SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Pitkin RM. The importance of the abstract. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70:267.
  • 2
    Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Walker CJ, Ryan N, Fitzgerald D, Ramsden MF. A study of the use and usefulness of online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:7884.
  • 3
    Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106:598604.
  • 4
    Haynes RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ, Altman DG, Gardner MJ. More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:6976.
  • 5
    LeBlond RF. Improving structured abstracts (Letter). Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:764.
  • 6
    Altman DG, Gardner MJ. More informative abstracts. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:7901.
  • 7
    Hux JE, Naylor CD. In the eye of the beholder. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:227780.
  • 8
    Bobbio M, Demichelis B, Giustetto G. Completeness of reporting trial results: effect on physicians' willingness to prescribe. Lancet. 1994;343:120911.
  • 9
    Malenka DJ, Baron JA, Johansen S, Wahrenberger JW, Ross JM. The framing effect of relative and absolute risk. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:5438.
  • 10
    Forrow L, Taylor WC, Arnold RM. Absolutely relative: how research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions. Am J Med. 1992;92:1214.
  • 11
    Bucher HC, Weinbacher M, Gyr K. Influence of method of reporting study results on decision of physicians to prescribe drugs to lower cholesterol concentration. BMJ. 1994;309:7614.
  • 12
    Marshall KG. Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 1. Influence of reporting methods on perception of benefits. Can Med Assoc J. 1996;154:14939.
  • 13
    Journal Citation Reports SCI. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information; 1994.
  • 14
    Sackett DL, Cook RJ. Understanding clinical trials: what measures of efficacy should journal articles provide busy clinicians? BMJ. 1994;309:7556.
  • 15
    Cook RJ, Sackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ. 1995;310:4524.
  • 16
    Pitkin RM, Branagan MA, Burmeister LF. Accuracy of data in abstracts of published research articles. JAMA. 1999;281:11101.
  • 17
    Naylor CD, Chen E, Strauss B. Measured enthusiasm: does the method of reporting trial results alter perceptions of therapeutic effectiveness? Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:91621.
  • 18
    Dowie J. The “number needed to treat” and the “adjusted NNT” in health care decision making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998;3:449.
  • 19
    Feinstein AR. P-values and confidence intervals: two sides of the same unsatisfactory coin. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:35560.
  • 20
    Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Confidence intervals rather than p-values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. BMJ. 1986;292:74650.
  • 21
    Borenstein M. The case for confidence intervals in controlled clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1994;15:41128.
  • 22
    Guyatt G, Jaedschke R, Heddle N, Cook D, Shannon H, Walter S. Basic statistics for clinicians: 2. Interpreting study results: confidence intervals. CMAJ. 1995;152:16973.
  • 23
    Simon R. Confidence intervals for reporting results of clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 1986;105:42935.
  • 24
    Pitkin RM, Branagan MA. Can the accuracy of abstracts be improved by providing specific instructions? A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;280:2679.
  • 25
    Spitzer WO. The structured sonnet. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:729.