Dr. Saliba is a Pfizer/FHA postdoctoral fellow and recipient of a Claude Pepper OAIC Award AG10415.
The Vulnerable Elders Survey: A Tool for Identifying Vulnerable Older People in the Community
Article first published online: 21 DEC 2001
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume 49, Issue 12, pages 1691–1699, December 2001
How to Cite
Saliba, D., Elliott, M., Rubenstein, L. Z., Solomon, D. H., Young, R. T., Kamberg, C. J., Carol Roth, R., MacLean, C. H., Shekelle, P. G., Sloss, E. M. and Wenger, N. S. (2001), The Vulnerable Elders Survey: A Tool for Identifying Vulnerable Older People in the Community. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49: 1691–1699. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49281.x
This study was presented at the American Geriatrics Society Annual Meeting, Nashville, TN, May 2000, and received the American Geriatrics Society 2000 Presidential Poster Award for Health Services Research.
- Issue published online: 25 FEB 2005
- Article first published online: 21 DEC 2001
OBJECTIVES: To develop a simple method for identifying community-dwelling vulnerable older people, defined as persons age 65 and older at increased risk of death or functional decline. To assess whether self-reported diagnoses and conditions add predictive ability to a function-based survey.
DESIGN: Analysis of longitudinal survey data.
SETTING: A nationally representative community-based survey.
PARTICIPANTS: Six thousand two hundred five Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older.
MEASUREMENTS: Bivariate and multivariate analyses of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey; development and comparison of scoring systems that use age, function, and self-reported diagnoses to predict future death and functional decline.
RESULTS: A multivariate model using function, self-rated health, and age to predict death or functional decline was only slightly improved when self-reported diagnoses and conditions were included as predictors and was significantly better than a model using age plus self-reported diagnoses alone. These analyses provide the basis for a 13-item function-based scoring system that considers age, self-rated health, limitation in physical function, and functional disabilities. A score of ≥3 targeted 32% of this nationally representative sample as vulnerable. This targeted group had 4.2 times the risk of death or functional decline over a 2-year period compared with those with scores <3. The receiver operating characteristics curve had an area of .78. An alternative scoring system that included self-reported diagnoses did not substantially improve predictive ability when compared with a function-based scoring system.
CONCLUSIONS: A function-based targeting system effectively and efficiently identifies older people at risk of functional decline and death. Self-reported diagnoses and conditions, when added to the system, do not enhance predictive ability. The function-based targeting system relies on self-report and is easily transported across care settings.