SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Hogarth RM, Einhorn HJ. Order effects in belief updating: the belief-adjustment model. Cognit Psychol. 1992;24: 155.
  • 2
    Strang KR, Schwei M, Geiselman RE. Effects of the structure of descriptions on group impression formation. Bull Psychosom Soc. 1978;12: 22426.
  • 3
    Schadewald MS, Limberg ST. Effect of information order and accountability on causal judgments in a legal context. Psychol Rep. 1992;71: 61925.
  • 4
    Adelman L, Bresnick T, Black PK, Marvin FF, Sak SG. Research with Patriot air defense officers—examining information order effects. Hum Factors. 1996;38: 25061.
  • 5
    Tubbs RM, Gaeth GJ, Levin IP, Van Osdol LA. Order effects in belief updating with consistent and inconsistent evidence. J Behav Decis Making. 1993;6: 25769.
  • 6
    Bergus GR, Chapman GB, Gjerde C, Elstein AS. Clinical reasoning about new symptoms despite pre-existing disease: sources of error and order effects. Fam Med. 1995;27: 31420.
  • 7
    Chapman GB, Bergus GR, Elstein AS. Order of information affects clinical judgment. J Behav Decis Making. 1996;9: 20111.
  • 8
    Bergus GR, Chapman GB, Levy BT, Ely JW, Oppliger RA. Clinical diagnosis and the order of information. Med Decis Making. 1998;18: 41217.
  • 9
    Bergus GR, Levin IP, Johnson C. The influence of information order on patient decision making. Med Decis Making. 1998;18: 460.
  • 10
    Grubb RL Jr., Derdeyn CP, Fritsch SM, et al. Importance of hemodynamic factors in the prognosis of symptomatic carotid occlusion. JAMA. 1998;280: 105560.
  • 11
    Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy–I. Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. BMJ. 1994;308: 81106.
  • 12
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325: 44553.
  • 13
    Guadagnoli E, Ward P. Patient participation in decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47: 32939.
  • 14
    Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect Theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979;47: 26391.
  • 15
    Smith SM, Levin IP. Need for cognition and choice framing effects. J Behav Decis Making. 1996;9: 28390.
  • 16
    Sanbonmatsu DM, Kardes FR. The effects of physiologic arousal on information processing and persuasion. J Consum Res. 1988;15: 37985.
  • 17
    Pham MT. Cue representation and selection effects of arousal on persuasion. J Consum Res. 1996;22: 37387.
  • 18
    Miller JM, Krosnick JA. The impact of candidate name order on election outcomes. Public Opin Q. 1998;62: 291330.
  • 19
    Wang H, Zhang J, Johnson TR. Human belief revision and order effect. Proceedings of the 22th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. 2000. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • 20
    Instructions for the Use of Vaccine Information Statements. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/vis/vis-Instructions.pdf, created 10/1/01. Accessed 01/06/02.
  • 21
    Lopes LL. Procedural debiasing. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1987;64: 16785.
  • 22
    Wang H. Order Effects in Human Belief Revision. Dissertation. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University; 1998.