Health and economic impact of posttransfusion hepatitis B and cost-effectiveness analysis of expanded HBV testing protocols of blood donors: a study focused on the European Union


  • Arturo Pereira

    1. From the Service of Hemotherapy and Hemostasis and Blood Bank, Hospital Clinic, August Pi-Sunyer Memorial Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
    Search for more papers by this author


    HCC = hepatocellular cancer; LY(s) = life expectancy year(s); PT-HB = posttransfusion hepatitis B; QALY(s) = quality-adjusted, discounted year(s).

  • This work has been supported in part by Grant FIS 01/1478 from the Ministry of Health of the Government of Spain.

Address reprint requests to: Arturo Pereira, MD, PhD, Service of Hemotherapy, Hospital Clínic, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; e-mail: .


BACKGROUND : Residual risk of posttransfusion hepatitis B (PT-HB) may be reduced through implementation of HBV NAT or the new, enhanced-sensitivity HBsAg assays in routine donor testing. However, there are some doubts about the cost-effectiveness of these new safety measures, because hepatitis B acquired in adulthood is not regarded as a severe disease in western countries.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS : A computer model was designed to estimate the health outcomes and associated costs of patients with PT-HB. Results from this model and estimations of the residual risk of HBV transmission, the risk reduction yielded by the new assays, and their cost were used to calculate the cost-effectiveness of including the new HBsAg assays or single-sample HBV NAT in the routine screening of blood donors.

RESULTS : The model predicts that 0.97 percent of patients with PT-HB die of liver disease (54% of them due to fulminant hepatitis). The mean loss of life expectancy was 0.178 years per patient, and the present value of the lifetime costs of treating PT-HB was 4160 euros per patient. Single-donor HBV NAT or the new HBsAg assays would increase the life expectancy of blood recipients by 16 (95% CI, 8-40) or 14 (95% CI, 7-28) years, respectively, per every 10 million donations tested. The projected cost per life-year gained was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.15-1.85) million euros for the enhanced-sensitivity HBsAg assays and 5.8 (95% CI, 1.9-13.1) million euros for single-donation HBV NAT, both compared with current HBsAg assays. If single-donation HBV NAT is compared with the new HBsAg assays, its cost- effectiveness ratio increases to 53 (95% CI, 16-127) million euros.

CONCLUSION : PT-HB has few health or economic repercussions. Single-donation HBV NAT would provide a small health benefit at a very high cost. Instead, in some circumstances, the cost-effectiveness of enhanced-sensitivity HBsAg assays would be within acceptable ranges for new public health interventions.