1These authors contributed equally to this work.
Conflicting phylogenetic signals at the base of the metazoan tree
Article first published online: 26 JUN 2003
Evolution & Development
Volume 5, Issue 4, pages 346–359, July 2003
How to Cite
Rokas, A., King, N., Finnerty, J. and Carroll, S. B. (2003), Conflicting phylogenetic signals at the base of the metazoan tree. Evolution & Development, 5: 346–359. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-142X.2003.03042.x
- Issue published online: 26 JUN 2003
- Article first published online: 26 JUN 2003
Summary A phylogenetic framework is essential for under-standing the origin and evolution of metazoan development. Despite a number of recent molecular studies and a rich fossil record of sponges and cnidarians, the evolutionary relationships of the early branching metazoan groups to each other and to a putative outgroup, the choanoflagellates, remain uncertain. This situation may be the result of the limited amount of phylogenetic information found in single genes and the small number of relevant taxa surveyed. To alleviate the effect of these analytical factors in the phylogenetic recons-truction of early branching metazoan lineages, we cloned multiple protein-coding genes from two choanoflagellates and diverse sponges, cnidarians, and a ctenophore. Comparisons of sequences for α-tubulin, β-tubulin, elongation factor 2, HSP90, and HSP70 robustly support the hypothesis that choanoflagellates are closely affiliated with animals. However, analyses of single and concatenated amino acid sequences fail to resolve the relationships either between early branching metazoan groups or between Metazoa and choano-flagellates. We demonstrate that variable rates of evolution among lineages, sensitivity of the analyses to taxon selection, and conflicts in the phylogenetic signal contained in different amino acid sequences obscure the phylogenetic associations among the early branching Metazoa. These factors raise concerns about the ability to resolve the phylogenetic history of animals with molecular sequences. A consensus view of animal evolution may require investigations of genome-scale characters.