Differences in Generalist and Specialist Physicians’ Knowledge and Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors for Congestive Heart Failure
Version of Record online: 28 FEB 2002
1997 by the Society of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 12, Issue 9, pages 523–530, September 1997
How to Cite
Chin, M. H., Friedmann, P. D., Cassel, C. K. and Lang, R. M. (1997), Differences in Generalist and Specialist Physicians’ Knowledge and Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors for Congestive Heart Failure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 12: 523–530. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07105.x
- Issue online: 28 FEB 2002
- Version of Record online: 28 FEB 2002
- Cited By
To quantify the extent and determinants of underutilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for patients with congestive heart failure, especially with respect to physician specialty and clinical indication.
Survey of a national systematic sample of physicians.
Five hundred family practitioners, 500 general internists, and 500 cardiologists.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:
Physicians’ choice of medications were determined for four hypothetical patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: (1) new-onset, symptomatic; (2) asymptomatic; (3) chronic heart failure, on digitalis and diuretic; and (4) asymptomatic, post–myocardial infarction. For each patient, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that ACE inhibitors decrease mortality or the progression of symptoms. Among the 727 eligible physicians returning surveys (adjusted response rate 58%), approximately 90% used ACE inhibitors for patients with chronic heart failure who were already taking digitalis and a diuretic. However, family practitioners and general internists chose ACE inhibitors less frequently ( p≤ .01) than cardiologists for the other indications. Respective rates of ACE inhibitor use for each simulated patient were new-onset, symptomatic (family practitioners 72%, general internists 76%, cardiologists 86%); asymptomatic (family practitioners 68%, general internists 78%, cardiologists 93%); and asymptomatic, post–myocardial infarction (family practitioners 58%, general internists 70%, cardiologists 94%). Compared with generalists, cardiologists were more likely ( p≤ .05) to increase ACE inhibitors to a target dosage (45% vs 26%) and to tolerate systolic blood pressures of 90 mm Hg or less (43% vs 15%).
Compared with cardiologists, family practitioners and general internists probably underutilize ACE inhibitors, particularly among patients with decreased ejection fraction who are either asymptomatic or post–myocardial infarction. Educational efforts should focus on these indications and emphasize the dosages demonstrated to lower mortality and morbidity in the trials.
KEY WORDS: angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor; congestive heart failure; physician behavior; specialty; quality of care.