This study was performed as part of Contract 500-96-0008 Task Order #2 with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The findings and opinions are those solely of the authors and should not be interpreted as reflecting any policies or beliefs of CMS.
The Effect of Evercare on Hospital Use
Version of Record online: 23 SEP 2003
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume 51, Issue 10, pages 1427–1434, October 2003
How to Cite
Kane, R. L., Keckhafer, G., Flood, S., Bershadsky, B. and Siadaty, M. S. (2003), The Effect of Evercare on Hospital Use. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51: 1427–1434. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51461.x
- Issue online: 23 SEP 2003
- Version of Record online: 23 SEP 2003
- managed care;
- nursing homes;
- nurse practitioners;
Objectives: To examine the use of hospital and related medical care services of a novel managed care program using nurse practitioners (NPs) and directed specifically at long-stay nursing home residents.
Design: Quasi-experimental posttest design with two control groups to minimize selection bias.
Setting: Nursing homes.
Participants: Evercare enrollees in five sites were compared with two sets of controls: nursing home residents in the same nursing homes who did not enroll in Evercare (control-in) and residents of nursing homes that did not participate in Evercare (control-out).
Measurements: Utilization data from Medicare and United Healthcare (the parent corporation for Evercare) were obtained for slightly more than 2 years. Patterns of use were assessed by calculating the monthly use rate for each group and aggregating to form annual rates. Usages addressed included hospital admissions and days, emergency room visits, therapy services, mental health services, and podiatry. Adjustments were made to correct for age, race, and sex. Because the groups differed in terms of the rate of cognitive impairment, the analysis was stratified on this variable.
Results: The incidence of hospitalizations was twice as high in control residents as in Evercare residents (4.63 and 4.67 per 100 enrollees per month vs 2.43 in the 15 months after census, P<.001). This difference corresponded to Evercare's use of intensive service days. The same pattern held for preventable hospitalizations (0.80 and 0.86 vs 0.28, P<.001). The pattern held when residents were stratified by cognitive status. On average, using a NP is estimated to save about $103,000 a year in hospital costs per NP.
Conclusion: The use of active primary care provided by NPs may have prevented the occurrence of some hospitalizable events, but its major effect was allowing cases to be managed more cost-effectively.