisfaction of their informational and psychological needs at day 21. Significant correlations between total mood disturbance and satisfaction of informational, psychological, and patient-care needs were found for inpatient caregivers across treatment time points.
Clinical implications: These findings support the IPOP model of care as being less emotionally distressing for and better meeting the needs of family caregivers. Specific implications for practice include the importance of caregiver education in the area of patient-care information and of assessment and intervention to meet caregiver psychological needs. Continued evaluation of the impact of changes in care delivery on family caregivers is essential for the provision of comprehensive cancer care.